Classroom Assessment as Co-Regulated Learning: A Systematic Review

Frontiers in Education

Volumn 6, Issue , 2021, Pages

  Andrade, Heidi L ^a   Brookhart, Susan M ^b   Yu, Elie ChingYen ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

classroom assessment; co regulated learning; formative assessment; peer assessment; self assessment; self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 85121386872     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2504284X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.751168     Document Type: Review

References (155)

1. Adie L. E. Willis J. Van der Kleij F. M. (2018). Diverse Perspectives on Student agency in Classroom Assessment. Aust. Educ. Res. 45 (1), 1–12. 10.1007/s13384-018-0262-2
2. Agricola B. T. Prins F. J. Sluijsmans D. M. A. (2020). Impact of Feedback Request Forms and Verbal Feedback on Higher Education Students' Feedback Perception, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (1), 6–25. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1688764
3. Allal L. (2019). Assessment and the Co-regulation of Learning in the Classroom. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (4), 332–349. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411
4. Allal L. (2010). “Assessment and the Regulation of Learning,” in International Encyclopedia of Education. Editor Peterson E. B. P. (Elsevier), 3, 348–352. 10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00362-6
5. Allal L. (2016). “The Co-regulation of Student Learning in an Assessment for Learning Culture,” in Assessment for Learning: Meeting the challenge of Implementation. Editors Laveault D. Allal L. (Springer), 4, 259–273. 10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_15
6. Ames C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, Structures, and Student Motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 84 (3), 261–271. 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
7. Andaya B. Andaya L. Reyes S. T. Diaz R. E. McDonald K. K. (2017). The Demise of the Malay Entrepôt State, 1699-1819. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 46 (4), 84–121. 10.1057/978-1-137-60515-3_4
8. Andrade H. Brookhart S. M. (2016). “The Role of Classroom Assessment in Supporting Self-Regulated Learning,” in Assessment for Learning: Meeting the challenge of Implementation. Editors Laveault D. Allal L. (Springer), 293–309. 10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_17
9. Andrade H. L. (2019). A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment. Front. Educ. 4. 10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
10. Andrade H. L. Brookhart S. M. (2019). Classroom Assessment as the Co-regulation of Learning. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (4), 350–372. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
11. Andrade H. (2010). “Students as the Definitive Source of Formative Assessment: Academic Self-Assessment and the Self-Regulation of Learning,” in Handbook of Formative Assessment. Editors Andrade H. Cizek G. (New York, NY: Routledge), 90–105.
12. Baas D. Vermeulen M. Castelijns J. Martens R. Segers M. (2020). Portfolios as a Tool for AfL and Student Motivation: Are They Related? Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (4), 444–462. 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1653824
13. Bernacki M. Nokes-Malach T. Richey J. E. Belenky D. M. (2016). Science Diaries: A Brief Writing Intervention to Improve Motivation to Learn Science. Educ. Psychol. 36 (1), 26–46. 10.1080/01443410.2014.895293
14. Boekaerts M. (1997). Self-regulated Learning: A New Concept Embraced by Researchers, Policy Makers, Educators, Teachers, and Students. Learn. instruction 7 (2), 161–186. 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1
15. Bonner S. Chen P. Jones K. Milonovich B. (2021). Formative Assessment of Computational Thinking: Cognitive and Metacognitive Processes. Appl. Meas. Edu. 34 (1), 27–45. 10.1080/08957347.2020.1835912
16. Bransford J. D. Brown A. L. Cocking R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
17. Braund H. DeLuca C. (2018). Elementary Students as Active Agents in Their Learning: An Empirical Study of the Connections between Assessment Practices and Student Metacognition. Aust. Educ. Res. 45 (1), 65–85. 10.1007/s13384-018-0265-z
18. Brookhart S. M. (1997). A Theoretical Framework for the Role of Classroom Assessment in Motivating Student Effort and Achievement. Appl. Meas. Edu. 10 (2), 161–180. 10.1207/s15324818ame1002_4
19. Brookhart S. M. (2001). Successful Students' Formative and Summative Uses of Assessment Information. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 8 (2), 153–169. 10.1080/09695940123775
20. Brown G. (2021). Responding to Assessment for Learning. nzaroe 26, 18–28. 10.26686/nzaroe.v26.6854
21. Brown G. T. Peterson E. R. Yao E. S. (2016). Student Conceptions of Feedback: Impact on Self-Regulation, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 86 (4), 606–629. 10.1111/bjep.12126
22. Brown G. T. Harris L. R. (2013). “Student Self-Assessment,” in SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment. Editor McMillan J. H. (Los Angeles: SAGE), 367–393.
