-
1
-
-
77951262697
-
Is the Feedback in Higher Education Assessment Worth the Paper it is Written on? Teachers’ Reflections on Their Practices
-
Bailey, R., and M. Garner. 2010. “ Is the Feedback in Higher Education Assessment Worth the Paper it is Written on? Teachers’ Reflections on Their Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2): 187–98. doi: 10.1080/13562511003620019
-
(2010)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.15
, Issue.2
, pp. 187-198
-
-
Bailey, R.1
Garner, M.2
-
4
-
-
77951197905
-
Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumptions and Wasted Resources
-
Bloxham, S. 2009. “ Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumptions and Wasted Resources.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 209–20. doi: 10.1080/02602930801955978
-
(2009)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.34
, Issue.2
, pp. 209-220
-
-
Bloxham, S.1
-
5
-
-
79955553276
-
Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the use of Interactive Cover Sheets
-
Bloxham, S., and L. Campbell. 2010. “ Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the use of Interactive Cover Sheets.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 291–300. doi: 10.1080/02602931003650045
-
(2010)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.35
, Issue.3
, pp. 291-300
-
-
Bloxham, S.1
Campbell, L.2
-
6
-
-
84924175383
-
The Calibration of Student Judgement Through Self-Assessment: Disruptive Effects of Assessment Patterns
-
Boud, D., R. Lawson, and D. G. Thompson. 2015. “ The Calibration of Student Judgement Through Self-Assessment: Disruptive Effects of Assessment Patterns.” Higher Education Research and Development 34 (1): 45–59. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934328
-
(2015)
Higher Education Research and Development
, vol.34
, Issue.1
, pp. 45-59
-
-
Boud, D.1
Lawson, R.2
Thompson, D.G.3
-
7
-
-
84879665126
-
Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design
-
Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “ Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
-
(2013)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.38
, Issue.6
, pp. 698-712
-
-
Boud, D.1
Molloy, E.2
-
9
-
-
34250028953
-
Evaluating Written Feedback
-
Bryan C., Clegg K., (eds), Abingdon: Routledge, and,. edited by
-
Brown, E., and C. Glover. 2006. “ Evaluating Written Feedback.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 101–11. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
(2006)
Innovative Assessment in Higher Education
, pp. 101-111
-
-
Brown, E.1
Glover, C.2
-
10
-
-
0040144890
-
Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: The Effects of Task-Involving and ego-Involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance
-
Butler, R. 1988. “ Enhancing and Undermining Intrinsic Motivation: The Effects of Task-Involving and ego-Involving Evaluation on Interest and Performance.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 58 (1): 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00874.x
-
(1988)
British Journal of Educational Psychology
, vol.58
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-14
-
-
Butler, R.1
-
11
-
-
79959432842
-
Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices
-
Carless, D., D. Salter, M. Yang, and J. Lam. 2011. “ Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi: 10.1080/03075071003642449
-
(2011)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.4
, pp. 395-407
-
-
Carless, D.1
Salter, D.2
Yang, M.3
Lam, J.4
-
12
-
-
85042264633
-
Marking and Providing Feedback Face-to-Face: Staff and Student Perspectives
-
Chalmers, C., E. Mowat, and M. Chapman. 2018. “ Marking and Providing Feedback Face-to-Face: Staff and Student Perspectives.” Active Learning in Higher Education 19 (1): 35–45. doi: 10.1177/1469787417721363
-
(2018)
Active Learning in Higher Education
, vol.19
, Issue.1
, pp. 35-45
-
-
Chalmers, C.1
Mowat, E.2
Chapman, M.3
-
13
-
-
84994128822
-
Refocusing Portfolio Assessment: Curating for Feedback and Portrayal
-
Clarke, J. L., and D. Boud. 2018. “ Refocusing Portfolio Assessment: Curating for Feedback and Portrayal.” Innovations in Education and Teaching Internationa 55 (4): 479–86. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1250664
-
(2018)
Innovations in Education and Teaching Internationa
, vol.55
, Issue.4
, pp. 479-486
-
