DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 238-245

  Bartek, Jiri ^a   Lukas, Jiri ^a  

^a Institute of Biology   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

APOPTOSIS; CANCER CELL; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; CELL DEATH; CELL SURVIVAL; DNA DAMAGE; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GENOTOXICITY; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENES, CDC; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 33847737716     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2007.02.009     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Bakkenist C.J., and Kastan M.B. Initiating cellular stress responses. Cell 118 (2004) 9-17
2. Bartek J., Lukas C., and Lukas J. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5 (2004) 792-804
3. Lukas J., Lukas C., and Bartek J. Mammalian cell cycle checkpoints: signalling pathways and their organization in space and time. DNA Repair (Amst) 3 (2004) 997-1007
4. Shiloh Y. ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat Rev Cancer 3 (2003) 155-168
5. Kastan M.B., and Bartek J. Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature 432 (2004) 316-323
6. Petrini J.H., and Stracker T.H. The cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks: defining the sensors and mediators. Trends Cell Biol 13 (2003) 458-462
7. Moreno-Herrero F., de Jager M., Dekker N.H., Kanaar R., Wyman C., and Dekker C. Mesoscale conformational changes in the DNA-repair complex Rad50/Mre11/Nbs1 upon binding DNA. Nature 437 (2005) 440-443
8. ••] identify related, conserved motifs within the C-terminal regions of NBS1, ATRIP and Ku80 proteins, through which these 'specificity factors' recruit DDR kinases ATM, ATR and DNA-PK, respectively, to sites of DNA damage. This process shows unexpected similarities of regulation among the major PIKKs involved in DDR, and demonstrates that the recruitment to damage sites is required for proper checkpoint signalling.
9. ••].
10. Morales M., Theunissen J.W., Kim C.F., Kitagawa R., Kastan M.B., and Petrini J.H. The Rad50S allele promotes ATM-dependent DNA damage responses and suppresses ATM deficiency: implications for the Mre11 complex as a DNA damage sensor. Genes Dev 19 (2005) 3043-3054
11. Lukas C., Melander F., Stucki M., Falck J., Bekker-Jensen S., Goldberg M., Lerenthal Y., Jackson S.P., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Mdc1 couples DNA double-strand break recognition by Nbs1 with its H2AX-dependent chromatin retention. Embo J 23 (2004) 2674-2683
12. Lukas C., Falck J., Bartkova J., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Distinct spatiotemporal dynamics of mammalian checkpoint regulators induced by DNA damage. Nat Cell Biol 5 (2003) 255-260
13. Bakkenist C.J., and Kastan M.B. DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation. Nature 421 (2003) 499-506
14. Cerosaletti K., Wright J., and Concannon P. Active role for nibrin in the kinetics of atm activation. Mol Cell Biol 26 (2006) 1691-1699
15. Kozlov S.V., Graham M.E., Peng C., Chen P., Robinson P.J., and Lavin M.F. Involvement of novel autophosphorylation sites in ATM activation. Embo J 25 (2006) 3504-3514
16. Bartkova J., Bakkenist C.J., Rajpert-De Meyts E., Skakkebaek N.E., Sehested M., Lukas J., Kastan M.B., and Bartek J. ATM activation in normal human tissues and testicular cancer. Cell Cycle 4 (2005) 838-845
17. ••], constitutive activation of DNA damage checkpoints is found in a wide spectrum of premalignant human lesions. Together with demonstration of DDR activation upon oncogene-evoked replication stress in cell culture models, these results lead the authors to propose the concept of DDR as an inducible anti-cancer barrier.
18. Pellegrini M., Celeste A., Difilippantonio S., Guo R., Wang W., Feigenbaum L., and Nussenzweig A. Autophosphorylation at serine 1987 is dispensable for murine Atm activation in vivo. Nature 443 (2006) 222-225
19. Stucki M., Clapperton J.A., Mohammad D., Yaffe M.B., Smerdon S.J., and Jackson S.P. MDC1 directly binds phosphorylated histone H2AX to regulate cellular responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 123 (2005) 1213-1226. Using a combination of structural approaches and functional assays, this paper demonstrates a direct protein-protein interaction between MDC1 and the phosphorylated histone H2AX, and illustrates the functional impact of this interplay on chromatin modification surrounding DSBs and on regulation of downstream events within the DDR machinery.
