A diagnostic system to assess sustainability at a farm level: The SOSTARE model

Agricultural Systems

Volumn 133, Issue , 2015, Pages 35-53

  Paracchini, Maria Luisa ^a   Bulgheroni, Claudia ^a   Borreani, Giorgio ^b   Tabacco, Ernesto ^b   Banterle, Alessandro ^c   Bertoni, Danilo ^d   Rossi, Graziano ^d   Parolo, Gilberto ^d   Origgi, Roberto ^e   De Paola, Claudio ^f  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^e Agricola 2000 Services and Research for Agriculture   (Italy)

^f DG Environment Energy and Sustainable Development   (Italy)

Author keywords

Agronomy; Ecology; Economy; Farm performance; Indicators; Sustainability assessment

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRONOMY; ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; FARMING SYSTEM; MODEL VALIDATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; POLICY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALUATION;

ITALY; PO PLAIN;

EID: 84921019804     PISSN: 0308521X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bechini L., Castoldi N. On-farm monitoring of economic and environmental performances of cropping systems: results of a 2-year study at the field scale in northern Italy. Ecol. Indic 2009, 9:1096-1113.
2. Bertoni, D., Cereda, E., Banterle, A. Quantifying farm diversification strategies: an empirical analysis and critical remarks, XIII Congress of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, Zurich, Switzerland, August 30-September 2, 2011.
3. Binder C.R., Schmid A., Steinberger J.K. Sustainability solution space of the Swiss milk value added chain. Ecol. Econ 2012, 83:210-220.
4. Buffa G., Villani M. Are the ancient forests of the Eastern Po Plain large enough for a long term conservation of herbaceous nemoral species?. Plant Biosyst 2012, 146:970-984.
5. Cadilhon J.J., Bossard P., Viaux P., Girardin P., Mouchet C., Vilain L. Caractérisation et suivi de la durabilité des exploitations agricoles françaises: les indicateurs de la méthode IDERICA. Notes et Etudes Economiques 2006, 26:127-158. accessed 14.06.27. http://www.idea.portea.fr/fileadmin/documents/En_savoir_plus/Cadilhon-etal-nee26.pdf.
6. Carmona-Torres C., Parra-López C., Hinojosa-Rodríguez A., Sayadi S. Farm-level multifunctionality associated with farming techniques in olive growing: an integrated modeling approach. Agric. Syst 2014, 127:97-114.
7. Carvalheiro L.G., Kunin W.E., Keil P., Aguirre-Gutiérrez J., Ellis W.N., Fox R., et al. Species richness declines and biotic homogenisation have slowed down for NW-European pollinators and plants. Ecol. Lett 2013, 16:870-878.
8. Castoldi N., Bechini L. Integrated sustainability assessment of cropping systems with agro-ecological and economic indicators in northern Italy. Eur. J. Agron 2010, 32:59-72.
9. Colomb V., Touchemoulin O., Bockel L., Chotte J.L., Martin S., Tinlot M., et al. Selection of appropriate calculators for landscape-scale greenhouse gas assessment for agriculture and forestry. Environ. Res. Lett 2013, 8:015029. 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015029.
10. Cruse J.M., Liebman M., Raman D.R., Wiedenhoeeft H.M. Fossil energy use in conventional and low-external-input cropping systems. Agron. J. 2012, 102:934-941.
11. Dalgaard T., Halberg N., Porter J.R. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 2001, 87:51-65.
12. Dantsis T., Douma C., Giourga C., Loumou A., Polychronaki E.A. A methodological approach to assess and compare the sustainability level of agricultural plant production systems. Ecol. Indic 2010, 10(2):256-263.
13. De Paola C. A tool for the sustainability assessment at farm level. 18th MARS Annual EU Conference, 21-23 November 2012, Paphos Cyprus accessed 14.01.28. ftp://mars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Paphos2012/Presentations/8_4_De%20Paola_SOSTARE.pdf.
14. Degenfelder L., Lösch S., Seibert O., Groier M. Evaluation des mesures agro-environmentales. Annexe 7: etude nationale autriche. ART Forschungsgruppe Agrar-und Regionalentwicklung Triesdorf accessed 14.01.28. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/eval/reports/measures/annex7.pdf.
15. European Commission Towards a common agricultural and rural policy for Europe. European Economy 1997, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, Brussels, Reports and Studies No 5.
