Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 491-503

  Garnett, Tara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Food security; Greenhouse gas emissions; Land use; Livestock; Needs; Opportunity cost

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; FOOD SECURITY; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIVESTOCK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 67349251204     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Abril A., and Bucher E.H. Overgrazing and soil carbon dynamics in the western Chaco of Argentina. Applied Soil Ecology 16 3 (2001) 243-249
2. Abril A., Barttfeld P., and Bucher E.H. The effect of fire and overgrazing disturbances on soil carbon balance in the Dry Chaco forest. Forest Ecology and Management 206 1-3 (2005) 399-405
3. 4) of semi-natural grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 121 (2007) 47-58
4. American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association and Dieticians of Canada: vegetarian diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association (2003)
5. Appleby P.N., Thorogood M., Mann J.I., and Key T.J. The Oxford Vegetarian Study: an overview. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70 Suppl. 3 (1999) 525S-531S
6. Baer P., Athanasiou T., and Kartha S. The Right to Development in a Climate Constrained World (2007), Heinrich Böll Foundation, Christian Aid, EcoEquity and the Stockholm Environment Institute, Berlin
7. Basset-Mens C., and van der Werf H.M.G. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 105 (2005) 127-144
8. Berlin J. Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) of Swedish semi-hard cheese. International Dairy Journal 12 (2002) 939-953
9. Berlin D., and Uhlin H.-E. Opportunity cost principles for life cycle assessment: towards strategic decision making in agriculture. Progress in Industrial Ecology 1 1/2/3 (2004) 187
10. Bhogal, A., Chambers, B.J., Whitmore, A.P., Powlson, D.S., 2007. The effects of reduced tillage practices and organic material additions on the carbon content of arable soils. Summary Report for Defra Project SP0561 by ADAS and Rothamsted Research, Defra, UK.
11. Biffaward, 2006. Poultry UK. Biffaward, UK.
12. British Pig Executive, 2007. Pig Year Book. Milton Keynes, UK.
13. British Pig Executive, 2008. personal communication.
14. British Standards Institution, 2008. PAS 2050:2008-Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. London.
15. Carlsson-Kanyama A. Climate change and dietary choices-how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced?. Food Policy 23 3/4 (1998) 277-293
16. Casey J.W., and Holden N.M. The relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the intensity of milk production in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Quality 34 (2005) 429-436
17. Casey J.W., and Holden N.M. Quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from suckler-beef production in Ireland. Agricultural Systems 90 (2006) 79-98
18. Cederberg C., and Mattson B. Life cycle assessment of milk production - a comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8 (2000) 49-60
19. Cederberg C., and Stadig M. System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8 6 (2003) 350-356
20. Chen Y.C., Nakthong C., and Chen T.C. Improvement of laying hen performance by dietary prebiotic chicory oligofructose and inulin. International Journal of Poultry Science 4 2 (2005) 103-108
21. Committee on Climate Change, 2008. Building a low-carbon economy-the UK's contribution to tackling climate change. The First Report of the Committee on Climate Change. The Stationary Office, London, UK.
22. Cottrill, B., Smith, C., Berry, P., Weightman, R., Wiseman, J., White, G., Temple, M., 2007. Opportunities and implications of using the co-products from biofuel production as feeds for livestock. Report prepared by ADAS and Nottingham University for the Home-Grown Cereals Authority, English Beef and Lamb Executive and British Pig Executive.
23. Dalgaard R., Schmidt J.H., Halberg N., Christensen P., Thrane M., and Pengue W.A. LCA of soybean meal. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2007)
24. Davis, J., Sonesson, U., 2008. Environmental potential of grain legumes in meals. Life cycle assessment of meals with varying content of peas. SIK Report 771. Swedish Institute for Food and Biotechnology, Göteborg, Sweden.
25. Defra, 2006. Agriculture in the UK - 2005 figures: figures derived from Tables 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4.
26. Defra, 2007. personal communication, work in progress.
27. Defra, 2007. Table B.10 The British Survey of Fertiliser Practice: Fertiliser Use on Farm Crops for Crop Year 2007, Defra.
28. Defra, 2008. The Milk Road Map. Produced by the Dairy Supply Chain Forum's Sustainable Consumption & Production Taskforce, London.
29. Druckman A., Bradley P., Papathanasopoulou E., and Jackson T. Measuring progress towards carbon reduction in the UK. Ecological Economics 66 4 (2007) 594-604
30. Edwards-Jones, G., Plassmann, K., York, E.H., Hounsome, B., Jones, D.L., Milà i Canals, 2008. Vulnerability of exporting nations to the development of a carbon label in theUnited Kingdom. Environ. Sci. Policy (available on line December 2008).
31. Elferink E.V., Nonhebel S., and Schoot Uiterkamp A.J.M. Does the Amazon suffer from BSE prevention?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 120 (2007) 467-469
32. English Nature, 2005. The importance of livestock grazing for wildlife conservation, English http://www.english-nature.org.uk/pubs/publication/PDF/LivestockGrazing.pdf.
33. European Environment Agency, 2007. Estimating the environmentally compatible bioenergy potential from agriculture. EEA Technical Report No12/2007. Luxembourg.
