Fruit and Vegetable Co-Products as Functional Feed Ingredients in Farm Animal Nutrition for Improved Product Quality

Agriculture (Switzerland)

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1020-1034

  Kasapidou, Eleni ^a   Sossidou, Evangelia ^b   Mitlianga, Paraskevi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN MACEDONIA   (Greece)

^b INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Farm animals; Fruit and vegetable co products; Nutrition; Product; Quality

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983257650     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20770472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/agriculture5041020     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Pfaltzgraff, L.A.; Cooper, E.C.; Budarin, V.; Clark, J.H. Food waste biomass: A resource for high-value chemicals. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 307–314.
2. Santana-Méridas, O.; González-Coloma, A.; Sánchez-Vioque, R. Agricultural residues as a source of bioactive natural products. Phytochem. Rev. 2012, 11, 447–466.
3. Waldron, K. Waste minimization, management and co-product recovery in food processing: An introduction. In Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing; Waldron, K., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2007; Volume 1, pp. 3–20.
4. Elferink, E.V.; Nonhebel, S.; Moll, H.C. Feeding livestock food residue and the consequences for the environmental impact of meat. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1227–1233.
5. Panouillé, M.; Ralet, M.C.; Bonnin, E.; Thibault, J.F. Recovery and reuse of trimmings and pulps from fruit and vegetable processing. In Handbook of Waste Management and Co-Product Recovery in Food Processing; Waldron, K., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2007; Volume 1, pp. 417–447.
6. European Commission. Innovating for sustainable growth: A bioeconomy for Europe. COM (212) 60 final. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/201202_ innovating_sustainable_growth.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2015).
7. Laufenberg, G.; Kunz, B.; Nystroem, M. Transformation of vegetable waste into value added products: (A) the upgrading concept; (B) practical implementations. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87, 167–198.
8. Mirabella, N.; Castellani, V.; Sala, S. Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 28–41.
9. Burt, S. Essential oils: Their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods—A review. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 94, 223–253.
10. Grunent, K.G. Food quality and safety: Consumer perception and demand. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2005, 32, 369–391.
11. Joppen, L. Taking out the chemistry. Food Eng. Ingred. 2006, 31, 38–41.
12. Karre, L.; Lopez, K.; Getty, K.J.K. Natural antioxidants in meat and poultry products. Meat Sci. 2013, 94, 220–227.
13. Schieber, A.; Stintzing, F.C.; Carle, R. By-products of plant food processing as a source of functional compounds—Recent developments. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 12, 401–413.
14. Bogue, J.; Coleman, T.; Sorenson, D. Determinants of consumers’ dietary behaviour for health-enhancing foods. Br. Food J. 2005, 107, 4–16.
15. Bou, R.; Codony, R.; Tres, A.; Decker, E.A.; Guardiola, F. Dietary strategies to improve nutritional value, oxidative stability, and sensory properties of poultry products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 800–822.
16. Wenk, C. Recent advances in animal feed additives such as metabolic modifiers, antimicrobial agents, probiotics, enzymes and highly available minerals—Review. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 13, 86–95.
17. Ajila, C.M.; Brar, S.K.; Verma, M.; Rao, U.P. Sustainable solutions for agro processing waste management: An Overview. In Environmental Protection Strategies for Sustainable Development, Malik, A., Grohmann, E., Eds., Springer Science/Business Media: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 65–109.
18. De las Fuentes, L.; Sanders, B.; Lorenzo, A.; Alber, S. AWARENET: Agro-Food Wastes Minimisation and Reduction Network. In Total Food Exploiting Co-Products—Minimizing Waste.-Workshop Report; Total Food Exploiting co-products—Minimizing waste; Proceedings Volume; Waldron, K.W., Faulds, C.B., Smith, A.C., Eds.; Institute of Food Research: Norwich, UK, 2004; pp. 233–244.
19. Anonymous. Animal Feed Additives Market Worth $20,233.2 Million by 2018. Available online: http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/animal-feed.asp (accessed on 15 June 2014).
20. OECD/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2015; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2015.
21. Galanakis, C.M. Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 68–87.
22. Wijngaard, H.; Hossain, M.B.; Rai, D.K.; Brunton, N. Techniques to extract bioactive compounds from food by-products of plant origin. Food Res. Int. 2012, 46, 505–513.
23. Fernández-López, J.; Sendra, E.; Sayas-Barberá, E.; Navarro, C.; Pérez-Alvarez, J.A. Physico-chemical and microbiological profiles of “salchich” (Spanish dry-fermented sausage) enriched with orange fiber. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 410–417.
24. Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; Vega-Vega, V.; Rosas-Domínguez, C.; Palafox-Carlos, H.; Villa-Rodriguez, J.A.; Siddiqui, M.W.; Dávila-Aviña, J.E.; González-Aguilar, G.A. Agro-industrial potential of exotic fruit byproducts as a source of food additives. Food Res. Int. 2011, 44, 1866–1874.
25. Oreopoulou, V.; Tzia, C. Utilization of plant by-products for the recovery of proteins, dietary fibers, antioxidants, and colorants. In Utilization of by-Products and Treatment of Waste in the Food Industry; Oreopoulou, V., Winfried, R., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 209–232.
26. Bampidis, V.A.; Robinson, P.H. Citrus by products as ruminant feeds: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2006, 128, 175–217.
27. Crawshaw, R. Co-Product Feeds: Animal Feeds from the Food and Drinks Industries; Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UK, 2001.
28. AWARENET. Handbook for the Prevention and Minimisation of Waste and Valorisation of By-Products in European Agro-Food Industries; Deposito legal BI-223-04; AWARENET: Grahamstown, South Africa, 2004.
29. European Union. Regulation No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the placing on the market and use of feed. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, L229, 1–28.
30. European Union. Directive No 2008/98 of the European Parliament and the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Off. J. Eur. Union 2008, L312, 3–30.
31. Serena, A.; Knudsen, K.E. Chemical and physicochemical characterisation of co-products from the vegetable food and agro industries. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2007, 139, 109–124.
32. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) on functional groups of additives as described in Annex 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. EFSA J. 2008, 920, 1–19.
33. European Union Register of Feed Additives pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/animalnutrition/feedadditives/legisl_en.htm (accessed on 6 October 2015).
34. Knoblich, M.; Anderson, B.; Latshaw, D. Analyses of tomato peel and seed byproducts and their use as a source of carotenoids. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 1166–1170.
35. Feedipedia. Animal Feed Resources Information System. Available online: http://www.feedipedia. org (accessed on 31 August 2015).
36. López, M.J.; Moreno, J.; Ramos-Cormenzana, A. The effect of olive mill wastewaters variability on xanthan production. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 90, 829–835.
37. Makris, D.P.; Boskou, G.; Andrikopoulos, N.K. Polyphenolic content and in vitro antioxidant characteristics of wine industry and other agri-food solid waste extracts. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2007, 20, 125–132.
38. Jiménez-Colmenero, F.; Carballo, S.; Cofrades, S. Healthier meat and meat products: Their role as functional foods. Meat Sci. 2001, 59, 5–13.
39. Kanner, J. Dietary advanced lipid oxidation endproducts are risk factors to human health. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2007, 51, 1094–1101.
40. Rice–Evans, C.A.; Miller, J.; Paganga, G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2, 152–159.
41. Hygreeva, D.; Pandey, M.C.; Radhakrishna, K. Potential applications of plant based derivatives as fat replacers, antioxidants and antimicrobials in fresh and processed meat products. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 47–57.
42. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for fats, including saturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, and cholesterol. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1461.
43. O’Grady, M.N.; Carpenter, R.; Lynch, P.B.; O’Brien, N.M.; Kerry, J.P. Addition of grape seed extract and bearberry to porcine diets. Influence on quality attributes of raw and cooked pork. Meat Sci. 2008, 78, 438–446.
44. Tsiplakou, E.; Zervas, G. The effect of dietary inclusion of olive tree leaves and grape marc on the content of conjugated linoleic acid and vaccenic acid in the milk of dairy sheep and goats. J. Dairy Res. 2008, 75, 270–278.
45. Francesch, A.; Cartañà, M. The effects of grape seed in the diet of the Penedes chicken, on growth and on the chemical composition and sensory profile of meat. Br. Poult. Sci. 2015, 56, 477–485.
46. Goñi, I.; Brenes, A.; Centeno, C.; Viveros, A.; Saura-Calixto, F.; Rebolé, A.; Arija, I.; Estevez, R. Effect of dietary grape pomace and vitamin E on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and susceptibility to meat lipid oxidation in chickens. Poult. Sci. 2007, 86, 508–516.
47. Brenes, A.; Viveros, A.; Goñi, I.; Centeno, C.; Sáyago-Ayerdy, S.G.; Arija, I.; Saura-Calixto, F. Effect of grape pomace concentrate and vitamin E on digestibility of polyphenols and antioxidant activity in chickens. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 307–316.
48. Smet, K.; Raes, K.; Huyghebaert, G.; Haak, L.; Arnouts, S.; de Smet, S. Lipid and protein oxidation of broiler meat as influenced by dietary natural antioxidant supplementation. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 1682–1688.
