Feedback in the Context of Self-Assessment

The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback

Volumn , Issue , 2018, Pages 376-408

  Andrade, Heidi L ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086216613     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9781316832134.019     Document Type: Chapter

References (107)

1. Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., and Pilli, O. (2015). Assessment in massive open online courses. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13, 207-216.
2. Alaoutinen, S. (2012). Evaluating the effect of learning style and student background on self-assessment accuracy. Computer Science Education, 22, 175-198.
3. Al-Rawahi, N. M., and Al-Balushi, S. M. (2015). The effect of reflective science journal writing on students’ self-regulated learning strategies. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10, 367-379.
4. Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. Andrade and G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). New York: Routledge.
5. Andrade, H. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of learning theory and research. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 17-34). New York: Sage.
6. Andrade, H., and Boulay, B. (2003). The role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 21-34.
7. Andrade, H., and Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning (pp. 293-309). In D. Laveault and L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation. Heidelberg: Springer.
8. Andrade, H. L., and Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Student self-assessment in the classroom. In G. T. L. Brown and L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 319-334). New York: Routledge.
9. Andrade, H., and Du, Y. (2007). Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 159-181.
10. Andrade, H., Du, Y., and Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students’ writing. Assessment in Education, 17, 199-214.
11. Andrade, H., Du, Y., and Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27(2), 3-13.
12. Andrade, H., and Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through selfassessment. Theory into Practice, 48, 12-19.
13. Andrade, H., Wang, X., Du, Y., and Akawi, R. (2009). Rubric-referenced selfassessment and self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Research, 102, 287-302.
14. Baars, M., Vink, S., van Gog, T., de Bruin, A., and Paas, F. (2014). Effects of training selfassessment and using assessment standards on retrospective and prospective monitoring of problem solving. Learning and Instruction, 33, 92-107.
15. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
16. Barney, S., Khurum, M., Petersen, K., Unterkalmsteiner, M., and Jabangwe, R. (2012). Improving students with rubric-based self-assessment and oral feedback. IEEE Transactions on Education, 55, 319-325.
17. Baxter, P., and Norman, G. (2011). Self-assessment or self deception? A lack of association between nursing students’ self-assessment and performance. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 67, 2406-2413.
18. Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 18, 5-25.
19. Birjandi, P., and Hadidi Tamjid, N. (2012). The role of self-, peer and teacher assessment in promoting Iranian EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 513-533.
20. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., and Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
21. Black, P., and Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-144, 146-148.
22. Blanch-Hartigan, D. (2011). Medical students’ self-assessment of performance: Results from three meta-analyses. Patient Education and Counseling, 84, 3-9.
23. Bol, L., Hacker, D. J., Walck, C. C., and Nunnery, J. A. (2012). The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 280-287.
24. Boud, D. (1995a). Implementing student self-assessment (2nd edn.). Australian Capital Territory: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
25. Boud, D. (1995b). Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page.
26. Boud, D. (1999). Avoiding the traps: Seeking good practice in the use of selfassessment and reflection in professional courses. Social Work Education, 18, 121-132.
27. Boud, D., and Brew, A. (1995). Developing a typology for learner self-assessment practices. Research and Development in Higher Education, 18, 130-135.
28. Bourke, R. (2014). Self-assessment in professional programmes within tertiary institutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 908-918.
29. Bourke, R. (2016). Liberating the learner through self-assessment. Cambridge Journal of Education, 46, 97-111.
30. Brown, G., Andrade, H., and Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education, 22(4), 444-457.
31. Brown, G. T., and Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Sage handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367-393). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
32. Brown, G. T. L., and Harris, L. R. (2014). The future of self-assessment in classroom practice: Reframing self-assessment as a core competency. Frontline Learning Research, 3, 22-30.
33. Butler, D. L., and Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
34. Chang, C.-C., Liang, C., and Chen, Y.-H. (2013). Is learner self-assessment reliable and valid in a web-based portfolio environment for high school students? Computers and Education, 60, 325-334.
35. Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., and Lou, S.-J. (2012). A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers and Education, 58, 303-320.
36. Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481.
37. de Bruin, A. B. H., and van Gog, T. (2012). Improving self-monitoring and self-regulation: From cognitive psychology to the classroom, Learning and Instruction, 22(4), 245-252.
38. De Grez, L., Valcke, M., and Roozen, I. (2012). How effective are self- and peer assessment of oral presentation skills compared with teachers’ assessments? Active Learning in Higher Education, 13, 129-142.
39. Draper, S. W. (2009). What are learners actually regulating when given feedback? British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 306-315.
40. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
41. Epstein, R. M., Siegel, D. J., and Silberman, J. (2008). Self-monitoring in clinical practice: A challenge for medical educators. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 5-13.
42. Eva, K. W., and Regehr, G. (2008). “I’ll never play professional football” and other fallacies of self-assessment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 14-19.
43. Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: Routledge Falmer.
44. Fastre, G. M. J., van der Klink, M. R., Sluijsmans, D., and van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2012). Drawing students’ attention to relevant assessment criteria: Effects on self-assessment skills and performance. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 64, 185-198.
45. Fastre, G. M. J., van der Klink, M. R., and van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (2010). The effects of performance-based assessment criteria on student performance and selfassessment skills. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15, 517-532.
46. Fitzpatrick, B., and Schulz, H. (2016, April). Teaching young students to self-assess critically. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington DC.
47. Franken, A. S. (1992). I’m good enough, I’m smart enough, and doggone it, people like me! Daily affirmations by Stuart Smalley. New York: Dell.
48. Glaser, C., and Brunstein, J. C. (2007). Improving fourth-grade students’ composition skills: Effects of strategy instruction and self-regulation procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 297-310.
49. Gonida, E. N., and Leondari, A. (2011). Patterns of motivation among adolescents with biased and accurate self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 50, 209-220.
50. Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., and Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160-170.
51. Harding, J. L., and Hbaci, I. (2015). Evaluating pre-service teachers’ math teaching experience from different perspectives. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3(6), 382-389.
52. Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., and Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
53. Harris, L. R., and Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101-111.
54. Hattie, J., and Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
55. Hawe, E., and Parr, J. (2014). Assessment for learning in the writing classroom: An incomplete realization. Curriculum Journal, 25, 210-237.
56. Hawkins, S. C., Osborne, A., Schofield, S. J., Pournaras, D. J., and Chester, J. F. (2012). Improving the accuracy of self-assessment of practical clinical skills using video feedback: The importance of including benchmarks. Medical Teacher, 34, 279-284.
57. Huang, Y., and Gui, M. (2015). Articulating teachers’ expectations afore: Impact of rubrics on Chinese EFL learners’ self-assessment and speaking ability. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(3), 126-132.
58. Kaderavek, J. N., Gillam, R. B., Ukrainetz, T. A., Justice, L. M., and Eisenberg, S. N. (2004). School-age children’s self-assessment of oral narrative production. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 26, 37-48.
59. Karnilowicz, W. (2012). A comparison of self-assessment and tutor assessment of undergraduate psychology students. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 40, 591-604.
60. Kingston, N. M., and Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28-37.
61. Kitsantas, A., and Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation of practice: The influence of graphing and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 201-212.
62. Kluger, A. N., and DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
63. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., and Hesse, F. (2006). Collaboration scripts: A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159-185.
64. Kolovelonis, A., Goudas, M., and Dermitzaki, I. (2012). Students’ performance calibration in a basketball dribbling task in elementary physical education. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 507-517.
65. Koriat, A. (2012). The relationships between monitoring, regulation and performance. Learning and Instruction, 22, 296-298.
66. Kostons, D., van Gog, T., and Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 121-132.
67. Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., and Hasselhorn, M. (2010). Enhancing students’ selfregulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and selfevaluative standards Metacognition and Learning, 5, 173-194.
68. Leach, L. (2012). Optional self-assessment: Some tensions and dilemmas. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 137-147.
69. Lew, M. D. N., Alwis, W. A. M., and Schmidt, H. G. (2010). Accuracy of students’ selfassessment and their beliefs about its utility. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 135-156.
70. Lin-Siegler, X., Shaenfield, D., and Elder, A. D. (2015). Contrasting case instruction can improve self-assessment of writing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 517-537.
71. Lipnevich, A. A., Berg, D. A. G., and Smith, J. K. (2016). Toward a model of student response to feedback. In G. T. L. Brown and L. R. Harris (Eds.), The handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 169-185). New York: Routledge.
72. Lopez, R., and Kossack, S. (2007). Effects of recurring use of self-assessment in university courses. International Journal of Learning, 14, 203-216.
73. Lopez-Pastor, V. M., Fernandez-Balboa, J.-M., Santos Pastor, M. L., and Aranda, A. F. (2012). Students’ self-grading, professor’s grading and negotiated final grading at three university programmes: Analysis of reliability and grade difference ranges and tendencies. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37, 453-464.
74. Lui, A. (2017). Validity of the Responses to Feedback Survey: Operationalizing and measuring students’ cognitive and affective responses to teachers’ feedback. Doctoral dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York.
