The Next Black Box of Formative Assessment: A Model of the Internal Mechanisms of Feedback Processing

Frontiers in Education

Volumn 7, Issue , 2022, Pages

  Lui, Angela M ^a   Andrade, Heidi L ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

affective and cognitive processes; decision making; emotions; formative assessment; formative feedback; internal mechanisms of feedback processing; interpretations; responses to feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 85125632705     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2504284X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.751548     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Allal L. (2019). Assessment and the Co-regulation of Learning in the Classroom. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (4), 332–349. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411
2. Allal L. (2020). Assessment and the Co-regulation of Learning in the Classroom. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (4), 332–349. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411
3. Allal L. Lopez L. M. OECD (2005). “Formative Assessment of Learning: A Review of Publications in French,” in Formative Assessment: Improving Learning in Secondary Classrooms (Paris: OECD), 241–264.
4. Andrade H. Brookhart S. Yu E. C. (2021). Classroom Assessment as Co-regulated Learning: A Systematic Review. Front. Educ. 10.3389/feduc.2021.751168
5. Andrade H. (2016). Classroom Assessment and Learning: A Selective Review of Theory and Research [White Paper]. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
6. Andrade H. (2013). “Classroom Assessment in the Context of Learning Theory and Research,” in SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. Editor McMillan J. H. (New York: SAGE), 17–34.
7. Andrade H. L. Brookhart S. M. (2020). Classroom Assessment as the Co-regulation of Learning. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (4), 350–372. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
8. Bandura A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9. Bangert-Drowns R. L. Kulik C.-L. C. Kulik J. A. Morgan M. (1991). The Instructional Effect of Feedback in Test-like Events. Rev. Educ. Res. 61 (2), 213–238. 10.3102/00346543061002213
10. Bennett R. E. (2011). Formative Assessment: A Critical Review. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 18 (1), 5–25. 10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678
11. Black P. Wiliam D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 5 (1), 7–74. 10.1080/0969595980050102
12. Black P. Wiliam D. (2009). Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment. Educ. Asse Eval. Acc. 21 (1), 5–31. 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
13. Boekaerts M. (2011). “Emotions, Emotion Regulation, and Self-Regulation of Learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Editors Zimmerman B. J. Schunk D. H. (New York: Routledge), 408–425.
14. Brown G. T. Peterson E. R. Yao E. S. (2016). Student Conceptions of Feedback: Impact on Self-Regulation, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 86 (4), 606–629. 10.1111/bjep.12126
15. Butler D. L. Winne P. H. (1995). Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis. Rev. Educ. Res. 65 (3), 245–281. 10.3102/00346543065003245
16. Butler R. (1987). Task-Involving and Ego-Involving Properties of Evaluation: Effects of Different Feedback Conditions on Motivational Perceptions, Interest, and Performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 79 (4), 474.
17. Carless D. Boud D. (2018). The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback. Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 43 (8), 1315–1325.
18. Carver C. S. Scheier M. (1990). Principles of self-regulation: Action and emotion. New York: The Guilford Press.
19. Chan J. C. Y. Lam S.-f. (2010). Effects of Different Evaluative Feedback on Students' Self-Efficacy in Learning. Instr. Sci. 38 (1), 37–58. 10.1007/sl1251-008-9077-2
20. Chen P. P. Bonner S. M. (2020). A Framework for Classroom Assessment, Learning, and Self-Regulation. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (4), 373–393. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1619515
21. Cimpian A. Arce H. M. Markman E. M. Dweck C. S. (2007). Subtle Linguistic Cues Affect Children's Motivation. Psychol. Sci. 18 (4), 314–316. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01896.x
22. Corno L. (1993). The best-laid plans: Modern Conceptions of Volition and Educational Research. Educ. Res. 22 (2), 14–22.
