Deep Learning with Microfluidics for Biotechnology

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 310-324

  Riordon, Jason ^a   Sovilj, Dušan ^a   Sanner, Scott ^a   Sinton, David ^a   Young, Edmond W K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

deep learning; lab on a chip; machine learning; microfluidics

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMPLEX NETWORKS; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT; LAB-ON-A-CHIP; LABORATORIES; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MICROFLUIDICS; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROGRAM PROCESSORS;

COMPLEX DATA; COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURE; HIGH THROUGHPUT; INPUT DATAS; RAPID ANALYSIS; ROADMAP;

DEEP LEARNING;

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; DEEP LEARNING; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; MICROFLUIDICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VIDEORECORDING; PROCEDURES;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DEEP LEARNING; MICROFLUIDICS;

EID: 85054446719     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.08.005     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Sackmann, E.K., et al. The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature 507 (2014), 181–189.
2. Lan, F., et al. Single-cell genome sequencing at ultra-high-throughput with microfluidic droplet barcoding. Nat. Biotechnol. 35 (2017), 640–646.
3. Zilionis, R., et al. Single-cell barcoding and sequencing using droplet microfluidics. Nat. Protoc. 12 (2016), 44–73.
4. Su, Y., et al. Single cell proteomics in biomedicine: high-dimensional data acquisition, visualization, and analysis. Proteomics, 17, 2017, 1600267.
5. Caen, O., et al. Microfluidics as a strategic player to decipher single-cell omics?. Trends Biotechnol. 35 (2017), 713–727.
6. Liu, Z., et al. Microfluidics for combating antimicrobial resistance. Trends Biotechnol. 35 (2017), 1129–1139.
7. Dittrich, P.S., Manz, A., Lab-on-a-chip: microfluidics in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5 (2006), 210–218.
8. Wolff, A., et al. Integrating advanced functionality in a microfabricated high-throughput fluorescent-activated cell sorter. Lab Chip 3 (2003), 22–27.
9. Gossett, D.R., et al. Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109 (2012), 7630–7635.
10. Mazutis, L., et al. Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics. Nat. Protoc. 8 (2013), 870–891.
11. Cermak, N., et al. High-throughput measurement of single-cell growth rates using serial microfluidic mass sensor arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 34 (2016), 1052–1059.
12. Riordon, J., et al. Quantifying the volume of single cells continuously using a microfluidic pressure-driven trap with media exchange. Biomicrofluidics, 8, 2014, 011101.
13. Wang, B.L., et al. Microfluidic high-throughput culturing of single cells for selection based on extracellular metabolite production or consumption. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 473–478.
14. Skelley, A., et al. Microfluidic control of cell pairing and fusion. Nat. Methods 6 (2009), 147–152.
15. Nagrath, S., et al. Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature 450 (2007), 1235–1239.
16. Sarioglu, A.F., et al. A microfluidic device for label-free, physical capture of circulating tumor cell clusters. Nat. Methods 12 (2015), 685–691.
17. Cho, B.S., et al. Passively driven integrated microfluidic system for separation of motile sperm. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003), 1671–1675.
18. Nosrati, R., et al. Rapid selection of sperm with high DNA integrity. Lab Chip 14 (2014), 1142–1150.
19. Knowlton, S.M., et al. Microfluidics for sperm research. Trends Biotechnol. 33 (2015), 221–229.
20. Nosrati, R., et al. Microfluidics for sperm analysis and selection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 14 (2017), 707–730.
21. Sesen, M., et al. Droplet control technologies for microfluidic high throughput screening (μHTS). Lab Chip 17 (2017), 2372–2394.
22. Wielhouwer, E.M., et al. Zebrafish embryo development in a microfluidic flow-through system. Lab Chip 11 (2011), 1815–1824.
23. Choudhury, D., et al. Fish and Chips: a microfluidic perfusion platform for monitoring zebrafish development. Lab Chip 12 (2012), 892–900.
24. Chung, K., et al. Automated on-chip rapid microscopy, phenotyping and sorting of C. elegans. Nat. Methods 5 (2008), 637–643.
25. Chung, K., et al. A microfluidic array for large-scale ordering and orientation of embryos. Nat. Methods 8 (2011), 171–176.
26. LeCun, Y., et al. Deep learning. Nature 521 (2015), 436–444.
27. Bengio, Y., et al. Representation learning: a review and new perspectives. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 35 (2013), 1798–1828.
28. Krizhevsky, A., et al. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 25 (2012), 1097–1105.
29. Simonyan, K., Zisserman, A., Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv, 2014 Published online September 4, 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556v6.
30. Szegedy, C. et al. (2016) Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 2818–2826, IEEE.
31. Redmon, J. et al. (2016) You only look once: unified, real-time object detection In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 779–788, IEEE.
32. Luong, M.-T., et al. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. arXiv, 2015 Published online August 17, 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.04025.
33. Sutskever, I., et al. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 4 (2014), 3104–3112.
34. Cho, K., et al. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv, 2014 Published online June 3, 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.1078.
