A response to Anthony Fleury's "liberal education and communication against the disciplines": A view from the world of writing

Communication Education

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 86-91

  Bazerman, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication Across the Curriculum; Writing Across the Curriculum; Writing in the Disciplines; Writing Pedagogy

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644970779     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520500077099     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Applebee, A. (1984). Writing and reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54, 577-596.
2. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
3. Bazerman, C. (1987). Codifying the social scientific style. In J. S. Nelson, A. Megill, & D. N. McCloskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs (pp. 125-144). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
4. Bazerman, C. (1992). From cultural criticism to disciplinary participation: Living with powerful words. In A. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching, and learning in the disciplines (pp. 61-68). New York: Modern Language Association.
5. Bazerman, C. (1999). The languages of Edison's light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. (in press). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/
7. Blakeslee, A. M. (1997). Activity, context, interaction, and authority: Learning to write scientific papers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 125-169.
8. Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
9. Chiseri-Strater, E. (1991). Academic literacies: The public and private discourse of university students. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
10. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
12. Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-128.
13. Faigley, L., & Hansen, K. (1985). Learning to write in the social sciences. College Composition and Communication, 36, 140-149.
14. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Fleury, A. (2005). Liberal education and communication against the disciplines. Communication Education, 54, 72-79.
16. Fulwiler, T., & Young, A. (1982). Language connections: Writing and reading across the curriculum. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
17. Gaonkar, D. P. (1997). The idea of rhetoric in the rhetoric of science. In A. G. Gross & W. M. Keith (Eds.), Rhetorical hermeneutics: Invention and interpretation in the age of science (pp. 25-85). Albany: State University of New York.
18. Geisler, C. (1994). Academic literacy and the nature of expertise. Reading, writing, and knowing in academic philosophy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Greene, S. (1993). The role of task in the development of academic thinking through reading and writing in a college history course. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 37-48.
20. Gross, A. G. (1990). The rhetoric of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Gusfield, J. (1976). The literary rhetoric of science: Comedy and pathos in drinking driver research. American Sociological Review, 41, 16-34.
22. Herrington, A. J. (1985). Writing in academic settings: A study of the contexts for writing in two college chemical engineering courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 331-361.
23. Langer, J., & Applebee, A. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
24. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. MacDonald, S. P., & Cooper, C. M. (1992). Contributions of academic and dialogic journals to writing about literature. In A. Herrington & C. Moran (Eds.), Writing, teaching and learning in the disciplines (pp. 137-155). New York: Modern Language Association.
26. McCarthy, L. P. (1987). A stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 233-365.
27. McCarthy, L. P. (1991). A psychiatrist using DSM-III: The influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 358-378). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
28. McCarthy, L. P., & Gerring, J. P. (1994). Revising psychiatry's charter document, DSM IV. Written Communication, 11, 147-192.
29. McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
30. McLeod, S. (1989). Writing across the curriculum: The second stage, and beyond. College Composition and Communication, 40, 337-343.
31. Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
32. Prelli, L. J. (1989). A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
33. Prior, P. A. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Russell, D. R. (1997). Writing and genre in higher education and workplaces. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 224-237.
35. Russell, D. R. (2001). Where do the naturalistic studies of WAC/WID point to? In S. McLeod, E. Miraglia, M. Soven, & C. Thaiss (Eds.), WAC for the new millennium: Strategies for continuing writing-across-the-curriculum programs (pp. 259-298). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
36. Sauer, B. (2003). The rhetoric of risk: Technical documentation in hazardous environments. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Schwegler, R., & Shamoon, L. (1991). Meaning attribution in ambiguous texts. In C. Bazerman, & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions (pp. 216-234). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
38. Van Nostrand, A. D. (1997). Fundable knowledge. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.