23. Cutumisu M. Blair K. P. Chin D. B. Schwartz D. L. (2017). Assessing whether Students Seek Constructive Criticism: The Design of an Automated Feedback System for a Graphic Design Task. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 27 (3), 419–447. 10.1007/s40593-016-0137-5
24. Dann R. (2014). Assessmentaslearning: Blurring the Boundaries of Assessment and Learning for Theory, Policy and Practice. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 21 (2), 149–166. 10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128
25. Dohrer G. (1991). Do Teachers' Comments on Students' Papers Help. Coll. Teach. 39 (2), 48–54. 10.1080/87567555.1991.9925485
26. Donia M. B. L. O'Neill T. A. Brutus S. (2018). The Longitudinal Effects of Peer Feedback in the Development and Transfer of Student Teamwork Skills. Learn. Individual Differences 61, 87–98. 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.012
27. Draper S. W. (2009). What Are Learners Actually Regulating when Given Feedback. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 40 (2), 306–315. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00930.x1
28. Dweck C. S. Leggett E. L. (1988). A Social^cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality. Psychol. Rev. 95 (2), 256–273. 10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256
29. Dweck C. S. Chiu C.-y. Hong Y.-y. (1995). Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions: A Word from Two Perspectives. Psychol. Inq. 6 (4), 267–285. 10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
30. Dweck C. S. (1999/2000). Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
31. Elliot A. J. (2005). “A Conceptual History of the Achievement Goal Construct,” in Handbook of Competence and Motivation. Editors Elliot A. J. Dweck C. S. (New York: Guilford Press), 52–72.
32. Evans C. (2013). Making Sense of Assessment Feedback in Higher Education. Rev. Educ. Res. 83 (1), 70–120.
33. Fatima S. Ali M. Saad M. I. (2021). The Effect of Students' Conceptions of Feedback on Academic Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation: Evidence from Higher Education in Pakistan. Jarhe. 10.1108/JARHE-07-2020-0209
34. Filsecker M. Kerres M. (2012). Repositioning Formative Assessment from an Educational Assessment Perspective: A Response to Dunn & Mulvenon, 17. Amherst, MA: Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 10.7275/xrkr-b675
35. Fisk S. M. (2017). A Qualitative Inquiry of Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions on Feedback in Three Queensland Secondary Schools. Brisbane: Publication No. 112506. Queensland University of Technology. 10.5204/thesis.eprints.112506
36. Forsythe A. Johnson S. (2017). Thanks, but No-Thanks for the Feedback. Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 42 (6), 850–859. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1202190
37. Fyfe E. R. Rittle-Johnson B. (2016). The Benefits of Computer-Generated Feedback for Mathematics Problem Solving. J. Exp. Child. Psychol. 147, 140–151. 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.009
38. Gamlem S. M. Smith K. (2013). Student Perceptions of Classroom Feedback. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 20 (2), 150–169. 10.1080/0969594X.2012.749212
39. Graham S. Hebert M. Harris K. R. (2015). Formative Assessment and Writing. Elem. Sch. J. 115 (4), 523–547. 10.1086/681947
40. Harackiewicz J. M. Barron K. E. Tauer J. M. Carter S. M. Elliot A. J. (2000). Short-term and Long-Term Consequences of Achievement Goals: Predicting Interest and Performance over Time. J. Educ. Psychol. 92 (2), 316–330. 10.1O3W0022-O663.92.2.31610.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
41. Harackiewicz J. M. Hulleman C. S. (2010). The Importance of Interest: The Role of Achievement Goals and Task Values in Promoting the Development of Interest. Social Personal. Psychol. Compass 4 (1), 42–52. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00207.x
42. Harris L. R. Brown G. T. L. Harnett J. A. (2014). Understanding Classroom Feedback Practices: A Study of New Zealand Student Experiences, Perceptions, and Emotional Responses. Educ. Asse Eval. Acc. 26 (2), 107–133. 10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5
43. Hattie J. A. (1999). Influences on student learning (Inaugural professorial address, University of Auckland, New Zealand). Available at: http://www.arts.auckland.ac.nz/staff/index.cfm?P=8650.
44. Hattie J. A. C. Gan M. (2011). “Instruction Based on Feedback,” in Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction. Editors Mayer R. Alexander P. (New York: Routledge), 249–271.
45. Hattie J. A. C. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of 800+ Meta-Analyses on Achievement. New York: Routledge.