20. Stucki M., and Jackson S.P. γH2AX and MDC1: anchoring the DNA-damage-response machinery to broken chromosomes. DNA Repair (Amst) 5 (2006) 534-543
21. Bekker-Jensen S., Lukas C., Kitagawa R., Melander F., Kastan M.B., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J Cell Biol 173 (2006) 195-206
22. Bekker-Jensen S., Lukas C., Melander F., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Dynamic assembly and sustained retention of 53BP1 at the sites of DNA damage are controlled by Mdc1/NFBD1. J Cell Biol 170 (2005) 201-211
23. Ziv Y., Bielopolski D., Galanty Y., Lukas C., Taya Y., Schultz D.C., Lukas J., Bekker-Jensen S., Bartek J., and Shiloh Y. Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nat Cell Biol 8 (2006) 870-876
24. Kruhlak M.J., Celeste A., Dellaire G., Fernandez-Capetillo O., Muller W.G., McNally J.G., Bazett-Jones D.P., and Nussenzweig A. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Biol 172 (2006) 823-834
25. ••].
26. ••].
27. 2 phases of the cell cycle and the link to homologous recombination repair are demonstrated, in contrast to ATM, which functions throughout interphase.
28. ••].
29. Zou L., and Elledge S.J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300 (2003) 1542-1548
30. Kumagai A., Lee J., Yoo H.Y., and Dunphy W.G. TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. Cell 124 (2006) 943-955. By demonstrating that interaction of TopBP1 with the ATR/ATRIP complex greatly enhances the ATR kinase activity, this study changed the prevailing model of ATR 'activation by recruitment', which postulated that the ATR/ATRIP complex is constitutively active and only targeted to substrates, but not directly activated, upon replication stress or DNA damage.
31. Liu S., Bekker-Jensen S., Mailand N., Lukas C., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Claspin operates downstream of TopBP1 to direct ATR signaling towards Chk1 activation. Mol Cell Biol 26 (2006) 6056-6064
32. Kumagai A., and Dunphy W.G. Claspin, a novel protein required for the activation of Chk1 during a DNA replication checkpoint response in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol Cell 6 (2000) 839-849
33. Wang X., Zou L., Lu T., Bao S., Hurov K.E., Hittelman W.N., Elledge S.J., and Li L. Rad17 phosphorylation is required for claspin recruitment and Chk1 activation in response to replication stress. Mol Cell 23 (2006) 331-341
34. 2.
35. ••].
36. ••].
37. Watanabe N., Arai H., Nishihara Y., Taniguchi M., Watanabe N., Hunter T., and Osada H. M-phase kinases induce phospho-dependent ubiquitination of somatic Wee1 by SCFβ-TrCP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101 (2004) 4419-4424
38. Busino L., Donzelli M., Chiesa M., Guardavaccaro D., Ganoth D., Dorrello N.V., Hershko A., Pagano M., and Draetta G.F. Degradation of Cdc25A by beta-TrCP during S phase and in response to DNA damage. Nature 426 (2003) 87-91
39. Jin J., Shirogane T., Xu L., Nalepa G., Qin J., Elledge S.J., and Harper J.W. SCFβ-TRCP links Chk1 signaling to degradation of the Cdc25A protein phosphatase. Genes Dev 17 (2003) 3062-3074
40. Kanemori Y., Uto K., and Sagata N. Beta-TrCP recognizes a previously undescribed nonphosphorylated destruction motif in Cdc25A and Cdc25B phosphatases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102 (2005) 6279-6284
41. Mailand N., Falck J., Lukas C., Syljuasen R.G., Welcker M., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage. Science 288 (2000) 1425-1429
42. Mailand N., Podtelejnikov A.V., Groth A., Mann M., Bartek J., and Lukas J. Regulation of G(2)/M events by Cdc25A through phosphorylation-dependent modulation of its stability. Embo J 21 (2002) 5911-5920
