Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the interactive tutoring feedback model

Digital Education Review

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 7-26

  Narciss, Susanne ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital learning; Formative tutoring feedback; Interactive instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880131124     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20139144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Psychology, 62, 148-156.
2. Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R., (Eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
3. Arroyo, I. Woolf, B.P., & Beal, C.R. (2006). Addressing cognitive differences and gender during problem solving. International Journal of Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 4, 31-63.;
4. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Royer, J.M., Tai, M., Muldner, K., Burleson, W., & Cooper, D. (2011). The Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents on Girls' and Boys' Emotions, Attitudes, Behaviors and Learning. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) (pp. 506-510). doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2011.157
5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co
7. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learnig. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74.
8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31.
9. Boekaerts, M. (1996). Self-regulated learning at the junction of cognition and motivation. European Psychologist, 1, 100-112.
10. Brown, J. S. & VanLehn, K. (1980). Repair theory: A generative theory of bugs in procedural skills. Cognitive Science, 4, 379-426.
11. Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J. & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. Oxford, England: John Wiley and Sons.
12. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
13. Chinn, C.A., & Brewer, W.F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
14. Collins, M., Carnine, D. & Gersten, R. (1987). Elaborated corrective feedback and the acquisition of reasoning skills: A study of computer-assisted instruction. Exceptional Children, 54, 254-262.
15. Eichelmann, A., Andres, E., Schnaubert, L., Narciss, S., & Sosnovsky, S. (2012). Interaktive Fehler-Finde-und-Korrektur-Aufgaben - Eine Akzeptanz- und Usability-Studie bei Sechst- und Siebtklässlern. In G. Csanyi, F. Reichl, & A. (Hrsg.), Digitale Medien Werkzeuge für exzellente Forschung und Lehre (S. 401-412). Münster: Waxmann.
16. Eichelmann, A., Narciss, S., Schnaubert, L., & Melis, E. (2012). Typische Fehler und Fehlerquellen bei der Addition und Subtraktion von Brüchen - Ein Review zu empirischen Fehleranalysen. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 33, 29-57.
17. Eichelmann, A., Narciss, S., Schnaubert, L., Melis, E. & Goguadze, G. (2011). Design und Evaluation von interaktiven webbasierten Bruchrechenaufgaben. In H. Rohland, A. Kienle & S. Friedrich (Hrsg.), DeLFI 2011 - Die 9. e-Learning Fachtagung Informatik (S. 31-42). Bonn: Köllen Verlag.
18. Eichelmann, A., Narciss, S., Faulhaber, A., & Melis, E. (2008). Analyzing computer-based fraction tasks on the basis of a two-dimensional view of mathematics competencies. In J. Zumbach, N. Schwartz, T. Seufert, & L. Kester (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: The legacy of competence. Meaningful computer-based learning environments (pp. 125-134). Dordrecht: Springer.
19. th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 73-80).;
20. Goodman, J.S., Wood, R.E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Feedback specificity, information processing, and transfer of training. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 115 253-267.
21. Hattie, J.A. (2009). Visible Learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London & New York: Routledge.
22. Hattie, J.A., & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on Feedback. In Mayer, R & Alexander, P. (Eds). Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction (pp. 249-271). New York: Routledge
23. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
24. Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. Heidelberg: Springer.
25. Hoska, D. M. (1993). Motivating learners trough CBI feedback: Developing a positive learner perspective. In J. V. Dempsey, & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 105-131). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
26. Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., & Hannum, W. H. (1999). Classifying knowledge and skills from task analysis. In D. H. Jonassen, M. Tessmer, & W. H. Hannum (Eds.), Task analysis methods for instructional design (pp. 25-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Klieme, E., Leutner, D., & Kenk, M. (2010). Kompetenzmodellierung. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. 56, 9-11.
28. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). Effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284. (Pubitemid 126042646)
29. Kulhavy, R. W. & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 279-308.
30. Mathan, S.A., & Koedinger, K.R. (2005). Fostering the intelligent novice: Learning from errors with meta-cognitive tutoring. Educational Psychologist, 40, 257-265. (Pubitemid 43266594)
31. McKendree, J. (1990). Effective feedback content for tutoring complex skills. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 381-413.