49. Simitzis, P.E.; Symeon, G.K.; Charismiadou, M.A.; Ayoutanti, A.G.; Deligeorgis, S.G. The effects of dietary hesperidin supplementation on broiler performance and chicken meat characteristics. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 91, 275–282.
50. Mourão, J.L.; Pinheiro, V.M.; Prates, J.A.M.; Bessa, R.J.B.; Ferreira, L.M.A.; Fontes, C.M.G.A.; Ponte, P.I.P. Effect of dietary dehydrated pasture and citrus pulp on the performance and meat quality of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 733–743.
51. Ahmed, S.T.; Islam, M.M.; Bostami, A.R.; Mun, H.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Yang, C.J. Meat composition, fatty acid profile and oxidative stability of meat from broilers supplemented with pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) by-products. Food Chem. 2015, 188, 481–488.
52. Goliomytis, M.; Orfanou, H.; Petrou. E.; Charismiadou, M.A.; Simitzis, P.E.; Deligeorgis, S.G. Effect of hesperidin dietary supplementation on hen performance, egg quality and yolk oxidative stability. Br. Poult. Sci. 2014, 55, 98–104.
53. Kara, K.; Kocaoğlu Güçlü, B.; Baytok, E.; Şentürk, M. Effects of grape pomace supplementation to laying hen diet on performance, egg quality, egg lipid peroxidation and some biochemical parameters. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2015, 44, 303–310.
54. Kaya, A.; Yildirim, B.A.; Kaya, H.; Gül, M.; Çelebi, S. The effects of diets supplemented with crushed and extracted grape seed on performance, egg quality parameters, yolk peroxidation and serum traits in laying hens. Eur. Poult. Sci. 2014, 78, doi:10.1399/eps.2014.59.
55. Botsoglou, N.; Papageorgiou, G.; Nikolakakis, I.; Florou-Paneri, P.; Giannenas, I.; Dotas, V.; Sinapis, E. Effect of dietary dried tomato pulp on oxidative stability of Japanese quail meat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2982–2988.
56. Sahin, N.; Orhan, C.; Tuzcu, M.; Sahin, K.; Kucuk, O. The effects of tomato powder supplementation on performance and lipid peroxidation in quail. Poult. Sci. 2008, 87, 276–283.
57. Karadas, F.; Grammenidis, E.; Surai, P.F.; Acamovic, T.; Sparks, N.H.C. Effects of carotenoids from lucerne, marigold and tomato on egg yolk pigmentation and carotenoid composition. Br. Poult. Sci. 2006, 47, 561–566.
58. Dal Bosco, A.; Mourvaki, E.; Cardinali, R.; Servili, M.; Sebastiani, B.; Ruggeri, S.; Mattioli, S.; Taticchi, A.; Esposto, S.; Castellini, C. Effect of dietary supplementation with olive pomaces on the performance and meat quality of growing rabbits. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 783–788.
59. Peiretti, P.G.; Gai, F.; Rotolo, L.; Brugiapaglia, A.; Gasco, L. Effects of tomato pomace supplementation on carcass characteristics and meat quality of fattening rabbits. Meat Sci. 2013, 95, 345–351.
60. Doyle, S.P.; Harrison, K.R.; Daley, C.A.; Hamilton, P.C.; Sinnott, D.K. Effects of feeding olive pomace on the fatty acid profile of pork. Proc. West. Sect. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 2006, 57, 216–218.
61. Inserra, L.; Luciano, G.; Bella, M.; Scerra, M.; Cilione, C.; Basile, P.; Lanza, M.; Priolo, A. Effect of including carob pulp in the diet of fattening pigs on the fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of pork. Meat Sci. 2015, 100, 256–261.
62. Yan, L.; Kim, I.H. Effect of dietary grape pomace fermented by Saccharomyces boulardii on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and meat quality in finishing pigs. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 24, 1763–1770.
63. Abbeddou, S.; Rischkowsky, B.; Richter, E.K.; Hess, H.D.; Kreuzer, M. Modification of milk fatty acid composition by feeding forages and agro-industrial byproducts from dry areas to Awassi sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 4657–4668.
64. Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E.; Vera, R.R.; Aguilar, C.; Lira, R.; Peña, I.; Fernández, J. Feeding olive cake to ewes improves fatty acid profile of milk and cheese. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2013, 184, 94–99.
65. Molina-Alcaide, E.; Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R. Potential use of olive by-products in ruminant feeding: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2008, 147, 247–264.
66. Romero-Huelva, M.; Ramos-Morales, E.; Molina-Alcaide, E. Nutrient utilization, ruminal fermentation, microbial abundances, and milk yield and composition in dairy goats fed diets including tomato and cucumber waste fruits. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 6015–6026.