23. Burke Moneypenny D. Evans M. Kraha A. (2018). Student Perceptions of and Attitudes toward Peer Review. Am. J. Distance Edu. 32 (4), 236–247. 10.1080/08923647.2018.1509425
24. Çakir R. Korkmaz Ö. Bacanak A. Arslan Ö. (2016). An Exploration of the Relationship between Students’ Preferences for Formative Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning Skills. Malaysian Online J. Educ. Sci. 4 (4), 14–30.
25. Callender A. A. Franco-Watkins A. M. Roberts A. S. (2016). Improving Metacognition in the Classroom through Instruction, Training, and Feedback. Metacognition Learn. 11 (2), 215–235. 10.1007/s11409-015-9142-6
26. Carless D. (2019). Feedback Loops and the Longer-Term: Towards Feedback Spirals. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 44 (5), 705–714. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108
27. Carless D. R. (2011a). From Testing to Productive Student Learning: Implementing Formative Assessment in Confucian-Heritage Settings. New York, NY: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203128213
28. Carless D. R. (2011b). “Reconfiguring Assessment to Promote Productive Student Learning,” in New Directions: Assessment And Evaluation – A Collection of Papers (East Asia). Editor Powell-Davies P. (London, United Kingdom: British Council), 51–56.
29. Chaktsiris M. G. Southworth J. (2019). Thinking beyond Writing Development in Peer Review. cjsotl-rcacea 10 (1). 10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.1.8005
30. Chan D. (2010). “So Why Ask Me? Are Self-Report Data Really that Bad,” in Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends. Editors Lance C. E. Vandenberg R. J. (New York, NY: Routledge), 329–356.
31. Cheah S. Li S. (2020). The Effect of Structured Feedback on Performance: The Role of Attitude and Perceived Usefulness. Sustainability 12 (5), 2101. 10.3390/su12052101
32. Chen Q. Kettle M. Klenowski V. May L. (2013). Interpretations of Formative Assessment in the Teaching of English at Two Chinese Universities: A Sociocultural Perspective. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 38 (7), 831–846. 10.1080/02602938.2012.726963
33. Chien S.-Y. Hwang G.-J. Jong M. S.-Y. (2020). Effects of Peer Assessment within the Context of Spherical Video-Based Virtual Reality on EFL Students' English-Speaking Performance and Learning Perceptions. Comput. Edu. 146, 103751. 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751
34. Cho K. W. (2019). Exploring the Dark Side of Exposure to Peer Excellence Among Traditional and Nontraditional College Students. Learn. Individual Differences 73, 52–58. 10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.001
35. Colthorpe K. Sharifirad T. Ainscough L. Anderson S. Zimbardi K. (2018). Prompting Undergraduate Students' Metacognition of Learning: Implementing 'meta-Learning' Assessment Tasks in the Biomedical Sciences. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 43 (2), 272–285. 10.1080/02602938.2017.1334872
36. Cookson C. (2017). Voices from the East and West: Congruence on the Primary Purpose of Tutor Feedback in Higher Education. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 42 (7), 1168–1179. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1236184
37. Crimmins G. Nash G. Oprescu F. Liebergreen M. Turley J. Bond R. et al. (2016). A Written, Reflective and Dialogic Strategy for Assessment Feedback that Can Enhance Student/teacher Relationships. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 41 (1), 141–153. 10.1080/02602938.2014.986644
38. Cross J. (2010). Raising L2 Listeners' Metacognitive Awareness: a Sociocultural Theory Perspective. Lang. Awareness 19 (4), 281–297. 10.1080/09658416.2010.519033
39. Dann R. (2014). Assessmentaslearning: Blurring the Boundaries of Assessment and Learning for Theory, Policy and Practice. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 21 (2), 149–166. 10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128
40. David L. C. G. Marinas F. S. Torres D. S. (2018). “The Impact of Final Term Exam Exemption Policy: Case Study at MAAP,” in IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Wollongong, NSW, December 4–7, 2018, 955. 10.1109/TALE.2018.8615448
41. Davison C. (2004). The Contradictory Culture of Teacher-Based Assessment: ESL Teacher Assessment Practices in Australian and Hong Kong Secondary Schools. Lang. Test. 21 (3), 305–334. 10.1191/0265532204lt286oa
