Academics writing: The dynamics of knowledge creation

Academics Writing: The Dynamics of Knowledge Creation

Volumn , Issue , 2019, Pages 1-165

  Tusting, Karin ^a   McCulloch, Sharon ^b   Bhatt, Ibrar ^c   Hamilton, Mary ^a   Barton, David ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85061775617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780429197994     Document Type: Book

References (173)

1. Adam, B. (2008). The timescapes challenge: Engagement with the invisible temporal. Paper presented at the Timescapes (ESRC Longitudinal Study). Leeds: University of Leeds. Retrieved from www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/resources/Leeds%20talk%20prose %20Timescapes%20Challenge%20250208.pdf.
2. Ainsworth, S., Grant, D., & Iedema, R. (2009). "Keeping things moving": Space and the construction of middle management identity in a post-NPM organization. Dis- course & Communication, 3(1), 5-25.
3. Antoniou, M., & Moriarty, J. (2008). What can academic writers learn from creative writers? Developing guidance and support for lecturers in higher education. Teach- ing in Higher Education, 13(2), 157-167. doi:10.1080/13562510801923229.
4. Barberis, P. (2013). The managerial imperative: Fifty years' change in UK public administration. Public Policy and Administration, 28(4), 327-345.
5. Barnett, R. (2000). University knowledge in an age of supercomplexity. Higher Edu- cation, 40(4), 409-422.
6. Baron, N. S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language & Communication, 18(2), 133-170. doi:10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00005-6.
7. Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language (Second edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
8. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2012). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one com- munity (Second edition). London: Routledge, 1998.
9. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (Eds.) (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
10. Barton, D., & Lee, C. (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. Abingdon: Routledge.
11. Barton, D., & Papen, U. (Eds.) (2010). The anthropology of writing. London: Continuum.
12. Barton, D., & Tusting, K. (Eds.) (2005). Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Baynham, M., & Prinsloo, M. (Eds.) (2009). The future of literacy studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Bazerman, C. (2005). A response to Anthony Fleury's "Liberal education and com- munication against the disciplines": A view from the world of writing. Communica- tion Education, 54(1), 86-91.
15. Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Milton Keynes: Society for Research in Higher Education/Open University Press.
16. Bellotti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., Smith, I., & Grinter, R. (2005). Quality versus quantity: E-mail-centric task management and its relation with overload. Human-Computer Interaction, 20(1), 89-138.
17. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
18. Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, superdiversity and linguistic landscapes: Chronicles of complexity (critical language and literacy studies). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
19. Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. (2000). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21. Brandt, D. (1998). Sponsors of literacy. College Composition and Communication, 49 (2), 165-185.
22. Brandt, D., & Clinton, K. (2002). Limits of the local: Expanding perspectives on lit- eracy as a social practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(3), 337-356. doi:10.1207/ s15548430jlr3403_4.
23. Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70, 4-28.
24. Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: economy, society, and culture (Vol. 1) (Second edition). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
25. Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as Method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.
26. Chubb, J., Watermeyer, R., & Wakeling, P. (2017). Fear and loathing in the academy? The role of emotion in response to an impact agenda in the UK and Australia. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(3), 555-568. https://doi.org/10. 1080/07294360.2017.1288709.
27. Corrall, S., & Keates, J. (2011). The subject librarian and the virtual learning envir- onment: A study of UK universities. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 45(1), 29-49.
28. Dale, K., & Burrell, G. (2007). The spaces of organisation & the organisation of space: Power, identity & materiality at work. New York: Palgrave.
29. Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press.
30. Denis, J., & Pontille, D. (2015). Material ordering and the care of things. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(3), 338-367.
31. Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., & Völker, T. (2016). Transdisciplinary sustain- ability research in practice: Between imaginaries of collective experimentation and entrenched academic value orders. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4), 732-761. doi:10.1177/0162243915626989.
32. Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2014). Networks of knowledge, matters of learning, and criticality in higher education. Higher Education, 67, 35-50. doi:10.1007/s10734- 10013-9639-9633.
