The framing of innovation among European research funding actors: Assessing the potential for 'responsible research and innovation' in the food and health domain

Food Policy

Volumn 62, Issue , 2016, Pages 78-87

  Khan, Shumaisa S ^a   Timotijevic, Lada ^a   Newton, Rachel ^b   Coutinho, Daniela ^b   Llerena, José Luis ^c   Ortega, Santiago ^c   Benighaus, Ludger ^d   Hofmaier, Christian ^d   Xhaferri, Zamira ^e   de Boer, Alie ^e   Urban, Christine ^f   Strähle, Michael ^f   Da Pos, Lara ^g   Neresini, Federico ^h   Raats, Monique M ^a   Hadwiger, Klaus ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação ^*  (Portugal)

^c CTAEX   (Spain)

^d DIALOGIK   (Germany)

^e MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f Science Shop Vienna Wissenschaftsladen Wien   (Austria)

^g Observa Science in Society   (Italy)

^h UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Europe; Food and health; Innovation; Research funding; Responsible research and innovation; RRI

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969862446     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Avermaete T., Viaene J., Morgan E.J., Crawford N. Determinants of innovation in small food firms. Eur. J. Innov. 2003, 6:8-17.
2. Beaglehold R., Bonita R., Horton R., Adams O., McKee M. Public health in the new era: improving health through collective action. Lancet 2004, 363:2084-2086.
3. Benford R.D., Snow D.A. Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 2000, 26:611-639.
4. Bhaskaran S. Incremental innovation and business performance: small and medium-size food enterprises in a concentrated industry environment. J. Small Bus. Manage. 2006, 44:64-80.
5. Biggs B., King L., Basu S., Stuckler D. Is wealthier always healthier? The impact of national income level, inequality, and poverty on public health in Latin America. Soc. Sci. Med. 2010, 71:266-273.
6. Borrás S. The Innovation Policy of the European Union: From Government to Governance: From Government to Governance 2002, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
7. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3:77-101.
8. Brook Lyndhurst An Evidence Review of Public Attitudes to Emerging Food Technologies 2009.
9. Buchanan A.V., Weiss K.M., Fullerton S.M. On stones, wands and promises. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 35:593-596.
10. Davidson D. On the very idea of a conceptual scheme. Post-Analytic Philosophy 1985, 129-144. Columbia University Press, New York. J. Rajchman, C. West (Eds.).
11. Dewulf A., Gray B., Putnam L., Lewicki R., Aarts N., Bouwen R., van Woerkum C. Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: a metaparadigmatic perspective. Hum. Relat. 2009, 62:155-193.
12. Dixon J. From the imperial to the empty calorie: how nutrition relations underpin food regime transitions. Agric. Hum. Values 2009, 26:321-333.
13. Earle M.D. Innovation in the food industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1997, 8:166-175.
14. Egger G. Health, "illth", and economic growth: medicine, environment, and economics at the crossroads. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2009, 37:78-83.
15. Egger G., Swinburn B., Islam F.M. Economic growth and obesity: an interesting relationship with world-wide implications. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2012, 10:147-153.
16. EU Food Law CIAA Puts Three Key Topics on Research Agenda 2010.
17. European Commission The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation [WWW Document] 2013, URL. http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/index_en.cfm?pg=h2020.
18. European Commission A Guide to Social Innovation 2013.
19. European Commission DG Health and Consumers What is Health Claims? [WWW Document] 2012, URL. http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/labellingnutrition/claims/health_claims_en.htm.
20. Felt U., Wynne B., Callon M., Gonçalves M.E., Jasanoff S., Jepsen M., Joly P., Konopasek Z., May S., Neubauer C., Rip A., Siune K., Stirling A., Tallacchini M., Communities E. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously - Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research 2007, European Commission, Brussels.
21. Galizzi G., Venturini L. Product innovation in the food industry: nature, characteristics and determinants. Economics of Innovation: The Case of the Food Industry 1996, 133-153. Physica-Verlag HD, Piacenza, Italy. G. Galizzi, L. Venturini (Eds.).
22. Godin B. The linear model of innovation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2006, 31:639-667.
23. Godin B., Lane J.P. Pushes and pulls: hi(s)tory of the demand pull model of innovation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2013, 38:621-654.
24. Granados J.A.T., Ionides E.L. The reversal of the relation between economic growth and health progress: Sweden in the 19th and 20th centuries. J. Health Econ. 2008, 27:544-563.
25. Greenhalgh C., Rogers M. Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth 2010.
26. Groves T. Pandemic obesity in Europe. Br. Med. J. 2006, 333:1081-1082.
27. Hard M. Beyond harmony and consensus: a social conflict approach to technology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 1993, 18:408-432.
28. Hsieh Y.P., Ofori J.A. Innovations in food technology for health. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 16:65-73.
29. IEA, ISEE, EUPHA Joint Statement of the Public Health Associations of Europe on the Health Research Programme 2014-2015 (Horizon2020) Proposed by the European Commission [WWW Document] 2013, URL. http://www.eupha.org/repository/publications/joint_statement_IEA_ISEE_EUPHA_30_Sep_2013.pdf.
30. Innovation Futures in Europe Innovation Futures in Europe: A Foresight Exercise on Emerging Patterns of Innovation. Visions, Scenarios and Implications for Policy and Practice 2012.
31. Jasanoff S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
32. Joint Programme Initiative A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life 2010.