16. European Commission NACE Rev. 2 - Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community 2008, 363. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, accessed 14.01.18. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-RA-07-015/EN/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF.
17. European Commission, 2010. The CAP towards 2020: meeting the food, natural resources and territorial challenges of the future. COM(2010) 672. Brussels.
18. European Commission, 2011. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM(2011) 244. Brussels.
19. European Commission Building a green infrastructure for Europe accessed 14.01.28. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/ecosystems/docs/green_infrastructure_broc.pdf.
20. European Court of Auditors Is Agri-Environment Support Well Designed and Managed? 2011, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 75 pp. Special Report No 7/2011.
21. Floridi M., Pagni S., Falorni S., Luzzati T. An exercise in composite indicators construction: assessing the sustainability of Italian regions. Ecol. Econ 2011, 70:1440-1447.
22. Freemark K.E., Boutin C., Keddy C.J. Importance of farmland habitats for conservation of plant species. Conserv. Biol 2002, 16:399-412.
23. Fumagalli M., Acutis M., Mazzetto F., Vidotto F., Sali G., Bechini L. An analysis of agricultural sustainability of cropping systems in arable and dairy farms in an intensively cultivated plain. Eur. J. Agron 2011, 34:71-82.
24. Furlanetto D. Valutazione Ambientale Strategica dei programmi di sviluppo del sistema di trasporto nel territorio del Parco Lombardo della valle del Ticino Consorzio Parco Lombardo della Valle del Ticino Il Guado, Corbetta, MI. 224 pp, accessed 14.06.27. http://eventi.parcoticino.it/archivio/39.%20VAS%20dei%20programmi%20di%20sviluppo%20del%20sistema%20di%20trasporto.pdf.
25. Godefroid S., Koedam N. How important are large vs. small forest remnants for the conservation of the woodland flora in an urban context?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr 2003, 12:287-298.
26. Gollop F.M., Monahan J.L. A generalized index of diversification: trends in U.S. manufacturing. Rev. Econ. Stat 1991, 73:318-330.
27. Gourley C.J.P., Dougherty W.J., Weaver D.M., Aarons S.R., Awty I.M., Gibson D.M., et al. Farm-scale nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfur balances and use efficiencies on Australian dairy farms. Anim. Prod. Sci 2012, 52:929-944.
28. Grande J. New venture creation in the farm sector - critical resources and capabilities. J. Rural Stud 2011, 27:220-233.
29. Honnay O., Endels P., Vereecken H., Hermy M. The role of patch area and habitat diversity in explaining native plant species richness in disturbed suburban forest patches in northern Belgium. Divers. Distrib 1999, 5:129-141.
30. Jongeneel R.A., Polman N.B.P., Slangen L.H.G. Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional?. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:81-94.
31. Levine J.M., Vila M., Antonio C.M., Dukes J.S., Grigulis K., Lavorel S. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc. Biol. Sci 2003, 270:775-781.
32. Mann S. The nature of the diversified farm household Working Paper Series No.6, Forschungsanstal Agroscope Reckenholz-Tanikon (ART), Switzerland, accessed 14.06.27. http://purl.umn.edu/56726.
33. Mauchline A.L., Mortimer S.R., Park J.R., Finn J.A., Haysom K., Westbury D.B., et al. Environmental evaluation of agri-environment schemes using participatory approaches: experiences of testing the Agri-Environmental Footprint Index. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:317-328.
34. McGarigal K., Cushman S.A., Neel M.C., Ene E. FRAGSTATS v3: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, accessed 14.06.27. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html.
35. Meert H., Van Huylenbroeck G., Vernimmen T., Bourgeois M., van Hecke E. Farm household survival strategies and diversification on marginal farms. J. Rural Stud 2005, 21:81-97.
36. Meul M., Nevens F., Reheul D., Hofman G. Energy use efficiency of specialised dairy, arable and pig farms in Flanders. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ 2007, 119:135-144.
37. Meul M., Van Passel S., Nevens F., Dessein J., Rogge E., Mulier A., et al. MOTIFS: a monitoring tool for integrated farm sustainability. Agron. Sustain Dev 2008, 28:321-332.
38. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Multifunctionality: towards an Analytical Framework 2001, 9-26. OECD Publications Service, Paris, France.
39. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Pesticide use and risks, in Environmental indicators for agriculture. Methods and Results 2001, 141-170. Paris, France.
40. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Summary Report of the OECD Project on Pesticide Terrestrial Risk Indicators (TERI) 2005, 11-27. Paris, France.
41. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC) Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide 2008, OECD publication Code: 302008251E1. M. Nardo, M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, S. Tarantola, A. Hoffman, E. Giovannini (Eds.).
42. Pacini C., Giesen G., Wossink A., Omodei-Zorini L., Huirne R. The EU's Agenda 2000 reform and the sustainability of organic farming in Tuscany: ecological-economic model at field and farm level. Agric. Syst 2004, 80:171-197.
43. Parolo G., Abeli T., Gusmeroli F., Rossi G. Large scale heterogeneous cattle grazing affects plant diversity and forage value of alpine species-rich Nardus pastures. Grass Forage Sci 2011, 66:541-550.
44. Parra-López C., Calatrava-Requena J., Haro-Giménez T. A systemic comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alternative olive systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework. Ecol. Econ 2008, 64:820-834.
45. Pieniadz A., Renner S., Rathmann C., Glauben T., Loy J.P. Income diversification of farm households: relevance and determinants in Germany, 111th EAAE Seminar Small Farms: Decline or Persistence? Canterbury, UK, accessed 14.10.31. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/52836/2/061.pdf.
46. Pointereau P., Langevin B., Gimaret M. DIALECTE, a comprehensive and quick tool to assess the agro-environmental performance of farms 10th European IFSA Symposium, July 1-4, 2012, Aarhus, Denmark, accessed 13.07.29. http://ifsa.boku.ac.at/cms/fileadmin/Proceeding2012/IFSA2012_WS1.3_Pointereau.pdf.
47. Pope J., Annandale D., Morrison-Saunders A. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev 2004, 24:595-616.
48. Ripoll-Bosch R., Díez-Unquera B., Ruiz R., Villalba D., Molina E., Joy M., et al. An integrated sustainability assessment of Mediterranean sheep farms with different degrees of intensification. Agric. Syst 2012, 105:46-56.
49. Rotz C.A., Montes F., Chianese D.S. The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment. J. Dairy Sci 2010, 93:1266-1282.
50. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw Hill, New York, Pittsburgh, Reprinted in 1996 by RWS Publications.
51. Saaty T.L. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process 2001, RWS Publications. second ed.
52. Schoeneboom J., Saling P., Gipmans M. AgBalance™ - technical background paper BASF SE. Agricultural Centre, 35 pp, accessed 14.06.27. http://www.agbalance.agro.basf.com.
53. Segrè M., Chinaglia N., Riva M., Elefanti A. Programma di Tutela e uso Delle Acque in Lombardia 2006, Regione Lombardia - Direzione Generale reti e Servizi di Pubblica Utilità, accessed 14.06.27. http://www.ors.regione.lombardia.it/resources/pagina/N11e3b0af51da6020148/N11e3b0af51da6020148/PROGRAMMA_DI_TUTELA_E_USO_DELLE_ACQUE_IL_lOMBARDIA.pdf.
54. Shapouri H., Duffield J.A., Wang M. The Energy Balance of Maize Ethanol: an Update 2002, 19. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Office of the Chief Economist, Office of Energy Policy and New Uses, Washington, DC, Agricultural economic report N. 814.
55. Thomassen M.A., Dolman M.A., van Calker K.J., de Boer I.J.M. Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms. Ecol. Econ 2009, 68:2278-2284.
56. van der Ploeg J.D., Roep D. Multifunctionality and rural development: the actual situation in Europe. Multifunctional Agriculture: a New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 2003, 37-54. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK. G. van Huylenbroeck, G. Durand (Eds.).
57. Van Huylenbroeck G., Vandermeulen V., Mettepenningen E., Verspecht A. Multifunctionality of agriculture: a review of definitions, evidence and instruments. Living Rev. Landscape Res 2007, 1(3):1-33.
58. Van Passel S., Nevens F., Mathijs E., van Huylenbroeck G. Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecol. Econ 2007, 62:149-161.
59. Viglizzo E.F., Frank F., Bernardos J., Buschiazzo D.E., Cabo S. A rapid method for assessing the environmental performance of commercial farms in the Pampas of Argentina. Environ. Monit. Assess 2006, 117:109-134.
60. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) Our Common Future 1987, 416. Oxford University Press, Oxford.