The effects of individual or group guidelines on the calibration accuracy and achievement of high school biology students

Contemporary Educational Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 280-287

  Bol, Linda ^a   Hacker, Douglas J ^b   Walck, Camilla C ^a   Nunnery, John A ^a  

^a OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibration; Group learning; Metacognition; Self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865644702     PISSN: 0361476X     EISSN: 10902384     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aiken L.S., West S.G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions 1991, Sage Publications, London.
2. Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist 1993, 28(2):117-131.
3. Bangert-Drowns R., Kulik C., Kulik J., Morgan M. The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research 1991, 61:213-238.
4. Bol L., Hacker D. A comparison of the effects of practice tests and traditional review on performance and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education 2001, 69(2):133-151.
5. Bol L., Hacker D., O'Shea P., Allen D. The influence of overt practice, achievement level, and explanatory style on calibration accuracy and performance. The Journal of Experimental Education 2005, 73(4):269-290.
6. Butler D., Winne H. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research 1995, 65(3):245-281.
7. Cantrell S. Promoting talk: A framework for reading discussions in teacher education courses. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 2002, 45(7):642-657.
8. Dahl B. Analyzing cognitive learning processes through group interventions of successful high school pupils: Development and use of a model. Educational Studies in Mathematics 2004, 56(2):129-155.
9. Davis E. Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 2003, 12(1):91-142.
10. Garavalia L., Gredler M. An exploratory study of academic goal setting, achievement calibration and self-regulated learning. Journal of Instructional Psychology 2002, 4(29):221-231.
11. Georghiades P. Beyond conceptual change learning in science education: Focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition. Educational Research 2000, 41(2):129-139.
12. Hacker D., Bol L., Bahbahani K. Explaining calibration accuracy in classroom contexts: The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition Learning 2008, 3:101-121.
13. Hacker D.J., Bol L., Horgan D., Rakow E.A. Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology 2000, 92:160-170.
14. Hacker D., Bol L., Keener M. Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. Handbook of memory and metacognition 2008, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. J. Dunlsky, R. Bjork (Eds.).
15. Hacker D., Dunlosky J., Graesser A. Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading. Metacognition in educational theory and practice 1998, 165-191. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Keren G. Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica 1991, 77:217-273.
17. Kirschner F., Paas F., Kirschner P.A., Janssen J. Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction 2011, 21:587-599.
18. Kramarski B., Dudai V. Group metacognitive support for on-line inquiry in mathematics with differential self-questioning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2009, 40(4):377-404.
19. Kramarski B., Mevarech Z.R. Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal 2003, 40:281-310.
20. Kruger J., Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, 77:1121-1134.
21. Kulhavy R., Stock W. Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Review 1989, 1:279-308.
22. Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B., Phillips L.D. Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases 1982, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, A. Tversky (Eds.).
23. Lundeberg M., Moch S. Influence of social interaction on cognition: Connected learning in science. Journal of Higher Education 1995, 66(3):312-320.
24. Martinez M. What is metacognition? Teachers intuitively recognize the importance of metacognition but may not be aware of its many dimensions. Phi Delta Kappa 2006, 87(9):696-699.
25. Meyer L. Strategies for correcting students' wrong responses. Elementary School Journal 1986, 87:227-241.
26. Nietfeld J.L., Cao L., Osborne J.W. Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education 2005, 74:7-28.
27. Nietfeld J., Schraw G. The effect of knowledge and strategy explanation on monitoring accuracy. Journal of Educational Research 2002, 95:131-142.
28. Orange C. Using peer modeling to teach self-regulation. The Journal of Experimental Science 1999, 68(1):21-39.
29. Paris S., Newman R. Developmental aspects of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 1990, 25(1):100-116.
30. Phanikiran R., Arrow H., Sniezek J. Hoping, performing, learning, and predicting: Changes in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Human Performance 1996, 9(1):23-32.
31. Pintrich P., Marx R., Boyle R. Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research 1993, 63:167-199.
32. Schraw G. Measuring metacognitive judgments. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 415-429. Routledge, New York. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).
33. Schunk D., Zimmerman B.J. Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist 1997, 32:195-208.
34. Taylor S. Better learning through better thinking: Developing students metacognitive abilities. Journal of College Reading and Learning 1999, 30(1):34-39.
35. Thomas J., Bol L., Warkentin R., Wilson M., Strage A., Rohwer W. Interrelationships among students' study activities, self-concept of academic ability, and achievement as a function of characteristics of high-school biology courses. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1993, 7:499-532.
36. Van Zee E., Minstrell J. Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of Learning Sciences 1997, 6(2):227-269.
37. Vygotsky L.S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes 1978, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Wentzel K. Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding students' academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology 1999, 91:76-97.
39. White B., Frederiksen J. Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 1998, 16(1):3-118.
40. Winne P. Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist 1995, 30:187-200.
41. Wiseman A. Collaboration, initiation, and rejection: The social construction of stories in a kindergarten class. The Reading Teacher 2003, 56(8):802-807.
42. Zimmerman B.J. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal 2008, 45(1):166-183.
43. Zimmerman B.J., Kitsantas A. Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation. Journal of Educational Psychology 2002, 94:660-668.
44. Zimmerman B.J., Moylan A.R. Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. Handbook of metacognition in education 2009, 299-315. Routledge, New York. D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A.C. Graesser (Eds.).