Recent contributions of agricultural economics research in the field of sustainable development

Agriculture (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2018, Pages

  Bertoni, Danilo ^a   Cavicchioli, Daniele ^a   Donzelli, Franco ^a   Ferrazzi, Giovanni ^a   Frisio, Dario G ^a   Pretolani, Roberto ^a   Ricci, Elena Claire ^a   Ventura, Vera ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Agbiotech; Agri food economics; Agriculture; Consumer; Environmental sustainability; Migration

Indexed keywords

EID: 85060984257     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20770472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture8120200     Document Type: Review

References (178)

1. Martin, J.E. Agricultural Economics: A Critical Review of the State of the Science. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 1978, 10, 39–42. [CrossRef]
2. Shao, G.; Li, F.; Tang, L. Multidisciplinary perspectives on sustainable development. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2011, 18, 187–189. [CrossRef]
3. Cortese, A.D. The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plan. High. Educ. 2003, 31, 15–22.
4. Jabareen, Y. Teaching Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Creat. Educ. 2011, 2, 388–392. [CrossRef]
5. Wu, J.J. Landscape Ecology, Cross-Disciplinarity, and Sustainability Science; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2006.
6. Glavič, P.; Lukman, R. Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 1875–1885. [CrossRef]
7. Mauerhofer, V. 3-D Sustainability: An approach for priority setting in situation of conflicting interests towards a Sustainable Development. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 64, 496–506. [CrossRef]
8. Smith, P.; Clark, H.; Dong, H.; Elsiddig, E.A.; Haberl, H.; Harper, R.; House, J.; Jafari, M.; Masera, O.; Mbow, C.; et al. Chapter 11—Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC Working Group III Contribution to AR5; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2014.
9. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1987; ISBN 978-0-19-282080-8.
10. Defrancesco, E.; Gatto, P.; Runge, F.; Trestini, S. Factors affecting farmers’ participation in agri-environmental measures: A Northern Italian perspective. J. Agric. Econ. 2008, 59, 114–131. [CrossRef]
11. Bertoni, D.; Cavicchioli, D.; Pretolani, R.; Olper, A. Agri-Environmental Measures Adoption: New Evidence from Lombardy Region. In The Common Agricultural Policy after the Fischler Reform; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2011; pp. 275–294.
12. Burton, R.J. The influence of farmer demographic characteristics on environmental behaviour: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 135, 19–26. [CrossRef]
13. Franzén, F.; Dinnétz, P.; Hammer, M. Factors affecting farmers’ willingness to participate in eutrophication mitigation—A case study of preferences for wetland creation in Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 2016, 130, 8–15. [CrossRef]
14. Pavlis, E.S.; Terkenli, T.S.; Kristensen, S.B.; Busck, A.G.; Cosor, G.L. Patterns of agri-environmental scheme participation in Europe: Indicative trends from selected case studies. Land Use Policy 2016, 57, 800–812. [CrossRef]
15. Paracchini, M.L.; Bulgheroni, C.; Borreani, G.; Tabacco, E.; Banterle, A.; Bertoni, D.; Rossi, G.; Parolo, G.; Origgi, R.; De Paola, C. A diagnostic system to assess sustainability at a farm level: The SOSTARE model. Agric. Syst. 2015, 133, 35–53. [CrossRef]
16. De Olde, E.M.; Oudshoorn, F.W.; Sørensen, C.A.; Bokkers, E.A.; De Boer, I.J. Assessing sustainability at farm-level: Lessons learned from a comparison of tools in practice. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 66, 391–404. [CrossRef]
17. Zahm, F.; Viaux, P.; Vilain, L.; Girardin, P.; Mouchet, C. Assessing farm sustainability with the IDEA method–from the concept of agriculture sustainability to case studies on farms. Sustain. Dev. 2008, 16, 271–281. [CrossRef]
18. Bertoni, D.; Curzi, D.; Iacus, S.; Olper, A. Estimating the Causal Effect of Green Payments in Agriculture: The Coarsened Exact Matching; International Association of Agricultural Economists: Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2018.
19. Pufahl, A.; Weiss, C.R. Evaluating the effects of farm programmes: Results from propensity score matching. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2009, 36, 79–101. [CrossRef]
20. Chabé-Ferret, S.; Subervie, J. How much green for the buck? Estimating additional and windfall effects of French agro-environmental schemes by DID-matching. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2013, 65, 12–27. [CrossRef]
21. Olper, A.; Raimondi, V.; Cavicchioli, D.; Vigani, M. Do CAP payments reduce farm labour migration? A panel data analysis across EU regions. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2014, 41, 843–873. [CrossRef]
22. Giannakis, E.; Efstratoglou, S.; Antoniades, A. Off-Farm Employment and Economic Crisis: Evidence from Cyprus. Agriculture 2018, 8, 41. [CrossRef]
23. Matthews, A. Greening agricultural payments in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy. Bio-Based Appl. Econ. 2013, 2, 1–27.