-
Clarke, J.L.1
Boud, D.2
-
14
-
-
85039554241
-
Assessment Terms Half a Century in the Making and Unmaking: From Conceptual Ingenuity to Definitional Anarchy
-
Cookson, C. J. 2018. “ Assessment Terms Half a Century in the Making and Unmaking: From Conceptual Ingenuity to Definitional Anarchy.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (6): 930–42. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1420138
-
(2018)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.43
, Issue.6
, pp. 930-942
-
-
Cookson, C.J.1
-
15
-
-
85046102609
-
What Makes for Effective Feedback: Staff and Student Perspectives
-
Dawson, P., M. Henderson, P. Mahoney, M. Phillips, T. Ryan, D. Boud, and E. Molloy. 2019. “ What Makes for Effective Feedback: Staff and Student Perspectives.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1): 25–36. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877
-
(2019)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.44
, Issue.1
, pp. 25-36
-
-
Dawson, P.1
Henderson, M.2
Mahoney, P.3
Phillips, M.4
Ryan, T.5
Boud, D.6
Molloy, E.7
-
16
-
-
79955513797
-
‘Feed-Forward’: Improving Students’ Use of Tutors’ Comments
-
Duncan, N. 2007. “ ‘Feed-Forward’: Improving Students’ Use of Tutors’ Comments.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (3): 271–83. doi: 10.1080/02602930600896498
-
(2007)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.32
, Issue.3
, pp. 271-283
-
-
Duncan, N.1
-
17
-
-
85112563410
-
Designing for Productive Feedback: an Analysis of Two Undergraduate Courses in Biology and Engineering
-
Advance Online Publication
-
Esterhazy, R., M. Nerland, and C. Damşa. 2019. “ Designing for Productive Feedback: an Analysis of Two Undergraduate Courses in Biology and Engineering.” Teaching in Higher Education. Advance Online Publication.
-
(2019)
Teaching in Higher Education
-
-
Esterhazy, R.1
Nerland, M.2
Damşa, C.3
-
19
-
-
79751474869
-
Enhancing Student Appreciation of Written Feedback on Essay Assignments
-
Frankland S., (ed), Dordrecht: Springer, and,. edited by
-
Gomez, S., and R. Osborne. 2007. “ Enhancing Student Appreciation of Written Feedback on Essay Assignments.” In Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Assessment: Deriving an Appropriate Model, edited by S. Frankland, 40–50. Dordrecht: Springer.
-
(2007)
Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Assessment: Deriving an Appropriate Model
, pp. 40-50
-
-
Gomez, S.1
Osborne, R.2
-
21
-
-
85086218756
-
Designing Feedback for Impact
-
Henderson M., Ajjawi R., Boud D., Molloy E., (eds), London: Palgrave Macmillan, and,. edited by
-
Henderson, M., E. Molloy, R. Ajjawi, and D. Boud. 2019a. “ Designing Feedback for Impact.” In The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education, edited by M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 267–85. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
(2019)
The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education
, pp. 267-285
-
-
Henderson, M.1
Molloy, E.2
Ajjawi, R.3
Boud, D.4
-
23
-
-
0010709236
-
Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback
-
Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2001. “ Getting the Message Across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback.” Teaching In Higher Education 6 (2): 269–74. doi: 10.1080/13562510120045230
-
(2001)
Teaching In Higher Education
, vol.6
, Issue.2
, pp. 269-274
-
-
Higgins, R.1
Hartley, P.2
Skelton, A.3
-
24
-
-
0036486748
-
The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the Role of Assessment Feedback in Student Learning
-
Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2002. “ The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the Role of Assessment Feedback in Student Learning.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (1): 53–64. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099368
-
(2002)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.27
, Issue.1
, pp. 53-64
-
-
Higgins, R.1
Hartley, P.2
Skelton, A.3
-
25
-
-
85027514115
-
A Large-Scale Examination of the Effectiveness of Anonymous Marking in Reducing Group Performance Differences in Higher Education Assessment
-
Hinton, D. P., and H. Higson. 2017. “ A Large-Scale Examination of the Effectiveness of Anonymous Marking in Reducing Group Performance Differences in Higher Education Assessment.” PloS one 12: 8.
