메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2022, Pages 656-667

The need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education

Author keywords

Assessment; feedback; formative; students; summative

Indexed keywords


EID: 85086946636     PISSN: 03075079     EISSN: 1470174X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (109)

References (59)
  • 1
    • 77951262697 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is the Feedback in Higher Education Assessment Worth the Paper it is Written on? Teachers’ Reflections on Their Practices
    • Bailey, R., and M. Garner. 2010. “ Is the Feedback in Higher Education Assessment Worth the Paper it is Written on? Teachers’ Reflections on Their Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2): 187–98. doi: 10.1080/13562511003620019
    • (2010) Teaching in Higher Education , vol.15 , Issue.2 , pp. 187-198
    • Bailey, R.1    Garner, M.2
  • 4
    • 77951197905 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumptions and Wasted Resources
    • Bloxham, S. 2009. “ Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumptions and Wasted Resources.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 209–20. doi: 10.1080/02602930801955978
    • (2009) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.34 , Issue.2 , pp. 209-220
    • Bloxham, S.1
  • 5
    • 79955553276 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the use of Interactive Cover Sheets
    • Bloxham, S., and L. Campbell. 2010. “ Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the use of Interactive Cover Sheets.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 291–300. doi: 10.1080/02602931003650045
    • (2010) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.35 , Issue.3 , pp. 291-300
    • Bloxham, S.1    Campbell, L.2
  • 6
    • 84924175383 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Calibration of Student Judgement Through Self-Assessment: Disruptive Effects of Assessment Patterns
    • Boud, D., R. Lawson, and D. G. Thompson. 2015. “ The Calibration of Student Judgement Through Self-Assessment: Disruptive Effects of Assessment Patterns.” Higher Education Research and Development 34 (1): 45–59. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934328
    • (2015) Higher Education Research and Development , vol.34 , Issue.1 , pp. 45-59
    • Boud, D.1    Lawson, R.2    Thompson, D.G.3
  • 7
    • 84879665126 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design
    • Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “ Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
    • (2013) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.38 , Issue.6 , pp. 698-712
    • Boud, D.1    Molloy, E.2
  • 8
    • 84961188187 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sustainable Assessment Revisited
    • Boud, D., and R. Soler. 2016. “ Sustainable Assessment Revisited.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (3): 400–13. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
    • (2016) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.41 , Issue.3 , pp. 400-413
    • Boud, D.1    Soler, R.2
  • 9
    • 34250028953 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluating Written Feedback
    • Bryan C., Clegg K., (eds), Abingdon: Routledge, and,. edited by
    • Brown, E., and C. Glover. 2006. “ Evaluating Written Feedback.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 101–11. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • (2006) Innovative Assessment in Higher Education , pp. 101-111
    • Brown, E.1    Glover, C.2
  • 10
    • 0040144890 scopus 로고
    • Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: The Effects of Task-Involving and ego-Involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance
    • Butler, R. 1988. “ Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: The Effects of Task-Involving and ego-Involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 58 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
    • (1988) British Journal of Educational Psychology , vol.58 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-14
    • Butler, R.1
  • 11
    • 79959432842 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices
    • Carless, D., D. Salter, M. Yang, and J. Lam. 2011. “ Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi: 10.1080/03075071003642449
    • (2011) Studies in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.4 , pp. 395-407
    • Carless, D.1    Salter, D.2    Yang, M.3    Lam, J.4
  • 12
    • 85042264633 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Marking and Providing Feedback Face-to-Face: Staff and Student Perspectives
    • Chalmers, C., E. Mowat, and M. Chapman. 2018. “ Marking and Providing Feedback Face-to-Face: Staff and Student Perspectives.” Active Learning in Higher Education 19 (1): 35–45. doi: 10.1177/1469787417721363
