Academic sell-out: how an obsession with metrics and rankings is damaging academia

Journal of Marketing for Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 165-177

  Gruber, Thorsten ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

altmetrics; citations; h index; academia; journal impact factor; journal ranking; metrics; open access

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920122793     PISSN: 08841241     EISSN: 15407144     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08841241.2014.970248     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alberts, B. (2013). Impact factor distortions. Science, 340(6134). Retrieved from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6134/787.full doi: 10.1126/science.1240319
2. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. doi: 10.2307/3150783
3. Ball, P. (2012). The h-index, or the academic equivalent of the stag's antlers. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jan/06/bad-science-h-index
4. Bhattacharjee, Y. (2013, April 26). The mind of a con man. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik-stapels-audacious-academic-fraud.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
5. Cluley, R. (2014). Sexual fetishism in organizations: The case of journal list fetishism. Organization, 21(3), 314–328. doi: 10.1177/1350508413519763
6. Colquhoun. (2014). Should metrics be used to assess research performance? A submission to HEFCE. Retrieved from http://www.dcscience.net/?p=6636
7. Colquhoun, D., & Plested, A. (2014). Scientists don't count: Why you should ignore altmetrics and other bibliometric nightmares. Retrieved from http://www.dcscience.net/?p=6369
8. Crotty, D. (2013). Driving altmetrics performance through marketing — a new differentiator for scholarly journals? Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2013/10/07/altmetrics-and-the-value-of-publicity-efforts-for-journal-publishers/
9. Curry, S. (2012). Sick of impact factors. Retrieved from http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/
10. Davis, P. (2012). Gaming Google Scholar citations, made simple and easy. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/12/12/gaming-google-scholar-citations-made-simple-and-easy/
11. De Angelis, M., & Harvie, D. (2009). ‘Cognitive capitalism’ and the rat-race: How capital measures immaterial labour in British universities. Historical Materialism, 17(3), 3–30. doi: 10.1163/146544609X12469428108420
12. Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-García, N., & Torres Salinas, D. (2012). Manipulating Google Scholar citations and Google Scholar metrics: Simple, easy and tempting (EC3 Working Papers 6). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1212/1212.0638.pdf
13. Donald, A. M. (2013). It's time to resist the pressure. Retrieved from http://occamstypewriter.org/athenedonald/2013/03/14/its-time-to-resist-the-pressure/
14. Fenner, M., & Lin, J. (2013). Evaluating impact: What's your number? Retrieved from http://blogs.plos.org/tech/evaluating-impact-whats-your-number/
15. Gruber, T., Reppel, A., & Voss, R. (2010). Understanding the characteristics of effective professors: The student's perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 20(2), 175–190. doi: 10.1080/08841241.2010.526356
16. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
17. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. doi: 10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
18. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.
19. Hofacker, C. F., Gleim, M. R., & Lawson, S. J. (2009). Revealed reader preference for marketing journals. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(2), 238–247. doi: 10.1007/s11747-008-0124-y
20. Holmwood, J. (2013). Death by metrics. Retrieved from http://isa-global-dialogue.net/death-by-metrics/
21. Krüss, J. (1962). Timm Thaler oder Das verkaufte Lachen. Hamburg: Oetinger Verlag.
22. Lawrence, P. (2007). The mismeasurement of science. Current Biology, 17(15), R583–R585. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.014
23. Li, S., Sivadas, E., & Johnson, M. S. (2014). Explaining article influence: Capturing article citability and its dynamic effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (online first), Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11747-014-0392-7
24. LSE Public Policy Group. (2011). Maximizing the impacts of your research: A handbook for social scientists. Consultation draft 3. London: LSE Public Policy Group, London School of Economics and Political Science. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/government/research/resgroups/LSEPublicPolicy/Docs/LSE_Impact_Handbook_April_2011.pdf
25. McPeek, M. A. (2012). Want to increase your Impact Factor? Retrieved from http://www.enallagma.com/wordpress/2012/07/want-to-increase-your-impact-factor/
26. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
27. Parker, M. (2014). Universality, Ltd: Changing a business school. Organization, 21(2), 281–292. doi: 10.1177/1350508413502646
28. REF. (2014). All FAQs about the Research Excellence Framework (REF) – How will journal impact factors, rankings or lists, or the perceived standing of publishers be used to inform the assessment of research outputs? Retrieved from http://www.ref.ac.uk/faq/all/
29. Schekman, R. (2013, December 9). How journals like Nature, Cell and Science are damaging science. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science
30. Seglen, P. O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314, 498–502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497
31. Simkin, M. V., & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2003). Read before you cite! Complex Systems, 14, 269–274.
32. Stremersch, S., Verniers, I., & Verhoef, P. C. (2007). The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 171–193. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171
33. Willmott, H. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18(4), 429–442. doi: 10.1177/1350508411403532
34. Woodside, A. G. (2009). Journal and author impact metrics: An editorial. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.06.002
35. Wright, M., & Armstrong, J. S. (2008). The ombudsman: Verification of citations: Fawlty towers of knowledge? Interface, 38(2), 125–139. doi: 10.1287/inte.1070.0317