-
(2017)
PloS one
, vol.12
, pp. 8
-
-
Hinton, D.P.1
Higson, H.2
-
26
-
-
79957864153
-
Towards a Personal Best: A Case for Introducing Ipsative Assessment in Higher Education
-
Hughes, G. 2011. “ Towards a Personal Best: A Case for Introducing Ipsative Assessment in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (3): 353–67. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.486859
-
(2011)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.3
, pp. 353-367
-
-
Hughes, G.1
-
27
-
-
84927546835
-
Improving the Effectiveness of Feedback by Use of Assessed Reflections and Withholding of Grades
-
Jackson, M., and L. Marks. 2016. “ Improving the Effectiveness of Feedback by Use of Assessed Reflections and Withholding of Grades.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (4): 532–47. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1030588
-
(2016)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.41
, Issue.4
, pp. 532-547
-
-
Jackson, M.1
Marks, L.2
-
28
-
-
84911092508
-
Written Feedback: What is It Good for and How Can We Do It Well?
-
Boud D., Molloy E., (eds), Abingdon: Routledge, and,. edited by
-
Jolly, B., and D. Boud. 2013. “ Written Feedback: What is It Good for and How Can We Do It Well? ” In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education, edited by D. Boud and E. Molloy, 104–24. Abingdon: Routledge.
-
(2013)
Feedback in Higher and Professional Education
, pp. 104-124
-
-
Jolly, B.1
Boud, D.2
-
29
-
-
84866522173
-
Student Feedback via Screen Capture Digital Video: Stimulating Student’s Modified Action
-
Jones, N., P. Georghiades, and J. Gunson. 2012. “ Student Feedback via Screen Capture Digital Video: Stimulating Student’s Modified Action.” Higher Education 64 (5): 593–607. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9514-7
-
(2012)
Higher Education
, vol.64
, Issue.5
, pp. 593-607
-
-
Jones, N.1
Georghiades, P.2
Gunson, J.3
-
30
-
-
84874008749
-
Facilitating Productive Use of Feedback in Higher Education
-
Jönsson, A. 2013. “ Facilitating Productive Use of Feedback in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (1): 63–76. doi: 10.1177/1469787412467125
-
(2013)
Active Learning in Higher Education
, vol.14
, Issue.1
, pp. 63-76
-
-
Jönsson, A.1
-
31
-
-
84897749119
-
Review of Assessment Feedback
-
Li, J., and R. De Luca. 2014. “ Review of Assessment Feedback.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (2): 378–93. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.709494
-
(2014)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.39
, Issue.2
, pp. 378-393
-
-
Li, J.1
De Luca, R.2
-
32
-
-
85047159853
-
A Qualitative Synthesis of Video Feedback in Higher Education
-
Mahoney, P., S. Macfarlane, and R. Ajjawi. 2019. “ A Qualitative Synthesis of Video Feedback in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (2): 157–79. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1471457
-
(2019)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.24
, Issue.2
, pp. 157-179
-
-
Mahoney, P.1
Macfarlane, S.2
Ajjawi, R.3
-
33
-
-
84994499970
-
Bias in Grading: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research Findings
-
Malouff, J. M., and E. B. Thorsteinsson. 2016. “ Bias in Grading: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research Findings.” Australian Journal of Education 60 (3): 245–56. doi: 10.1177/0004944116664618
-
(2016)
Australian Journal of Education
, vol.60
, Issue.3
, pp. 245-256
-
-
Malouff, J.M.1
Thorsteinsson, E.B.2
-
34
-
-
85062788589
-
Student Access of Online Feedback is Modified by the Availability of Assessment Marks, Gender and Academic Performance
-
Mensink, P. J., and K. King. 2020. “ Student Access of Online Feedback is Modified by the Availability of Assessment Marks, Gender and Academic Performance.” British Journal of Educational Technology 51 (1): 10–22. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12752
-
(2020)
British Journal of Educational Technology
, vol.51
, Issue.1
, pp. 10-22
-
-
Mensink, P.J.1
King, K.2
-
35
-
-
85073945894
-
Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy
-
Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2020. “ Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955
-
(2020)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.45
, Issue.4
, pp. 527-540
-
-
Molloy, E.1
Boud, D.2
Henderson, M.3
-
36
-
-
85028976203
-
Responsibility-sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback
-
Nash, R. A., and N. E. Winstone. 2017. “ Responsibility-sharing in the Giving and Receiving of Assessment Feedback.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01519
-
(2017)
Frontiers in Psychology
, vol.8
, pp. 1519
-
-
Nash, R.A.1
Winstone, N.E.2
-
37
-
-
33645227268
-
Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice
-
Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “ Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
-
(2006)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.31
, Issue.2
, pp. 199-218
-
-
Nicol, D.J.1
Macfarlane-Dick, D.2
-
38
-
-
33750935169
-
Biology Students’ Utilization of Tutors’ Formative Feedback: a Qualitative Interview Study
-
Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 2005. “ Biology Students’ Utilization of Tutors’ Formative Feedback: a Qualitative Interview Study.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 369–86. doi: 10.1080/02602930500099177
-
(2005)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.30
, Issue.4
, pp. 369-386
-
-
Orsmond, P.1
Merry, S.2
Reiling, K.3
-
39
-
-
85062796593
-
Students’ Perceptions of Interventions for Supporting Their Engagement with Feedback
-
Parker, M., and N. E. Winstone. 2016. “ Students’ Perceptions of Interventions for Supporting Their Engagement with Feedback.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education 10 (1): 53–64.
