Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 392-402

  Greenhow, Christine ^a   Gleason, Benjamin ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY;

AFFORDANCES; CRITICAL APPROACH; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; SOCIAL MEDIA; THROUGH THE LENS;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 84908671508     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12150     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Lederman, D., &, Jaschik, S., (2012). Digital faculty: professors, teaching and technology 2012. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from http://www.insidehighered.com
2. Boyd, D., &, Crawford, K., (2011). Six provocations for big data: a decade in internet time. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society. Symposium conducted at the University of Oxford, Oxford, England, September 2011. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.1926431
3. Boyer, E. L., (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
4. Cohen, L., (2007). Social scholarship on the rise. Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://liblogs.albany.edu/library20/about.html
5. Cormode, G., &, Krishnamurthy, B., (2008). Key differences between web 1.0 and web 2.0. First Monday, 13, 6. Retrieved January 10, 2009, from http://www.firstmonday.org
6. Czerniewicz, L., (2013). Power and politics in a changing scholarly communication landscape. Proceedings from IATUL Conference. Cape Town, South Africa, April 2013.
7. Dede, C., (2008). A seismic shift in epistemology. EDUCAUSE Review, 43, 80-81. Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http://net.educause.edu
8. Draxler, B., Hsieh, H., Dudley, N., &, Winet, J., (2012). "City of lit": collaborative research in literature and new media. Journal of Interactive Technology & Pedagogy, 1, 1. Retrieved November 10, 2013, from http://jitp.commons.gc.cuny.edu
9. Ellis, C., (2013). Broadening the scope and increasing the usefulness of learning analytics: the case for assessment analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 662-664. ISSN 0007-1013; in press.
10. Esposito, A., (2013). Neither digital or open. Just researchers: views on digital/open scholarship practices in an Italian university. First Monday, 18, 1. Retrieved November 27, 2013, from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/ article/view/3881/3404
11. Ferguson, R., (2012). The state of learning analytics in 2012: a review and future challenges. (technical report). Milton Keynes, UK: Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University.
12. Gao, F., Luo, T., &, Zhang, K., (2012). Tweeting for learning: a critical analysis of research on microblogging in education published 2008-2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 5, 783-801.
13. Garnett, F., &, Ecclesfield, N., (2012). Towards a framework for co-creating open scholarship. Research in Learning Technology, 19. Retrieved December 10, 2013, from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/ rlt/article/view/7795/10499
14. Grant, S., (2012, December 3). Big data meets collaboration by difference: HASTAC goes CIBER. Retrieved from HASTAC Blog. Retrieved October 15, 2013, from http://hastac.org/blogs/slgrant/2013/01/15/socializing-big-data- collaborative-opportunities-computer-science-social-sc
15. Greenhow, C., &, Burton, L., (2011). Help from my "friends:" social capital in the social network sites of low-income high school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 45, 2, 223-245.
16. Greenhow, C., &, Gleason, B., (2012). Twitteracy: tweeting as a new literacy practice. The Educational Forum, 76, 463-477.
17. Greenhow, C., &, Robelia, E., (2009a). Old communication, new literacies: social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14, 1130-1161.
18. Greenhow, C., &, Robelia, E., (2009b). Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks. Learning, Media and Technology, 34, 2, 119-140.
19. Greenhow, C., Robelia, E., &, Hughes, J., (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: what path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38, 4, 246-259.
20. Gruzd, A., Staves, K., &, Wilk, A., (2012). Connected scholars: examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2340-2350.
21. Gupta, J., Bouvier, J., &, Gordon, E., (2012). Exploring new modalities of public engagement. An evaluation of digital gaming platforms on civic capacity and collective action in the Boston Public School District. Retrieved from Mayors Innovation Project. Retrieved November 5, 2013, from http://www.mayorsinnovation.org/pdf/3newmodalititesof.pdf
22. Hargittai, E., (2010). Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the "Net Generation". Sociological Inquiry, 80, 1, 92-113.
23. Heap, T., &, Minocha, S., (2012). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging for digital scholarship. Research In Learning Technology, 20. Retrieved December 10, 2013, from http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/ index.php/rlt/article/view/19195
24. Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R. C., &, Wulfson, K., (2013). US Faculty Survey 2012, Ithaka S+R. Retrieved June 8, 2013, from http://www.sr.ithaka.org
25. Howard, J., (2011, February 20). Social media lure academics frustrated by journals. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://chronicle.com
26. Jaeger, P., Bertot, J., &, Shilton, K., (2012). Information policy and social media: framing government-citizen web 2.0 interactions. In, C. G. Reddick, &, S. K. Aikins, (Eds), Web 2.0 technologies and democratic governance (pp. 11-25). New York: Springer.
27. Junco, R., Elavsky, C. M., &, Heiberger, G., (2012). Putting twitter to the test: assessing outcomes for student collaboration, engagement and success. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 273-287.
28. Kalil, T., (2012). Big data is a big deal. Retrieved from the USA Office of Science and Technology Policy Blog. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/29/big-data-big-deal
29. Kolowich, S., (2012). Digital faculty: professors and technology 2012. Inside Higher Education. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www. insidehighered.com
30. Kop, R., &, Hill, A., (2008). Connectivism: learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9, 3, 1-13.
31. Mandavilli, A., (2011). Trial by twitter. Nature, 469, 286-287.
32. Moore, S. L., &, Ellsworth, J. B., (2014). Ethics of educational technology. In, J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, &, M. J. Bishop, (Eds), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 113-127). New York: Springer.
33. Moran, M., Seaman, J., &, Tinti-Kane, H., (2011). Teaching, learning, and sharing: how today's higher education faculty use social media for work and for play. Pearson Learning Solutions the Babson Survey Research Group and Conversion Research Report. Retrieved September, 2013, from http://www. pearsonlearningsolutions.com/educators/%20pearson-social-media-survey-2011-bw. pdf
34. Pearce, N., Weller, M., Scanlon, E., &, Kinsley, S., (2010). Digital scholarship considered: how new technologies could transform academic work in education. In Education, 16, 1. Retrieved December 5, 2013, from http://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/44
35. Pimmer, C., Linxen, S., &, Grohbiel, U., (2012). Facebook as a learning tool? A case study on the appropriation of social network sites from mobile phones in developing countries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 5, 726-738.
36. Preston, J., (2012). If Twitter is a workplace necessity. The New York Times. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com
37. Ranieri, M., Manca, S., &, Fini, A., (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 5, 754-769.
38. Rice, R. E., (2002). Beyond scholarship reconsidered: toward an enlarged vision of the scholarly work of faculty members. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002, 90, 7-18.
39. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., &, Watkinson, A., (2011). Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing, 24, 3, 183-195.
40. Selwyn, N., (2011). Social media in higher education. In, A. Gladman, (Ed.), The Europa world of learning (pp. 1-9). London: Routledge.
41. Siemens, G., (2005). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2, 10, 3-10.
42. Taraborelli, D., (2008). Soft peer review: social software and distributed scientific evaluation. Paper presented at The 8th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, Carry-Le-Rouet, France.
43. Van Aalst, J., (2010). Estimating the impact of journal articles in education. Educational Researcher, 39, 387-400.
44. Veletsianos, G., &, Kimmons, R., (2012). Assumptions and challenges of open scholarship. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13, 4, 166-189.
45. Weller, M., (2011). The digital scholar: how technology is transforming scholarly practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
46. Willinsky, J., (2006). The access principle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.