42. Dawson P. Henderson M. Ryan T. Mahoney P. Boud D. Phillips M. et al. (2018). “Technology and Feedback Design,” in Learning, Design and Technology: An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice and Policy. Editors Spector J. M. Lockee B. B. Childress M. D. (Springer), 1–45. 10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_124-1
43. Deci E. L. Ryan R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11 (4), 227–268. 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
44. Dolezal D. Motschnig R. Pucher R. (2018). “Peer Review as a Tool for Person-Centered Learning: Computer Science Education at Secondary School Level,” in Teaching and Learning in a Digital World Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning. Editors Auer D. Guralnick I. Simonics (Springer), Vol. 1, 468–478. 10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_56
45. Dorans N. J. (2012). The Contestant Perspective on Taking Tests: Emanations from the Statue within. Educ. Meas. Issues Pract. 31 (4), 20–37. 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00250.x
46. Earl L. (2013). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximise Student Learning. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
47. Farahian M. Avarzamani F. (2018). The Impact of Portfolio on EFL Learners' Metacognition and Writing Performance. Cogent Edu. 5 (1), 1450918. 10.1080/2331186x.2018.1450918
48. Fletcher A. K. (2016). Exceeding Expectations: Scaffolding Agentic Engagement through Assessment as Learning. Educ. Res. 58 (4), 400–419. 10.1080/00131881.2016.1235909
49. Fletcher A. K. (2018). Help Seeking: Agentic Learners Initiating Feedback. Educ. Rev. 70 (4), 389–408. 10.1080/00131911.2017.1340871
50. Förster M. Weiser C. Maur A. Förster M. Weiser C. Maur A. (2018). How Feedback provided by Voluntary Electronic Quizzes Affects Learning Outcomes of university Students in Large Classes. Comput. Edu. 121, 100–114. 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.012
51. Fraile J. Panadero E. Pardo R. (2017). Co-creating Rubrics: The Effects on Self-Regulated Learning, Self-Efficacy and Performance of Establishing Assessment Criteria with Students. Stud. Educ. Eval. 53, 69–76. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003
52. Fukuda S. T. Lander B. W. Pope C. J. (2020). Formative Assessment for Learning How to Learn: Exploring university Student Learning Experiences. RELC J., 003368822092592. 10.1177/0033688220925927
53. Gan Z. He J. He J. Liu F. (2019). Understanding Classroom Assessment Practices and Learning Motivation in Secondary EFL Students. J. Asia TEFL 16 (3), 783–800. 10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.2.783
54. Garrison D. R. Archer W. (2000). A Transactional Perspective on Teaching and Learning: A Framework for Adult and Higher Education. United Kingdom: Emerald.
55. Gašević D. Mirriahi N. Dawson S. Joksimović S. (2017). Effects of Instructional Conditions and Experience on the Adoption of a Learning Tool. Comput. Hum. Behav. 67, 207–220. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.026
56. Gezer-Templeton P. G. Mayhew E. J. Korte D. S. Schmidt S. J. (2017). Use of Exam Wrappers to Enhance Students' Metacognitive Skills in a Large Introductory Food Science and Human Nutrition Course. J. Food Sci. Edu. 16 (1), 28–36. 10.1111/1541-4329.12103
57. Ghahari S. Sedaghat M. (2018). Optimal Feedback Structure and Interactional Pattern in Formative Peer Practices: Students' Beliefs. System 74, 9–20. 10.1016/j.system.2018.02.003
58. Gikandi J. W. Morrow D. (2016). Designing and Implementing Peer Formative Feedback within Online Learning Environments. Technol. Pedagogy Edu. 25 (2), 153–170. 10.1080/1475939X.2015.1058853
59. Guo W. Lau K. L. Wei J. (2019). Teacher Feedback and Students' Self-Regulated Learning in Mathematics: A Comparison between a High-Achieving and a Low-Achieving Secondary Schools. Stud. Educ. Eval. 63, 48–58. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.001
60. Guo W. Wei J. (2019). Teacher Feedback and Students' Self-Regulated Learning in Mathematics: A Study of Chinese Secondary Students. Asia-pacific Edu Res. 28 (3), 265–275. 10.1007/s40299-019-00434-8
61. Hadwin A. F. Järvelä S. Miller M. (2011). “Self-regulated, Co-regulated, and Socially Shared Regulation of Learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Editors Schunk D. Zimmerman B. (New York, NY: Routledge), 65–84.