75. Memis, E. K., and Seven, S. (2015). Effects of an SWH approach and self-evaluation on sixth grade students’ learning and retention of an electricity unit. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(3), 32-49.
76. Meusen-Beekman, K. D., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., and Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). Effects of formative assessments to develop self-regulation among sixth grade students: Results from a randomized controlled intervention. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 51, 126-136.
77. Miller, T. M., and Geraci, L. (2011). Training metacognition in the classroom: The influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions. Metacognition and Learning, 6, 303-314.
78. Murakami, C., Valvona, C., and Broudy, D. (2012). Turning apathy into activeness in oral communication classes: Regular self- and peer-assessment in a TBLT programme. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 40, 407-420.
79. Nicol, D., and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218.
80. Nielsen, K. (2014), Self-assessment methods in writing instruction: A conceptual framework, successful practices and essential strategies. Journal of Research in Reading, 37, 1-16.
81. Nowell, C., and Alston, R. M. (2007). I thought I got an A! Overconfidence across the economics curriculum. Journal of Economic Education, 38(2), 131-142.
82. Panadero, E., and Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11, 551-576.
83. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., and Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 806-813.
84. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., and Huertas, J. A. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: Effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 3(7), 149-183.
85. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., and Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 125-132.
86. Panadero, E., Brown, G. L., and Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). The future of student selfassessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 803-830.
87. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., and Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on selfregulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74-98.
88. Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., and Strijbos, J. W. (2016). Scaffolding self-regulated learning through self-assessment and peer assessment: Guidelines for classroom implementation. In D. Laveault and L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 311-326). New York: Springer.
89. Panadero, E., and Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of selfassessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21, 133-148.
90. Punhagui, G. C., and de Souza, N. A. (2013). Self-regulation in the learning process: Actions through self-assessment activities with Brazilian students. International Education Studies, 6(10), 47-62.
91. Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., and Hogaboam-Gray, A. (1998, April). Impact of selfevaluation training on mathematics achievement in a cooperative learning environment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
92. Ross, J. A., and Starling, M. (2008). Self-assessment in a technology-supported environment: The case of grade 9 geography. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15(2), 183-199.
93. Sargeant, J. (2008). Toward a common understanding of self-assessment. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 1-4.
94. Sargeant, J., Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C., and Metsemakers, J. (2008). “Directed” selfassessment: Practice and feedback within a social context. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 47-54.
95. Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
96. Silver, I., Campbell, C., Marlow, B., and Sargeant, J. (2008). Self-assessment and continuing professional development: The Canadian perspective. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 25-31.
97. Siow, L.-F. (2015). Students’ perceptions on self- and peer-assessment in enhancing learning experience. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 21-35.
98. Tan, K. (2004). Does student self-assessment empower or discipline students? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(6), 651-662.
99. Tan, K. (2009). Meanings and practices of power in academics’ conceptions of student self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 361-373.
100. Taras, M. (2008). Issues of power and equity in two models of self-assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 81-92.
101. Tejeiro, R. A., Gomez-Vallecillo, J. L., Romero, A. F., Pelegrina, M., Wallace, A., and Emberley, E. (2012). Summative self-assessment in higher education: Implications of its counting towards the final mark. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10, 789-812.
102. van Helvoort, A. A. J. (2012). How adult students in information studies use a scoring rubric for the development of their information literacy skills. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38, 165-171.
103. van Loon, M. H., de Bruin, A. B. H., van Gog, T., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., and Dunlosky, J. (2014). Can students evaluate their understanding of cause-andeffect relations? The effects of diagram completion on monitoring accuracy. Acta Psychologica, 151, 143-154.
104. Wang, W. (2017). Using rubrics in student self-assessment: Student perceptions in the English as a foreign language writing context. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 1280-1292.
105. Wollenschläger, M., Hattie, J., Machts, N., Möller, J., and Harms, U. (2016). What makes rubrics effective in teacher-feedback? Transparency of learning goals is not enough. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44-45, 1-11.
106. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91.
107. Zimmerman, B. J., and Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance: An introduction and overview. In B. J Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge.