Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-β family signalling

Nature

Volumn 425, Issue 6958, 2003, Pages 577-584

  Derynck, Rik ^a   Zhang, Ying E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELLS; PROTEINS;

INTRACELLULAR EFFECTORS;

NATURAL SCIENCES;

SMAD PROTEIN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

MEDICINE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CARCINOGENESIS; CELL FUNCTION; CELL NUCLEUS; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; ANIMALS; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; LIGANDS; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SMAD PROTEINS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA;

EID: 0142104985     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature02006     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Massagué, J. How cells read TGF-β signals. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1, 169-178 (2000).
2. Itoh, S., Itoh, F., Goumans, M. J. & ten Dijke, P. Signaling of transforming growth factor-β family members through Smad proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 6954-6967 (2000).
3. Moustakas, A., Souchelnytskyi, S. & Heldin, C.-H. Smad regulation in TGF-β signal transduction. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4359-4369 (2001).
4. Derynck, R. & Feng, X.-H. TGF-β receptor signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1333, F105-F150 (1997).
5. Gilboa, L. et al. Bone morphogenetic protein receptor complexes on the surface of live cells: a new oligomerization mode for serine/threonine kinase receptors. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 1023-1035 (2000).
6. Goumans, M. J. et al. Balancing the activation state of the endothelium via two distinct TGF-β type I receptors. EMBO J. 21, 1743-1753 (2002).
7. Miettinen, P. J., Ebner, R., Lopez, A. R. & Derynck, R. TGF-β induced transdifferentiation of mammary epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells: involvement of type receptors. J. Cell Biol. 127, 2021-2036 (1994).
8. Lai, Y. T. et al. Activin receptor-like kinase 2 can mediate atrioventricular cushion transformation. Dev. Biol. 222, 1-11 (2000).
9. Yan, Y. T. et al. Dual roles of Cripto as a ligand and coreceptor in the nodal signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 4439-4449 (2002).
10. Blobe, G. C., Liu, X., Fang, S. J., How, T. & Lodish, H. F. A novel mechanism for regulating transforming growth factorβ (TGF-β) signaling. Functional modulation of type III TGF-β receptor expression through interaction with the PDZ domain protein, GIPC. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 39608-39617 (2001).
11. Barbara, N. P., Wrana, J. L. & Letarte, M. Endoglin is an accessory protein that interacts with the signaling receptor complex of multiple members of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 584-594 (1999).
12. Masuyama, N., Hanafusa, H., Kusakabe, M., Shibuya, H. & Nishida, E. Identification of two Smad4 proteins in Xenopus. Their common and distinct properties. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 12163-12170 (1999).
13. Sirard, C. et al. Targeted disruption in murine cells reveals variable requirement for Smad4 in transforming growth factor β-related signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2063-2070 (2000).
14. Durocher, D. et al. The molecular basis of FHA domain:phosphopeptide binding specificity and implications for phospho-dependent signaling mechanisms. Mol. Cell 6, 1169-1182 (2000).
15. Choy, L., Skillington, J. & Derynck, R. Roles of autocrine TGF-β receptor and Smad signaling in adipocyte differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 149, 667-682 (2000).
16. Arora, K. & Warrior, R. A new Smurf in the village. Dev Cell 1, 441-442 (2001).
17. Zhu, H., Kavsak, P., Abdollah, S., Wrana, J. L. & Thomsen, G. H. A SMAD ubiquitin ligase targets the BMP pathway and affects embryonic pattern formation. Nature 400, 687-693 (1999).
18. Zhang, Y., Chang, C., Gehling, D. J., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A. & Derynck, R. Regulation of Smad degradation and activity by Smurf2, an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 974-979 (2001).
19. Bonni, S. et al. TGF-β induces assembly of a Smad2-Smurf2 ubiquitin ligase complex that targets SnoN for degradation. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 587-595 (2001).
20. Lo, R. S. & Massagué, J. Ubiquitin-dependent degradation of TGF-β-activated Smad2. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 472-478 (1999).
21. Fukuchi, M. et al. Ligand-dependent degradation of Smad3 by a ubiquitin ligase complex of ROC1 and associated proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1431-1443 (2001).
22. Inman, G. J., Nicolas, F. J. & Hill, C. S. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Smads 2, 3, and 4 permits sensing of TGF-β receptor activity. Mol. Cell 10, 283-294 (2002).