62. Hadwin A. Järvelä S. Miller M. (2018). “Self-regulation, Co-regulation, and Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning Environments,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Editors Schunk D. Greene J.. 2nd ed. (New York, NY: Routledge), 83–106.
63. Hadwin A. Oshige M. (2011). Self-Regulation, Coregulation, and Socially Shared Regulation: Exploring Perspectives of Social in Self-Regulated Learning Theory. Teach. Coll. Rec. 113 (2), 240–264.
64. Harris L. R. Brown G. T. L. Dargusch J. (2018). Not playing the Game: Student Assessment Resistance as a Form of agency. Aust. Educ. Res. 45 (1), 125–140. 10.1007/s13384-018-0264-0
65. Hattie J. Crivelli J. Van Gompel K. West-Smith P. Wike K. (2021). Feedback that Leads to Improvement in Student Essays: Testing the Hypothesis that “Where to Next” Feedback Is Most Powerful. Front. Educ. 6 (182), 645758. 10.3389/feduc.2021.645758
66. Hattie J. Timperley H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77 (1), 81–112. 10.3102/2F003465430298487
67. Hawe E. Dixon H. (2017). Assessment for Learning: A Catalyst for Student Self-Regulation. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 42 (8), 1181–1192. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1236360
68. Heritage M. (2018). Assessment for Learning as Support for Student Self-Regulation. Aust. Educ. Res. 45 (1), 51–63. 10.1007/s13384-018-0261-3
69. Hsia L.-H. Huang I. Hwang G.-J. (2016). A Web-Based Peer-Assessment Approach to Improving Junior High School Students' Performance, Self-Efficacy and Motivation in Performing Arts Courses. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 47 (4), 618–632. 10.1111/bjet.12248
70. Ibarra-Sáiz M. S. Rodríguez-Gómez G. Boud D. (2020). Developing Student Competence through Peer Assessment: The Role of Feedback, Self-Regulation and Evaluative Judgement. High Educ. 80 (1), 137–156. 10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2
71. Ismail M. A. Ahmad A. Mohammad J. A. Fakri N. M. R. M. Nor M. Z. M. Pa M. N. M. (2019). Using Kahoot! as a Formative Assessment Tool in Medical Education: A Phenomenological Study. BMC Med. Educ. 19 (1), 230. 10.1186/s12909-019-1658-z
72. McMillan J. (Editor) (2013). SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE).
73. Joh J. (2019). Impact of Peer Feedback on Learning: A Case of EFL Teacher Trainees. J. Asia TEFL 16 (4), 1103–1118. 10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.4.3.1103
74. Pellegrino J. Chudowsky N. Glaser R. (Editors) (2001). Knowing what Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment (Washington, DC: National Academies Press). 10.17226/10019
75. Kane M. (2012). Validity, Fairness, and Testing. [Paper Presentation] Educational Assessment, Accountability, and Equity: Conversations on Validity Around the World, Teachers College. New York: Columbia University. https://origin-www.ets.org/c/18486/pdf/19633_ets_tc_validityconference_Kane%202012_03_28.pdf.