34. European Commission, 2006. Environmental impact of products (EIPRO): Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the total final consumption of the EU25. European Commission Technical Report EUR 22284 EN.
35. Fadel J. Quantitative analyses of selected plant by-product feedstuffs, a global perspective. Animal Feed Science and Technology 79 (1999) 255-268
36. FAO, 2001. Soil carbon sequestration for improved land management. World Soil Resources Reports 96. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.
37. FAO, 2002. World Agriculture: towards 2015/2030. Summary report. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.
38. FAO, 2003. World statistical compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear 1984-2002, Rome, Italy.
39. FAO, 2006. Livestock's Long Shadow-Environmental Issues and Options. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.
40. FAO, 2008. Food Outlook: Global Market Analysis. Statistical Appendix Table A24-Selected international prices for oilcrop products and price indices. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.
41. Fearnside, Philip (Lead Author); Mryka Hall-Beyer (Topic Editor), 2007. Deforestation in Amazonia. Encyclopedia of Earth. In: Cutler J. Cleveland (Ed.). Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment, Washington, DC.
42. 2O) from two farming systems in southern Germany. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 91 (2002) 175-189
43. Fließbach A., Oberholzer H.-R., Gunst L., and Mäder P. Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118 1-4 (2007)
44. Food Climate Research Network, 7 December 2007. Meat & Dairy Seminar. Food Climate Research Network (FCRN) seminar hosted by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Westminster, London.
45. Foster, C., Green, K., Bleda, M., Dewick, P., Evans, B., Flynn, A., Mylan, J., 2006. Environmental impacts of food production and consumption. A report produced for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
46. Friends of the Earth Netherlands, 2008. Soy consumption for feed and fuel in the European Union. A research paper prepared for Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) by Profundo Economic Research, The Netherlands. Country-specific data available from FOE on request.
47. Garnett, T., 2007. Meat and dairy production & consumption: Exploring the livestock sector's contribution to the UK's greenhouse gas emissions and assessing what less greenhouse gas intensive systems of production and consumption might look like. Working paper produced a part of the work of the Food Climate Research Network, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, UK.
48. Garnett T. Cooking up a Storm: Food, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Our Changing Climate (2008), Food Climate Research Network, Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, UK
49. Garnsworthy P.C. The environmental impact of fertility in dairy cows: a modelling approach to predict methane and ammonia emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology 112 (2004) 211-223
50. Gerbens-Leenes P.W., and Nonhebel S. Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food. Ecological Economics 42 S (2002) 185-199
51. Gibbons J.M., Ramsden S.J., and Blake A. Modelling uncertainty in greenhouse gas emissions from UK agriculture at the farm level. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112 (2006) 347-355
52. Gold M. The Global Benefits of Eating Less Meat (2004), Compassion in World Farming Trust, Petersfield, UK
53. Goodland R. Environmental sustainability in agriculture: diet matters. Ecological Economics 23 (1997) 189-200
54. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production. In: Hensen A., Olesen J.E., Petersen S.O., Sneath R., Weiske A., and Yamulki S. (Eds). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112 2-3 (2006) 105-248 (special issue)
55. IAASTD, 2008. Executive Summary of the Synthesis Report. International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development, http://www.agassessment.org/.
56. IPCC, 2007. Summary for Policymakers. In: Metz, B., Davidson, O.R., Bosch, P.R., Dave, R., Meyer, L.A. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
57. Jackson T., Jager W., and Stagl S. Beyond Insatiability-needs theory, consumption and sustainability. In: Reisch L., and Røpke I. (Eds). Consumption-Perspectives from Ecological Economics (2004), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2004
58. Jackson T., Papathanasopoulou E., Bradley P., and Druckman A. Attributing carbon emissions to functional household needs: a pilot framework for the UK. International Conference on Regional and Urban Modelling. Brussels (2006)
59. Jan Kramer K., Moll H.C., Nonhebel S., and Wilting H.C. Greenhouse gas emissions related to Dutch food consumption. Energy Policy 27 (1999) 203-216
60. Kalliala E.M., and Nousiainen P. Life cycle assessment: environmental profile of cotton and polyester-cotton fabrics. AUTEX Research Journal 1 1 (1999). www.autex.org/v1n1/2264_99.pdf
61. Key T.J., et al. Health Benefits of a vegetarian diet. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58 (1999) 271-275
62. Keyzer M.A., Merbis M.D., Pavel I.F.P.W., and van Wesenbeeck C.F.A. Diet shifts towards meat and the effects on cereal use: can we feed the animals in 2030?. Ecological Economics 55 2 (2005) 187-202
63. Kløverpris J., Wenzel H., and Nielsen PH. Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption part 1: conceptual analysis and methodological proposal. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13 1 (2008) 13-21
64. Laursen, S.E., Hansen, J., Bagh, J., Jensen, O.K., Werther, I., 1997. Environmental assessment of textiles. Life cycle screening of the production of textiles containing cotton, wool, viscose, polyester or acrylic fibres. Environmental project no. 369. Ministry of the Environment and Energy. Danish Environmental Protection Agency.
65. Lovett D.K., Shalloo L., Dillon P., and O'Mara F.P. A systems approach to quantify greenhouse gas fluxes from pastoral dairy production as affected by management regime. Agricultural Systems 88 2-3 (2006) 156-179
66. McAlpine, C.A., Etter, A., Fearnside, P.M., Seabrook, L., Laurance, W.F., 2009. Inreasing world consumption of beef as a driver of regional and global change: A call for policy action based on evidence from Queensland (Australia), Colombia and Brazil. Global Environmental Change, in press.
67. McMichael A.J., Powles J.W., Butler C.D., and Uaua R. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. The Lancet 370 (2007)
68. Meat and Livestock Commission, September 2007. personal communication.
69. Milà i Canals L., Bauer C., Depestele J., Dubreuil A., Freiermuth Knuchel R., Gaillard G., Michelsen O., Müller-Wenk R., and Rydgren B. Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12 1 (2007) 5-15
70. Milà i Canals L., Domènech X., Rieradevall J., Puig R., and Fullana P. Use of life cycle assessment in the procedure for the establishment of environmental criteria in the Catalan eco-label of leather. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 7 1 (2002) 39-46
71. Millward D.J. The nutritional value of plant-based diets in relation to human amino acid and protein requirements. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58 (1999) 249-260
72. Nepstad D.C., Stickler C.M., and Almeida O.T. Globalization of the Amazon soy and beef industries: op portunities for conservation. Conservation Biology 20 6 (2006) 1595-1603
73. Neumann C., Harris D.M., and Rogers L.M. Contribution of animal source foods in improving diet quality and function in children in the developing world. Nutrition Research 22 1-2 (2002) 193-220
74. OECD-FAO, 2007. Agricultural Outlook 2007-2016.
75. O'Hara, P., Freney, J., Ulyatt, M., 2003. Abatement of Agricultural Non-Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Study of Research Requirements. Report prepared for the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry on behalf of the Convenor, Ministerial Group on Climate Change, the Minister of Agriculture and the Primary Industries Council.
76. Olesen J.E., Schelde K., Weiske A., Weisbjerg M.R., Asman W.A.H., and Djurhuus J. Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from European conventional and organic dairy farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 112 (2006) 207-220
77. Renewable Fuels Agency. The Gallagher Review of the Indirect Effects of Biofuels Production (2008), Renewable Fuels Agency, East Sussex, UK
78. Sanders T.A. The nutritional adequacy of plant-based diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58 (1999) 265-269
79. Schils R.L.M., Verhagen A., Aarts H.F.M., and Šebek L.B.J. A farm level approach to define successful mitigation strategies for GHG emissions from ruminant livestock systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 71 (2005) 163-175
80. Schjønning P., Munknolm L.J., Elmholt S., and Olesen J.E. Organic matter and soil tilth in arable farming: management makes a difference within 5-6 years. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 122 (2007) 157-172
81. Schmidt J.H., and Weidema B.P. Shift in the marginal supply of vegetable oil. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (2007)
82. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., Tokgoz S., Hayes D., and Yu T.-H. Greenhouse gases through emissions from use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases land-use change. Science 319 (2008) 1238
83. In: Schellnhuber J., Cramer W., Nakicenovic N., Wigley T., and Yohe G. (Eds). Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change (2006), Cambridge University Press
84. Srinivasan C.S., Irz X., and Shankar B. An assessment of the potential consumption impacts of WHO dietary norms in OECD countries. Food Policy 31 (2006) 53-77
85. United Nations Environment Programme, undated. Animal waste management in livestock farms: practical environmental policies and reviews, http://www.agrifood-forum.net/home.asp.
86. USDA, 13 August 2008. Table 10. U.S. oilseed meal prices. Oil Crops Outlook. Economic Research Service.
87. USDA, 2008. Livestock and Products Semi-Annual Livestock Report 2008 Global Agriculture Information Network, USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.
88. Weiske, A., 2005. Survey of technical and management-based mitigation measures in agriculture. Document number: MEACAP WP3 D7a, Institute for European Environmental Policy.
89. Williams, A.G., Audsley, E., Sandars, D.L., 2006. Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities. Main Report. Defra Research Project IS0205. Bedford: Cranfield University and Defra.
90. Wirsenius S. Efficiencies and biomass appropriation of food commodities on global and regional levels. Agricultural Systems 77 (2003) 219-255
91. World Agriculture: Towards 2030/2050. Interim report Global Perspective Studies Unit. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, June 2006.
92. World Agriculture: Towards 2030/2050. Prospect for food nutrition, agriculture and major commodity groups: interim report Global Perspective Studies Unit. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, June 2006.
93. WRI, 2004. Food Security: Grain fed to livestock as a percent of total grain consumed 2003/4 data. World Resources Institute, http://earthtrends.wri.org/.
94. WWF, 2004. ISTA Mielke, Oil World Annual 2004, Hamburg, May 2004 cited in Jan Maarten Dros, Managing the Soy Boom: Two scenarios of soy production expansion in South America, http://www.panda.org/downloads/forests/managingthesoyboomenglish_nbvt.pdf.