The maize homologue of the cell cycle checkpoint protein MAD2 reveals kinetochore substructure and contrasting mitotic and meiotic localization patterns

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 145, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 425-435

  Yu, Hong Guo ^a   Muszynski, Michael G ^c   Dawe, R Kelly ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc ^*  (United States)

^c PIONEER HI BRED INTERNATIONAL INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Checkpoint; Kinetochore; MAD2; Meiosis; Spindle assembly

Indexed keywords

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; MAIZE; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SPINDLE CELL;

ANAPHASE; ANTIBODIES; CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; FUNGAL PROTEINS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KINETOCHORES; MEIOSIS; METAPHASE; MICROTUBULES; MITOSIS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PLANT PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; STAINING AND LABELING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; ZEA MAYS;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0033519357     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.145.3.425     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anthony, R.G., T.R. Waldin, J.A. Ray, S.W.J. Bright, and P.J. Hussey. 1998. Herbicide resistance caused by spontaneous mutation of the cytoskeletal protein tubulin. Nature. 393:260-263.
2. Asai, D.J., C.J. Brokaw, W.C. Thompson, and L. Wilson. 1982. Two different monoclonal antibodies to tubulin inhibit the bending of reactivated sea urchin spermatozoa. Cell Motil. 2:599-614.
3. Atschul, S.F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E.W. Myers, and D.J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410.
4. Ault, J.G., and R.B. Nicklas. 1989. Tension, microtubule rearrangements, and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis. Chromosoma. 98:33-39.
5. Bajer, A.S., and J. Molé-Bajer. 1972. Spindle Dynamics and Chromosome Movements. Academic Press, New York.
6. Baskin, T.I., and W.Z. Cande. 1990. The structure and function of the mitotic spindle in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 41: 277-315.
7. Braselton, J.P., and C.C. Bowen. 1971. The ultrastructure of the kinetochores of Lilium longiflorum during the first meiotic division. Caryologia. 24:49-58.
8. Campbell, M.S., and G.J. Gorbsky. 1995. Microinjection of mitotic cells with the 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody delays the onset of anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 129:1195-1204.
9. Chan, A., and W.Z. Cande. 1998. Maize meiotic spindles assemble around chromatin and do not require paired chromosomes. J. Cell Sci. 111:3507-3515.
10. Chen, R.-H., J.C. Waters, E.D. Salmon, and A.W. Murray. 1996. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science. 274:242-246.
11. Choo, K.H.A. 1997. The Centromere. Oxford University, New York.
12. Dawe, R.K., L.M. Reed, H.-G. Yu, M.G. Muszynski, and E.N. Hiatt. 1999. A maize homolog of mammalian CENP-C is a constitutive component of the inner kinetochore. Plant Cell. In press.
13. Earnshaw, W.C. 1994. Structure and molecular biology of the kinetochore. In Microtubules. J.S. Hyams and C.W. Lloyd, editors. Wiley-Liss, New York.
14. Elledge, S.J. 1996. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science. 274:1664-1672.
15. Elledge, S.J. 1998. Mitotic arrest: Mad2 prevents sleepy from waking up the APC. Science. 279:999-1000.
16. Fang, G., H. Yu, and M. Kirschner. 1998. The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12:1871-1883.
17. Gorbsky, G.J., R.-H. Chen. and A.W. Murray. 1998. Microinjection of antibody to Mad2 protein into mammalian cells in mitosis induces premature anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 141:1193-1205.
18. Gorbsky, G.J., and W.A. Ricketts. 1993. Differential expression of a phospho-epitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122:1311-1321.
19. Hardwick, K.G. 1998. The spindle checkpoint. Trends Genet. 14:1-4.
20. Hardwick, K.G., E. Weiss, F.C. Luca, M. Winey, and A.W. Murray. 1996. Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science. 273:953-956.
21. Harlow, E., and D. Lane. 1988. Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
22. He, X., T.E. Patterson, and S. Sazer. 1997. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe spindle checkpoint protein mad2p blocks anaphase and genetically interacts with the anaphase-promoting complex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:7965-7970.
23. Hiraoka, Y., J.R. Swedlow, M.R. Paddy, D.A. Agard, and J.W. Sedat. 1991. Three-dimensional multiple-wavelength fluorescence microscopy for the structural analysis of biological phenomena. Semin. Cell Biol. 2:153-165.
24. Hoffman, J.C., and K.C. Vaughn. 1994. Mitotic disrupter herbicides act by a single mechanism but vary in efficacy. Protoplasma. 179:16-25.
25. Hwang, L.H., L.F. Lau, D.L. Smith, C.A. Mistrot, K.G. Hardwick, E.S. Hwang, A. Amon, and A.W. Murray. 1998. Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science. 279:1041-1044.
26. Jensen, C.G. 1982. Dynamics of spindle microtubule organization: kinetochore fiber microtubules of plant endosperm. J. Cell Biol. 92:540-558.