-
(2016)
Practitioner Research in Higher Education
, vol.10
, Issue.1
, pp. 53-64
-
-
Parker, M.1
Winstone, N.E.2
-
40
-
-
84869384322
-
A Role for Technology in Enhancing Students’ Engagement with Feedback
-
Parkin, H. J., S. Hepplestone, G. Holden, B. Irwin, and L. Thorpe. 2012. “ A Role for Technology in Enhancing Students’ Engagement with Feedback.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 37 (8): 963–73. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2011.592934
-
(2012)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.37
, Issue.8
, pp. 963-973
-
-
Parkin, H.J.1
Hepplestone, S.2
Holden, G.3
Irwin, B.4
Thorpe, L.5
-
41
-
-
85041798751
-
The Impact of Anonymous Marking on Students’ Perceptions of Fairness, Feedback and Relationships with Lecturers
-
Pitt, E., and N. Winstone. 2018. “ The Impact of Anonymous Marking on Students’ Perceptions of Fairness, Feedback and Relationships with Lecturers.” Assessment and& Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (7): 1183–93. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1437594
-
(2018)
Assessment and& Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.43
, Issue.7
, pp. 1183-1193
-
-
Pitt, E.1
Winstone, N.2
-
42
-
-
62249175528
-
Effectiveness of Feedback: The Students’ Perspective
-
Poulos, A., and M. J. Mahony. 2008. “ Effectiveness of Feedback: The Students’ Perspective.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 143–54. doi: 10.1080/02602930601127869
-
(2008)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.33
, Issue.2
, pp. 143-154
-
-
Poulos, A.1
Mahony, M.J.2
-
43
-
-
84858425594
-
Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement
-
Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “ Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–96. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.483513
-
(2011)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.36
, Issue.8
, pp. 879-896
-
-
Price, M.1
Handley, K.2
Millar, J.3
-
44
-
-
79951861213
-
Feedback: All That Effort, But What is the Effect?
-
Price, M., K. Handley, J. Millar, and B. O’Donovan. 2010. “ Feedback: All That Effort, But What is the Effect? ” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 277–89. doi: 10.1080/02602930903541007
-
(2010)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.35
, Issue.3
, pp. 277-289
-
-
Price, M.1
Handley, K.2
Millar, J.3
O’Donovan, B.4
-
45
-
-
85026873698
-
Misunderstandings and Mismatches: The Collective Disillusionment of Written Summative Assessment Feedback
-
Rand, J. 2017. “ Misunderstandings and Mismatches: The Collective Disillusionment of Written Summative Assessment Feedback.” Research in Education 97 (1): 33–48. doi: 10.1177/0034523717697519
-
(2017)
Research in Education
, vol.97
, Issue.1
, pp. 33-48
-
-
Rand, J.1
-
46
-
-
84992861873
-
An Opinion Piece: A Possible Student-Centred Assessment Solution to Some of the Current Problems of Modular Degree Programmes
-
Rust, C. 2000. “ An Opinion Piece: A Possible Student-Centred Assessment Solution to Some of the Current Problems of Modular Degree Programmes.” Active Learning in Higher Education 1 (2): 126–31. doi: 10.1177/1469787400001002003
-
(2000)
Active Learning in Higher Education
, vol.1
, Issue.2
, pp. 126-131
-
-
Rust, C.1
-
47
-
-
0039921137
-
Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems
-
Sadler, D. R. 1989. “ Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00117714
-
(1989)
Instructional Science
, vol.18
, Issue.2
, pp. 119-144
-
-
Sadler, D.R.1
-
48
-
-
0002288111
-
The Methodology of Evaluation
-
Tyler R.W., Gagné R.M., Scriven M., (eds), Chicago: Rand McNally,. edited by
-
Scriven, M. 1967. “ The Methodology of Evaluation.” In Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, edited by R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, and M. Scriven, 39–83. Chicago: Rand McNally.
-
(1967)
Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation
, pp. 39-83
-
-
Scriven, M.1
-
50
-
-
28744447217
-
Assessment–Summative and Formative–Some Theoretical Reflections
-
Taras, M. 2005. “ Assessment–Summative and Formative–Some Theoretical Reflections.” British Journal of Educational Studies 53 (4): 466–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x
-
(2005)
British Journal of Educational Studies
, vol.53
, Issue.4
, pp. 466-478
-
-
Taras, M.1
-
52
-
-
84866453382
-
Breaking the Feedback Loop: Problems with Anonymous Assessment
-
Whitelegg, D. 2002. “ Breaking the Feedback Loop: Problems with Anonymous Assessment.” Planet 5 (1): 7–8. doi: 10.11120/plan.2002.00050007
-
(2002)
Planet
, vol.5
, Issue.1
, pp. 7-8
-
-
Whitelegg, D.1
-
53
-
-
85084852515
-
Facilitating Students’ Use of Feedback: Capturing and Tracking Impact Using Digital Tools
-
Henderson M., Ajjawi R., Boud D., Molloy E., (eds), London: Palgrave,. edited by
-
Winstone, N. E. 2019. “ Facilitating Students’ Use of Feedback: Capturing and Tracking Impact Using Digital Tools.” In The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education: Improving Assessment Outcomes for Learners, edited by M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, and E. Molloy, 225–42. London: Palgrave.
-
(2019)
The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education: Improving Assessment Outcomes for Learners
, pp. 225-242
-
-
Winstone, N.E.1
-
54
-
-
85055163402
-
Exploring Cultures of Feedback Practice: The Adoption of Learning-Focused Feedback Practices in the UK and Australia
-
Winstone, N., and D. Boud. 2019. “ Exploring Cultures of Feedback Practice: The Adoption of Learning-Focused Feedback Practices in the UK and Australia.” Higher Education Research and Development 38 (2): 411–25. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2018.1532985
-
(2019)
Higher Education Research and Development
, vol.38
, Issue.2
, pp. 411-425
-
-
Winstone, N.1
Boud, D.2
-
56
-
-
84986220304
-
Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes
-
Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, M. Parker, and J. Rowntree. 2017b. “ Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes.” Educational Psychologist 52 (1): 17–37. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
-
(2017)
Educational Psychologist
, vol.52
, Issue.1
, pp. 17-37
-
-
Winstone, N.E.1
Nash, R.A.2
Parker, M.3
Rowntree, J.4
-
57
-
-
84939485861
-
What do Students Want Most from Written Feedback Information? Distinguishing Necessities from Luxuries Using a Budgeting Methodology
-
Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and R. Menezes. 2016. “ What do Students Want Most from Written Feedback Information? Distinguishing Necessities from Luxuries Using a Budgeting Methodology.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (8): 1237–53. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1075956
-
(2016)
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
, vol.41
, Issue.8
, pp. 1237-1253
-
-
Winstone, N.E.1
Nash, R.A.2
Rowntree, J.3
Menezes, R.4
-
58
-
-
84954526598
-
‘It’d be Useful, But I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience
-
Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017a. “ ‘It’d be Useful, But I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–41. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032
-
(2017)
Studies in Higher Education
, vol.42
, Issue.11
, pp. 2026-2041
-
-
Winstone, N.E.1
Nash, R.A.2
Rowntree, J.3
Parker, M.4
-
59
-
-
84878658584
-
The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes
-
Yang, M., and D. Carless. 2013. “ The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–97. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154
-
(2013)
Teaching in Higher Education
, vol.18
, Issue.3
, pp. 285-297
-
-
Yang, M.1
Carless, D.2
|