24. Gocht, A.; Ciaian, P.; Bielza, M.; Terres, J.-M.; Röder, N.; Himics, M.; Salputra, G. EU-wide Economic and Environmental Impacts of CAP Greening with High Spatial and Farm-type Detail. J. Agric. Econ. 2017, 68, 651–681. [CrossRef]
25. Louhichi, K.; Ciaian, P.; Espinosa, M.; Perni, A.; Gomez y Paloma, S. Economic impacts of CAP greening: Application of an EU-wide individual farm model for CAP analysis (IFM-CAP). Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2017, 45, 205–238. [CrossRef]
26. Fumagalli, M.; Acutis, M.; Mazzetto, F.; Vidotto, F.; Sali, G.; Bechini, L. An analysis of agricultural sustainability of cropping systems in arable and dairy farms in an intensively cultivated plain. Eur. J. Agron. 2011, 34, 71–82. [CrossRef]
27. Cavicchioli, D.; Bertoni, D. Effects of Cap Green Payments in Lombardy: A Comparison of Proposed and Approved Measures Based on Census Data; Universitas Studiorum: Mantova, Italy, 2015; pp. 109–120.
28. Solazzo, R.; Pierangeli, F. How does greening affect farm behaviour? Trade-off between commitments and sanctions in the Northern Italy. Agric. Syst. 2016, 149, 88–98. [CrossRef]
29. Solazzo, R.; Donati, M.; Tomasi, L.; Arfini, F. How effective is greening policy in reducing GHG emissions from agriculture? Evidence from Italy. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 573, 1115–1124. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Cortignani, R.; Severini, S.; Dono, G. Complying with greening practices in the new CAP direct payments: An application on Italian specialized arable farms. Land Use Policy 2017, 61, 265–275. [CrossRef]
31. Gaudino, S.; Reidsma, P.; Kanellopoulos, A.; Sacco, D.; van Ittersum, M.K. Integrated Assessment of the EU’s Greening Reform and Feed Self-Sufficiency Scenarios on Dairy Farms in Piemonte, Italy. Agriculture 2018, 8, 137. [CrossRef]
32. Bertoni, D.; Aletti, G.; Ferrandi, G.; Micheletti, A.; Cavicchioli, D.; Pretolani, R. Farmland Use Transitions After the CAP Greening: A Preliminary Analysis Using Markov Chains Approach. Land Use Policy 2018, 79, 789–800. [CrossRef]
33. Le Roy, D.G.; Klein, K.K. The policy objectives of a biofuel industry in Canada: An assessment. Agriculture 2012, 2, 436–451. [CrossRef]
34. Tokgoz, S.; Zhang, W.; Msangi, S.; Bhandary, P. Biofuels and the future of food: Competition and complementarities. Agriculture 2012, 2, 414–435. [CrossRef]
35. Bartoli, A.; Cavicchioli, D.; Kremmydas, D.; Rozakis, S.; Olper, A. The impact of different energy policy options on feedstock price and land demand for maize silage: The case of biogas in Lombardy. Energy Policy 2016, 96, 351–363. [CrossRef]
36. Demartini, E.; Gaviglio, A.; Gelati, M.; Cavicchioli, D. The Effect of Biogas Production on Farmland Rental Prices: Empirical Evidences from Northern Italy. Energies 2016, 9, 965. [CrossRef]
37. Pacini, C.; Giesen, G.; Wossink, A.; Omodei-Zorini, L.; Huirne, R. The EU’s Agenda 2000 reform and the sustainability of organic farming in Tuscany: Ecological-economic modelling at field and farm level. Agric. Syst. 2004, 80, 171–197. [CrossRef]
38. Van Passel, S.; Nevens, F.; Mathijs, E.; Van Huylenbroeck, G. Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 62, 149–161. [CrossRef]
39. Meul, M.; Nevens, F.; Reheul, D.; Hofman, G. Energy use efficiency of specialised dairy, arable and pig farms in Flanders. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 119, 135–144. [CrossRef]
40. Bechini, L.; Castoldi, N. On-farm monitoring of economic and environmental performances of cropping systems: Results of a 2-year study at the field scale in northern Italy. Ecol. Indic. 2009, 9, 1096–1113. [CrossRef]
41. Thomassen, M.A.; Dolman, M.A.; Van Calker, K.J.; De Boer, I.J.M. Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 2278–2284. [CrossRef]