67. Modaresi, J.; Fathi Nasri, M.H.; Rashidi, L.; Dayani, O.; Kebreab, E. Short communication: Effects of supplementation with pomegranate seed pulp on concentrations of conjugated linoleic acid and punicic acid in goat milk. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 4075–4080.
68. Salvador, A.; Igual, M.; Contreras, C.; Martínez-Navarrete, N.; del Mar Camacho, M. Effect of the inclusion of citrus pulp in the diet of goats on cheeses characteristics. Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 121, 361–367.
69. Emami, A.; Ganjkhanlou, M.; Nasri, M.F.; Zali, A.; Rashidi, L. Pomegranate seed pulp as a novel replacement of dietary cereal grains for kids. Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 123, 238–245.
70. Kotsampasi, B.; Christodoulou, V.; Zotos, A.; Liakopoulou-Kyriakides, M.; Goulas, P.; Petrotos, K.; Natas, P.; Bampidis, V.A. Effects of dietary pomegranate byproduct silage supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of growing lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 197, 92–102.
71. Luciano, G.; Pauselli, M.; Servili, M.; Mourvaki, E.; Serra, A.; Monahan, F.J.; Lanza, M.; Priolo, A.; Zinnai, A.; Mele, M. Dietary olive cake reduces the oxidation of lipids, including cholesterol, in lamb meat enriched in polyunsaturated fatty acids. Meat Sci. 2013, 93, 703–714.
72. Inserra, L.; Priolo, A.; Biondi, L.; Lanza, M.; Bognanno, M.; Gravador, R.; Luciano, G. Dietary citrus pulp reduces lipid oxidation in lamb meat. Meat Sci. 2014, 96, 1489–1493.
73. Gravador, R.S.; Jongberg, S.; Andersen, M.L.; Luciano, G.; Priolo, A.; Lund, M.N. Dietary citrus pulp improves protein stability in lamb meat stored under aerobic conditions. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 231–236.
74. Abarghuei, M.J.; Rouzbehan, Y.; Salem, A.Z.M.; Zamiri, M.J. Nitrogen balance, blood metabolites and milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows fed pomegranate-peel extract. Livest. Sci. 2014, 164, 72–80.
75. Terramoccia, S.; Bartocci, S.; Taticchi, A.; di Giovanni, S.; Pauselli, M.; Mourvaki, E.; Urbani, S.; Servili, M. Use of dried stoned olive pomace in the feeding of lactating buffaloes: Effect on the quantity and quality of the milk produced. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26, 971–980.
76. Williams, P.E.V. Alternative feed ingredients—Overview from an end-users perspective with specific reference to bioethanol co-products. Adv. Anim. Biosci. 2014, 5, 1.
77. Cassinerio, C.A.; Fadel, J.G.; Asmus, J.; Heguy, J.M.; Taylor, S.J.; DePeters, E.J. Tomato seeds as a novel by-product feed for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 4811–4828.
78. Chamorro, S.; Viveros, A.; Centeno, C.; Romero, C.; Arija, I.; Brenes, A. Effects of dietary grape seed extract on growth performance, amino acid digestibility and plasma lipids and mineral content in broiler chicks. Animal 2013, 7, 555–561.
79. Lau, D.W.; King, A.J. Pre-and post-mortem use of grape seed extract in dark poultry meat to inhibit development of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1602–1607.
80. Yáñez-Ruiz, D.R.; Molina-Alcaide, E. A comparative study of the effect of two-stage olive cake added to alfalfa on digestion and nitrogen losses in sheep and goats. Animal 2007, 1, 227–232.
81. Huang, H.J.; Ramaswamy, S. Separation and purification of phytochemicals as co-products in biorefineries. In Biorefinery Co-Products: Phytochemicals, Primary Metabolites and Value-Added Biomass Processing; Bergeron, C., Carrier, D.J., Ramaswamy, S., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 37–53.
82. Favreau-Peigné, A.; Baumont, R.; Ginane, C. Food sensory characteristics: Their unconsidered roles in the feeding behaviour of domestic ruminants. Animal 2013, 7, 806–813.
83. Smits, C.; Sijtsma, R. A decision tree for co-product utilization. Adv. Pork Prod. Proc. Banff Pork Semin. 2007, 18, 213–221.
84. Wadhwa, M.; Bakshi, M.P.S. Utilization of Fruit and Vegetable Wastes as Livestock Feed and as Substrates for Generation of Other Value-Added Products; Makkar, H.P.S., Ed.; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013. Available online: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3273e/i3273e.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2015).