33. Fenwick, T., & Nerland, M. (2014). Reconceptualising professional learning: Socio- material knowledges, practices and responsibilities. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
34. Fenwick, T., Nerland, M., & Jensen, K. (2012). Sociomaterial approaches to conceptualiz- ing professional learning and practice. Journal of Education and Work, 22(1), 1-13.
35. Fisher, D., Brush, A. J., Gleave, E., & Smith, M. A. (2006). Revisiting Whittaker & Sidner's "e-mail overload" ten years later. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW '06.
36. Fraiberg, S. (2010). Composition 2.0: Toward a multilingual and multimodal frame- work. College Composition and Communication, 62(1), 100-126.
37. Garcia, C. M., Eisenberg, M. E., Frerich, E. A., Lechner, K. E., & Lust, K. (2012). Conducting go-along interviews to understand context and promote health. Quali- tative Health Research, 22(10), 1395-1403.
38. Goodfellow, R., & Lea, M. R. (2013). Literacy in the digital university: Critical per- spectives on learning, scholarship and technology. London: Routledge.
39. Gornall, L., Cook, C., Daunton, L., Salisbury, J., & Thomas, B. (2013). Academic working lives: Experience, practice and change. London: Bloomsbury.
40. Gornall, L., & Salisbury, J. (2012). Compulsive working, "hyperprofessionality" and the unseen pleasures of academic work. Higher Education Quarterly, 66(2), 135- 154. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2012.00512.x.
41. Gourlay, L. (2014). Creating time: Students, technologies and temporal practices in higher education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(2), 141-153.
42. Green, H., & Powell, S. (2005). Doctoral study in contemporary higher education. Maidenhead: SRHE and Open University Press (McGraw-Hill Education).
43. Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24(3), 392-402.
44. Gruber, T. (2014). Academic sell-out: How an obsession with metrics and rankings is damaging academia. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 24(2), 165-177. doi:10.1080/08841241.2014.970248.
45. Hamilton, M. (2012). Literacy and the politics of representation. London: Routledge.
46. Harley, D., Acord, S. K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., & Judson King, C. (2010). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines. Retrieved from Center for Research Evaluation (BU), Los Angeles, CA and London https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g.
47. Hassan, R. (2003). Network time and the new knowledge epoch. Time & Society, 12 (2), 225-241.
48. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Henwood, F., Kennedy, H., & Miller, N. (2001). Cyborg lives? Women's technobio- graphies. York: Raw Nerve Books Ltd.
50. Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind: When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York: Metropolitan Books.
51. Holborow, M. (2013). Applied linguistics in the neoliberal university: Ideological key- words and social agency. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 229-257. doi:10.1515/ applirev-2013-0011.
52. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic dis- course. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-191.
53. Hyland, K. (2012). Disciplinary identities: Individuality and community in academic discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 32-43.
55. Iedema, R., & Scheeres, H. (2003). From doing work to talking work: Renegotiating knowing, doing, and identity. Applied Linguistics, 24(3), 316-337.
56. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London: Taylor & Francis.
57. Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in aca- demic writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58. Jaffe, A. (Ed.) (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
59. Jarrahi, M., Nelson, S. B., & Thomson, L. (2017). Personal artefact ecologies in the context of mobile knowledge workers. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 469-483.
60. Jerejian, A. C. M., Reid, C., & Rees, C. S. (2013). The contribution of email volume, email management strategies and propensity to worry in predicting email stress among academics. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 991-996. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2012.12.037.
61. Johansson, A., & Vinthagen, S. (2016). Dimensions of everyday resistance: An analy- tical framework. Critical Sociology, 42(3), 417-435.
62. Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly publishing. The Hague: International Association of Scien- tific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Retrieved from www.stm-assoc.org/2018_ 10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf.
63. Kalman, J. (1999). Writing on the plaza. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
64. Kalman, J., & Street, B. (2013). Literacy and numeracy in Latin America. New York: Routledge.
65. Karr-Wisniewski, P., & Lu, Y. (2010). When more is too much: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1061-1072.