23. Xu, L., Kang, Y., Col, S. & Massagué, J. Smad2 nucleocytoplasmic shuttling by nucleoporins CAN/ Nup214 and Nup153 feeds TGF-β signaling complexes in the cytoplasm and nucleus. Mol. Cell 10, 271-282 (2002).
24. Lee, P. S., Chang, C., Liu, D. & Derynck, R. Sumoylation of Smad4, the common Smad mediator of TGF-β family signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 27853-27863 (2003).
25. Xu, J. & Attisano, L. Mutations in the tumor suppressors Smad2 and Smad4 inactivate transforming growth factor β signaling by targeting Smads to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4820-4825 (2000).
26. Wan, M. et al. Jab1 antagonizes TGF-β signaling by inducing Smad4 degradation. EMBO Rep. 3, 171-176 (2002).
27. Huse, M. et al. The TGF-β receptor activation process: an inhibitor- to substrate-binding switch. Mol. Cell 8, 671-682 (2001).
28. Penheiter, S. G. et al. Internalization-dependent and -independent requirements for transforming growth factor β receptor signaling via the Smad pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 4750-4759 (2002).
29. Hayes, S., Chawla, A. & Corvera, S. TGF-β receptor internalization into EEA1-enriched early endosomes: role in signaling to Smad2. J. Cell Biol. 158, 1239-1249 (2002).
30. Di Guglielmo, G. M., Le Roy, C., Goodfellow, A. F. & Wrana, J. L. Distinct endocytic pathways regulate TGF-b receptor signaling and turnover. Nature Cell 5, 410-421 (2003).
31. Hocevar, B. A., Smine, A., Xu, X. X. & Howe, P. H. The adaptor molecule Disabled-2 links the transforming growth factor β receptors to the Smad pathway. EMBO J. 20, 2789-2801 (2001).
32. Razani, B. et al. Caveolin-1 regulates transforming growth factor (TGF)-β/SMAD signaling through an interaction with the TGF-β type I receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 6727-6738 (2001).
33. Dong, C., Li, Z., Alvarez, R. Jr, Feng, X.-H. & Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J. Microtubule binding to Smads may regulate TGF-β activity. Mol. Cell 5, 27-34 (2000).
34. Sasaki, A., Masuda, Y., Ohta, Y., Ikeda, K. & Watanabe, K. Filamin associates with Smads and regulates transforming growth factor-β signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 17871-17877 (2001).
35. Tang, Y. et al. Disruption of transforming growth factor-β signaling in ELF β-spectrin-deficient mice. Science 299, 574-577 (2003).
36. Kavsak, P. et al. Smad7 binds to Smurt2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF-β receptor for degradation. Mol. Cell 6, 1365-1375 (2000).
37. Ebisawa, T. et al. Smurf1 interacts with transforming growth factor-β type I receptor through Smad7 and induces receptor degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 12477-12480 (2001).
38. Wu, J. W. et al. Crystal structure of a phosphorylated Smad2. Recognition of phosphoserine by the MH2 domain and insights on Smad function in TGF-β signaling. Mol. Cell 8, 1277-1289 (2001).
39. Chacko, B. M. et al. The L3 loop and C-terminal phosphorylation jointly define Smad protein trimerization. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 248-253 (2001).
40. Inman, G. J. & Hill, C. S. Stoichiometry of active Smad-transcription factor complexes on DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 51008-51016 (2002).
41. Ink4B transcription in response to TGF-β. EMBO J. 19, 5178-5193, (2000).
42. Watanabe, M., Masuyama, N., Fukuda, M. & Nishida, E. Regulation of intracellular dynamics of Smad4 by its leucine-rich nuclear export signal. EMBO Rep. 1, 176-182 (2000).
43. Xiao, Z., Watson, N., Rodriguez, C. & Lodish, H. F. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Smad1 conferred by its nuclear localization and nuclear export signals. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 39404-39410 (2001).
44. Xu, L., Chen, Y.-G. & Massagué, J. The nuclear import function of Smad2 is masked by SARA and unmasked by TGFβ-dependent phosphorylation. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 559-562 (2000).
45. Kurisaki, A., Kose, S., Yoneda, Y., Heldin, C. H. & Moustakas, A. Transforming growth factor-β induces nuclear import of Smad3 in an importin-β1 and Ran-dependent manner. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1079-1091 (2001).
46. Itoh, F. et al. Promoting bone morphogenetic protein signaling through negative regulation of inhibitory Smads. EMBO J. 20, 4132-4142 (2001).
47. Hanyu, A. et al. The N domain of Smad7 is essential for specific inhibition of transforming growth factor-β signaling. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1017-1027 (2001).
48. Bai, S. & Cao, X. A nuclear antagonistic mechanism of inhibitory Smads in transforming growth factor-β signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 4176-4182 (2002).
49. Pulaski, L., Landström, M., Heldin, C. H. & Souchelnytskyi, S. Phosphorylation of Smad7 at Ser-249 does not interfere with its inhibitory role in transforming growth factor-β-dependent signaling but affects Smad7-dependent transcriptional activation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 14344-14349 (2001).