76. Karaoglan Yilmaz F. G. Yilmaz R. (2020). Learning Analytics as a Metacognitive Tool to Influence Learner Transactional Distance and Motivation in Online Learning Environments. Innov. Edu. Teach. Int., 1–11. 10.1080/14703297.2020.1794928
77. Kickert R. Meeuwisse M. M. Stegers-Jager K. V. Koppenol-Gonzalez G. R. Arends L. Prinzie P. (2019). Assessment Policies and Academic Performance within a Single Course: The Role of Motivation and Self-Regulation. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 44 (8), 1177–1190. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1580674
78. Koenka A. C. (2020). Grade Expectations: The Motivational Consequences of Performance Feedback on a Summative Assessment. J. Exp. Edu., 1–24. 10.1080/00220973.2020.1777069
79. Koenka A. C. Linnenbrink-Garcia L. Moshontz H. Atkinson K. M. Sanchez C. E. Cooper H. (2019). A Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Grades and Comments on Academic Motivation and Achievement: A Case for Written Feedback. Educ. Psychol. 41, 922–947. 10.1080/01443410.2019.1659939
80. Lam R. (2016). Assessment as Learning: Examining a Cycle of Teaching, Learning, and Assessment of Writing in the Portfolio-Based Classroom. Stud. Higher Edu. 41 (11), 1900–1917. 10.1080/03075079.2014.999317
81. Lee H. (2016). Which Feedback Is More Effective for Pursuing Multiple Goals of Differing Importance? the Interaction Effects of Goal Importance and Performance Feedback Type on Self-Regulation and Task Achievement. Educ. Psychol. 36 (2), 297–322. 10.1080/01443410.2014.995596
82. Lerdpornkulrat T. Poondej C. Koul R. Khiawrod G. Prasertsirikul P. (2019). The Positive Effect of Intrinsic Feedback on Motivational Engagement and Self-Efficacy in Information Literacy. J. Psychoeducational Assess. 37 (4), 421–434. 10.1177/2F0734282917747423
83. Li M. Zhang X. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of Self-Assessment and Language Performance in Language Testing and Assessment. Lang. Test. 38 (2), 189–218. 10.1177/2F0265532220932481
84. Lin J.-W. (2018). Effects of an Online Team Project-Based Learning Environment with Group Awareness and Peer Evaluation on Socially Shared Regulation of Learning and Self-Regulated Learning. Behav. Inf. Tech. 37 (5), 445–461. 10.1080/0144929X.2018.1451558
85. Llorens A. C. Vidal-Abarca E. Cerdán R. Vidal-Abarca E. Cerdán R. (2016). Formative Feedback to Transfer Self-Regulation of Task-Oriented reading Strategies. J. Comp. Assist. Learn. 32 (4), 314–331. 10.1111/jcal.12134
86. Lobo M. A. Moeyaert M. Baraldi Cunha A. Babik I. (2017). Single-case Design, Analysis, and Quality Assessment for Intervention Research. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 41 (3), 187–197. 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000187
87. Ma J. (2018). Student Perceptions of Assessment-For-Learning Practices in an English Academic Writing Course. English Teach. Learn. 42 (2), 155–183. 10.1007/s42321-018-0008-2
88. Mak P. Wong K. M. (2018). Self-regulation through Portfolio Assessment in Writing Classrooms. ELT J. English Lang. Teach. J. 72 (1), 49–61. 10.1093/elt/ccx012
89. Maras K. Gamble T. Brosnan M. (2019). Supporting Metacognitive Monitoring in Mathematics Learning for Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Classroom-Based Study. Autism 23 (1), 60–70. 10.1177/1362361317722028
90. Martin C. S. Polly D. Kissel B. (2017). Exploring the Impact of Written Reflections on Learning in the Elementary Mathematics Classroom. J. Educ. Res. 110 (5), 538–553. 10.1080/00220671.2016.1149793
91. McInerney D. M. King R. B. (2017). “Culture and Self-Regulation in Educational Contexts,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Editors Schunk D. H. Greene J. A.. 2nd ed. (New York, NY: Routledge), 485–502. 10.4324/9781315697048-31
92. Meusen-Beekman K. D. Joosten-ten Brinke D. Boshuizen H. P. A. (2016). Effects of Formative Assessments to Develop Self-Regulation Among Sixth Grade Students: Results from a Randomized Controlled Intervention. Stud. Educ. Eval. 51, 126–136. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.008
93. Miihkinen A. Virtanen T. (2018). Development and Application of Assessment Standards to Advanced Written Assignments. Account. Edu. 27 (2), 121–159. 10.1080/09639284.2017.1396480
94. Moore N. S. MacArthur C. A. (2016). Student Use of Automated Essay Evaluation Technology during Revision. J. Writing Res. 8 (1), 149–175. 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.05
95. Muñoz L. Santa Cruz J. (2016). El aula Preescolar como espacio de desarrollo cognitivo: tipo de feedback docente y control metacognitivo en los niños. Ejrep 14 (1), 23–44. 10.14204/ejrep.38.15033
96. Nederhand M. L. Tabbers H. K. Jongerling J. Rikers R. M. J. P. (2020). Reflection on Exam Grades to Improve Calibration of Secondary School Students: A Longitudinal Study. Metacognition Learn. 15, 291–317. 10.1007/s11409-020-09233-9
97. Nikou S. A. Economides A. A. (2016). The Impact of Paper-Based, Computer-Based and mobile-based Self-Assessment on Students' Science Motivation and Achievement. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 1241–1248. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025
98. Nugteren M. L. Jarodzka H. Kester L. Van Merriënboer J. J. G. (2018). Self-regulation of Secondary School Students: Self-Assessments Are Inaccurate and Insufficiently Used for Learning-Task Selection. Instr. Sci. 46 (3), 357–381. 10.0.3.239/s11251-018-9448-210.1007/s11251-018-9448-2
99. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014). PISA 2012 Results, Vol. V. Paris, France: Creativeproblem solving: Students’ skills in tackling real-life problems. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/310373.
