Is learner self-assessment reliable and valid in a Web-based portfolio environment for high school students?

Computers and Education

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 325-334

  Chang, Chi Cheng ^a   Liang, Chaoyun ^b   Chen, Yi Hui ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b YUAN ZE UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Portfolio; Portfolio assessment; Reliability; Self assessment; Validity; Web based Portfolio

Indexed keywords

PORTFOLIO; PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT; SELF-ASSESSMENT; VALIDITY; WEB-BASED PORTFOLIO;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; RELIABILITY; STUDENTS;

WEBSITES;

EID: 84866563068     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. R. Ballantyne, K. Hughes, and A. Mylonas Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 5 2002 427 441
2. M.H. Baturay, and A. Daloglu E-portfolio assessment in an online English language course Computer Assisted Language Learning 23 5 2010 413 428
3. S. Bloxham, and A. West Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 6 2004 721 733
4. L. Bouzidi, and A. Jaillet Can online peer assessment be trusted? Educational Technology & Society 12 4 2009 257 268
5. C.-C. Chang A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio (WBLP) British Journal of Educational Technology 32 4 2001 435 458
6. L.L. Chang The analysis of portfolio assessment reliability and validity: a case study of elementary school students Education and Psychology 25 2002 1 34
7. C.-C. Chang Enhancing self-perceived effects using Web-based portfolio assessment Computers in Human Behavior 24 4 2008 1753 1771
8. C.-C. Chang, and K.-H. Tseng Using a Web-based portfolio assessment system to elevate project-based learning performances Interactive Learning Environments 16 2 2009 1 20
9. C.-C. Chang, and K.-H. Tseng Use and performances of web-based portfolio assessment British Journal of Educational Technology 40 2 2009 358 370
10. K. Cho, C. Schunn, and R. Wilson Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives Journal of Educational Psychology 98 4 2006 891 901
11. P. Davies Computerized peer assessment Innovations in Education and Training International 37 4 2000 346 355
12. C. Derham, and J. DiPerna Digital professional portfolios of preservice teaching: an initial study of score reliability and validity International Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 15 3 2007 363 381
13. N. Falchikov, and J. Goldfinch Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks Review of Educational Research 70 3 2000 287 322
14. Gadbury-Amyot, C. C. (2003). Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment of competency in a baccalaureate dental hygiene program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Kansas City, Missouri: University of Missouri.
15. C.;C. Gadbury-Amyot, J. Kim, R.L. Palm, E. Mills, E. Noble, and P. Overman Validity and reliability of portfolio assessment of competency in a baccalaureate dental hygiene program Journal of Dental Education 67 9 2003 991 1002
16. Gelinas, A. M. (1998). Issue of reliability and validity in using portfolio assessment to measure foreign language teacher performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
17. C. Hult Using on-line portfolios to assess English majors at Utah state University B.L. Cambridge, S. Kahn, D.P. Tompkins, K.B. Yancey, Electronic portfolios: Emerging practice in student, faculty, and institutional learning 2001 American Association for Higher Education Press Washington, DC 60 70
18. M.S. Knowles, E.F. Holton III, and R.A. Swanson The adult learner 6th ed. 2005 Elsevier Burlington, MA
19. J. Lenze Inter-rater reliability in the evaluation of electronic portfolios: a survey of empirical research results R. Ferdig, Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2004 2004 AACE Chesapeake, VA 164 169
20. J.C. Liang, and C.C. Tsai Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course Internet and Higher Education 13 2010 242 247
21. S.J. Lin, Z.F. Liu, and S.M. Yuan Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 17 4 2001 420 432
22. Z.F. Liu, S.J. Lin, C.H. Chiu, and S.M. Yuan Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer IEEE Transactions on Education 44 3 2001 246 251
23. J. Luca, and M. McMahon Developing multidisciplinary teams through self-assessment, supported with online tools E. Pearson, P. Bohman, Proceedings of Ed-Media 2006 AACE Norfolk, VA 1855 1860
24. P.J. Miller The effect of scoring criteria specificity on peer and self-assessment Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 4 2003 383 394
25. O. Oskay, M. Schallies, and I. Morgil A closer look at findings from recent publication Hacettepe University Journal of Education 35 2008 263 272
26. M. Price, and B. O'Donovan Improving performance through enhancing student understanding of criteria and feedback C. Bryan, K. Clegg, Innovative assessment in higher education 2006 Routledge London, UK 100 109
27. F.J. Prins, D.M.A. Sluijsmans, P.A. Kirschner, and J.-W. Strijbos Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: a case study Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 4 2005 417 444
28. P. Sadler, and E. Good The impact of self- and peer-grading on student learning Educational Assessment 11 1 2006 1 31
29. D. Sluijsmans, F. Dochy, and G. Moerkerke Creating a learning environment by using self-, peer-, and co-assessment Learning Environments Research 1 3 1999 293 319
30. J. Sulzen, M. Young, and R. Hannifin Reliability and validity of an ecologically-grounded student teacher electronic portfolio rubric K. McFerrin, Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 2008 AACE Chesapeake, VA 153 159
31. Y.-T. Sung, K.-E. Chang, S.-K. Chiou, and H.-T. Hou The design and application of a web-based self and peer-assessment system Computers & Education 45 2 2005 187 202
32. Y.-T. Sung, C.-S. Lin, C.-L. Lee, and K.-E. Chang Evaluating proposals for experiments: an application of web-based self-assessment and peer-assessment Teaching of Psychology 30 4 2003 331 334
33. K.J. Topping, E.F. Smith, I. Swanson, and A. Elliot Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 2 2000 149 169
34. C.-C. Tsai, and J.-C. Liang The development of science activities via on-line peer assessment: the role of scientific epistemological views Instructional Science 37 3 2009 293 310
35. C.-C. Tsai, S.-J. Lin, and S.-M. Yuan Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system Computers & Education 38 1-3 2002 241 252
36. M.-L. Wen, and C.-C. Tsai University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment Higher Education 51 1 2006 27 44
37. K.B. Yancey General patterns and the future B.L. Cambridge, S. Kahn, D.P. Tompkins, K.B. Yancey, Electronic Portfolios: Emerging practice in student, faculty, and institutional learning 2001 American Association for Higher Education Press Washington, DC 83 87
38. Y.-F. Yang, and C.-C. Tsai Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment Learning and Instruction 20 1 2010 72 83
39. M.N. Yu Educational testing and assessment 2002 Psychological Publishing Taipei, Taiwan
40. K.A. Zalatan Electronic portfolios in a management major curriculum B.L. Cambridge, S. Kahn, D.P. Tompkins, K.B. Yancey, Electronic portfolios: Emerging practice in student, faculty, and institutional learning 2001 American Association for Higher Education Press Washington, DC 44 52
41. O. Zawacki-Richter, and A. Hanft Validation of competencies in e-portfolios: a qualitative analysis International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12 1 2011 42 60