42. Ripoll-Bosch, R.; Díez-Unquera, B.; Ruiz, R.; Villalba, D.; Molina, E.; Joy, M.; Olaizola, A.; Bernués, A. An integrated sustainability assessment of mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agric. Syst. 2012, 105, 46–56. [CrossRef]
43. Demartini, E.; Gaviglio, A.; Bertoni, D. Integrating agricultural sustainability into policy planning: A geo-referenced framework based on Rough Set theory. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 54, 226–239. [CrossRef]
44. Kirchner, M.; Schmidt, J.; Kindermann, G.; Kulmer, V.; Mitter, H.; Prettenthaler, F.; Rüdisser, J.; Schauppenlehner, T.; Schönhart, M.; Strauss, F. Ecosystem services and economic development in Austrian agricultural landscapes—The impact of policy and climate change scenarios on trade-offs and synergies. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 109, 161–174. [CrossRef]
45. Paracchini, M.L.; Correia, T.P.; Loupa-Ramos, I.; Capitani, C.; Madeira, L. Progress in indicators to assess agricultural landscape valuation: How and what is measured at different levels of governance. Land Use Policy 2016, 53, 71–85. [CrossRef]
46. Palmgren, M.G.; Edenbrandt, A.K.; Vedel, S.E.; Andersen, M.M.; Landes, X.; Østerberg, J.T.; Falhof, J.; Olsen, L.I.; Christensen, S.B.; Sandøe, P.; et al. Are we ready for back-to-nature crop breeding? Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 155–164. [CrossRef]
47. Lusser, M.; Parisi, C.; Plan, D.; Rodríguez-Cerezo, E. Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding. Nat. Biotechnol. 2012, 30, 231–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
48. Andersen, M.M.; Landes, X.; Xiang, W.; Anyshchenko, A.; Falhof, J.; Østerberg, J.T.; Olsen, L.I.; Edenbrandt, A.K.; Vedel, S.E.; Thorsen, B.J.; et al. Feasibility of new breeding techniques for organic farming. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 426–434. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
49. Kissoudis, C.; van de Wiel, C.; Visser, R.G.; van der Linden, G. Future-proof crops: Challenges and strategies for climate resilience improvement. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 30, 47–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Stenberg, J.A.; Heil, M.; Åhman, I.; Björkman, C. Optimizing Crops for Biocontrol of Pests and Disease. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 698–712. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
51. Shew, A.M.; Danforth, D.M.; Nalley, L.L.; Nayga, R.M.; Tsiboe, F.; Dixon, B.L. New innovations in agricultural biotech: Consumer acceptance of topical RNAi in rice production. Food Control 2017, 81, 189–195. [CrossRef]
52. Jefferson, O.A.; Jaffe, A.; Ashton, D.; Warren, B.; Koellhofer, D.; Dulleck, U.; Ballagh, A.; Moe, J.; DiCuccio, M.; Ward, K.; et al. Mapping the global influence of published research on industry and innovation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 31–39. [CrossRef]
53. Clancy, M.S.; Moschini, G. Intellectual Property Rights and the Ascent of Proprietary Innovation in Agriculture. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2017, 9, 53–74. [CrossRef]
54. Zilberman, D.; Gordon, B.; Hochman, G.; Wesseler, J. Economics of Sustainable Development and the Bioeconomy. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2018, 40, 22–37. [CrossRef]
55. Haščič, I.; Migotto, M. Measuring Environmental Innovation Using Patent Data; OECD: Paris, France, 2015.
56. Haščič, I.; Silva, J.; Johnstone, N. The Use of Patent Statistics for International Comparisons and Analysis of Narrow Technological Fields; OECD: Paris, France, 2015.
57. Graff, G.D.; Cullen, S.E.; Bradford, K.J.; Zilberman, D.; Bennett, A.B. The public–private structure of intellectual property ownership in agricultural biotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 989–995. [CrossRef]
58. Frisio, D.G.; Ferrazzi, G.; Ventura, V.; Vigani, M. Public vs. Private Agbiotech Research in the United States and European Union, 2002–2009. AgBioForum 2010, 13, 333–342.