46. Hattie J. Timperley H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77 (1), 81–112. 10.3102/003465430298487
47. Havnes A. Smith K. Dysthe O. Ludvigsen K. (2012). Formative Assessment and Feedback: Making Learning Visible. Stud. Educ. Eval. 38 (1), 21–27. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001
48. Hier B. O. Mahony K. E. (2018). The Contribution of Mastery Experiences, Performance Feedback, and Task Effort to Elementary-Aged Students' Self-Efficacy in Writing. Sch. Psychol. Q. 33, 408–418. 10.1037/spq0000226
49. Higgins R. Hartley P. Skelton A. (2001). Getting the Message across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback. Teach. Higher Educ. 6 (2), 269–274. 10.1080/13562510120045230
50. Andrade H. L. Bennett R. E. Cizek G. J. (Editors) (2019). Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines (New York: Routledge). 10.4324/9781315166933
51. Horvath M. Herleman H. A. Lee McKie R. (2006). Goal Orientation, Task Difficulty, and Task Interest: A Multilevel Analysis. Motiv. Emot. 30, 169–176. 10.1007/s11031-006-9029-6
52. Illies R. Judge T. A. Wagner D. T. (2010). The Influence of Cognitive and Affectivereactions to Feedback on Subsequent Goals: Role of Behavioral Inhibition/activation. Eur. Psychol. 15 (2), 121–131. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000001
53. Irving S. E. Peterson E. R. Brown G. T. L. (2008). Feedback And Academic Achievement: The Relationship between Students’ Conceptions of Feedback and Achievement. [Paper presentation]. Liverpool, UK: The 6th Biennial Conference of the International Test Commission.
54. Irving S. E. Peterson E. R. Brown G. T. L. (2007). Student Conceptions of Feedback: A Study of New Zealand Secondary Students. [Paper presentation]. Budapest, Hungary: Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction.
55. Jonsson A. Panadero E. (2018). “Facilitating Students’ Active Engagement with Feedback,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback. Editors Lipnevich A. A. Smith J. K. (Cambridge University Press), 531–554.
56. Katz I. Assor A. Kanat-Maymon Y. Bereby-Meyer Y. (2006). Interest as a Motivational Resource: Feedback and Gender Matter, but Interest Makes the Difference. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 9, 27–42. 10.1007/s11218-005-2863-7
57. Kingston N. Nash B. (2011). Formative Assessment: A Meta-Analysis and a Call for Research. Educ. Meas. Issues Pract. 30 (4), 28–37. 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00220.x
58. Kluger A. N. DeNisi A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychol. Bull. 119 (2), 254–284. 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
59. Kuhl J. Goschke T. (1994). A theory of action control: Mental subsystems, modes of control, and volitional conflict-resolution strategies. Volition Personality: Action vs. State Orientation 5, 93–124.
60. Kulhavy R. W. (1977). Feedback in Written Instruction. Rev. Educ. Res. 47 (2), 211–232. 10.3102/00346543047002211
61. Kulhavy R. W. Stock W. A. (1989). Feedback in Written Instruction: The Place of Response Certitude. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 1 (4), 279–308.
62. Kulik J. A. Kulik C. L. C. (1988). Timing of Feedback and Verbal Learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 58 (1), 79–97.
63. Leighton J. P. (2019). Students' Interpretation of Formative Assessment Feedback: Three Claims for Why We Know So Little about Something So Important. J. Educ. Meas. 56 (4), 793–814. 10.1111/jedm.12237
64. Lipnevich A. A. Smith J. K. (2009a). Effects of Differential Feedback on Students' Examination Performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 15 (4), 319–333. 10.1037/a0017841
65. Lipnevich A. A. Berg D. A. G. Smith J. K. (2016). “Toward a Model of Student Response to Feedback,” in The Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment. Editors Brown G. T. L. Harris L. R. (New York: Routledge), 169–185.
66. Lipnevich A. A. Smith J. K. (2009b). "I Really Need Feedback to Learn:" Students' Perspectives on the Effectiveness of the Differential Feedback Messages. Educ. Asse Eval. Acc. 21 (4), 347–367. 10.1007/s11092-009-9082-2
67. Lui A. M. Andrade H. L. (2021). Inside the Next Black Box: Examining Students’ Responses to Teacher Feedback in a Formative Assessment Context. [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany – SUNY.
68. Mason B. J. Bruning R. H. (2001). Providing Feedback in Computer-Based Instruction: What the Research Tells us. CLASS Research Report No. 9. Center for Instructional Innovation, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
69. McMillan J. H. (2016). “Section Discussion: Student Perceptions of Assessment,” in Handbook of Social and Human Conditions in Assessment. Editors Brown G. T. L. Harris L. R. (New York: Routledge), 221–244.