50. Grönroos, E., Hellman, U., Heldin, C. H. & Ericsson, J. Control of Smad7 stability by Competition between acetylation and ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 10, 483-493 (2002).
51. de Caestecker, M. P. et al. Smad2 transduces common signals from receptor serine-threonine and tyrosine kinases. Genes Dev. 12, 1587-1592 (1998).
52. Kretzschmar, M., Doody, J., Timokhina, I. & Massagué, J. A mechanism of repression of TGF-β/Smad signaling by oncogenic Ras. Genes Dev. 13, 804-816 (1999).
53. Funaba, M., Zimmerman, C. M. & Mathews, L. S. Modulation of Smad2-mediated signaling by extracellular signal-regulated kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 41361-41368 (2002).
54. Engel, E., McDonnell, M.A., Law, B. K. & Moses, H.L. Interdependent SMAD and JNK signaling in transforming growth factor-β-mediated transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37413-37420 (1999).
55. Janda, E. et al. Ras and TGF-β cooperatively regulate epithelial cell plasticity and metastasis: dissection of Ras signaling pathways. J. Cell Biol. 156, 299-313 (2002).
56. Grimm, O. H. & Gurdon, J. B. Nuclear exclusion of Smad2 is a mechanism leading to loss of competence. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 519-522 (2002).
57. Brown, J. D., DiChiara, M. R., Anderson, K. R., Gimbrone, M. A. Jr & Topper, J. N. MEKK-1, a component of the stress (stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun N-terminal kinase) pathway, can selectively activate Smad2-mediated transcriptional activation in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 8797-8805 (1999).
58. 2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8103-8111 (2000).
59. Yakymovych, I., ten Dijke, P., Heldin, C. H. & Souchelnytskyi, S. Regulation of Smad signaling by protein kinase C. FASEB J. 15, 553-555 (2001).
60. Chen, C.-R., Kang, Y., Siegel, P. M. & Massagué, J. E2F4/5 and p107 as Smad cofactors linking the TGFβ receptor to c-myc repression. Cell 110, 19-32 (2002).
61. Kang, Y., Chen, C.-R. & Massagué, J. A self-enabling TGF-β response coupled to stress signaling: Smad engages stress response factor ATF3 for Id1 repression in epithelial cells. Mol. Cell 11, 915-926 (2003).
62. Comijn, J. et al. The two-handed E box binding zinc finger protein SIP1 downregulates E-cadherin and induces invasion. Mol. Cell 7, 1267-1278 (2001).
63. Alliston, T., Choy, L., Ducy, P., Karsenty, G. & Derynck, R. TGF-β-induced repression of CBFA1 by Smad3 decreases cbfa1 and osteocalcin expression and inhibits osteoblast differentiation. EMBO J. 20, 2254-2272 (2001).
64. Liu, D., Black, B. L. & Derynck, R. TGF-β inhibits muscle differentiation through functional repression of myogenic transcription factors by Smad3. Genes Dev. 15, 2950-2966 (2001).
65. Choy, L. & Derynck, R. Transforming growth factor-β inhibits adipocyte differentiation by Smad3 interacting with CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) and repressing C/EBP transactivation function. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 9609-9619 (2003).
66. Liberati, N. T., Moniwa, M., Borton, A. J., Davie, J. R. & Wang, X.-F. An essential role for Mad homology domain 1 in the association of Smad3 with histone deacetylase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 22595-22603 (2001).
67. Choy, L. & Derynck, R. The type II transforming growth factor (TGF)-β receptor-interacting protein TRIP-1 acts as a modulator of the TGF-β response. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31455-31462 (1998).
68. McGonigle, S., Beall, M. J. & Pearce, E. J. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2 α subunit associates with TGF-β receptors and 14-3-3ε and acts as a modulator of the TGF-β response. Biochemistry 41, 579-587 (2002).
69. Griswold-Prenner, I., Kamibayashi, C., Maruoka, E. M., Mumby, M. C. & Derynck, R. Physical and functional interactions between type 1 transforming growth factor β receptors and Bα, a WD-40 repeat subunit of phosphatase 2A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 6595-6604 (1998).
70. Datta, P. K. & Moses, H. L. STRAP and Smad7 synergize in the inhibition of transforming growth factor β signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 3157-3167 (2000).
71. Huse, M., Chen, Y.-G., Massagué, J. & Kuriyan, J. Crystal structure of the cytoplasmic domain of the type 1 TGF-β receptor in complex with FKBP12. Cell 96, 425-436 (1999).
72. Yao, D., Doré, J. J. Jr & Leof, E. B. FKBP12 is a negative regulator of transforming growth factor-α receptor internalization. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 13149-13154 (2000).
73. Aghdasi, B. et al. FKBP12, the 12-kDa FK506-binding protein, is a physiologic regulator of the cell cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2425-2430 (2001).
