Improving students with rubric-based self-assessment and oral feedback

IEEE Transactions on Education

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 319-325

  Barney, Sebastian ^a   Khurum, Mahvish ^b   Petersen, Kai ^b   Unterkalmsteiner, Michael ^b   Jabangwe, Ronald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b BLEKINGE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Learning outcomes; oral feedback; perception gap; rubric based evaluation; software engineering

Indexed keywords

LEARNING OUTCOME; RUBRIC-BASED EVALUATION; SELF-ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING COURSE; STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84864649772     PISSN: 00189359     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TE.2011.2172981     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. J. B. Biggs and K. F. Collis, Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). New York: Academic, 1982.
2. A. Jonsson and G. Svingby, "The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences," Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 2, pp. 130-144, 2007.
3. G. T. L. Brown, K. Glasswell, and D. Harland, "Accuracy in the scoring of writing: Studies of reliability and validity using a new zealand writing assessment system," Assessing Writing, vol. 9, pp. 105-121, 2004.
4. A. Blair and S. McGinty, "Its good to talk? developing feedback practice," Gateway Papers, vol. 1, 2010.
5. M. Jollands, N. McCallum, and J. Bondy, "If students want feedback why dont they collect their assignments?," in Proc. 20th Annu. Conf. Australasian Assoc. Eng. Educ., 2009, pp. 735-740.
6. J. A. Ross, "The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment," Res. Eval., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1-13, 2006.
7. H. G. Andrade, "Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning," Educ. Leadership, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1-7, 2000.
8. H. J. C. Ellis, "Self-grading: An approach to supporting self-directed learning," in Proc. 11th Annu. SIGCSE ITiCSE, 2006, pp. 349-349.
9. B. Moskal, K. Miller, and L. A. S. King, "Grading essays in computer ethics: Rubrics considered helpful," in Proc. 33rd SIGCSE Tech. Symp. Comput. Sci.e Educ., 2002, pp. 101-105.
10. R. Feldt, M. Höst, and F. Lüders, "Generic skills in software engineering master thesis projects: Towards rubric-based evaluation," in Proc. 22nd CSEE&T, 2009, pp. 12-15.
11. K. Becker, "Grading programming assignments using rubrics," in Proc. 8th Annu. SIGCSE ITiCSE, 2003, pp. 253-253.
12. C. S. G. Gibbs and R. MacDonald, "Improving student learning through changing assessment a conceptual and practical framework," in EARLI, 2003, pp. 1-10.