32. Melis, E., Faulhaber, A., Eichelmann, A., & Narciss, S. (2008). Interoperable Competencies Characterizing Learning Objects in Mathematics. In B. Woolf et al. (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring System, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5091 (pp. 416-425). Berlin: Springer.
33. Melis, E., Goguadze, G., Homik, M., Libbrecht, P., Ullrich, C. and Winterstein, S. (2006), Semantic-aware components and services of ActiveMath. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37: 405-423. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00613.x
34. Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Ranney, M., & Trafton, J. G. (1992). Effective tutoring techniques: A comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2, 277-305.
35. Mitrovic, A., Ohlsson, S., & Barrow, D.K. (2013). The effect of positive feedback in a constraint-based intelligent tutoring system. Computers & Education, 60, 264-272.
36. nd Edition) (pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 214-228. (Pubitemid 38904307)
38. Narciss, S. (2006). Informatives tutorielles Feedback. Entwicklungs- und Evaluationsprinzipien auf der Basis instruktionspsychologischer Erkenntnisse. Reihe Pädagogische Psychologie und Entwicklungspsychologie, Band 56. Münster: Waxmann.
39. rd ed., pp. 125-144). Mahaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Narciss, S. (2012a). Feedback in instructional contexts. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Learning Sciences, Volume F(6), pp. 1285-1289. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.
41. Narciss, S. (2012b). Feedback strategies. In N. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Learning Sciences, Volume F(6), pp. 1289-1293. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, LLC.
42. Narciss, S. & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning. In H. M. Niegemann, D. Leutner & R. Brünken (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195). Münster: Waxmann.
43. Narciss, S. & Huth, K. (2006). Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training on written subtraction. Learning and Instruction, 16, 310-322. (Pubitemid 44317673)
44. Narciss, S., Körndle, H. Reimann, G., & Müller. C. (2004). Feedback-seeking and feedback efficiency in web-based learning - How do they relate to task and learner characteristics? In P. Gerjets, P.A. Kirschner, J. Elen, & R. Joiner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning. Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers (pp. 377-388). Tuebingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
45. Narciss, S., Proske, A. & Körndle, H. (2007). Promoting Self-regulated learning in Web-based Learning Environments. Computers and Human Behavior. 23, 1126-1144. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.006 (Pubitemid 46073602)
46. Narciss, S., Schnaubert, L., Andres, E., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Sosnovsky, S. (2013). Exploring feedback and student characteristics relevant for personalizing feedback strategies. Manuscript submitted for publication to Computers & Education.
47. Nicol, D.J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218.
48. Pressley, M. (1986). The relevance of the good strategy user model to the teaching of mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 21, 139-161.
49. Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O'Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 277-289
50. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4-13.
51. Sadler, D.R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
52. Salas, S. B. & Dickinson, D. J. (1990). The effect of feedback and three different types of corrections on student learning. Journal of Human Behavior & Learning, 7, 13-19.
53. Schimmel, B. J. (1988). Providing meaningful feedback in courseware. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware (pp. 183-195). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54. Schnaubert, L., Andrès, E., Narciss, S., Eichelmann, A., Goguadze, G., & Melis, E. (2011). Student Behavior in Error-Correction-Tasks and Its Relation to Perception of Competence. In C. Delago Kloos, D. Gillet, R. Crespo Garcìa, F. Wild, & M. Wolpers (Eds.) Towards Ubiquitous Learning, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (pp. 370-383). Berlin: Springer.
55. Shute, V.J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.
56. Strijbos, J.W., Narciss, S., & Duennebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20, 291-303.
57. Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9, 1-15.
58. VanLehn, K. (1990). Mind bugs: The origins of procedural misconceptions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
59. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., & Wintersgill, M. (2005). The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15 147-204.
60. VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist, 46, 197-221.
61. Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Oxford, England: Houghton Mifflin.
62. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
63. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Development of achievement motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
64. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Wittmann, G. (2013). The consistency of students' error patterns in solving computational problems with fractions. Retrieved 3.3.2013 from http://cerme8.metu.edu.tr/wgpapers/WG2/WG2Wittmann.pdf