74. Ventura, F., Liu, F., Doody, J. & Massagué, J. Interaction of transforming growth factor-β receptor I with farnesyl-protein transferase-α in yeast and mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 13931-13934 (1996).
75. Yu, L., Hebert, M. C. & Zhang, Y. E. TGF-β receptor-activated p38 MAP kinase mediates Smad-independent TGF-β responses. EMBO J. 21, 3749-3759 (2002).
76. Yue, J. & Mulder, K. M. Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by transforming growth factor-β. Methods Mol. Biol. 142, 125-131 (2000).
77. Yamaguchi, K. et al. XIAP, a cellular member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, links the receptors to TAB1-TAK1 in the BMP signaling pathway. EMBO J. 18, 179-187 (1999).
78. Salvesen, G. S. & Duckett, C. S. IAP proteins: blocking the road to death's door. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 401-410 (2002).
79. Bakin, A. V., Rinehart, C., Tomlinson, A. K. & Arteaga, C. L. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for TGFβ-mediated fibroblastic transdifferentiation and cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 115, 3193-3206 (2002).
80. Zavadil, J. et al. Genetic programs of epithelial cell plasticity directed by transforming growth factor-β. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6686-6691 (2001).
81. Kimura, N., Matsuo, R., Shibuya, H., Nakashima, K. & Taga, T. BMP2-induced apoptosis is mediated by activation of the TAK1-p38 kinase pathway that is negatively regulated by Smad6. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17647-17652 (2000).
82. Mazar, A. et al. Evidence for a role of the JNK cascade in Smad7-mediated apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36797-36803 (2001).
83. Pessah, M. et al. c-Jun associates with the oncoprotein Ski and suppresses Smad2 transcriptional activity. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 29094-29100 (2002).
84. Bhowmick, N. A. et al. Transforming growth factor-β1 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation through a RhoA-dependent mechanism. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 27-36 (2001).
85. Edlund, S., Landström, M., Heldin, C. H. & Aspenström, P. Transforming growth factor-β-induced mobilization of actin cytoskeleton requires signaling by small GTPases Cdc42 and RhoA. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 902-914 (2002).
86. Engel, M. E., Datta, P. K. & Moses, H. L. RhoB is stabilized by transforming growth factor β and antagonizes transcriptional activation. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9921-9926 (1998).
87. Shen, X. et al. The activity of guanine exchange factor NET1 is essential for transforming growth factor-β-mediated stress fiber formation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 15362-15368 (2001).
88. Bishop, A. L. & Hall, A. Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. Biochem. J. 348, 241-255 (2000).
89. Bakin, A. V., Tomlinson, A. K., Bhowmick, N. A., Moses, H. L. & Arteaga, C. L. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase function is required for transforming growth factor β-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 36803-36810 (2000).
90. Vinals, F. & Pouysségur, J. Transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) promotes endothelial cell survival during in vitro angiogenesis via an autocrine mechanism implicating TGF-α signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 7218-7230 (2001).
91. Piek, E., Moustakas, A., Kurisaki, A., Heldin, C. H. & ten Dijke, P. TGF-β type I receptor/ALK-5 and Smad proteins mediate epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation in NMuMG breast epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 112, 4557-4568 (1999).
92. 1 arrest. Genes Dev. 14, 3093-3101 (2000).
93. Bennett, D. & Alphey, L. PP1 binds Sara and negatively regulates Dpp signalling in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature Genet. 31, 419-423 (2002).
94. Stroschein, S. L., Bonni, S., Wrana, J. L. & Luo, K. Smad3 recruits the anaphase-promoting complex for ubiquitination and degradation of SnoN. Genes Dev. 15, 2822-2836 (2001).
95. Wan, Y., Liu, X. & Kirschner, M. W. The anaphase-promoting complex mediates TGF-β signaling by targeting SnoN for destruction. Mol. Cell 8, 1027-1039 (2001).
96. Yamaka, N., Tsuchida, K. & Sugino, H. The rasGAP-binding protein, Dok-1, mediates activin signaling via serine/threonine kinase receptors. EMBO J. 21, 1684-1694 (2002).
97. Bai, R. Y. et al. SMIF, a Smad4-interacting protein that functions as a co-activator in TGFβ signalling. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 181-190 (2002).
98. Kato, Y., Habas, R., Katsuyama, Y., Naar, A. M. & He, X. A component of the ARC/Mediator complex required for TGF-β/Nodal signalling. Nature 418, 641-646 (2002).
99. INK4b. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 400-409 (2001).
100. Ink4B Mol. Cell 9, 133-143 (2002).
101. Foletta, V. C. et al. Direct signaling by the BMP type II receptor via the cytoskeletal regulator LIMK1. J. Cell Biol. 162, 1089-1098 (2003).