100. Pan X. Shao H. (2020). Teacher Online Feedback and Learning Motivation: Learning Engagement as a Mediator. Soc. Behav. Pers 48 (6), 1–10. 10.2224/sbp.9118
101. Panadero E. Broadbent J. Boud D. Lodge J. M. (2019). Using Formative Assessment to Influence Self- and Co-regulated Learning: the Role of Evaluative Judgement. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 34, 535–557. 10.1007/s10212-018-0407-8
102. Panadero E. Fernández-Ruiz J. Sánchez-Iglesias I. (2020). Secondary Education Students' Self-Assessment: the Effects of Feedback, Subject Matter, Year Level, and Gender. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (6), 607–634. 10.1080/0969594X.2020.1835823
103. Panadero E. Järvelä S. (2015). Socially Shared Regulation of Learning: A Review. Eur. Psychol. 20 (3), 190–203. 10.1027/1016-9040/a000226
104. Panadero E. Jonsson A. Botella J. (2017). Effects of Self-Assessment on Self-Regulated Learning and Self-Efficacy: Four Meta-Analyses. Educ. Res. Rev. 22, 74–98. 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
105. Pereira D. Flores M. A. Simão A. M. V. Barros A. (2016). Effectiveness and Relevance of Feedback in Higher Education: A Study of Undergraduate Students. Stud. Educ. Eval. 49, 7–14. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.004
106. Pintrich P. R. (2004). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16 (4), 385–407. 10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
107. Pintrich P. R. Zusho A. (2002). “The Development of Academic Self-Regulation,” in Development of Achievement Motivation. Editors Eccles J. Wigfield A. (Academic Press), 249–284. 10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7
108. Raaijmakers S. F. Baars M. Paas F. van Merriënboer J. J. G. van Gog T. (2019). Effects of Self-Assessment Feedback on Self-Assessment and Task-Selection Accuracy. Metacognition Learn. 14 (1), 21–42. 10.1007/s11409-019-09189-5
109. Resnick L. B. Resnick D. P. (1992). “Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform,” in Changing Assessments. Editors Gifford B. R. O’Connor M. C. (Springer), 30, 37–75. 10.1007/978-94-011-2968-8_3
110. Rivers M. L. Dunlosky J. Joynes R. (2019). The Contribution of Classroom Exams to Formative Evaluation of Concept-Level Knowledge. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 59, 101806. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101806
111. Roure C. Méard J. Lentillon-Kaestner V. Flamme X. Devillers Y. Dupont J.-P. (2019). The Effects of Video Feedback on Students' Situational Interest in Gymnastics. Technol. Pedagogy Edu. 28 (5), 563–574. 10.1080/1475939X.2019.1682652
112. Ruegg R. (2018). The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Changes in EFL Students' Writing Self-Efficacy. Lang. Learn. J. 46 (2), 87–102. 10.1080/09571736.2014.958190
113. Sadler D. R. (1989). Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems. Instr. Sci. 18 (2), 119–144. 10.1007/BF00117714
114. Saks K. Leijen A. (2019). “Digital Learning Diary as a Tool for Enhancing EFL Learners' Metacognitive Reflection,” in IEEE 19th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Maceio, Brazil, July 15–18, 2019, 263–264. 10.1109/ICALT.2019.00085
115. Sarsar F. (2017). Student and Instructor Responses to Emotional Motivational Feedback Messages in an Online Instructional Environment. Turkish Online J. Educ. Tech. 16 (1), 115–127.
