Examining formative feedback in the classroom context: New research perspectives

SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 215-232

  Ruiz Primo, Maria Araceli ^a   Li, Min ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879673743     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452218649.n13     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Andrade, H. L. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. L.Andrade & G. J.Cizek (eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). New York: Routledge.
2. Angrosino, M. V., & May de Pérez, K. A. (2000). Rethinking observation: From method to context. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S.Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 673-702). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Askew, S. (ed.). (2000). Feedback for learning. New York: Routledge.
4. Askew, S., & Lodge, S. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops-linking feedback and learning. In S.Askew (ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 17-32). New York: Routledge.
5. Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995). A meta-analysis of the effect of feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 109-125.
6. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C-L., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. T. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
7. Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Black, P. (2001). Dreams, strategies and systems: Portraits of assessment past, present and future. Assessment in Education, 8(1), 65-85.
9. Black, P. (2003). The importance of everyday assessment. In J. M.Atkin & J. E.Coffey (eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 1-11). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
10. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
12. Bower, M. (2005). Online assessment feedback: Competitive, individualistic, or … preferred form Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(2), 121-147.
13. Brookhart, S. M. (2001). Successful students' formative and summative uses of assessment information. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(2), 153-169.
14. Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 22(4), 5-12.
15. Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Feedback that fits. Educational Leadership, 65(4), 54-59.
16. Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Exploring formative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17. Brookhart, S. M., Moss, C. M., & Long, B. A. (2009). Promoting student ownership of learning through high-impact formative assessment practices. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 6(12), 52-67.
18. Brosvic, G. M., Dihoff, R. E., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. L. (2006). Feedback facilitates the acquisition and retention of numerical fact series by elementary school students with mathematics learning disabilities. Psychological Record, 56(1), 35-54.
19. Butler, R., & Neuman, O. (1995). Effects of task and ego achievement goals on help-seeking behaviors and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 261-271.
20. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.
21. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363-423.
22. Carnell, E., (2000). Dialogue, discussion and feedback-views of secondary school students on how others help their learning. In S.Askow (ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 56-69). New York: Routledge.
23. Clarke, S. (2000). Getting it right-distance marking as accessible and effective feedback in the primary classroom. In S.Askow (ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 44-55). New York: Routledge.
24. Coffey, J. E. (2003). Involving students in assessment. In J. M.Atkin & J. E.Coffey (eds.), Everyday assessment in the science classroom (pp. 75-87). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
25. Cowie, B. (2005a). Student commentary on classroom assessment in science: A sociocultural interpretation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 199-214.
26. Cowie, B. (2005b). Pupil commentary on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 6(2), 137-151.
27. Gipps, C., Brown, M., McCallum, B., & McAlister, S. (1995). Intuition or evidence? Teachers and national assessment of seven years old. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
28. Gipps, C., McCallum, B., & Hargreaves, E. (2000). What makes a good primary school teacher: Expert classroom strategies. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
29. Hargreaves, E., McCallum, B., & Gipps, C. (2000). Teacher feedback strategies in primary classrooms-new evidence. In S.Askow (ed.), Feedback for learning (pp. 34-43). New York: Routledge.
30. Hattie, J. (1999, August). Influences on student learning. Inaugural lecture, University of Auckland. Retrieved from http://www.arts.aucklandac.nz/staff/index.cfm?P=5049
31. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-113.
32. Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment. Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
33. Inagaki, K., Hatano, G., & Morita, E. (1998). Construction of mathematical knowledge through whole-class discussion. Learning and Instruction, 8, 503-526.
34. Jordan, B., & Putz, P. (2004). Assessment as practice: Notes on measures, tests, and targets. Human Organization, 63, 346-358.
35. Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
36. Kulhavy, R. W. (1977). Feedback in written instruction. Review of Educational Research, 47, 211-232.
37. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97.
38. Laboratory for Comparative Human Cognition. (2010). Cultural-historical activity theory. In P.Peterson, E.Baker, & B.McGaw, (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Vol. 6, pp. 360-366). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
39. Li, M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Yin, Y., & Morozov, A. (2011, April). Identifying effective feedback practices on student learning of mathematics: A literature synthesis. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
40. Minstrell, J., Li, M., & Anderson, R. (2009). Evaluating science teachers' formative assessment competency. Technical report, Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
41. Morozov, A., Yin, Y., Li, M., & Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2010, April). Effects of classroom feedback practice on motivational outcomes: A synthesis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
42. Moss, P. A. (2008). Sociocultural implications for the practice of assessment I: Classroom assessment. In P. A.Moss, D.Pullin, J. P.Gee, E. H.Haertel, & L. J.Young (eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 222-258). New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Nichols, P. D., Meyers, J. L., & Burling, K. S. (2009). A framework for evaluating and planning assessments intended to improve. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 14-23.
44. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199-218.
45. Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4-13.
46. Rosenbaum, P. R. (1995). Observational studies. New York: Springer.
47. Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. In A.Wenden & J.Rubin (eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 15-30). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2010). Developing and evaluating measures of formative assessment practice (DEMFAP) theoretical and methodological approach. Internal manuscript, Denver, CO: University of Colorado Denver, Laboratory for Educational Assessment, Research, and InnovatioN (LEARN).
49. Ruiz-Primo, M. A. (2011). Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students' learning [Special issue]. Assessment for Learning Studies of Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 15-24.
50. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Briggs, D., Iverson, H., Talbot, R., & Shepard, L. (2011). Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning. Science, 331, 1269-1270.
51. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal formative assessment and scientific inquiry: Exploring teachers' practices and student learning. Educational Assessment, 11 (3-4), 205-235.
52. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57-84.
53. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E., Yin, Y., Ayala, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2010). On the impact of formative assessment on student science learning and motivation. In H. L.Andrade & G. J.Cizek (eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 139-158). New York: Routledge.
54. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2004). On the use of students' science notebooks as an assessment tool. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 61-85.
55. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2011, April). Looking into the teachers' feedback practices: How teachers interpret students' work. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.
56. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Ayala, C. C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). Evaluating students' science notebooks as an assessment tool. International Journal of Science Education, 26(12), 1477-1506.
57. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Yin, Y., & Morozov, A. (2010, March). Identifying effective feedback practices on student learning: A literature synthesis. Paper presented at the annual meeting for the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.
58. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Sands, D. (2009). Developing and evaluating measures of formative assessment practice. Research proposal proposed and awarded to the Developing and Evaluating Measures of Formative Assessment Practice, Washington, DC.
59. Sadler, R. D. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
60. Schunk, D. H. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children's cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359-382.
61. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
62. Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Ayala, C. (2008). On the role and impact of formative assessment on science inquiry teaching and learning. In J.Coffey, R.Douglas, & C.Stearns (eds.), Assessing science learning. Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 21-36). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
63. Shih, S., & Alexander, J. M. (2000). Interacting effects of goal setting and self- or other-referenced feedback on children's development of self-efficacy and cognitive skill within the Taiwanese classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 536-543.
64. Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
65. Shepard, L. (2009). Commentary: Evaluating the validity of formative and interim assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 32-37.
66. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
68. Tudge, J., Winterhoff, P., & Hogan, D. (1996). The cognitive consequences of collaborative problem solving with and without feedback. Child Development, 67, 2892-2909.
69. Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C., (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389-404.
70. Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
71. Wragg, E. C. (1993). An introduction to classroom observation. London: Routledge.
72. Yeany, R. H., & Miller, P. A. (1983). Effects of diagnostic/remedial instruction on science learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Education, 20(1), 19-26.
73. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.