Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning Through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation

Enabling Power of Assessment

Volumn 4, Issue , 2016, Pages 311-326

  Panadero, Ernesto ^a   Jonsson, Anders ^b   Strijbos, Jan Willem ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b KRISTIANSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Forethought Phase; Panadero; Peer Assessment (PA); Provide Sufficient Time; Rubra Group

Indexed keywords

EID: 85136717608     PISSN: 21982643     EISSN: 21982651     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Assessment as the regulation of learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, USA.
2. Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(3), 1–11. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=3
3. Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009). Promoting learning and achievement through self-assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 12–19.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5(1), 7–73.
5. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54(2), 199–231.
6. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.
7. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher-education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5), 529–549. doi: 10. 1007/BF00138746
8. Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
10. Clark, I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2), 205–249. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6
11. de la Harpe, B., & Radloff, A. (2000). Informed teachers and learners: The importance of assessing the characteristics needed for lifelong learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 169–182. doi:10.1080/01580379950177323
12. Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231–264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
13. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65–84). New York: Routledge.
14. Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer-and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36(0), 101–111. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008
15. Jonsson, A. (2013). Facilitating productive use of feedback in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(1), 63–76. doi:10.1177/1469787412467125
16. Jonsson, A. (2014). Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(7), 840–852. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.875117
17. Jonsson, A., Lundahl, C., & Holmgren, A. (2015). Evaluating a large-scale implementation of assessment for learning in Sweden. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22 (1), 104–121. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.970612
18. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2, 130–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
19. Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121–132. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
20. Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Three metacognitive approaches to training pre-service teachers in different learning phases of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 15 (5), 465–485.
21. Lan, W. Y. (1998). Teaching self-monitoring skills in statistics. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 86–105). New York: Guilford Press.
22. McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 137–146. doi:10.1080/00461520902832384
23. McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 227–252). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Nicol, D., & McFarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning, a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
25. Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. J. (2004). Student self-evaluation, teacher evaluation, and learner performance. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 5–22. doi:10.1007/BF02504672
26. Panadero, E. (2011). Instructional help for self-assessment and self-regulation: Evaluation of the efficacy of self-assessment scripts vs. rubrics. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.
27. Panadero, E. (2016). Social, interpersonal and human effects of peer assessment: A review and future directions. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Human factors and social conditions of assessment (pp. 247–266). New York: Routledge.
28. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and practical connotations. When it happens, how is it acquired and what to do to develop it in our students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551–576. doi:10.14204/ejrep.30.12200
29. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman’s cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales De Psicologia, 30(2), 450–462. doi:10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
30. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(6), 806–813. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.007
31. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2014a). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts: Effects on first year university students’ self-regulation and performance. Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 37(1), 149–183.
32. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Reche, E. (2013). Rubrics vs. self-assessment scripts effect on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy in pre-service teachers. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 39(3), 125–132. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.04.001
33. Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. L. (2015). Higher education teachers’ assessment practices: Formative espoused but not yet fully implemented. Paper presented at the Fifth Assessment in Higher Education Conference 2015, Birmingham, (UK).
34. Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Courtney, M. G. R. (2014b). Teachers’ reasons for using self-assessment: A survey self-report of Spanish teachers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 365–383. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.919247
35. Panadero, E., Brown, G. T. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review. doi:10. 1007/s10648-015-9350-2
36. Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000226
37. Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
38. Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133–148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
39. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101.
40. Ross, J. A. (2006). The reliability, validity, and utility of self-assessment. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 11. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=11&n=10. Accessed May 7, 2015.
41. Segers, M., Nijhuis, J., & Gijselaers, W. (2006). Redesigning a learning and assessment environment: The influence on students’ perceptions of assessment demands and their learning strategies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(3), 223–242. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.08.004
42. Strijbos, J. W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Fostering interactivity through formative peer assessment in (web-based) collaborative learning environments. In C. Mourlas, N. Tsianos, & P. Germanakos (Eds.), Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-Based Education: Integrating Human Factors and Personalization (pp. 375–395). Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
43. Tan, K. H. K. (2012). Student self-assessment. Assessment, learning and empowerment. Singapore: Research Publishing.
44. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249–276.
45. Topping, K. J. (2003). Self and peer assessment in school and university: Reliability, validity and utility. In M. Segers, F. Dochy, & E. Cascallar (Eds.), Optimising new modes of assessment: In search of qualities and standards (Vol. 1, pp. 55–87). Dordrecht: Springer.
46. van Zundert, M. (2012). Conditions of peer assessment for complex learning (Doctoral dissertation, Maastrich University).
47. van Zundert, M. J., Könings, K. D., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012a). Teaching domain-specific skills before peer assessment skills is superior to teaching them simultaneously. Educational Studies, 38(5), 541–557. doi:10.1080/03055698.2012.654920
48. van Zundert, M. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Könings, K. D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2012b). The differential effects of task complexity on domain-specific and peer assessment skills. Educational Psychology, 32(1), 127–145. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.626122
49. van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
50. Wiliam, D. (2014). Formative assessment and contingency in the regulation of learning processes. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, USA.
51. Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53–82). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Winne, P. H. (2014). Fusing self-regulated learning with formative evaluation to improve education. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, USA.
53. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.794676
55. Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). New York: Routledge.
56. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York: Routledge.