    • (2018) Active Learning in Higher Education , vol.19 , Issue.1 , pp. 35-45
    • Chalmers, C.1    Mowat, E.2    Chapman, M.3
  • 13
    • 84994128822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Refocusing Portfolio Assessment: Curating for Feedback and Portrayal
    • Clarke, J. L., and D. Boud. 2018. “ Refocusing Portfolio Assessment: Curating for Feedback and Portrayal.” Innovations in Education and Teaching Internationa 55 (4): 479–86. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1250664
    • (2018) Innovations in Education and Teaching Internationa , vol.55 , Issue.4 , pp. 479-486
    • Clarke, J.L.1    Boud, D.2
  • 14
    • 85039554241 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment Terms Half a Century in the Making and Unmaking: From Conceptual Ingenuity to Definitional Anarchy
    • Cookson, C. J. 2018. “ Assessment Terms Half a Century in the Making and Unmaking: From Conceptual Ingenuity to Definitional Anarchy.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (6): 930–42. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1420138
    • (2018) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.43 , Issue.6 , pp. 930-942
    • Cookson, C.J.1
  • 16
    • 79955513797 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘Feed-Forward’: Improving Students’ Use of Tutors’ Comments
    • Duncan, N. 2007. “ ‘Feed-Forward’: Improving Students’ Use of Tutors’ Comments.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (3): 271–83. doi: 10.1080/02602930600896498
    • (2007) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.32 , Issue.3 , pp. 271-283
    • Duncan, N.1
  • 17
    • 85112563410 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Designing for Productive Feedback: an Analysis of Two Undergraduate Courses in Biology and Engineering
    • Advance Online Publication
    • Esterhazy, R., M. Nerland, and C. Damşa. 2019. “ Designing for Productive Feedback: an Analysis of Two Undergraduate Courses in Biology and Engineering.” Teaching in Higher Education. Advance Online Publication.
    • (2019) Teaching in Higher Education
    • Esterhazy, R.1    Nerland, M.2    Damşa, C.3
  • 19
    • 79751474869 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Enhancing Student Appreciation of Written Feedback on Essay Assignments
    • Frankland S., (ed), Dordrecht: Springer, and,. edited by
    • Gomez, S., and R. Osborne. 2007. “ Enhancing Student Appreciation of Written Feedback on Essay Assignments.” In Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Assessment: Deriving an Appropriate Model, edited by S. Frankland, 40–50. Dordrecht: Springer.
    • (2007) Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Assessment: Deriving an Appropriate Model , pp. 40-50
    • Gomez, S.1    Osborne, R.2
  • 21
    • 85086218756 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Designing Feedback for Impact
    • Henderson M., Ajjawi R., Boud D., Molloy E., (eds), London: Palgrave Macmillan, and,. edited by
    • Henderson, M., E. Molloy, R. Ajjawi, and D. Boud. 2019a. “ Designing Feedback for Impact.” In The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education, edited by M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 267–85. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • (2019) The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education , pp. 267-285
    • Henderson, M.1    Molloy, E.2    Ajjawi, R.3    Boud, D.4
  • 23
    • 0010709236 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback
    • Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2001. “ Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback.” Teaching In Higher Education 6 (2): 269–74. doi: 10.1080/13562510120045230
    • (2001) Teaching In Higher Education , vol.6 , Issue.2 , pp. 269-274
    • Higgins, R.1    Hartley, P.2    Skelton, A.3
  • 24
    • 0036486748 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the Role of Assessment Feedback in Student Learning
    • Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2002. “ The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the Role of Assessment Feedback in Student Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (1): 53–64. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099368
    • (2002) Studies in Higher Education , vol.27 , Issue.1 , pp. 53-64
    • Higgins, R.1    Hartley, P.2    Skelton, A.3
  • 25
    • 85027514115 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Large-Scale Examination of the Effectiveness of Anonymous Marking in Reducing Group Performance Differences in Higher Education Assessment
    • Hinton, D. P., and H. Higson. 2017. “ A Large-Scale Examination of the Effectiveness of Anonymous Marking in Reducing Group Performance Differences in Higher Education Assessment.” PloS one 12: 8.
