Assessment in massive open online courses

Electronic Journal of e-Learning

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 207-216

  Admiraal, Wilfried ^a   Huisman, Bart ^a   Pilli, Olga ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b GIRNE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

Assessment; Higher education; MOOC; Open Online Learning; Peer assessment; Quiz; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928682146     PISSN: 14794403     EISSN: 14794403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Admiraal, W., Huisman, B., & Ven, M. van de (2014) “Self-and peer assessment in Massive Open Online Courses”, International Journal of Higher Education, Vol 3, No 3, pp 119-128.
2. Admiraal, W.F., Lockhorst, D., Wubbels, T., Korthagen, F.A.J. and Veen, W. (1998) “Computer-mediated communication environments in teacher education: computer conferencing and the supervision of student teachers”, Learning Environments Research, Vol 1, No 1, pp 59-74.
3. Bates, T. (2014) “Comparing xMOOCs and cMOOCs: philosophy and practice”, Online Learning and Distance Education Resources. Available at: http://www.tonybates.ca/2014/10/13/comparing-xmoocs-and-cmoocs-philosophy-and-practice/ [Accessed 15 February 2015].
4. Bayne, S., and Ross, J. (2013) “The pedagogy of the Massive Open Online Course: the UK view”, York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
5. Bell, F. (2010) “Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 12, No 3, pp 98-118.
6. Bulfin, S., Pangrazio, L. and Selwyn, N. (2014) “Making ‘MOOCs’: The construction of a new digital higher education within news media discourse”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 15, No 5, pp 290-305.
7. Clarà, M. and Barberà, E. (2014) “Three problems with the connectivist conception of learning”, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol 30, No 3, pp 197-206.
8. Clark, D. (2013) “MOOCs: taxonomy of 8 types of MOOC”, Available at: http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com.es/2013/04/moocs-taxonomy-of-8-types-of-mooc.html [Accessed 15 February 2015].
9. Daniels, J. (2013) “MOOC to POOC: Moving from Massive to Participatory” JustPublics@365. Available at: http://justpublics365.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2013/02/05/mooc-to-pooc-moving-from-massive-to-participatory/ [Accessed 29 May 2014].
10. DeBoer, J., Ho, A. D., Stump, G.S. and Breslow, L. (2014) “Changing ‘course’: reconceptualizing educational variables for Massive Open Online Courses”, Educational Researcher, Vol 42, No 2, pp 74-84.
11. Ebben, M. and Murphy, J.S. (2014) “Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship”, Learning Media and Technology, Vol 39, No 3, pp 328-345.
12. Harris, J. and Hofer, M. (2009) “Grounded tech integration”, Learning & Leading with Technology, September/October pp 23-25, Available at: http://www.learningandleading-digital.com/learning_leading/20090910/#pg24 [Accessed 30 May 2014].
13. Hashmi, A.H. (2013) “HarvardX set to launch second SPOC”, Harvard Crimson. Available at: http://harvardx.harvard.edu/links/harvardx-set-launch-second-spocharvard-crimson-amna-h-hashmi-september-16-2013 [Accessed 29 May 2014].
14. Hew, K.F. and Cheung, W.S. (2014) “Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges”, Educational Research Review, Vol 12, No 1, pp 45-58.
15. Hill, P. (2013) “Emerging student patterns in MOOCs: A (revised) graphical view”, e-Literate. Available at: http://mfeldstein.com/emerging-student-patterns-in-moocs-arevised-graphical-view/ [Accessed 12 September 2013].
16. Jaschik, S. (2013) “Feminists challenge Moocs with Docc”, Times Higher Education. Available at: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/feminists-challenge-moocswith-docc/2006596.article [Accessed 29 May 2014].
17. Kop, R. (2011) “The challenges to connectivist Learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a Massive Open Online Course”, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning and Instruction, Vol 12, No 3, pp 74-93.
18. Liyanagunawardena, T.R., Adams, A.A. and Williams, S.A. (2013) “MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 14, No 3, pp 202-27.
19. Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A. and Margaryan, A. (2013) “Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs”, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol 9, No 2.
20. Paulsen, M.F. (1995) “Moderating educational computer conferences”, In Z.L. Berge & M.P. Collins (Eds.), Computer-mediated communications and the online classroom (Vol. III; pp. 81-103). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
21. Reeves, T. (1996) “Evaluating what really matters in computer-based education”. Available at:: http://www.eduworks.com/Documents/Workshops/EdMedia1998/docs/reeves.html#ref10 [Accessed 30 May 2014]
22. Reilly, E.D., Stafford, R.E., Williams, K.M. and Corliss, S.B. (2014) “Evaluating the validity and applicability of automated essay scoring in two massive open online courses”, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 15, No 5 , pp 83-98.
23. Rodriguez, C. O. (2012) “MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for Massive Open Online Courses”, European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, Available at: http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=2&article=516 [Accessed 15 February 2015].
24. Rodriguez, O. (2013) “Two distinct course formats in the delivery of connectivist moocs”, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol 14, No 2, pp 66-80.
25. Tattersall, A. (2013) “Gold rush or just fool’s gold-A quick look at the literature”, ScHARR MOOC Diaries. Available at: http://scharrmoocdiaries.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/scharr-mooc-diaries-part-xvii-gold-rush.html [Accessed 29 May 2014].