Elaborated feedback and learning: Examining cognitive and motivational influences

Computers and Education

Volumn 136, Issue , 2019, Pages 130-140

  Wang, Zhen ^a,b   Gong, Shao Ying ^a,b   Xu, Sheng ^a,b   Hu, Xiang En ^a,b  

^a CENTRAL CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

Author keywords

Evaluation of CAL systems; Interactive learning environments; Pedagogical issues; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS;

EVALUATION OF CAL SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; GERMANE COGNITIVE LOAD; INSTRUCTIONAL INFORMATION; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGY; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 85064047522     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Attali, Y., Effects of multiple-try feedback and question type during mathematics problem solving on performance in similar problems. Computers & Education 86 (2015), 260–267.
2. Attali, Y., Laitusis, C., Stone, E., Differences in reaction to immediate feedback and opportunity to revise answers for multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Educational and Psychological Measurement 76 (2016), 787–802.
3. Attali, Y., Van der Kleij, F.M., Effects of feedback elaboration and feedback timing during computer-based practice in mathematics problem solving. Computers & Education 110 (2017), 154–169.
4. Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulik, C.L.C., Kulik, J.A., Morgan, M., The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research 61 (1991), 213–238.
5. Cero, I., Sifers, S.K., Parenting behavior and the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicide: A mediated moderation analysis with adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders 150 (2013), 987–992.
6. Cheng, G., The impact of online automated feedback on students' reflective journal writing in an EFL course. The Internet and Higher Education 34 (2017), 8–27.
7. Clariana, R.B., Lee, D., The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer-based vocabulary lesson. Educational Technology Research & Development 49 (2001), 23–36.
8. Dresel, M., Haugwitz, M., A computer-based approach to fostering motivation and self-regulated learning. The Journal of Experimental Education 77 (2008), 3–20.
9. Fazio, L.K., Huelser, B.J., Johnson, A., Marsh, E.J., Receiving right/wrong feedback: Consequences for learning. Memory 18 (2010), 335–350.
10. Finn, B., Thomas, R., Rawson, K.A., Learning more from feedback: Elaborating feedback with examples enhances concept learning. Learning and Instruction 54 (2018), 104–113.
11. Fyfe, E.R., Providing feedback on computer-based algebra homework in middle-school classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior 63 (2016), 568–574.
12. Fyfe, E.R., Decaro, M.S., Rittle-Johnson, B., When feedback is cognitively-demanding: The importance of working memory capacity. Instructional Science 43 (2015), 73–91.
13. Fyfe, E.R., Rittle-Johnson, B., Feedback both helps and hinders learning: The causal role of prior knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology 108 (2016), 82–97.
14. Fyfe, E.R., Rittle-Johnson, B., Decaro, M.S., The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters. Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (2012), 1094–1108.
15. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., Opfermann, M., Hesse, F.W., Eysink, T.H.S., Learning with hypermedia: The influence of representational formats and different levels of learner control on performance and learning behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 25 (2009), 360–370.
16. th international improving student learning symposium. England: Hinckley, 2003.
17. Golke, S., Dorfler, T., Artelt, C., The impact of elaborated feedback on text comprehension within a computer-based assessment. Learning and Instruction 39 (2015), 123–136.
18. Gong, S., Shangguan, C., Zhai, K., Guo, Y., The effects of emotional design on multimedia learning. Acta Psychology Sinica 49 (2017), 771–782.
19. Gong, S., Zhang, P., Shangguan, C., The effect of learner control and task difficulty on multimedia learning. Studies of Psychology & Behavior 15 (2017), 335–342.
20. Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., Klieme, E., The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: The role of feedback's perceived usefulness. Educational Psychology 34 (2014), 269–290.
21. Hattie, J., Timperley, H., The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research 77 (2007), 81–112.
22. Hayes, A.F., Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2013, The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
23. Ilgen, D.R., Fisher, C.D., Taylor, M.S., Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 64 (1979), 349–371.
24. Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., Seidel, T., Predicting students' cognitive learning activity and intrinsic learning motivation: How powerful are teacher statements, student profiles, and gender?. Learning and Individual Differences 32 (2014), 132–139.
25. Keller, J.M., Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. 2010, Springer, New York, NY.
26. Kornell, N., Rhodes, M.G., Feedback reduces the metacognitive benefit of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 19 (2013), 1–13.
27. Krause, U.M., Stark, R., Mandl, H., The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction 19 (2009), 158–170.
28. Lachner, A., Burkhart, C., Nückles, M., Formative computer-based feedback in the university classroom: Specific concept maps scaffold students' writing. Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017), 459–469.
29. Lin, L., Atkinson, R.K., Christopherson, R.M., Joseph, S.S., Harrison, C.J., Animated agents and learning: Does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter?. Computers & Education 67 (2013), 239–249.
30. Lin, L., Li, M., Optimizing learning from animation: Examining the impact of biofeedback. Learning and Instruction 55 (2018), 32–40.
31. Martinez, M.E., Cognition and the question of test item format. Educational Psychologist 34 (1999), 207–218.
32. Moreno, R., Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science 32 (2004), 99–113.
33. Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. Journal of Educational Psychology 97 (2005), 117–128.
34. Narciss, S., The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology 51 (2004), 214–228.
35. Narciss, S., Designing and evaluating tutoring feedback strategies for digital learning environments on the basis of the interactive tutoring feedback model. Digital Education Review 23 (2013), 7–26.
36. Paas, F., Renkl, A., Sweller, J., Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist 38 (2003), 1–4.
37. Paas, F., Van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Adam, J.J., Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual & Motor Skills 79 (1994), 419–430.
38. Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., Hochweber, J., Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students' perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction 27 (2013), 63–73.
39. Roediger, H.L. III, Marsh, E.J., The positive and negative consequences of multiple-choice testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005), 1155–1159.
40. Roelle, J., Berthold, K., Fries, S., Effects of feedback on learning strategies in learning journals: Learner-expertise matters. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning 1 (2011), 16–30.
41. Shute, V.J., Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 78 (2008), 153–189.
42. Slamecka, N.J., Graf, P., The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory 4 (1978), 592–604.
43. Strijbos, J.W., Narciss, S., Dünnebier, K., Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?. Learning and Instruction 20 (2010), 291–303.
44. Sweller, J., Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review 22 (2010), 123–138.
45. Timmers, C.F., Veldkamp, B.P., Attention paid to feedback provided by a computer-based assessment for learning on information literacy. Computers & Education 56 (2011), 923–930.
46. Timmers, C.F., Walraven, A., Veldkamp, B.P., The effect of regulation feedback in a computer-based formative assessment on information problem solving. Computers & Education 87 (2015), 1–9.
47. Van der Kleij, F.M., Eggen, T.J., Timmers, C.F., Veldkamp, B.P., Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning. Computers & Education 58 (2012), 263–272.
48. Van der Kleij, F.M., Feskens, R.C., Eggen, T.J., Effects of feedback in a computer-based learning environment on students' learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 85 (2015), 475–511.
49. Wang, S., Wu, P., The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education 51 (2008), 1589–1598.
50. Xie, J., Ma, H., Zhou, Z., Tang, H., Work-related use of information and communication technologies after hours (W_ICTs) and emotional exhaustion: A mediated moderation model. Computers in Human Behavior 79 (2018), 94–104.