59. Egelie, K.J.; Graff, G.D.; Strand, S.P.; Johansen, B. The emerging patent landscape of CRISPR–Cas gene editing technology. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 1025–1031. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
60. Khan, S.S.; Timotijevic, L.; Newton, R.; Coutinho, D.; Llerena, J.L.; Ortega, S.; Benighaus, L.; Hofmaier, C.; Xhaferri, Z.; de Boer, A. The framing of innovation among European research funding actors: Assessing the potential for ‘responsible research and innovation’in the food and health domain. Food Policy 2016, 62, 78–87. [CrossRef]
61. Eriksson, M.; Strid, I.; Hansson, P.-A. Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy–a Swedish case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 93, 115–125. [CrossRef]
62. Reynolds, C.J.; Piantadosi, J.; Boland, J. Rescuing Food from the Organics Waste Stream to Feed the Food Insecure: An Economic and Environmental Assessment of Australian Food Rescue Operations Using Environmentally Extended Waste Input-Output Analysis. Sustainability 2015, 7, 4707–4726. [CrossRef]
63. Bellemare, M.F.; Çakir, M.; Peterson, H.H.; Novak, L.; Rudi, J. On the Measurement of Food Waste. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2017, 99, 1148–1158. [CrossRef]
64. Garrone, P.; Melacini, M.; Perego, A. Opening the black box of food waste reduction. Food Policy 2014, 46, 129–139. [CrossRef]
65. Papargyropoulou, E.; Lozano, R.; Steinberger, J.K.; Wright, N.; bin Ujang, Z. The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 76, 106–115. [CrossRef]
66. Garcia-Herrero, I.; Hoehn, D.; Margallo, M.; Laso, J.; Bala, A.; Batlle-Bayer, L.; Fullana, P.; Vazquez-Rowe, I.; Gonzalez, M.J.; Durá, M.J. On the estimation of potential food waste reduction to support sustainable production and consumption policies. Food Policy 2018, 80, 24–38. [CrossRef]
67. Chegere, M.J. Post-harvest losses reduction by small-scale maize farmers: The role of handling practices. Food Policy 2018, 77, 103–115. [CrossRef]
68. Balzaretti, C.M.; Ventura, V.; Ratti, S.; Ferrazzi, G.; Spallina, A.; Carruba, M.O.; Castrica, M. Improving the overall sustainability of the school meal chain: The role of portion sizes. Eat Weight Disord. 2018. [CrossRef]
69. Vittuari, M.; De Menna, F.; Gaiani, S.; Falasconi, L.; Politano, A.; Dietershagen, J.; Segrè, A. The Second Life of Food: An Assessment of the Social Impact of Food Redistribution Activities in Emilia Romagna, Italy. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1817. [CrossRef]
70. Schneider, F. The evolution of food donation with respect to waste prevention. Waste Manag. 2013, 33, 755–763. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
71. Stepman, E.; Uyttendaele, M.; De Boeck, E.; Jacxsens, L. Needs of beneficiaries related to the format and content of food parcels in Ghent, Belgium. Br. Food J. 2018, 120, 578–587. [CrossRef]
72. Mourad, M. Recycling, recovering and preventing “food waste”: Competing solutions for food systems sustainability in the United States and France. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 126, 461–477. [CrossRef]
73. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives (Text with EEA Relevance); European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2008; Volume 034, pp. 99–126.
74. Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 Laying down Health Rules as Regards Animal by-Products and Derived Products not Intended for Human Consumption and Repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-Products Regulation); European Parliament: Brussels, Belgium, 2009; Volume 300.
75. Zu Ermgassen, E.K.H.J.; Phalan, B.; Green, R.E.; Balmford, A. Reducing the land use of EU pork production: Where there’s a will, there’s a way. Food Policy 2016, 58, 35–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
76. Salemdeeb, R.; zu Ermgassen, E.K.H.J.; Kim, M.H.; Balmford, A.; Al-Tabbaa, A. Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: A comparative analysis of food waste management options. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 871–880. [CrossRef]
77. Castrica, M.; Tedesco, D.E.A.; Panseri, S.; Ferrazzi, G.; Ventura, V.; Frisio, D.G.; Balzaretti, C.M. Pet Food as the Most Concrete Strategy for Using Food Waste as Feedstuff within the European Context: A Feasibility Study. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2035. [CrossRef]
78. Kasapidou, E.; Sossidou, E.; Mitlianga, P. Fruit and Vegetable Co-Products as Functional Feed Ingredients in Farm Animal Nutrition for Improved Product Quality. Agriculture 2015, 5, 1020–1034. [CrossRef]
79. Stranieri, S.; Orsi, L.; Banterle, A.; Ricci, E.C. Sustainable development and supply chain coordination: The impact of corporate social responsibility rules in the European Union food industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018. [CrossRef]
80. Banterle, A.; Ricci, E.C.; Cavaliere, A. Environmental sustainability and the food system. In Regulating Food Safety Law in the EU—A Management and Economics Perspective; Bremmers, H.J., Purnhagen, K., Eds.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2018.
81. Cole, C.V.; Duxbury, J.; Freney, J.; Heinemeyer, O.; Minami, K.; Mosier, A.; Paustian, K.; Rosenberg, N.; Sampson, N.; Sauerbeck, D.; et al. Global estimates of potential mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by agriculture. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 1997, 49, 221–228. [CrossRef]
82. Valdez, V.; Berger, J.D.; Warkentin, T.; Asseng, S.; Ratnakumar, P.; Rao, K.P.C.; Gaur, P.M.; Munier-Jolain, N.; Larmure, A.; Voisin, A.S. Adaptation of grain legumes to climatic change: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 31–44. [CrossRef]
83. Bruinsma, J. World Agriculture: Towards 2015/2030: An FAO Study; Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017.
84. Delgado, C.; Rosegrant, M.; Steinfeld, H.; Ehui, S.; Courbois, C. Livestock to 2020: The Next Food Revolution. Outlook Agric. 2001, 30, 27–29. [CrossRef]
85. De Vries, M.; de Boer, I.J. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livest. Sci. 2010, 128, 1–11. [CrossRef]
86. Presumido, P.H.; Sousa, F.; Gonçalves, A.; Dal Bosco, T.C.; Feliciano, M. Environmental Impacts of the Beef Production Chain in the Northeast of Portugal Using Life Cycle Assessment. Agriculture 2018, 8, 165. [CrossRef]
87. Garnett, T. Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: Impacts and options for policy makers. Environ. Sci. Policy 2009, 12, 491–503. [CrossRef]
88. Steinfeld, H.; Gerber, P.; Wassenaar, T.D.; Castel, V.; Rosales, M.; Rosales, M.; de Haan, C. Livestock’s Long Shadow: Environmental Issues and Options; Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2006.
89. Vermeir, I.; Verbeke, W. Sustainable Food Consumption: Exploring the Consumer “Attitude—Behavioral Intention” Gap. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 2006, 19, 169–194.
90. Crosson, P.; Shalloo, L.; O’Brien, D.; Lanigan, G.J.; Foley, P.A.; Boland, T.M.; Kenny, D.A. A review of whole farm systems models of greenhouse gas emissions from beef and dairy cattle production systems. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166, 29–45. [CrossRef]
91. Capper, J.L. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 4249–4261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
92. Pelletier, N.; Pirog, R.; Rasmussen, R. Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agric. Syst. 2010, 103, 380–389. [CrossRef]
93. Casey, J.W.; Holden, N.M. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Conventional, Agri-Environmental Scheme, and Organic Irish Suckler-Beef Units. J. Environ. Qual. 2006, 35, 231–239. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
94. Garnett, T. Where are the best opportunities for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the food system (including the food chain)? Food Policy 2011, 36, S23–S32. [CrossRef]
95. Micha, R.; Wallace, S.K.; Mozaffarian, D. Red and processed meat consumption and risk of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, and diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2010, 121, 2271–2283. [CrossRef]
96. Bouvard, V.; Loomis, D.; Guyton, K.Z.; Grosse, Y.; El Ghissassi, F.; Benbrahim-Tallaa, L.; Guha, N.; Mattock, H.; Kurt, S. Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat—Google Scholar. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 16, 1599–1600. [CrossRef]
97. Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A. The effects of EXPO MIlano 2015 on consumer food choices. Econ. Ago-Aliment. Food Econ. 2018, 20, 233–244. [CrossRef]
98. Grunert, K.G. Sustainability in the Food Sector: A Consumer Behaviour Perspective. Int. J. Food Syst. Dyn. 2011, 2, 207–218.