    • (2017) PloS one , vol.12 , pp. 8
    • Hinton, D.P.1    Higson, H.2
  • 26
    • 79957864153 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards a Personal Best: A Case for Introducing Ipsative Assessment in Higher Education
    • Hughes, G. 2011. “ Towards a Personal Best: A Case for Introducing Ipsative Assessment in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 353–67. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.486859
    • (2011) Studies in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.3 , pp. 353-367
    • Hughes, G.1
  • 27
    • 84927546835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving the Effectiveness of Feedback by Use of Assessed Reflections and Withholding of Grades
    • Jackson, M., and L. Marks. 2016. “ Improving the Effectiveness of Feedback by Use of Assessed Reflections and Withholding of Grades.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (4): 532–47. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1030588
    • (2016) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.41 , Issue.4 , pp. 532-547
    • Jackson, M.1    Marks, L.2
  • 28
    • 84911092508 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Written Feedback: What is It Good for and How Can We Do It Well?
    • Boud D., Molloy E., (eds), Abingdon: Routledge, and,. edited by
    • Jolly, B., and D. Boud. 2013. “ Written Feedback: What is It Good for and How Can We Do It Well? ” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by D. Boud and E. Molloy, 104–24. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • (2013) Feedback in Higher and Professional Education , pp. 104-124
    • Jolly, B.1    Boud, D.2
  • 29
    • 84866522173 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Student Feedback via Screen Capture Digital Video: Stimulating Student’s Modified Action
    • Jones, N., P. Georghiades, and J. Gunson. 2012. “ Student Feedback via Screen Capture Digital Video: Stimulating Student’s Modified Action.” Higher Education 64 (5): 593–607. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9514-7
    • (2012) Higher Education , vol.64 , Issue.5 , pp. 593-607
    • Jones, N.1    Georghiades, P.2    Gunson, J.3
  • 30
    • 84874008749 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Facilitating Productive Use of Feedback in Higher Education
    • Jönsson, A. 2013. “ Facilitating Productive Use of Feedback in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (1): 63–76. doi: 10.1177/1469787412467125
    • (2013) Active Learning in Higher Education , vol.14 , Issue.1 , pp. 63-76
    • Jönsson, A.1
  • 31
    • 84897749119 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Review of Assessment Feedback
    • Li, J., and R. De Luca. 2014. “ Review of Assessment Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 378–93. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.709494
    • (2014) Studies in Higher Education , vol.39 , Issue.2 , pp. 378-393
    • Li, J.1    De Luca, R.2
  • 32
    • 85047159853 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A Qualitative Synthesis of Video Feedback in Higher Education
    • Mahoney, P., S. Macfarlane, and R. Ajjawi. 2019. “ A Qualitative Synthesis of Video Feedback in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (2): 157–79. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1471457
    • (2019) Teaching in Higher Education , vol.24 , Issue.2 , pp. 157-179
    • Mahoney, P.1    Macfarlane, S.2    Ajjawi, R.3
  • 33
    • 84994499970 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bias in Grading: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research Findings
    • Malouff, J. M., and E. B. Thorsteinsson. 2016. “ Bias in Grading: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research Findings.” Australian Journal of Education 60 (3): 245–56. doi: 10.1177/0004944116664618
    • (2016) Australian Journal of Education , vol.60 , Issue.3 , pp. 245-256
    • Malouff, J.M.1    Thorsteinsson, E.B.2
  • 34
    • 85062788589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Student Access of Online Feedback is Modified by the Availability of Assessment Marks, Gender and Academic Performance
    • Mensink, P. J., and K. King. 2020. “ Student Access of Online Feedback is Modified by the Availability of Assessment Marks, Gender and Academic Performance.” British Journal of Educational Technology 51 (1): 10–22. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12752
    • (2020) British Journal of Educational Technology , vol.51 , Issue.1 , pp. 10-22
    • Mensink, P.J.1    King, K.2
  • 35
    • 85073945894 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy
    • Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2020. “ Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
    • (2020) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.45 , Issue.4 , pp. 527-540
    • Molloy, E.1    Boud, D.2    Henderson, M.3
  • 36
    • 85028976203 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Responsibility-sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback
    • Nash, R. A., and N. E. Winstone. 2017. “ Responsibility-sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519
    • (2017) Frontiers in Psychology , vol.8 , pp. 1519
    • Nash, R.A.1    Winstone, N.E.2
  • 37
    • 33645227268 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice
    • Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “ Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
    • (2006) Studies in Higher Education , vol.31 , Issue.2 , pp. 199-218
    • Nicol, D.J.1    Macfarlane-Dick, D.2
  • 38
    • 33750935169 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Biology Students’ Utilization of Tutors’ Formative Feedback: a Qualitative Interview Study
    • Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 2005. “ Biology Students’ Utilization of Tutors’ Formative Feedback: a Qualitative Interview Study.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 369–86. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099177
    • (2005) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.30 , Issue.4 , pp. 369-386
    • Orsmond, P.1    Merry, S.2    Reiling, K.3
  • 39
    • 85062796593 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Students’ Perceptions of Interventions for Supporting Their Engagement with Feedback
    • Parker, M., and N. E. Winstone. 2016. “ Students’ Perceptions of Interventions for Supporting Their Engagement with Feedback.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education 10 (1): 53–64.
    • (2016) Practitioner Research in Higher Education , vol.10 , Issue.1 , pp. 53-64
    • Parker, M.1    Winstone, N.E.2
  • 41
    • 85041798751 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Impact of Anonymous Marking on Students’ Perceptions of Fairness, Feedback and Relationships with Lecturers
    • Pitt, E., and N. Winstone. 2018. “ The Impact of Anonymous Marking on Students’ Perceptions of Fairness, Feedback and Relationships with Lecturers.” Assessment and& Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (7): 1183–93. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1437594
    • (2018) Assessment and& Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.43 , Issue.7 , pp. 1183-1193
    • Pitt, E.1    Winstone, N.2
  • 42
    • 62249175528 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effectiveness of Feedback: The Students’ Perspective
    • Poulos, A., and M. J. Mahony. 2008. “ Effectiveness of Feedback: The Students’ Perspective.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 143–54. doi: 10.1080/02602930601127869
    • (2008) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.33 , Issue.2 , pp. 143-154
    • Poulos, A.1    Mahony, M.J.2
  • 43
    • 84858425594 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement
    • Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “ Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–96. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
    • (2011) Studies in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.8 , pp. 879-896
    • Price, M.1    Handley, K.2    Millar, J.3
  • 45
    • 85026873698 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Misunderstandings and Mismatches: The Collective Disillusionment of Written Summative Assessment Feedback
    • Rand, J. 2017. “ Misunderstandings and Mismatches: The Collective Disillusionment of Written Summative Assessment Feedback.” Research in Education 97 (1): 33–48. doi: 10.1177/0034523717697519
    • (2017) Research in Education , vol.97 , Issue.1 , pp. 33-48
    • Rand, J.1
  • 46
    • 84992861873 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An Opinion Piece: A Possible Student-Centred Assessment Solution to Some of the Current Problems of Modular Degree Programmes
    • Rust, C. 2000. “ An Opinion Piece: A Possible Student-Centred Assessment Solution to Some of the Current Problems of Modular Degree Programmes.” Active Learning in Higher Education 1 (2): 126–31. doi: 10.1177/1469787400001002003
    • (2000) Active Learning in Higher Education , vol.1 , Issue.2 , pp. 126-131
    • Rust, C.1
  • 47
    • 0039921137 scopus 로고
    • Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems
    • Sadler, D. R. 1989. “ Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
    • (1989) Instructional Science , vol.18 , Issue.2 , pp. 119-144
    • Sadler, D.R.1
  • 48
    • 0002288111 scopus 로고
    • The Methodology of Evaluation
    • Tyler R.W., Gagné R.M., Scriven M., (eds), Chicago: Rand McNally,. edited by
    • Scriven, M. 1967. “ The Methodology of Evaluation.” In Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, edited by R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, and M. Scriven, 39–83. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    • (1967) Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation , pp. 39-83
    • Scriven, M.1
  • 49
    • 84874556762 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sink or Swim? Improving Student Learning Through Feedback and Self-Assessment
    • Sendziuk, P. 2010. “ Sink or Swim? Improving Student Learning Through Feedback and Self-Assessment.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 22 (3): 320–30.