33. Kaplan S., Tripsas M. Thinking about technology: applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Res. Policy 2008, 2(37):790-805.
34. Klein H.K., Kleinman D.L. The social construction of technology: structural considerations. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2002, 27:28-52.
35. Klerck D., Sweeney J.C. The effect of knowledge types on consumer-perceived risk and adoption of genetically modified foods. Psychol. Mark. 2007, 24:171-193.
36. Kogevinas M., McGuire P., McKee M., Victora C. Concerns Regarding Draft of Health Research Programme 2014-2015 (Horizon 2020) Proposed by the European Commission [WWW Document] 2013, URL. http://www.epha.org/IMG/pdf/Research_Programme_letter_Commissioner_Quinn_CLEAN_ok-2.pdf.
37. Lagnevik M. The Dynamics of Innovation Clusters: A Study of the Food Industry 2003, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
38. Latour B. How to write "The Prince" for machines as well as for machinations. Technology and Social Change 1988, 20-43. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. B. Elliot (Ed.).
39. Lee R.P. Knowledge claims and the governance of agri-food innovation. Agric. Hum. Values 2012, 29:79-91.
40. Levidow L., Birch K., Papaioannou T. Divergent paradigms of European agro-food innovation: the knowledge-based bio-economy (KBBE) as an R&D agenda. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2012, 38:94-125.
41. Levin I.P., Schneider S.L., Gaeth G.J. All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1998, 76:149-188.
42. Lundkvist P., Fjellstro C., Sidenvall B., Lumbers M., Raats M. Management of healthy eating in everyday life among senior Europeans. Appetite 2010, 55:616-622.
43. McCarthy M., Aitsi-Selmi A., Bánáti D., Frewer L., Hirani V., Lobstein T., McKenna B., Mulla Z., Rabozzi G., Sfetcu R., Newton R. Research for food and health in Europe: themes, needs and proposals. Health Res. Policy Syst. 2011, 9.
44. McCarthy M., Cluzel E., Dressel K., Newton R. Food and health research in Europe: structures, gaps and futures. Food Policy 2013, 39:64-71.
45. Minsky M. A framework for representing knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision 1975, 211-277. McGraw-Hill, New York. P.H. Winston (Ed.).
46. Moss M. The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food 2013, New York Times.
47. Mulgan G., Tucker S., Ali R., Sanders B., Foundation T.Y. Social Innovation - What It Is, Why It Matters and How It Can Be Accelerated 2007, Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, Said Business School, University of Oxford, London.
48. Mytelka, L.K., Smith, K., 2001. Innovation Theory and Innovation Policy: Bridging the Gap. DRUID Conf.
49. Nieuwlaat R., Schwalm J., Khatib R., Yusuf S. Why are we failing to implement effective therapies in cardiovascular disease?. Eur. Heart J. 2013, 34:1262-1269.
50. OECD Technology and the Economy: The Key Relationships 1992, OECD, Paris.
51. Offer A., Pechey R., Ulijaszek S. Obesity under affluence varies by welfare regimes: the effect of fast food, insecurity, and inequality. Econ. Hum. Biol. 2010, 8:297-308.
52. Owen R., Macnaghten P., Stilgoe J. Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Sci. Public Policy 2012, 39:71-760.
53. Pinch T.J., Bijker W.E. The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology 1987, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge. W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, T. Pinch (Eds.).
54. Rein M., Schön D. Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowl. Policy 1996, 9:85-104.
55. Sarraci R., Olsen J., Hofman A. Health research policy in the European Union. Br. Med. J. 2005, 330:1459-1460.
56. Skogstad G. The WTO and food safety regulatory policy innovation in the European Union. J. Common Mark. Stud. 2001, 39:485-505.
57. Stange K.C. The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions. Ann. Fam. Med. 2009, 7:100-103.
58. Stilgoe J., Owen R., Macnaghten P. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res. Policy 2013, 42:1568-1580.
59. Tannen D., Wallat C. Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples from a medical examination/interview. Soc. Psychol. Q. 1987, 50:205-216.
60. Traill W.B., Meulenberg M. Innovation in the food industry. Agribusiness 2002, 18:1-21.
61. Trepte A., Aim K., Nordquist J., Giry C., Lery T., Herou A. Science Foresight to Advance European Research 2013.
62. Unnevehr L.J., Jensen H.H. HACCP as a Regulatory Innovation to Improve Food Safety in the Meat Industry 1996, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Ames, Iowa.
63. Von Schomberg R. Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation. Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer Methoden 2011, Vs Verlag, Wiesbaden. M. Dusseldorp, R. Beecroft (Eds.).
64. Wallace H. Biosciences for Life 2010, Genewatch, UK, Derbyshire.
65. Weick K.E. Sensemaking in Organizations 1995, Sage, Thousand Oaks, United States.
66. Weick K.E. Technology as equivoque. Technology and Organizations 1990, 1-44. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. P. Goodman, L. Sproull (Eds.).
67. WHO Regional Office for Europe Food and Health in Europe: A Basis for Action 2004, WHO Reg. Publ. Eur. Ser.
68. Williams P.R., Hammit J.K. Perceived risks of conventional and organic produce: pesticides, pathogens, and natural toxins. Risk Anal. 2001, 21:319-330.
69. Williams R., Edge D. The social shaping of technology. Res. Policy 1996, 865-899.
70. Wilsdon J., Willis R. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream 2004, Demos, London.
71. Woolf S.H., Johnson R.E. Inattention to the fidelity of health care delivery is costing lives. Am. J. Public Health 2007, 97:1732-1733.
72. Woolf S.H., Johnson R.E. The break-even point: when medical advances are less important then improving the fidelity with which they are delivered. Ann. Fam. Med. 2005, 3:545-552.
73. Zhou G. Nanotechnology in the food system: consumer acceptance and willingness to pay. Agric. Econ. 2013, University of Kentucky.