66. Kennedy, H. (2003). Technobiography: Researching lives, online and off. Biography, 26 (1), 120-139.
67. Kress, G. (2013). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary commu- nication. London: Routledge.
68. Kuteeva, M., & McGrath, L. (2015). The theoretical research article as a reflection of disciplinary practices: The case of pure mathematics. Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 215-235. doi:10.1093/applin/amt042.
69. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: Uni- versity of Chicago Press.
70. Lambert, C. (2016). Shadow work: The unpaid, unseen jobs that fill your day. London: Counterpoint Press.
71. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and class- room learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
72. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (Second edition). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
75. Lawn, M., & Grosvenor, I. (Eds.) (2005). Materialities of schooling: Design, technol- ogy, objects, routines. Oxford: Symposium Books.
76. Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2009). Lecturers' everyday writing as professional practice in the university as workplace: New insights into academic identities. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 417-428.
77. Lea, M. R., & Stierer, B. (2011). Changing academic identities in changing academic workplaces: Learning from academics' everyday professional writing practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(6), 605-616.
78. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.
79. Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The academic literacies model: Theory and appli- cations. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368-377.
80. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.
81. Lemke, J. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273-290.
82. Leon, K., & Pigg, S. (2011). Graduate students professionalizing in digital time/space: A view from "down below". Computers and Composition, 28(1), 3-13.
83. Liao, T. F., Beckman, J., Marzolph, E., Riederer, C., Sayler, J., & Schmelkin, L. (2013). The social definition of time for university students. Time & Society, 22(1), 119-151.
84. Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2006). Professional academic writing by multilingual scho- lars: Interactions with literacy brokers in the production of English-medium texts. Written Communication, 23(1), 3-35.
85. Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.
86. Lillis, T. M., & Maybin, J. (Eds) (2017). The dynamics of textual trajectories in pro- fessional and workplace practice. Text and Talk, 37(4), 409-414.
87. Lillis, T. M., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5-32.
88. Lingard, B., & Thompson, G. (2017). Doing time in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(1), 1-12. doi:10.1080/01425692.2016.1260854.
89. Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (2000). Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90. Lupton, D. (2014). "Feeling better connected": Academics' use of social media. Can- berra: News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.
91. Massey, D. (1994). Space, place and gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
92. Mautner, G. (2005). The entrepreneurial university. Critical Discourse Studies, 2(2), 95-120. doi:10.1080/17405900500283540.
93. Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the market society. London: Routledge.
94. May, J., & Thrift, N. (Eds.) (2003). Timespace: Geographies of temporality. Abingdon: Routledge.
95. McCarty, R., & Swales, J. M. (2017). Technological change and generic effects in a university Herbarium: A textography revisited. Discourse Studies, 19(5), 561-580.
96. McCulloch, S. (2017). Hobson's choice: The effects of research evaluation on aca- demics' writing practices in England. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69 (5), 503-515.
97. McCulloch, S., Tusting, K., & Hamilton, M. (2017). The role of networked learning in academics' writing. Research in Learning Technology, 25. doi:10.25304/rlt.v25.1958.
98. McGrath, L., & Kaufhold, K. (2016). English for specific purposes and academic lit- eracies: Eclecticism in academic writing pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 21 (8), 933-947.
99. McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161-173.
100. Menzies, H., & Newson, J. (2007). No time to think: Academics' life in the globally wired university. Time & Society, 16(1), 83-98.
101. Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 8-20.
102. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-167.
103. Mingers, J., & Willmott, H. (2012). Taylorizing business school research: On the "one best way" performative effects of journal ranking lists. Human Relations, 66(8), 1051-1073. doi:10.1177/0018726712467048.
104. Misra, J., Lundquist, J. H., & Templer, A. (2012). Gender, work time, and care responsibilities among faculty. Sociological Forum, 27(2), 300-323.
