Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students' perception, moderated by goal orientation

Learning and Instruction

Volumn 27, Issue , 2013, Pages 63-73

  Rakoczy, Katrin ^a   Harks, Birgit ^a   Klieme, Eckhard ^a   Blum, Werner ^b   Hochweber, Jan ^a  

^a GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Feedback; Mastery approach goal orientation; Mathematics; Perceived competence; Perceived usefulness

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877314373     PISSN: 09594752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Bandura A. Self efficacy: The exercise of control 1997, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Bangert-Drowns R.L., Kulik C.-L.C., Kulik J.A., Morgan M.T. The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research 1991, 61:231-238. 10.3102/00346543061002213.
3. Besser M., Blum W., Klimczak M. Formative assessment in every-day teaching of mathematical modelling: implementation of written and oral feedback to competency-oriented tasks. ICTMA-15 Proceedings 2012, Springer, New York. G. Stillman, W. Blum, J. Brown, G. Kaiser (Eds.).
4. Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education 1998, 5:7-68. 10.1080/0969595980050102.
5. Blum W., Drüke-Noe C., Hartung R., Köller O. Bildungsstandards Mathematik: konkret. Sekundarstufe I: Aufgabenbeispiele, Unterrichtsanregungen, Fortbildungsideen 2006, Cornelsen-Scriptor, Berlin, Germany.
6. Brett J.F., Atwater L.E. 360° Feedback: accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86:930-942. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930.
7. Butler D.L., Winne P.H. Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 1995, 65:245-281. 10.3102/00346543065003245.
8. Butler R. Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 1987, 79:474-482. 10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.474.
9. Cizek G.J., Rachor R.E., Fitzgerald S.M. Teachers' assessment practices: preparation, isolation, and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment 1996, 3:159-179. 10.1207/s15326977ea0302_3.
10. Deci E.L., Koestner R., Ryan R.M. Ameta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:627-668. 10.1037//0033-2909.125.6.627.
11. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior 1985, Plenum Press, New York.
12. Deci E.L., Ryan R.M. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 2000, 11:227-268. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
13. Dempsey J., Driscoll M., Swindell L. Text-based feedback. Interactive instruction and feedback 1993, 21-54. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. J. Dempsey, G. Sales (Eds.).
14. Dresel, M., Ziegler, A. Failure as an element of adaptive learning. Paper presented at the Eighth Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Adolescence, Oxford, UK, September 2002.
15. Dresel M., Ziegler A. Zur Abhängigkeit handlungsadaptiver Reaktionen nach Misserfolg von Attributionsstil, Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept, Impliziter Fähigkeitstheorie, Zielorientierungen und Interesse September 2007, Vortrag auf der 11, Tagung der Fachgruppe Pädagogische Psychologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPS), Berlin, Germany.
16. Dweck C.S. Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist 1986, 41:1040-1048. 10.1037//0003-066X.41.10.1040.
17. Elliot A.J. Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist 1999, 34:169-189. 10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3.
18. Elliot A.J., Faler J., McGregor H.A., Campbell W.K., Sedikies C., Harackiewicz J.M. Competence valuation as a strategic intrinsic motivational process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2000, 26:780-794. 10.1177/0146167200269004.
19. Elliot A.J., McGregor H.A. A2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 80:501-519. 10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501.
20. Evans C., Waring M. Student teacher assessment feedback preferences: the influence of cognitive styles and gender. Learning and Individual Differences 2011, 21:271-280. 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.11.011.
21. Fisher S.L., Ford J.K. Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology 1998, 51:397-420. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00731.x.
22. Ford J.K., Smith E.M., Weissbein D.A., Gully S.M., Salas E. Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. Journal of Applied Psychology 1998, 83:218-233. 10.1037//0021-9010.83.2.218.
23. Gibbs G., Simpson C. Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 2004, 1:3-31.
24. Gielen S., Peeters E., Dochy F., Onghena P., Struyven K. Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20:304-315. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007.
25. Harks, B., Klieme, E., Hartig, J., Leiss, D. The assessment of mathematical competence: the role of cognition and content domain, submitted for publication.
26. Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Klieme, E., Besser, M. Feedback effects on achievement, interest, and self-evaluation - the role of feedback's perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology, in press.
27. Hattie J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement 2009, Routledge, New York, NY.
28. Hattie J., Timperley H. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 2007, 77:81-112. 10.3102/003465430298487.
29. Hiebert J., Gallimore R., Garnier H., Givvin K.B., Hollingsworth H., Jacobs J., et al. Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study 2003, NCES (2003-013), U.S. Department of Education/National Center for Education Statistics, Washington DC.
30. Higgins R., Hartley P., Skelton A. The conscientious consumer: recognising the role of feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education 2002, 27:53-64. 10.1080/03075070120099368.
31. Hox J.J. Multilevel analyses: Techniques and applications 2010, Erlbaum, Mahwah.
32. Ilgen D.R., Fisher C.D., Taylor M.S. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 1979, 64(4):349-371. 10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349.
33. Kim S.-I., Lee M.-J., Chung Y., Bong M. Comparison of brain activation during norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced feedback: the role of perceived competence and performance approach goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2010, 35:141-152. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.04.002.
34. Klieme E., Bürgermeister A., Harks B., Blum W., Leiss D., Rakoczy K. Leistungsbeurteilung und Kompetenzmodellierung im Mathematikunterricht. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 2010, 56(Beiheft):64-74.