99. Evans, D. Consuming conventions: Sustainable consumption, ecological citizenship and the worlds of worth. J. Rural. Stud. 2011, 27, 109–115. [CrossRef]
100. Cavaliere, A.; Ventura, V. Mismatch between food sustainability and consumer acceptance toward innovation technologies among Millennial students: The case of Shelf Life Extension. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 641–650. [CrossRef]
101. Coppola, A.; Verneau, F. An empirical analysis on technophobia/technophilia in consumer market segmentation. Agric. Food Econ. 2014, 2, 2. [CrossRef]
102. Grunert, K.G.; Hieke, S.; Wills, J. Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy 2014, 44, 177–189. [CrossRef]
103. Grebitus, C.; Steiner, B.; Veeman, M.M. Paying for sustainability: A cross-cultural analysis of consumers’ valuations of food and non-food products labeled for carbon and water footprints. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 2016, 63, 50–58. [CrossRef]
104. Grolleau, G.; Caswell, J.A. Interaction between Food Attributes in Markets: The Case of Environmental Labeling. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2006, 31, 471–484. [CrossRef]
105. Krystallis, A.; Grunert, K.G.; de Barcellos, M.D.; Perrea, T.; Verbeke, W. Consumer attitudes towards sustainability aspects of food production: Insights from three continents. J. Mark. Manag. 2012, 28, 334–372. [CrossRef]
106. Asioli, D.; Næs, T.; Granli, B.S.; Lengard Almli, V. Consumer preferences for iced coffee determined by conjoint analysis: An exploratory study with N orwegian consumers. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 49, 1565–1571. [CrossRef]
107. Hu, W.; Hünnemeyer, A.; Veeman, M.; Adamowicz, W.; Srivastava, L. Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2004, 31, 389–408. [CrossRef]
108. Caputo, V.; Nayga, R.M.; Scarpa, R. Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2013, 57, 465–482. [CrossRef]
109. Akaichi, F.; Nayga, R.M.; Nalley, L.L. Are there trade-offs in valuation with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, origin and food miles attributes? Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2017, 44, 3–31. [CrossRef]
110. Feucht, Y.; Zander, K. Consumers’ preferences for carbon labels and the underlying reasoning. A mixed methods approach in 6 European countries. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 178, 740–748. [CrossRef]
111. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [CrossRef]
112. Cerri, J.; Testa, F.; Rizzi, F. The more I care, the less I will listen to you: How information, environmental concern and ethical production influence consumers’ attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 343–353. [CrossRef]
113. De Groot, J.; Steg, L. General Beliefs and the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Role of Environmental Concerns in the TPB. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2007, 37, 1817–1836. [CrossRef]
114. Govindasamy, R.; Italia, J.; Adelaja, A. Predicting willingness-to-pay a premium for integrated pest management produce: A logistic approach. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 2001, 30, 151–159. [CrossRef]
115. Ohtomo, S.; Hirose, Y. The dual-process of reactive and intentional decision-making involved in eco-friendly behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2007, 27, 117–125. [CrossRef]
116. Hobbs, J.E.; Goddard, E. Consumers and trust. Food Policy 2015, 52, 71–74. [CrossRef]
117. Lassoued, R.; Hobbs, J.E. Consumer confidence in credence attributes: The role of brand trust. Food Policy 2015, 52, 99–107. [CrossRef]
118. Nuttavuthisit, K.; Thøgersen, J. The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for green products: The case of organic food. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 140, 323–337. [CrossRef]
119. Ricci, E.C.; Banterle, A.; Stranieri, S. Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 148, 54–65. [CrossRef]
120. Brunner, T.A.; van der Horst, K.; Siegrist, M. Convenience food products. Drivers for consumption. Appetite 2010, 55, 498–506. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
