메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 81-92

Issues of power and equity in two models of self-assessment

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 38049115417     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562510701794076     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (33)

References (31)
  • 1
    • 0001586316 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education: Principles
    • Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 5:1, pp. 7-74.
    • (1998) Policy & Practice , vol.5 , Issue.1 , pp. 7-74
    • Black, P.1    Wiliam, D.2
  • 3
    • 24044464962 scopus 로고
    • Tertiary Education Research Centre, The University of New South Wales
    • Boud, D. J. (1985) Studies in self-assessment, Tertiary Education Research Centre, The University of New South Wales
    • (1985) Studies in Self-assessment
    • Boud, D.J.1
  • 7
    • 75649106303 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education
    • Broadfoot, P. and Black, P. (2004) Redefining assessment? The first ten years of assessment in education. Assessment in Education, 11:1, pp. 7-27.
    • (2004) Assessment in Education , vol.11 , Issue.1 , pp. 7-27
    • Broadfoot, P.1    Black, P.2
  • 8
    • 1842715737 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice
    • Brookhart, S. M. (2004) Classroom assessment: Tensions and intersections in theory and practice. Teachers College Record, 106:3, pp. 429-458.
    • (2004) Teachers College Record , vol.106 , Issue.3 , pp. 429-458
    • Brookhart, S.M.1
  • 12
    • 0141445204 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Litigation and learning tensions in improving university lecturers' assessment practice, Assessment in Education: Principles
    • Ecclestone, K. and Swann, J. (1999) Litigation and learning tensions in improving university lecturers' assessment practice, Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy and Practice, 6:3, pp. 377-389.
    • (1999) Policy and Practice , vol.6 , Issue.3 , pp. 377-389
    • Ecclestone, K.1    Swann, J.2
  • 15
    • 33645282171 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford
    • (1999) Staff guide to self and peer assessment, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford
    • (1999) Staff Guide to Self and Peer Assessment
  • 16
    • 0036699978 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray
    • Knight, P. T. (2002) Summative assessment in higher education: Practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 27, pp. 275-286.
    • (2002) Studies in Higher Education , vol.27 , pp. 275-286
    • Knight, P.T.1
  • 17
    • 22544461083 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The public understanding of measurement inaccuracy
    • Newton, P. E. (2005) The public understanding of measurement inaccuracy. British Educational Research Journal, 31:4, pp. 419-442.
    • (2005) British Educational Research Journal , vol.31 , Issue.4 , pp. 419-442
    • Newton, P.E.1
  • 18
    • 33645227268 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice
    • Nicol, D. J. and Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2005) Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31:2, pp. 199-218.
    • (2005) Studies in Higher Education , vol.31 , Issue.2 , pp. 199-218
    • Nicol, D.J.1    Macfarlane-Dick, D.2
  • 19
    • 0039921137 scopus 로고
    • Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
    • Sadler, D. R. (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, pp. 145-165.
    • (1989) Instructional Science , vol.18 , pp. 145-165
    • Sadler, D.R.1
  • 20
    • 0007106103 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education: Principles
    • Sadler, D. R. (1998) Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education: Principles. Policy and Practice, 5:1, pp. 77-85.
    • (1998) Policy and Practice , vol.5 , Issue.1 , pp. 77-85
    • Sadler, D.R.1
  • 22
    • 0348067453 scopus 로고
    • Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self, peer and collaborative assessment
    • Somervell, H. (1993) Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self, peer and collaborative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18:3, pp. 221-233.
    • (1993) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.18 , Issue.3 , pp. 221-233
    • Somervell, H.1
  • 24
    • 34147122325 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Does student self-assessment empower or discipline students?
    • Tan, K. H. K. (2004) Does student self-assessment empower or discipline students?. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29:6, pp. 651-663.
    • (2004) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.29 , Issue.6 , pp. 651-663
    • Tan, K.H.K.1
  • 25
    • 68049118640 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: Towards transparency for students and for tutors
    • Taras, M. (2001) The use of tutor feedback and student self-assessment in summative assessment tasks: Towards transparency for students and for tutors. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26:6, pp. 606-614.
    • (2001) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.26 , Issue.6 , pp. 606-614
    • Taras, M.1
  • 26
    • 3242793182 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment
    • Taras, M. (2002) Using assessment for learning and learning from assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27:6, pp. 501-510.
    • (2002) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.27 , Issue.6 , pp. 501-510
    • Taras, M.1
  • 27
    • 28744446189 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment
    • Taras, M. (2003) To feedback or not to feedback in student self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28:5, pp. 549-565.
    • (2003) Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.28 , Issue.5 , pp. 549-565
    • Taras, M.1
  • 28
    • 28744447217 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment? Summative and formative? Some theoretical reflections
    • Taras, M. (2005) Assessment? summative and formative? some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53:3, pp. 466-478.
    • (2005) British Journal of Educational Studies , vol.53 , Issue.3 , pp. 466-478
    • Taras, M.1
  • 29
    • 38049135735 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Integrating formative and summative functions of assessment
    • Wiliam, D. (2000) Integrating formative and summative functions of assessment.
    • (2000)
    • Wiliam, D.1
  • 30
    • 38049135735 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Integrating summative and formative functions of assessment
    • Wiliam, D. (2000) Integrating summative and formative functions of assessment.
    • (2000)
    • Wiliam, D.1
  • 31
    • 85066199813 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement
    • Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C. and Black, P. (2004) Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11, pp. 49-65.
    • (2004) Assessment in Education , vol.11 , pp. 49-65
    • Wiliam, D.1    Lee, C.2    Harrison, C.3    Black, P.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.