35. Kline R.B. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2005, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
36. Kluger A.N., DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 1996, 119:256-284. 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254.
37. Krapp A. Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction 2005, 15:381-395. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.007.
38. Krause U.-M., Stark R., Mandl H. The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction 2009, 19:158-170. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.003.
39. Kunter M., Baumert J., Köller O. Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction 2007, 17:494-509. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.002.
40. MacKinnon D.P., Lockwood C.M., William J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research 2004, 39:99-128. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
41. Meece J.L. The classroom context and students' motivational goals. Goals and self-regulatory processes 1991, Vol. 7:261-285. JAI Press, Greenwich.
42. Miserandino M. Children who do well in school: individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology 1996, 88:203-214. 10.1037//0022-0663.88.2.203.
43. Mueller R.O., Hancock G.R. Structural equation modeling. The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences 2010, 371-383. Routledge, New York. G.R. Hancock, R.O. Mueller (Eds.).
44. Muthén B.O., Satorra A. Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology 1995, 25:267-316.
45. Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. Mplus user's guide (version 5.0) 1998-2007, [Computer software], Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
46. Narciss S. Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology 2008, 125-144. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 3rd ed. J.M. Spector, M.D. Merrill, J.J.G. van Merrienboer, M.P. Driscoll (Eds.).
47. Narciss S., Huth K. How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. Instructional design for multimedia learning 2004, 181-195. Waxmann, Münster, Germany. H.M. Niegemann, D. Leutner, R. Brünken (Eds.).
48. Narciss S., Huth K. Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction. Learning and Instruction 2006, 16:310-322. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.003.
49. Nicholls J.G. Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review 1984, 91:328-346. 10.1037//0033-295X.91.3.328.
50. Nicol D.J., MacFarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education 2006, 31:199-218. 10.1080/03075070600572090.
51. Peterson E.R., Irving S.E. Secondary school students' conceptions of assessment and feedback. Learning and Instruction 2008, 18:238-250. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.05.001.
52. Preacher K.J., Hayes A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:879-891. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
53. Rakoczy K., Buff A., Lipowsky F. Befragungsinstrumente. Materialien zur Bildungsforschung 2005, Vol. 13. [Questionnaires], GFPF, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E. Klieme, C. Pauli, K. Reusser (Eds.).
54. Reeve J. Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. Handbook of self-determination research 2002, 183-203. University Press, Rochester. E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan (Eds.).
55. Rheinberg F., Vollmeyer R., Burns B.D. FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. Diagnostica 2001, 47:57-66. 10.1026//0012-1924.47.2.57.
56. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Authors response: the darker and brighter sides of human existence: basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory 2000, 11:319-338. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03.
57. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. An overview of self-determination theory: an organismic-dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research 2002, 3-33. University Press, Rochester. E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan (Eds.).
58. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Promoting self-determined school engagement: motivation, learning, and well-being. Handbook on motivation at school 2009, 171-196. Routledge, New York. K.R. Wentzel, A. Wigfield (Eds.).
59. Sansone C. Aquestion of competence: the effects of competence and task feedback on intrinsic interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:918-931. 10.1037//0022-3514.51.5.918.
60. Sansone C. Competence feedback, task feedback, and intrinsic interest: an examination of process and context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1989, 25:343-361. 10.1016/0022-1031(89)90027-9.
61. Sansone C., Smith J.L. Commentaries on "The 'what' and 'why' of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior". Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory 2000, 11:269-318.
62. Schafer J.L., Graham J.W. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods 2002, 7:147-177. 10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147.
63. Shute V.J. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 2008, 78(1):153-189. 10.3102/0034654307313795.
64. Spinath B., Stiensmeier-Pelster J., Schöne C., Dickhäuser O. Skalen zur Erfassung der Lern- und Leistungsmotivation - SELLMO 2002, Hogrefe, Göttingen, Germany.
65. Strijbos J.W., Narciss S., Dünnebier K. Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?. Learning and Instruction 2010, 20:291-303. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008.
66. Turner R., Dossey J., Blum W., Niss M. Using mathematical competencies to predict item difficulty in PISA: a MEG study. Research in the context of the programme for international student assessment 2012, Waxmann, Münster. M. Prenzel, M. Kobarg, K. Schöps, S. Rönnebeck (Eds.).
67. Vallerand R.J., Reid G. On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: a test of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Sport Psychology 1984, 6:94-102.
68. VandeWalle D. Why wanting to look successful doesn't always lead to success. Organizational Dynamics 2001, 30:162-171. 10.1016/S0090-2616(01).
69. Wigfield A., Eccles J.S. Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 2000, 25:68-81. 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.
70. Wu M.L., Adams R.J., Wilson M.R. ConQuest: Multi-aspect test software 1998, [Computer software], Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell.