Feedback and instructional correctives

SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 197-214

  Wiliam, Dylan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84899078765     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218649.n12     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Allal, L., & Lopez, L. M. (2005). Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French. In J.Looney (ed.), Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 241-264). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
2. Anderson, R. C., Kulhavy, R. W., & Andre, T. (1971). Feedback procedures in programmed instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 62, 148-156.
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.
4. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
5. Bart, W. M., Post, T., Behr, M. J., & Lesh, R. (1994). A diagnostic analysis of a proportional reasoning test item: An introduction to the properties of a semi-dense item. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 16(3), 1-11.
6. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 18(1), 5-25.
7. Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
8. Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139-148.
9. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.
10. Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 149-167.
11. Boekaerts, M. (2006). Self-regulation and effort investment. In K. A.Renninger & I. E.Sigel (eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (6th ed., pp. 345-377). New York: John Wiley.
12. Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice. Teachers College Record, 106(3), 429-458.
13. Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative classroom assessment: A review of the literature. In J. H.McMillan (ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 43-62). New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
15. Clymer, J. B., & Wiliam, D. (2006/2007). Improving the way we grade science. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 36-42.
16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.
18. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1994). Promoting self-determined education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 38(1), 3-14.
19. Dempster, F. N. (1991). Synthesis of research on reviews and tests. Educational Leadership, 48(7), 71-76.
20. Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist?Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
21. Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
22. Elshout-Mohr, M. (1994). Feedback in self-instruction. European Education, 26(2), 58-73.
23. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation-a meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53(3), 199-208.
24. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (eds.). (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Hattie, J. (1999, August 2). Influences on student learning. Retrieved from http://www.education.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/education/staff/j.hattie/papers/influences.cfm
26. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
27. Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically umotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
28. Kingston, N. M., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28-37.
29. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
30. Köller, O. (2005). Formative assessment in classrooms: A review of the empirical German literature. In J.Looney (ed.), Formative assessment: improving learning in secondary classrooms (pp. 265-279). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
31. Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 211-232.
32. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58(1), 79-97.
33. Levins, R. (1966). The strategy of model building in population biology. American Scientist, 54(4), 421-431.
34. Looney, J. (ed.). (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
35. Mencken, H. L. (1920). The divine afflatus. In H. L.Mencken (ed.), Prejudices: second series (Rev. ed., pp. 155-171). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
36. National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Glossary of RTI terms. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/RTIGlossary#RTI
37. Natriello, G. (1987). The impact of evaluation processes on students. Educational Psychologist, 22(2), 155-175.
38. Nyquist, J. B. (2003). The benefits of reconstruing feedback as a larger system of formative assessment: A meta-analysis. Unpublished master of science thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
39. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4-13.
40. Rheinberg, F. (1980). Achievement evaluation and learning motivation. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
41. Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1987). Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(6), 623-637.
42. Schimmel, B. J. (1983, April). A meta-analysis of feedback to learners in computerized and programmed instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association held at Montreal, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 233708)
43. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
44. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
45. Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. M. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement. In W. M.Reynolds & G. J.Miller (eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 7. Educational psychology (pp. 177-198). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
46. Vinner, S. (1997). From intuition to inhibition-mathematics, education and other endangered species. In E.Pehkonen (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 63-78). Lahti, Finland: University of Helsinki Lahti Research and Training Centre.
47. von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. In C.Janvier (ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 3-17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48. Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: John Wiley.
49. Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track: Classroom assessment and the regulation of learning. In F. K.LesterJr. (ed.), Second handbook of mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053-1098). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
50. Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. L.Andrade & G. J.Cizek (eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18-40). New York: Routledge.
51. Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
52. Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. J. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice, 11(1), 49-65.