27. Kallio. M., J. Weinstein, J.R. Daum, D.J. Burke, and G.J. Gorbsky. 1998. Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events. J. Cell Biol. 141:1393-1406.
28. Kim, S.H., D. Lin, S. Matsumoto, A. Kitazono, and T. Matsumoto. 1998. Fission yeast S1p1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science. 279:1045-1047.
29. King, R.W., R.J. Deshaies, J.-M. Peters, and M.W. Kirschner. 1996. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science. 274:1652-1659.
30. Kirschner, M.W., and T.J. Mitchison. 1986. Beyond self assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell. 45:329-342.
31. Lambert, A.-M. 1993. Microtubule organizing centers in higher plants. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5:116-122.
32. Lambert, A.-M., and C.W. Lloyd. 1994. The higher plant microtubule cycle. In Microtubules. J.S. Hyams and C.W. Lloyd, editors. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York. 325-341.
33. Li, R., and A.W. Murray. 1991. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell. 66:519-531.
34. Li, X., and R.B. Nicklas. 1995. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature. 373:630-632.
35. Li, X.T., and R.B. Nicklas. 1997. Tension sensitive kinetochore phosphorylation and the chromosome distribution checkpoint in praying mantid sper-matocytes. J. Cell Sci. 110:537-545.
36. Li, Y., and R. Benezra. 1996. Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science. 274:246-248.
37. Lima-de-Faria, A. 1956. The role of the kinetochore in chromosome organization. Hereditas. 42:85-160.
38. McIntosh, J.R. 1991. Structural and mechanical control of mitotic progression. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 56:613-619.
39. McIntosh, J.R., and G.E. Hering. 1991. Spindle fiber action and chromosome movement. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 7:403-426.
40. Meluh, P.B., and D. Koshland. 1997. Budding yeast centromere composition and assembly as revealed by in vivo cross-linking. Genes Dev. 11:3401-3412.
41. Merdes, A., and D.W. Cleveland. 1997. Pathways of spindle pole formation: different mechanisms; conserved components. J. Cell Biol. 138:953-956.
42. Nicklas, R.B. 1988. The forces that move chromosomes in mitosis. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 17:431-449.
43. Nicklas, R.B. 1997. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science. 275:632-637.
44. Nicklas, R.B., S. Ward, and G.J. Gorbsky. 1995. Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130:929-939.
45. Rieder, C.L. 1982. The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber. Int. Rev. Cyt. 79:1-58.
46. Rieder, C.L., J. Ault, U. Eichenlaub-Ritter, and G. Sluder. 1993. Morphogenesis of the mitotic and meiotic spindle: conclusions from one system are not necessarily applicable to the other. In Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy. B.K. Vig, editor. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 183-197.
47. Rudner, A.D., and A.W. Murray. 1996. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8:773-780.
48. Saitoh, H., J. Tomkiel, C.A. Cooke, H. Ratrie III, M. Maurer, N.F. Rothfield, and W.C. Earnshaw. 1992. CENP-C, an autoantigen in scleroderma, is a component of the human inner kinetochore plate. Cell. 70:115-125.
49. Shapiro, P.S., E. Vaisberg, A.J. Hunt, N.S. Tolwinski, A.M. Whalen, J.R. McIntosh, and N.G. Ahn. 1998. Activation of the MKK/ERK pathway during somatic cell mitosis: direct interactions of active ERK with kinetochores and regulation of the mitotic 3F3/2 phosphoantigen. J. Cell Biol. 142:1533-1545.
50. Smirnova, E.A., and A.S. Bajer. 1992. Spindle poles in higher plant mitosis. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 23:1-7.
51. Staiger, C.J., and W.Z. Cande. 1990. Microtubule distribution in dv, a maize meiotic mutant defective in the prophase to metaphase transition. Dev. Biol. 138:213-242.
52. Tang, W.-J.Y. 1993. Blot-affinity purification of antibodies. Methods Cell Biol. 37:95-103.
53. Vernos, I., and E. Karsenti. 1995. Chromosomes take the lead in spindle assembly. Trends Cell Biol. 5:297-301.
54. Visitin, R., S. Prinz, and A. Amon. 1997. CDC20 and CDH1: a family of substrate-specific activators of APC-dependent proteolysis. Science. 278:460-463.
55. Wassmann, K., and R. Benezra. 1998. Mad2 transiently associates with an APC/ p55Cdc complex during mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:11193-11198.
56. Waters, J., and E.D. Salmon. 1997. Pathways of spindle assembly. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9:37-43.
57. Waters, J.C., R.V. Skibbens, and E.D. Salmon. 1996. Oscillating mitotic newt lung cell kinetochores are, on average, under tension and rarely push. J. Cell Sci. 109:2823-2831.
58. Waters, J.C., R.-H. Chen, A.W. Murray, and E.D. Salmon. 1998. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141:1181-1191.
59. Wells, W.A.E. 1996. The spindle assembly checkpoint: aiming for a perfect mitosis, every time. Trends Cell Biol. 6:228-234.
60. Wendell, K.L., L. Wilson, and M.A. Jordan. 1993. Mitotic block in HeLa cells by vinblastine: ultrastructural changes in kinetochore-microtubule attachment and in centrosomes. J. Cell Sci. 104:261-274.
61. Yu, H.-G., E.N. Hiatt, A. Chan, M. Sweeney, and R.K. Dawe. 1997. Neocentromere-mediated chromosome movement in maize.J. Cell Biol. 139:831-840.