To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 133-148

  Panadero, Ernesto ^a,b   Romero, Margarida ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

accuracy; formative assessment; rubric; self assessment; self regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893189967     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Alonso-Tapia, J., Panadero, E., & Ruiz, M. A. (in press). Development and validity of the Emotion and Motivation Self-Regulation Questionnaire (EMSR-Q): Intertwined effects between self-regulation styles and classroom motivational climate. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17.
2. Andrade, H. (2010). Students as the definitive source of formative assessment: Academic self-assessment and the self-regulation of learning. In H. J. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 90-105). New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1-11. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=3
4. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and middle school students' writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17, 199-214. doi:10.1080/09695941003696172
5. Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students' writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 27, 3-13.
6. Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48, 12-19.
7. Andrade, H., Wang, X. L., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 287-302.
8. Berry, J. W., & Chew, S. L. (2008). Improving learning through interventions of student-generated questions and concept maps. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 305-312.
9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7-73.
10. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54, 199-231.
11. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529-549. doi:10.1007/BF00138746
12. Brown, G. T. L., Glasswell, K., & Harland, D. (2004). Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a New Zealand writing assessment system. Assessing Writing, 9, 105-121. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2004.07.001
13. Diaz Barriga, F. (2002). Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo: Una interpretación constructivista [Teachers' strategies for a meaningful learning: A constructivist interpretation]. Mexico: McGraw-Hill.
14. Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231-264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
15. Dignath, C., Büttner, G., & Langfeldt, H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training programmes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101-129. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003
16. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331-350.
17. Falchikov, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395-430.
18. Goodrich, H. W. (1996). Student self-assessment: At the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
19. Goodrich Andrade, H. (2001). The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write. Current Issues in Education, 4(4). Retrieved from http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume4/number4/
20. Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003). Quantitative analysis of the rubric as an assessment tool: An empirical study of student peer-group rating. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1509-1528. doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268
21. Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002). Concept maps as an assessment tool in psychology courses. Teaching of Psychology, 29, 25-29. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2901_06.
22. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130-144.
23. Kitsantas, A., Robert, A. R., & Doster, J. (2004). Developing self-regulated learners: Goal setting, self-evaluation, and organizational signals during acquisition of procedural skills. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 269-287.
24. Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22, 121-132. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
25. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2010). Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 20, 434-447. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.003
26. Lan, W. Y. (1998). Teaching self-monitoring skills in statistics. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 86-105). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
27. Landrum, R. E. (1999). Student expectations of grade inflation. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 124-128.
28. Lejk, M., & Wyvill, M. (2001). The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: A quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments. Assessment & Evaluation In Higher Education, 26, 551-561.
29. Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (2005). Learning to reflect and to attribute constructively as basic components of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 351-372. doi:10.1348/000709905X25030
30. McCormick, M. J., Dooley, K. E., Lindner, J. R., & Cummins, R. L. (2007). Perceived growth versus actual growth in executive leadership competencies: An application of the stair-step behaviorally anchored evaluation approach. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48, 23-35.
31. McDonald, B., & Boud, D. (2003). The impact of self-assessment on achievement: The effects of self-assessment training on performance in external examinations. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10, 209-220.
32. Ning, H. K., & Downing, K. (2012). Influence of student learning experience on academic performance: The mediator and moderator effects of self-regulation and motivation. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 219-237. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.538468
33. Nückles, M., Hübner, S., & Renkl, A. (2009). Enhancing self-regulated learning by writing learning protocols. Learning and Instruction, 19, 259-271. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.002
34. Panadero, E. (2011). Instructional help for self-assessment and self-regulation: Evaluation of the efficacy of self-assessment scripts vs. rubrics (Ph.D.). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid.
35. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 806-813. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
36. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2014). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: Effects on first year university students' self-regulation and performance. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37(1).
37. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 125-132. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001
38. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129-144. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
39. Panadero, E., Romero, M., & Strijbos, J. W. (2013). The impact of a rubric and friendship on construct validity of peer assessment, perceived fairness and comfort, and performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39, 195-203. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005
40. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89-101.
41. Perlow, L. A. (1999). The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 57-81.
42. Popham, J. (1997). What's wrong and what's right with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55, 72-75.
43. Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 269-286. doi:10.1080/00313830120074206
44. Reynolds-Keefer, L. (2010). Rubric-referenced assessment in teacher preparation: An opportunity to learn by using. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 15(8). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=15&n=8
45. Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1-31.
46. Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2007). Examining the validity of self-reports on scales measuring students' strategic processing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 351-378. doi:10.1348/000709906x106147
47. Schafer, W. D., Swanson, G., Bene, N., & Newberry, G. (2001). Effects of teacher knowledge of rubrics on student achievement in four content areas. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 151-170.
48. Schildkamp, K., Vanhoof, J., van Petegem, P., & Visscher, A. (2011). The use of school self-evaluation results in the Netherlands and Flanders. British Educational Research Journal, 38, 125-152. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.528556
49. Tan, K. H. K. (2012). Student self-assessment. Assessment, learning and empowerment. Singapore: Research Publishing.
50. Taras, M. (2010). Student self-assessment: Processes and consequences. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 199-209. doi:10.1080/13562511003620027
51. Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01281.x
52. Wang, J., & Imbrie, P. K. (2010, June). Students' peer evaluation calibration through the administration of vignettes. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY.
53. Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2010). The psychology of academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 653-678.
54. Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). New York, NY: Routledge.
55. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge.