Agri-environmental measures adoption: New evidence from Lombardy region

The Common Agricultural Policy after the Fischler Reform: National Implementations, Impact Assessment and the Agenda for Future Reforms

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 275-294

  Bertoni, Danilo ^a   Cavicchioli, Daniele ^a   Pretolani, Roberto ^a   Olper, Alessandro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865565413     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Anderson, K. 2000. Agriculture's 'multifunctionality' and the WTO. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 44(3), 475-494.
2. th, 2007.
3. st.
4. th EAAE Congress: 'People, Food and Environments: Global Trends and European Strategies', Ghent, Belgium, August 26-29, 2008.
5. Bonnieux, F., Rainelli, P. and Vermersch, D. 1998. Estimate the Supply of Environmental Benefits by Agriculture: A French Case Study. Environmental and Resource Economics 11(2), 135-153.
6. Damianos, D. and Giannakopoulos, N. 2002. Farmers' participation in agrienvironmental schemes in Greece. British Food Journal, 104, 261-273.
7. Defrancesco, E., Gatto, P., Runge, F. and Trestini, S. 2007. Factors Affecting Farmers' Participation in Agri-environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59(1), 114-131.
8. Dupraz, P., Vermersch, D., Henry De Frahan, B. and Delvaux, L. 2003. The Environmental Supply of Farm Households - A Flexible Willingness to Accept Model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 25(2), 171-189.
9. Falconer, K. 2000. Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 379-394.
10. th Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
11. Hackl, F., Halla, M. and Pruckner, G.J. 2007. Local compensation payments for agri-environmental externalities: a panel data analysis of bargaining outcomes. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 34(3), 295-320.
12. Hackl, F., Halla, M. and Pruckner, G.J. 2005. Combating moral hazard in agrienvironmental schemes: a multiple-agent approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 32(1), 75-91.
13. Kemmerling, A. and Bodenstein, T. 2006. Partisan Politics in Regional Redistribution: Do Parties Affect the Distribution of EU Structural Funds across Regions? European Union Politics, 7(3), 373-392.
14. Jongeneel, R.A., Polman, N.B.P. and Slangen, L.H.G. 2008. Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional? Land Use Policy, 25(1), 81-94.
15. th EAAE Seminar: 'Multifunctional agriculture, policies and markets: understanding the critical linkage', Rennes, France, October 28-29, 2004.
16. Mann, S 2005. Farm Size Growth and Participation in Agri-Environmental Schemes: A Configural Frequency Analysis of the Swiss Case. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56(3), 373-384.
17. th International Farm Management Congress, Wageningen, The Netherlands, July 7-12, 2002
18. Swinbank, A. 2001. Multifunctionality: a European Euphemism for Protection?, FWAG Conference: 'Multifunctional Agriculture - A European Model', National Agricultural Centre, Stoneleigh, 29 November 2001.
19. Vandermeulen, V., Verspecht, A., Van Huylenbroeck, G., Meert, H., Boulanger, A. and Van Hecke, E., 2006. The importance of the institutional environment on multifunctional farming systems in the peri-urban area of Brussels. Land Use Policy, 23(4), 486-501.
20. Vanslembrouck, I., Van Huylenbroeck, G. and Verbeke, W. 2002. Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agri-environmental Measures. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 53(3), 489-511.
21. Wilson, G.A. 1997. Factors Influencing Farmer Participation in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scheme. Journal of Environmental Management, 50(1), 67-93.
22. Wossink, G.A.A. and van Wenum, J.H. 2003. Biodiversity conservation by farmers: analysis of actual and contingent participation. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 30(4), 461-485.