    • (2010) International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education , vol.22 , Issue.3 , pp. 320-330
    • Sendziuk, P.1
  • 50
    • 28744447217 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment–Summative and Formative–Some Theoretical Reflections
    • Taras, M. 2005. “ Assessment–Summative and Formative–Some Theoretical Reflections.” British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4): 466–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
    • (2005) British Journal of Educational Studies , vol.53 , Issue.4 , pp. 466-478
    • Taras, M.1
  • 52
    • 84866453382 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Breaking the Feedback Loop: Problems with Anonymous Assessment
    • Whitelegg, D. 2002. “ Breaking the Feedback Loop: Problems with Anonymous Assessment.” Planet 5 (1): 7–8. doi: 10.11120/plan.2002.00050007
    • (2002) Planet , vol.5 , Issue.1 , pp. 7-8
    • Whitelegg, D.1
  • 53
    • 85084852515 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Facilitating Students’ Use of Feedback: Capturing and Tracking Impact Using Digital Tools
    • Henderson M., Ajjawi R., Boud D., Molloy E., (eds), London: Palgrave,. edited by
    • Winstone, N. E. 2019. “ Facilitating Students’ Use of Feedback: Capturing and Tracking Impact Using Digital Tools.” In The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education: Improving Assessment Outcomes for Learners, edited by M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 225–42. London: Palgrave.
    • (2019) The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education: Improving Assessment Outcomes for Learners , pp. 225-242
    • Winstone, N.E.1
  • 54
    • 85055163402 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Exploring Cultures of Feedback Practice: The Adoption of Learning-Focused Feedback Practices in the UK and Australia
    • Winstone, N., and D. Boud. 2019. “ Exploring Cultures of Feedback Practice: The Adoption of Learning-Focused Feedback Practices in the UK and Australia.” Higher Education Research and Development 38 (2): 411–25. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1532985
    • (2019) Higher Education Research and Development , vol.38 , Issue.2 , pp. 411-425
    • Winstone, N.1    Boud, D.2
  • 56
    • 84986220304 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes
    • Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, M. Parker, and J. Rowntree. 2017b. “ Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes.” Educational Psychologist 52 (1): 17–37. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
    • (2017) Educational Psychologist , vol.52 , Issue.1 , pp. 17-37
    • Winstone, N.E.1    Nash, R.A.2    Parker, M.3    Rowntree, J.4
  • 57
    • 84939485861 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What do Students Want Most from Written Feedback Information? Distinguishing Necessities from Luxuries Using a Budgeting Methodology
    • Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and R. Menezes. 2016. “ What do Students Want Most from Written Feedback Information? Distinguishing Necessities from Luxuries Using a Budgeting Methodology.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (8): 1237–53. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1075956
    • (2016) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.41 , Issue.8 , pp. 1237-1253
    • Winstone, N.E.1    Nash, R.A.2    Rowntree, J.3    Menezes, R.4
  • 58
    • 84954526598 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ‘It’d be Useful, But I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience
    • Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017a. “ ‘It’d be Useful, But I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–41. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032
    • (2017) Studies in Higher Education , vol.42 , Issue.11 , pp. 2026-2041
    • Winstone, N.E.1    Nash, R.A.2    Rowntree, J.3    Parker, M.4
  • 59
    • 84878658584 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes
    • Yang, M., and D. Carless. 2013. “ The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–97. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
    • (2013) Teaching in Higher Education , vol.18 , Issue.3 , pp. 285-297
    • Yang, M.1    Carless, D.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.