Consumers and trust

Food Policy

Volumn 52, Issue , 2015, Pages 71-74

  Hobbs, Jill E ^a   Goddard, Ellen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Consumer decision making; Credence attributes; Generalized trust; Institutional trust

Indexed keywords

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84955191496     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.10.017     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Couper, M.P., 2000. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin. Quart. 64, 464-494.
2. Couper, M.P., Miller, P.V., 2008. Web survey methods: introduction. Public Opin. Quart. 72 (5), 831-835.
3. Ding, Y., Veeman, M.M., Adamowicz, W.L., 2015. Functional food choices: impacts of trust and health control beliefs on Canadian consumers' choices of canola oil. Food Policy. 52, 92-98.
4. Dodou, D., de Winter, J.C.F., 2014. Social desirability is the same in offline, online, and paper surveys: a meta-analysis. Comput. Human Behav. 36, 487-495.
5. Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D., Schlösser., T.M., 2012. Trust as a social and emotional act: noneconomic considerations in trust behavior. J. Econ. Psychol. 33, 686-694.
6. Earle, T., 2010. Trust in risk management: a model-based review of empirical research. Risk Anal. 30 (4), 541-574.
7. Edelman, R., 2014. Trust Barometer 2014. . (accessed July 30.07.14).
8. Frewer, L.J., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., Shepherd, R., 1996. What determines trust in information about food-related risks? Underlying psychological constructs. Risk Anal. 16 (4), 473-485.
9. Grebitus, C., Steiner, B., Veeman, M.M., 2015. The roles of human values and generalized trust on stated preferences when food is labeled with environmental footprints: insights from Germany. Food Policy. 52, 84-91.
10. Greenberg, M.R., 2014. Energy policy and research: the underappreciation of trust. Energy Res. Social Sci. 1, 152-160.
11. Hartmann, M., Klink, J., Simons, J., 2015. Cause Related Marketing in the German retail sector: exploring the role of consumers' trust. Food Policy. 52, 108-114.
12. Heerwegh, D., Loosveldt, G., 2008. Face to face versus Web surveying in a high internet coverage population: differences in response quality. Public Opin. Quart. 72 (5), 836-846.
13. Janssen, M., Hamm, U., 2014. Governmental and private certification labels for organic food: consumer attitudes and preferences in Germany. Food Policy 49 (2), 437-448.
14. Kasperson, R.E., Golding, D., Tuler, S., 1992. Social distrust as a factor in siting hazardous facilities and communicating risk. J. Social Issues 48 (4), 161-187.
15. Kramer, R.M., Tyler, T.R., 1996. Trust in Organisations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
16. Lang, J.T., 2013. Elements of public trust in the American food system: experts, organizations, and genetically modified food. Food Policy 41, 145-154.
17. Lassoued, R., Hobbs, J.E., 2015. Consumer confidence in credence attributes: the role of brand trust. Food Policy. 52, 99-107.
18. Lindgreen, A., 2003. Trust as a valuable strategic variable in the food industry: different types of trust and their implementation. British Food J. 105 (6), 310-327.
19. Liu, L., Pieniak, Z., Verbeke, W., 2014. Food-related hazards in China: consumers' perceptions of risk and trust in information sources. Food Control 46, 291-298.
20. Lobb, A.E., Mazzocchi, M., Traill, W.B., 2007. Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour. Food Qual. Preference 18, 384-395.
21. Lombart, C., Louis, D., 2014. A study of the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility and price image on retailer personality and consumers' reactions (satisfaction, trust and loyalty to the retailer). J. Retailing Consumer Services 21 (4), 630-642.
22. McComas, K.A., Besley, J.C., Steinhardt, J., 2014. Factors influencing U.S. consumer support for genetic modification to prevent crop disease. Appetite 78c, 8-14.
23. McKnight, D.H., Chervany, N.L., 2002. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Int. J. Electronic Commerce 6 (2), 35-59.
24. Metlay, D., 1999. Institutional trust and confidence: a journey into a conceptual quagmire. In: Cvetkovich, G.T., Löfstedt, R.E. (Eds.), Social Trust and the Management of Risk. Earthscan, London.
25. Olivera, J., 2013. On Changes in General Trust in Europe. AIAS, GINI Discussion Paper 80. .
26. Petts, J., 2008. Public engagement to build trust-false hopes? J. Risk Res. 11 (6), 821-835.
27. Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N.F., 2003. Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Anal. 23 (5), 961-972.
28. Renn, O., Levine, D., 1991. Credibility and trust in risk communication. In: Kasperson, R.E., Stallen, P.J.M. (Eds.), Communicating Risk to the Public. Kluwer, The Hague, pp. 175-218.
29. Roosen, J., Bieberstein, A., Blanchemanche, S., Goddard, E., Marette, S., Vandermoore, F., 2015. Trust and willingness to pay for nanotechnology. Food Policy. 52, 75-83.
30. Ross, V.L., Fielding, K.S., Louis, W.R., 2014. Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: testing a social-psychological model. J. Environ. Manage. 137, 61-68.
31. Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C., 1998. Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23 (3), 393-404.
32. Schoder, D., Haenlein, M., 2004. The relative importance of different trust constructs for sellers in the online world. Electronic Markets 14 (1), 48-57.
33. Siegrist, M., Cousin, M., Kastenholz, H., Wiek, A., 2007. Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. Appetite 49, 459-466.
34. Siegrist, M., Stampfli, N., Kastenholz, H., 2008. Consumers' willingness to buy functional foods. The influence of carrier, benefit and trust. Appetite 51, 526-529.
35. Wales, C.M., Harvey, M., Warde, A., 2006. Recuperating from BSE: the shifting UK institutional basis for trust in food. Appetite 47, 187-195.