121. Olsen, N.V. The convenience consumer’s dilemma. Br. Food J. 2012, 114, 1613–1625. [CrossRef]
122. Thaler, R.; Sunstein, C. Nudge: The Gentle Power of Choice Architecture; Yale: New Haven, CT, USA, 2008.
123. Bacon, L.; Krpan, D. (Not) Eating for the environment: The impact of restaurant menu design on vegetarian food choice. Appetite 2018, 125, 190–200. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
124. Kurz, V. Nudging to reduce meat consumption: Immediate and persistent effects of an intervention at a university restaurant. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2018, 90, 317–341. [CrossRef]
125. De Boer, J.; Schösler, H.; Aiking, H. “Meatless days” or “less but better”? Exploring strategies to adapt Western meat consumption to health and sustainability challenges. Appetite 2014, 76, 120–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
126. Filimonau, V.; Lemmer, C.; Marshall, D.; Bejjani, G. ‘Nudging’ as an architect of more responsible consumer choice in food service provision: The role of restaurant menu design. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 144, 161–170. [CrossRef]
127. Menapace, L.; Raffaelli, R. Preferences for locally grown products: Evidence from a natural field experiment. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2017, 44, 255–284. [CrossRef]
128. Brunner, F.; Kurz, V.; Bryngelsson, D.; Hedenus, F. Carbon Label at a University Restaurant—Label Implementation and Evaluation. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 146, 658–667. [CrossRef]
129. Aertsens, J.; Verbeke, W.; Mondelaers, K.; Huylenbroeck, G.V. Personal determinants of organic food consumption: A review. Br. Food J. 2009, 111, 1140–1167. [CrossRef]
130. Agovino, M.; Crociata, A.; Quaglione, D.; Sacco, P.; Sarra, A. Good Taste Tastes Good. Cultural Capital as a Determinant of Organic Food Purchase by Italian Consumers: Evidence and Policy Implications. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 141, 66–75. [CrossRef]
131. Arvola, A.; Vassallo, M.; Dean, M.; Lampila, P.; Saba, A.; Lähteenmäki, L.; Shepherd, R. Predicting intentions to purchase organic food: The role of affective and moral attitudes in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Appetite 2008, 50, 443–454. [CrossRef]
132. Gerini, F.; Alfnes, F.; Schjøll, A. Organic-and Animal Welfare-labelled Eggs: Competing for the Same Consumers? J. Agric. Econ. 2016, 67, 471–490. [CrossRef]
133. Zanoli, R.; Scarpa, R.; Napolitano, F.; Piasentier, E.; Naspetti, S.; Bruschi, V. Organic label as an identifier of environmentally related quality: A consumer choice experiment on beef in Italy. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2013, 28, 70–79. [CrossRef]
134. Alfnes, F. Selling only sustainable seafood: Attitudes toward public regulation and retailer policies. Mar. Policy 2017, 78, 74–79. [CrossRef]
135. Roheim, C.A.; Asche, F.; Santos, J.I. The elusive price premium for ecolabelled products: Evidence from seafood in the UK market. J. Agric. Econ. 2011, 62, 655–668. [CrossRef]
136. Uchida, H.; Onozaka, Y.; Morita, T.; Managi, S. Demand for ecolabeled seafood in the Japanese market: A conjoint analysis of the impact of information and interaction with other labels. Food Policy 2014, 44, 68–76. [CrossRef]
137. Caracciolo, F.; Cicia, G.; Del Giudice, T.; Cembalo, L.; Krystallis, A.; Grunert, K.G.; Lombardi, P. Human values and preferences for cleaner livestock production. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 121–130. [CrossRef]
138. Pomarici, E.; Vecchio, R. Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: An exploratory study on Italian consumers. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 537–545. [CrossRef]
139. Van Loo, E.J.; Caputo, V.; Nayga, R.M.; Seo, H.-S.; Zhang, B.; Verbeke, W. Sustainability labels on coffee: Consumer preferences, willingness-to-pay and visual attention to attributes. Ecol. Econ. 2015, 118, 215–225. [CrossRef]
140. Van Loo, E.J.; Caputo, V.; Nayga, R.M.; Verbeke, W. Consumers’ valuation of sustainability labels on meat. Food Policy 2014, 49, 137–150. [CrossRef]
141. Vecchio, R.; Annunziata, A. Willingness-to-pay for sustainability-labelled chocolate: An experimental auction approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 86, 335–342. [CrossRef]
142. Apostolidis, C.; McLeay, F. Should we stop meating like this? Reducing meat consumption through substitution. Food Policy 2016, 65, 74–89. [CrossRef]
143. Hoek, A.C.; Pearson, D.; James, S.W.; Lawrence, M.A.; Friel, S. Shrinking the food-print: A qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours. Appetite 2017, 108, 117–131. [CrossRef]
144. Mullee, A.; Vermeire, L.; Vanaelst, B.; Mullie, P.; Deriemaeker, P.; Leenaert, T.; De Henauw, S.; Dunne, A.; Gunter, M.J.; Clarys, P.; et al. Vegetarianism and meat consumption: A comparison of attitudes and beliefs between vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, and omnivorous subjects in Belgium. Appetite 2017, 114, 299–305. [CrossRef]
145. Vainio, A.; Niva, M.; Jallinoja, P.; Latvala, T. From beef to beans: Eating, motives and the replacement of animal proteins with plant proteins among Finnish consumers. Appetite 2016, 106, 92–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
146. Reynolds, C.J.; Mirosa, M.; Clothier, B. New Zealand’s Food Waste: Estimating the Tonnes, Value, Calories and Resources Wasted. Agriculture 2016, 6, 9. [CrossRef]
147. Blanke, M. Challenges of Reducing Fresh Produce Waste in Europe—From Farm to Fork. Agriculture 2015, 5, 389–399. [CrossRef]
148. Secondi, L.; Principato, L.; Laureti, T. Household food waste behaviour in EU-27 countries: A multilevel analysis. Food Policy 2015, 56, 25–40. [CrossRef]
149. Stancu, V.; Haugaard, P.; Lähteenmäki, L. Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste. Appetite 2016, 96, 7–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
150. Neff, R.A.; Spiker, M.L.; Truant, P.L. Wasted food: US consumers’ reported awareness, attitudes, and behaviors. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127881. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
151. Hebrok, M.; Boks, C. Household food waste: Drivers and potential intervention points for design—An extensive review. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 151, 380–392. [CrossRef]
152. Toma, L.; Costa Font, M.; Thompson, B. Impact of consumers’ understanding of date labelling on food waste behaviour. Oper. Res. 2017, 1–18. [CrossRef]
153. Thompson, B.; Toma, L.; Barnes, A.P.; Revoredo-Giha, C. The effect of date labels on willingness to consume dairy products: Implications for food waste reduction. Waste Manag. 2018, 78, 124–134. [CrossRef]
154. Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Niebuhr Aagaard, E.M. Elaborating on the attitude-behaviour gap regarding organic products: Young Danish consumers and in-store food choice: In-store organic food choice. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2014, 38, 550–558. [CrossRef]
155. Godin, G.; Conner, M.; Sheeran, P. Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: The role of moral norm. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2005, 44, 497–512. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
156. Cai, R.; Feng, S.; Oppenheimer, M.; Pytlikova, M. Climate variability and international migration: The importance of the agricultural linkage. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2016, 79, 135–151. [CrossRef]
157. Kubik, Z.; Maurel, M. Weather shocks, agricultural production and migration: Evidence from Tanzania. J. Dev. Stud. 2016, 52, 665–680. [CrossRef]
158. Nawrotzki, R.J.; Hunter, L.M.; Runfola, D.M.; Riosmena, F. Climate change as a migration driver from rural and urban Mexico. Environ. Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 114023. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
159. Todaro, M.P. A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. Am. Econ. Rev. 1969, 59, 138–148.
160. Harris, J.R.; Todaro, M.P. Migration, unemployment and development: A two-sector analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 1970, 60, 126–142.
161. Stark, O.; Stark, O. The Migration of Labor; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1991.
162. Drabo, A.; Mbaye, L.M. Natural disasters, migration and education: An empirical analysis in developing countries. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2015, 20, 767–796. [CrossRef]
163. Falco, C.; Donzelli, F.; Olper, A. Climate Change, Agriculture and Migration: A Survey. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1405. [CrossRef]
164. Mendelsohn, R.; Nordhaus, W.D.; Shaw, D. The Impact of Global Warming on Agriculture: A Ricardian Analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 1994, 84, 753–771.
165. Mendelsohn, R.O.; Massetti, E. The use of cross-sectional analysis to measure climate impacts on agriculture: Theory and evidence. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2017, 11, 280–298. [CrossRef]
166. Dell, M.; Jones, B.F.; Olken, B.A. Temperature and Income: Reconciling New Cross-Sectional and Panel Estimates; National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009.
167. Falco, C.; Galeotti, M.; Olper, A. Climate change and Migration: Is Agriculture the Main Channel? IEFE Working Papers; IEFE, Center for Research on Energy and Environmental Economics and Policy, Universita’ Bocconi: Milano, Italy, 2018.
168. Cattaneo, C.; Peri, G. The migration response to increasing temperatures. J. Dev. Econ. 2016, 122, 127–146. [CrossRef]
169. Auffhammer, M.; Schlenker, W. Empirical studies on agricultural impacts and adaptation. Energy Econ. 2014, 46, 555–561. [CrossRef]
170. FAO. Reducing Vulnerabilities and Enhancing Resilience; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2017.
171. Lobell, D.B.; Bänziger, M.; Magorokosho, C.; Vivek, B. Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2011, 1, 42–45. [CrossRef]
172. Lobell, D.B.; Schlenker, W.; Costa-Roberts, J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 2011, 333, 616–620. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
173. Hsiang, S.M.; Burke, M.; Miguel, E. Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict. Science 2013, 341, 1235367. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
174. Hsiang, S.M.; Burke, M. Climate, conflict, and social stability: What does the evidence say? Clim. Chang. 2014, 123, 39–55. [CrossRef]
175. Cattaneo, C.; Bosetti, V. Climate-induced International Migration and Conflicts. CESifo Econ. Stud. 2017, 63, 500–528. [CrossRef]
176. Helpman, E.; Melitz, M.; Rubinstein, Y. Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. Q. J. Econ. 2008, 123, 441–487. [CrossRef]
177. Missirian, A.; Schlenker, W. Asylum applications respond to temperature fluctuations. Science 2017, 358, 1610–1614. [CrossRef]
178. Bazzi, S. Wealth Heterogeneity and the Income Elasticity of Migration. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 2017, 9, 219–255. [CrossRef]