70. McMillan J. H. Venable J. C. Varier D. (2013). Studies of the Effect of Formative Assessment on Student Achievement: So Much More Is Needed. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 18. 10.7275/tmwm-7792
71. Mega C. Ronconi L. De Beni R. (2014). What Makes a Good Student? How Emotions, Self-Regulated Learning, and Motivation Contribute to Academic Achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 106 (1), 121–131. 10.1037/a0033546
72. Mithaug D. E. (1993). Self-regulation theory: How Optimal Adjustment Maximizes Gain. Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
73. Narciss S. (2013). Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning. Digital Educ. Rev. 23, 7–26.
74. Nguyen H. Xiong W. Litman D. (2017). Iterative Design and Classroom Evaluation of Automated Formative Feedback for Improving Peer Feedback Localization. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 27 (3), 582–622. 10.1007/s40593-016-0136-6
75. Nicol D. J. Macfarlane‐Dick D. (2006). Formative Assessment and Self‐regulated Learning: a Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice. Stud. higher Educ. 31 (2), 199–218. 10.1080/03075070600572090
76. Niven P. Meyer B. (2007). Understanding the Impact that Principled Formative Feedback Has on First Year Students Writing: Is it Useable or Not? an Action Research Project. Int. J. Learn. 14 (8), 13–22.
77. Panadero E. Andrade H. Brookhart S. (2018). Fusing Self-Regulated Learning and Formative Assessment: A Roadmap of where We Are, How We Got Here, and where We Are Going. Aust. Educ. Res. 45 (1), 13–31. 10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y
78. Panadero E. Lipnevich A. A. (2022). A Review of Feedback Models and Typologies: Towards an Integrative Model of Feedback Elements. Educ. Res. Rev. 35, 100416. 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
79. Paris S. G. Byrnes J. P. (1989). “The Constructivist Approach to Self-regulation and Learning in the Classroom,” in Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement (New York: Springer), 169–200.
80. Pekrun R. Frenzel A. C. Goetz T. Perry R. P. (2007). “The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions,” in Educational Psychology Series. Emotion in Education. Editors Schutz P. A. Pekrun R. (Cambridge, MA: Elsevier Academic Press), 13–36. 10.1016/B978–012372545–5/50003–410.1016/b978-012372545-5/50003-4
81. Pekrun R. Goetz T. Frenzel A. C. Barchfeld P. Perry R. P. (2011). Measuring Emotions in Students' Learning and Performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 36 (1), 36–48. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
82. Pekrun R. (2006). The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 18 (4), 315–341. 10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
83. Pellegrino J. W. DiBello L. V. Goldman S. R. (2016). A Framework for Conceptualizing and Evaluating the Validity of Instructionally Relevant Assessments. Educ. Psychol. 51 (1), 59–81. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1145550
84. Perikos I. Grivokostopoulou F. Hatzilygeroudis I. (2017). Assistance and Feedback Mechanism in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching Conversion of Natural Language into Logic. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 27 (3), 475–514. 10.1007/s40593-017-0139-y
85. Perrenoud P. (1998). From Formative Evaluation to a Controlled Regulation of Learning Processes. Towards a Wider Conceptual Field. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 5 (1), 85–102. 10.1080/0969595980050105
86. Peterson E. R. Brown G. T. L. Jun M. C. (2015). Achievement Emotions in Higher Education: A Diary Study Exploring Emotions across an Assessment Event. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 42, 82–96. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.05.002
87. Petty R. E. Briñol P. (2014). Emotion and Persuasion: Cognitive and Meta-Cognitive Processes Impact Attitudes. Cogn. Emot. 29 (1), 1–26. 10.1080/02699931.2014.967183
88. Rakoczy K. Harks B. Klieme E. Blum W. Hochweber J. (2013). Written Feedback in Mathematics: Mediated by Students' Perception, Moderated by Goal Orientation. Learn. Instruction 27, 63–73. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.002
89. Ramachandran L. Gehringer E. F. Yadav R. K. (2017). Automated Assessment of the Quality of Peer Reviews Using Natural Language Processing Techniques. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 27 (3), 534–581. 10.1007/s40593-016-0132-x
90. Ramaprasad A. (1983). On the Definition of Feedback. Syst. Res. 28 (1), 4–13. 10.1002/bs.3830280103
91. Robinson S. Pope D. Holyoak L. (2013). Can We Meet Their Expectations? Experiences and Perceptions of Feedback in First Year Undergraduate Students. Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 38 (3), 260–272. 10.1080/02602938.2011.629291
92. Ruiz–Primo M. A. Li M. (2013). “Examining Formative Feedback in the Classroom Context: New Research Perspectives,” in SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. Editor McMillan J. H. (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE), 215–232.