105. Morrish, L. (2018). A short commercial break, on Academic irregularities: Critical university studies, discourse and managerialism. Retrieved from https://academicirre gularities.wordpress.com/2018/10/06/a-short-commercial-break/.
106. Müller, R. (2014). Racing for what? Anticipation and acceleration in the work and career practices of academic life science postdocs. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 15(3). doi:10.17169/fqs-15.3.2245.
107. Murray, R. (2015). Writing in social spaces: A social processes approach to academic writing. London: Routledge.
108. Murray, R., & Newton, M. (2009). Writing retreat as structured intervention: Margin or mainstream? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 541-553.
109. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge (Vol. 8). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
110. Myers, G. (2010). The discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum.
111. Naidoo, R., & Williams, J. (2015). The neoliberal regime in English higher education: Charters, consumers and the erosion of the public good. Critical Studies in Education, 56(2), 208-223.
112. Nespor, J. (2007). Curriculum charts and time in undergraduate education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(6), 753-766.
113. Nespor, J. (2014). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London: Routledge.
114. Nygaard, L. P. (2017). Publishing and perishing: An academic literacies framework for investigating research productivity. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 519-532. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1058351.
115. Obeng-Denteh, W., & Amoah-Mensah, J. (2011). Pure mathematicians' and applied mathematicians' saga: But one family! A mathematical panacea. Continental Jour- nal of Education Research, 4(2), 1-10.
116. O'Carroll, A. (2008). Fuzzy holes and intangible time: Time in a knowledge industry. Time & Society, 17(2-3), 179-193. doi:10.1177/0961463X08093421.
117. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowl- edge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345. doi:10.1080/02680930500108718.
118. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435-1448.
119. Oztok, M., Wilton, L., Lee, K., Wilton, L., Zingaro, D., MacKinnon, K., Hewitt, J. (2014). Polysynchronous: Dialogic construction of time in online learning. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(2), 154-161. doi:10.2304/elea.2014.11.2.154.
120. Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M. (2014). Researching language and social media: A student guide. London and New York: Routledge.
121. Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
122. Park, J. H., & De Costa, P. (2015). Reframing graduate student writing strategies from an activity theory perspective. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2(1), 25-50.
123. Pels, D. (2003). Unhastening science. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(2), 209-231.
124. Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
125. Probert, B. (2005). "I just couldn't fit it in": Gender and unequal outcomes in aca- demic careers. Gender, Work & Organization, 12(1), 50-72.
126. Radice, H. (2013). How we got here: UK higher education under neoliberalism. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 12(3), 407-418.
127. REF (2015). Research excellence framework 2014: Overview report by main panel C and sub-panels 16 to 26. Retrieved from www.ref.ac.uk/2014/media/ref/content/expa nel/member/Main%20Panel%20C%20overview%20report.pdf.
128. REF (2015). Research excellence framework 2014: Overview report by main panel B and sub-panels 7 to 15. Retrieved from www.ref.ac.uk/2014/media/ref/content/expa nel/member/Main%20Panel%20B%20overview%20report.pdf.
129. Russell, D. (2002). Writing in the academic disciplines. Carbondale and Edwardsville: S. Illinois University Press.
130. Ryberg, T., Davidsen, J., & Hodgson, V. (2017). Understanding nomadic collaborative learning groups. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 235-247. doi:10.1111/bjet.12584.
131. Scollon, R. (2002). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.
132. Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
133. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
134. Shattock, M. (2014). Can we still speak of there being an academic profession? History of Education, 43(6), 727-739. doi:10.1080/0046760X.2014.964008.
135. Shepherd, S. (2018). Managerialism: An ideal type. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1668-1678. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1281239.
136. Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Every- day life and how it changes. London: Sage.
137. Smith, S. (2015). Multiple temporalities of knowing in academic research. Social Sci- ence Information, 54(2), 149-176.
138. Snyder, I. (Ed.) (2002). Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age. London: Routledge.
139. Southerton, D. (2003). "Squeezing time": Allocating practices, coordinating networks and scheduling society. Time & Society, 12(1), 5-25.
140. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420. doi:10.1177/ 030631289019003001.
141. Star, S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: The ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 8(1-2), 9-30.
142. Strathern, M. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London and New York: Routledge.
143. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
144. Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
145. Sum, N. L., & Jessop, B. J. (2013). Competitiveness, the knowledge-based economy and higher education. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 4(24), 24-44. doi:10.1007/s13132-012-0121-8.
146. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
147. Swales, J. M. (1998). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
148. Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press.
149. Swales, J. M. (2018). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building: 20th anniversary edition. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
150. Taberner, A. M. (2018). The marketisation of the English higher education sector and its impact on academic staff and the nature of their work. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(1), 129-152. doi:10.1108/IJOA-07-2017-1198.
151. Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 325-346.
152. Temple, P. (Ed.) (2014). The physical university: Contours of space and place in higher education. Abingdon: Routledge.
153. Temple, P., & Barnett, R. (2007). Higher education space: Future directions. Planning for Higher Education, 36(1), 5-15.
154. Tight, M. (Ed.) (2000). Academic work and life: What it is to be an academic, and how this is changing. New York: JAI Press.
155. Tourish, D., & Willmott, H. (2015). In defiance of folly: Journal rankings, mindless measures and the ABS Guide. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 37-46. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2014.02.004.
156. Trowler, P. (2014). Depicting and researching disciplines: Strong and moderate essen- tialist approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1720-1731.
157. Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st cen- tury: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. London: Routledge.
158. Tusting, K. (2012). Learning accountability literacies in educational workplaces: Situated learning and processes of commodification. Language and Education, 26(2), 121-138.
159. Tusting, K. (2013). Literacy studies as linguistic ethnography (Working paper no. 105). Working papers in urban language and literacies. London. Retrieved from https:// core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16285101.pdf.
160. Tusting, K. (2018). The genre regime of research evaluation: Contradictory systems of value around academics' writing. Language and Education (early online publication).
161. UCU (University and College Union) (2015). Work-related wellbeing in UK higher education - 2014. London: University and College Union. Retrieved from http://hdl. handle.net/10547/622171.
162. UCU (University and College Union) (2016). Precarious work in higher education: A snapshot of insecure contracts and institutional attitudes. London: University and College Union. Retrieved from www.ucu.org.uk/media/7995/Precarious-work-in- higher-education-a-snapshot-of-insecure-contracts-and-institutional-attitudes-Ap r-16/pdf/ucu_precariouscontract_hereport_apr16.pdf.
163. Van Marrewijk, A., & Yanow, D. (Eds.) (2010). Organizational spaces: Rematerializing the workaday world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
164. Veletsianos, G. (2012). Higher education scholars' participation and practices on twit- ter. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(4), 336-349.
165. Wargo, J. M., & De Costa, P. I. (2017). Tracing academic literacies across con- temporary literacy sponsorscapes: Mobilities, ideologies, identities, and technolo- gies. London Review of Education, 15(1), 101-114.
166. Watermeyer, R. (2016). Impact in the REF: Issues and obstacles. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 199-214. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.915303.
167. Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly prac- tice. London: Bloomsbury.
168. Whittaker, S., & Sidner, C. (1996). Email overload: Exploring personal information management of email. Proceedings of CHI 96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 276-283). New York: ACM.
169. Widerberg, K. (2006). Embodying modern times: Investigating tiredness. Time & Society, 15(1), 105-120.
170. Wilkins, S., & Huisman, J. (2012). The international branch campus as transnational strategy in higher education. Higher Education, 64(5), 627-645. doi:10.1007/s10734- 012-9516-5.
171. Willmott, H. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactiv- ity and the ABS list. Organization, 18(4), 429-442. doi:10.1177/1350508411403532.
172. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A struc- turational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Manage- ment Review, 17(22), 299-326.
173. Ylijoki, O.-H., & Mäntylä, H. (2003). Conflicting time perspectives in academic work. Time & Society, 12(1), 55-78.