Teamwork in multiteam systems

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 964-971

  Marks, Michelle A ^a   Mathieu, John E ^b,f   DeChurch, Leslie A ^c   Panzer, Frederick J ^d,g   Alonso, Alexander ^e,h  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HumanR ^*

^e AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^g HumanR   (United States)

^h AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Coordination; Multiteam; Teams

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; AIRCRAFT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATION; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; MALE; ORGANIZATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; AIRCRAFT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; ORGANIZATIONAL OBJECTIVES; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 26444581724     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.964     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 634-666.
2. Ancona, D., & Chong, C. L. (1999). Cycles and synchrony: The temporal role of context in team behavior. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 2, 33-48.
3. Arrow, H., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 17, pp. 373-411). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Bateman, T. S., O'Neill, H., & Kenworthy-U'Ren, A. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of top managers' goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1134-1148.
5. Choi, J. N. (2002). External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Research, 33, 181-208.
6. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Denison, D. R., Hart, S. L., & Kahn, J. A. (1996). From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1005-1023.
8. Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Philips, J. L., Dunford, B. B., & Melner, S. B. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678-711.
9. Gully, S. M. (2000). Work teams research: Recent findings and future trends. In M. M. Beyerlein (Ed.), Work teams: Past, present and future (pp. 25-44). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
10. Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., & Sego, D. J. (1994). Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 3-23.
11. James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321.
12. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2002). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. Borman, D. Ilgen, & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333-375). New York: Wiley.
13. Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., McHugh, P. P., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: Developmental and task contingent leader roles. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management (Vol. 14, pp. 253-305). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Marks, M. A. (2000). A critical analysis of computer simulations for conducting team research. Small Group Behavior, 31, 653-675.
16. Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A conceptual framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
17. Mathieu, J. E., Marks, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 289-313). London: Sage.
18. Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Mohrman, A. M., Jr. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Saavedra, R., Earley, P. C., & Van Dyne, L. (1993). Complex interdependence in task-performing groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 61-72.
20. Tesluk, P., & Mathieu, J. E. (1999). Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 200-217.
21. Tesluk, P., Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & Mathieu, J. (1997). Task and aggregation issues in the analysis and assessment of team performance. In M. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance measurement and assessment: Theory and application (pp. 197-224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
23. Weingart, L. R. (1992). Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 682-693.