93. Sadler D. R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instr. Sci. 18 (2), 119–144. 10.1007/BF00117714
94. Sadler D. R. (1998). Formative Assessment: Revisiting the Territory. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 5 (1), 77–84. 10.1080/0969595980050104
95. Schimmel B. J. (1983). A Meta-Analysis of Feedback to Learners in Computerized and Programmed Instruction.
96. Shepard L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educ. Res. 29 (7), 4–14. 10.3102/0013189X029007004
97. Shute V. J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 78 (1), 153–189. 10.3102/0034654307313795
98. Stiggins R. (2005). From Formative Assessment to Assessment for Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-Based Schools. Phi Delta Kappan 87 (4), 324–328. 10.1177/003172170508700414
99. Tulis M. Steuer G. Dresel M. (2016). Learning from Errors: A Model of Individual Processes. Flr 4 (2), 12–26. 10.14786/flr.v4i2.168
100. Tunstall P. Gsipps C. (1996). Teacher Feedback to Young Children in Formative Assessment: A Typology. Br. Educ. Res. J. 22 (4), 389–404. 10.1080/0141192960220402
101. Van der Kleij F. M. Feskens R. C. W. Eggen T. J. H. M. (2015). Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students' Learning Outcomes. Rev. Educ. Res. 85 (4), 475–511. 10.3102/0034654314564881
102. Van der Kleij F. M. Lipnevich A. A. (2021). Student Perceptions of Assessment Feedback: A Critical Scoping Review and Call for Research. Educ. Asse Eval. Acc. 33, 345–373. 10.1007/s11092-020-09331-x
103. VandeWalle D. Cron W. L. Slocum J. W. Jr (2001). The Role of Goal Orientation Following Performance Feedback. J. Appl. Psychol. 86 (4), 629–640. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.629
104. Vogl E. Pekrun R. (2016). “Emotions that Matter to Achievement: Student Feelings about Assessment,” in Handbook of Social and Human Conditions in Assessment. Editors Brown G. T. L. Harris L. R. (New York: Routledge), 1–35.
105. Wang Z. Gong S. Y. Xu S. Hu X. E. (2019). Elaborated feedback and learning: Examining cognitive and motivational influences. Comput. Educ. 136, 130–140.
106. Weiner B. Heckhausen H. Meyer W. U. Cook R. E. (1972). Causal Ascriptions and Achievement Behavior: A Conceptual Analysis of Effort and Reanalysis of Locus of Control. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 21 (2), 239–248. 10.1037/h0032307
107. Weiner B. (1986). “An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion,” in An Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion (Springer), 159–190. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4948-1_6
108. Wiliam* D. Lee C. Harrison C. Black P. (2004). Teachers Developing Assessment for Learning: Impact on Student Achievement. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 11 (1), 49–65. 10.1080/0969594042000208994
109. Wiliam D. (2010). “An Integrative Summary of the Research Literature and Implications for a New Theory of Formative Assessment,” in Handbook of Formative Assessment. Editors Andrade H. L. Cizek G. J. (New York: Routledge), 18–40.
110. Wiliam D. (2013). “Feedback and Instructional Correctives,” in SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. Editor McMillan J. (Washington, DC: SAGE), 197.
111. Wiliam D. (2011). What Is Assessment for Learning. Stud. Educ. Eval. 37 (1), 3–14. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
112. Wingate U. (2010). The Impact of Formative Feedback on the Development of Academic Writing. Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 35 (5), 519–533. 10.1080/02602930903512909
113. Winstone N. Bourne J. Medland E. Niculescu I. Rees R. (2021). "Check the Grade, Log Out": Students' Engagement with Feedback in Learning Management Systems. Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 46 (4), 631–643. 10.1080/02602938.2020.1787331
114. Winstone N. E. Boud D. (2020). The Need to Disentangle Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education. Stud. Higher Educ., 1–12. 10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687
115. Winstone N. E. Nash R. A. Parker M. Rowntree J. (2017). Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educ. Psychol. 52 (1), 17–37. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
116. Wisniewski B. Zierer K. Hattie J. (2020). The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research. Front. Psychol. 10 (3087), 3087. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
117. Wolters C. A. Fan W. Daugherty S. G. (2013). Examining Achievement Goals and Causal Attributions Together as Predictors of Academic Functioning. J. Exp. Educ. 81 (3), 295–321. 10.1080/00220973.2012.700498
118. Zimmerman B. J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 81 (3), 329–339.