116. Schünemann N. Spörer N. Völlinger V. A. Brunstein J. C. (2017). Peer Feedback Mediates the Impact of Self-Regulation Procedures on Strategy Use and reading Comprehension in Reciprocal Teaching Groups. Instr. Sci. 45 (4), 395–415. 10.1007/s11251-017-9409-1
117. Schunk D. H. Schunk D. H. (2011). “Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Editors Schunk D. Zimmerman B. (New York, NY: Routledge), 15–26. 10.4324/9780203839010
118. Schut S. van Tartwijk J. Driessen E. van der Vleuten C. Heeneman S. (2020). Understanding the Influence of Teacher-Learner Relationships on Learners' Assessment Perception. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. Theor. Pract 25 (2), 441–456. 10.1007/s10459-019-09935-z
119. Seifried E. Lenhard W. Spinath B. (2016). Automatic Essay Assessment: Effects on Students' Acceptance and on Learning-Related Characteristics. Psihologija 49 (4), 469–482. 10.2298/PSI1604469SSharifi,
120. Sharifi M. Soleimani H. Jafarigohar M. (2017). E-portfolio Evaluation and Vocabulary Learning: Moving from Pedagogy to Andragogy. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 48 (6), 1441–1450. 10.1111/bjet.12479
121. Sitzmann T. Ely K. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning in Work-Related Training and Educational Attainment: What We Know and where We Need to Go. Psychol. Bull. 137 (3), 421–442. 10.1037/a0022777
122. Tapingkae P. Panjaburee P. Hwang G.-J. Srisawasdi N. (2020). Effects of a Formative Assessment-Based Contextual Gaming Approach on Students' Digital Citizenship Behaviours, Learning Motivations, and Perceptions. Comput. Edu. 159, 103998. 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103998
123. Tavoletti E. Stephens R. D. Dong L. (2019). The Impact of Peer Evaluation on Team Effort, Productivity, Motivation and Performance in Global Virtual Teams. Tpm 25 (5/6), 334–347. 10.1108/TPM-03-2019-0025
124. Teasdale A. Leung C. (2000). Teacher Assessment and Psychometric Theory: A Case of Paradigm Crossing? Lang. Test. 17 (2), 163–184. 10.1177/026553220001700204Thibodeaux,
125. Thibodeaux T. Harapnuik D. (2020). Exploring Students’ Use of Feedback to Take Ownership and Deepen Learning in an Online Program. Int. J. E-Learning 19 (1), 65–88.
126. Trogden B. G. Royal J. E. (2019). Using Exam Wrappers in Chemistry, Mathematics, and Statistics Courses to Encourage Student Metacognition. J. Excell. Coll. Teach. 30 (3), 71–96.
127. Vaessen B. E. van den Beemt A. van de Watering G. van Meeuwen L. W. Lemmens L. den Brok P. (2017). Students' Perception of Frequent Assessments and its Relation to Motivation and Grades in a Statistics Course: a Pilot Study. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 42 (6), 872–886. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1204532
128. Van Loon M. H. Roebers C. M. (2017). Effects of Feedback on Self-Evaluations and Self-Regulation in Elementary School. Appl. Cognit. Psychol. 31 (5), 508–519. 10.1002/acp.3347
129. Vattøy K.-D. Smith K. (2019). Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Feedback Practice in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Teach. Teach. Edu. 85, 260–268. 10.0.3.248/j.tate.2019.06.024
130. Vermunt J. D. Verloop N. (1999). Congruence and Friction between Learning and Teaching. Learn. Instruction 9 (3), 257–280. 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00028-0
131. Vogt K. Tsagari D. Csépes I. Green A. Sifakis N. (2020). Linking Learners' Perspectives on Language Assessment Practices to Teachers' Assessment Literacy Enhancement (TALE): Insights from Four European Countries. Lang. Assess. Q. 17, 410–433. 10.1080/15434303.2020.1776714
132. Volet S. Vauras M. Salonen P. (2009). Self- and Social Regulation in Learning Contexts: An Integrative Perspective. Educ. Psychol. 44, 215–226. 10.1080/00461520903213584
133. Wallin P. Adawi T. (2018). The Reflective Diary as a Method for the Formative Assessment of Self-Regulated Learning. Eur. J. Eng. Edu. 43 (4), 507–521. 10.1080/03043797.2017.1290585
134. Wang W. (2017). Using Rubrics in Student Self-Assessment: Student Perceptions in the English as a Foreign Language Writing Context. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 42 (8), 1280–1292. 10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993
135. Weidinger A. F. Steinmayr R. Spinath B. (2017). Math Grades and Intrinsic Motivation in Elementary School: A Longitudinal Investigation of Their Association. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 87 (2), 187–204. 10.1111/bjep.12143
136. Weidinger A. F. Spinath B. Steinmayr R. (2016). Why Does Intrinsic Motivation Decline Following Negative Feedback? the Mediating Role of Ability Self-Concept and its Moderation by Goal Orientations. Learn. Individual Differences 47, 117–128. 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.003
137. Wigfield A. Klauda S. L. Cambria J. (2011). “Influences on the Development of Academic Self-Regulatory Processes,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Editors Schunk D. Zimmerman B. (New York, NY: Routledge), 33–48.