43. Molinari M., Mercurio C., Dominguez J., Goubin F., and Draetta G.F. Human Cdc25 A inactivation in response to S phase inhibition and its role in preventing premature mitosis. EMBO Rep 1 (2000) 71-79
44. Cardozo T., and Pagano M. The SCF ubiquitin ligase: insights into a molecular machine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5 (2004) 739-751
45. van Vugt M.A., Bras A., and Medema R.H. Polo-like kinase-1 controls recovery from a G2 DNA damage-induced arrest in mammalian cells. Mol Cell 15 (2004) 799-811
46. Chini C.C., Wood J., and Chen J. Chk1 is required to maintain claspin stability. Oncogene 25 (2006) 4165-4171
47. Zhang D., Zaugg K., Mak T.W., and Elledge S.J. A role for the deubiquitinating enzyme USP28 in control of the DNA-damage response. Cell 126 (2006) 529-542
48. Chowdhury D., Keogh M.C., Ishii H., Peterson C.L., Buratowski S., and Lieberman J. gamma-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell 20 (2005) 801-809
49. Keogh M.C., Kim J.A., Downey M., Fillingham J., Chowdhury D., Harrison J.C., Onishi M., Datta N., Galicia S., Emili A., et al. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439 (2006) 497-501
50. Lu X., Nannenga B., and Donehower L.A. PPM1D dephosphorylates Chk1 and p53 and abrogates cell cycle checkpoints. Genes Dev 19 (2005) 1162-1174
51. Shreeram S., Demidov O.N., Hee W.K., Yamaguchi H., Onishi N., Kek C., Timofeev O.N., Dudgeon C., Fornace A.J., Anderson C.W., et al. Wip1 phosphatase modulates ATM-dependent signaling pathways. Mol Cell 23 (2006) 757-764
52. Toczyski D.P., Galgoczy D.J., and Hartwell L.H. CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90 (1997) 1097-1106
53. Harrison J.C., and Haber J.E. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 40 (2006) 209-235
54. Yoo H.Y., Kumagai A., Shevchenko A., Shevchenko A., and Dunphy W.G. Adaptation of a DNA replication checkpoint response depends upon inactivation of Claspin by the Polo-like kinase. Cell 117 (2004) 575-588
55. 2 checkpoint and mitotic entry in cells after ionizing radiation, is the first to show that the phenomenon of DNA damage checkpoint adaptation also occurs in human cells.
56. ••].
57. •] provide evidence, based on cell culture and mouse models, as well as data obtained with clinical specimens, that oncogene-induced cellular senescence is one of the possible outcomes of the DNA damage checkpoints activated in response to oncogene-induced DNA replication stress.
58. •].
59. Tort F., Bartkova J., Sehested M., Orntoft T., Lukas J., and Bartek J. Retinoblastoma pathway defects show differential ability to activate the constitutive DNA damage response in human tumorigenesis. Cancer Res 66 (2006) 10258-10263
60. Pusapati R.V., Rounbehler R.J., Hong S., Powers J.T., Yan M., Kiguchi K., McArthur M.J., Wong P.K., and Johnson D.G. ATM promotes apoptosis and suppresses tumorigenesis in response to Myc. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103 (2006) 1446-1451
61. Christophorou M.A., Ringshausen I., Finch A.J., Swigart L.B., and Evan G.I. The pathological response to DNA damage does not contribute to p53-mediated tumour suppression. Nature 443 (2006) 214-217
62. Efeyan A., Garcia-Cao I., Herranz D., Velasco-Miguel S., and Serrano M. Tumour biology: Policing of oncogene activity by p53. Nature 443 (2006) 159
63. Bao S., Wu Q., McLendon R.E., Hao Y., Shi Q., Hjelmeland A.B., Dewhirst M.W., Bigner D.D., and Rich J.N. Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 444 (2006) 756-760