138. Winne P. (2011). “A Cognitive and Metacognitive Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performances. Editors Schunk D. Zimmerman B. (New York, NY: Routledge), 15–32.
139. Winstone N. E. Nash R. A. Parker M. Rowntree J. (2017). Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educ. Psychol. 52 (1), 17–37. 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
140. Wolf D. P. (1993). “Assessment as an Episode of Learning,” in Construction versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement. Editors Bennet R. E. Ward W. C. (Lawrence Erlbaum), 213–240.
141. Wollenschläger M. Hattie J. Machts N. Möller J. Harms U. (2016). What Makes Rubrics Effective in Teacher-Feedback? Transparency of Learning Goals Is Not Enough. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 44-45, 1–11. 10.0.3.248/j.cedpsych.2015.11.00310.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.003
142. Xiao Y. (2017). Formative Assessment in a Test-Dominated Context: How Test Practice Can Become More Productive. Lang. Assess. Q. 14 (4), 295–311. 10.1080/15434303.2017.1347789
143. Xiao Y. Yang M. (2019). Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: How Formative Assessment Supports Students' Self-Regulation in English Language Learning. System 81, 39–49. 10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004
144. Yan Z. Chiu M. M. Ko P. Y. (2020). Effects of Self-Assessment Diaries on Academic Achievement, Self-Regulation, and Motivation. Assess. Educ. Principles, Pol. Pract. 27 (5), 562–583. 10.1080/0969594X.2020.1827221
145. Yan Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the Process of Self-Regulated Learning and its Relationship with Academic Achievement. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 45 (2), 224–238. 10.1080/02602938.2019.1629390
146. Yang Y. Chen Q. Yu Y. Feng X. Aalst J. (2020). Collective Reflective Assessment for Shared Epistemic agency by Undergraduates in Knowledge Building. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 51 (4), 1136–1154. 10.1111/bjet.12909
147. Yang Y. (2019). Reflective Assessment for Epistemic agency of Academically Low-Achieving Students. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 35 (4), 459–475. 10.1111/jcal.12343
148. Yu F.-Y. Wu W.-S. Huang H.-C. (2018). Promoting Middle School Students' Learning Motivation and Academic Emotions via Student-Created Feedback for Online Student-Created Multiple-Choice Questions. Asia-pacific Edu Res. 27 (5), 395–408. 10.1007/s40299-018-0398-x
149. Zamora Á. Suárez J. M. Ardura D. (2018). Error Detection and Self-Assessment as Mechanisms to Promote Self-Regulation of Learning Among Secondary Education Students. J. Educ. Res. 111 (2), 175–185. 10.1080/00220671.2016.1225657
150. Zhang W. Wenxiao Z. (2017). Using Classroom Assessment to Promote Self-Regulated Learning and the Factors Influencing its (In)effectiveness. Front. Educ. China 12 (2), 261–295. 10.1007/s11516-017-0019-0
151. Zheng L. Cui P. Li X. Huang R. (2018). Synchronous Discussion between Assessors and Assessees in Web-Based Peer Assessment: Impact on Writing Performance, Feedback Quality, Meta-Cognitive Awareness and Self-Efficacy. Assess. Eval. Higher Edu. 43 (3), 500–514. 10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533
152. Zhu J. Mok M. M. C. (2018). Predicting Primary Students' Self-Regulated Learning by Their Prior Achievement, Interest, Personal Best Goal Orientation and Teacher Feedback. Educ. Psychol. 38 (9), 1106–1128. 10.1080/01443410.2018.1497775
153. Zimmerman B. J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Academic Learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 81 (3), 329–339. 10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
154. Zimmerman B. (2011). “Motivational Sources and Outcomes of Self-Regulated Learning and Performance,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Editors Schunk D. Zimmerman B. (New York, NY: Routledge), 49–64.
155. Zumbrunn S. Marrs S. Mewborn C. (2016). Toward a Better Understanding of Student Perceptions of Writing Feedback: A Mixed Methods Study. Read. Writ 29 (2), 349–370. 10.1007/s11145-015-9599-3