35. Bahdanau, D. et al. (2016) End-to-end attention-based large vocabulary speech recognition. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 4945–4949, IEEE.
36. Graves, A. et al. (2013) Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 6645–6649, IEEE.
37. Joulin, A., et al. Bag of tricks for efficient text classification. arXiv, 2016 Published online July 6, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.01759.
38. Jaderberg, M., et al. Reading text in the wild with convolutional neural networks. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 116 (2016), 1–20.
39. Zhou, J., Troyanskaya, O.G., Predicting effects of noncoding variants with deep learning-based sequence model. Nat. Methods 12 (2015), 931–934.
40. Angermueller, C., et al. Deep learning for computational biology. Mol. Syst. Biol., 12, 2016, 878.
41. Ko, J., et al. Machine learning to detect signatures of disease in liquid biopsies – a user's guide. Lab Chip 18 (2018), 395–405.
42. Guo, B., et al. High-throughput, label-free, single-cell, microalgal lipid screening by machine-learning-equipped optofluidic time-stretch quantitative phase microscopy. Cytometry A 91 (2017), 494–502.
43. Ko, J., et al. Combining machine learning and nanofluidic technology to diagnose pancreatic cancer using exosomes. ACS Nano 11 (2017), 11182–11193.
44. Singh, D.K., et al. Label-free, high-throughput holographic screening and enumeration of tumor cells in blood. Lab Chip 17 (2017), 2920–2932.
45. Huang, X., et al. Machine learning based single-frame super-resolution processing for lensless blood cell counting. Sensors, 16, 2016, 1836.
46. Mahdi, Y., Daoud, K., Microdroplet size prediction in microfluidic systems via artificial neural network modeling for water-in-oil emulsion formulation. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 38 (2017), 1501–1508.
47. Chen, C.L., et al. Deep learning in label-free cell classification. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 21471.
48. Heo, Y.J., et al. Real-time image processing for microscopy-based label-free imaging flow cytometry in a microfluidic chip. Sci. Rep., 7, 2017, 21471.
49. Van Valen, D.A., et al. Deep learning automates the quantitative analysis of individual cells in live-cell imaging experiments. PLoS Comput. Biol., 12, 2016, e1005177.
50. Gopakumar, G., et al. Cytopathological image analysis using deep-learning networks in microfluidic microscopy. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis., 34, 2017, 111.
51. Stoecklein, D., et al. Deep learning for flow sculpting: insights into efficient learning using scientific simulation data. Sci. Rep, 7, 2017, 46368.
52. Albrecht, T., et al. Deep learning for single-molecule science. Nanotechnology, 28, 2017, 423001.
53. Ching, T., et al. Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. bioRxiv, 2017, 10.1101/142760 Published online May 28, 2017.
54. Mamoshina, P., et al. Applications of deep learning in biomedicine. Mol. Pharm. 13 (2016), 1445–1454.
55. Werbos, P.J., Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proc. IEEE 78 (1990), 1550–1560.
56. Das, D.K., et al. Machine learning approach for automated screening of malaria parasite using light microscopic images. Micron 45 (2013), 97–106.
57. Mirsky, S.K., et al. Automated analysis of individual sperm cells using stain-free interferometric phase microscopy and machine learning. Cytometry A 91A (2017), 893–900.
58. Ko, J., et al. Combining machine learning and nanofluidic technology to diagnose pancreatic cancer using exosomes. ACS Nano 11 (2017), 11182–11193.
59. San-Miguel, A., et al. Deep phenotyping unveils hidden traits and genetic relations in subtle mutants. Nat. Commun., 7, 2016, 12990.
60. Vasilevich, A.S., et al. How not to drown in data: a guide for biomaterial engineers. Trends Biotechnol. 35 (2017), 743–755.
61. Han, S., et al. Use of deep learning for characterization of microfluidic soft sensors. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3 (2018), 873–880.
62. Boža, V., et al. DeepNano: deep recurrent neural networks for base calling in MinION nanopore reads. PLoS One, 12, 2017, e0178751.
63. Godin, M., et al. Using buoyant mass to measure the growth of single cells. Nat. Methods 7 (2010), 387–390.
64. Jozefowicz, R., et al. Exploring the limits of language modeling. arXiv, 2016 Published online February 7, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.02410.
65. Qu, Y.-H., et al. On the prediction of DNA-binding proteins only from primary sequences: a deep learning approach. PLoS One, 12, 2017, e0188129.
66. Vaswani, A., et al. Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 30 (2017), 6000–6010.
67. Angerer, P., et al. Single cells make big data: new challenges and opportunities in transcriptomics. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 4 (2017), 85–91.
68. Deng, Y., et al. Massive single-cell RNA-seq analysis and imputation via deep learning. bioRxiv, 2018, 10.1101/315556 Published online July 26 2018.
69. Webb, S., Deep learning for biology. Nature 554 (2018), 555–557.
70. Camacho, D.M., et al. Next-generation machine learning for biological networks. Cell 173 (2018), 1581–1592.
71. Bock, C., et al. Multi-omics of single cells: strategies and applications. Trends Biotechnol. 34 (2016), 605–608.
72. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series. Handb. Brain Theory Neural Netw., 3361, 1995, 1995.
73. Zeiler, M.D. et al. (2011) Adaptive deconvolutional networks for mid and high level feature learning. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 2018–2025, IEEE.
74. Kim, K., et al. Visual estimation of bacterial growth level in microfluidic culture systems. Sensors, 18, 2018, 447.
75. Zaimi, A., et al. AxonDeepSeg: automatic axon and myelin segmentation from microscopy data using convolutional neural networks. Sci. Rep., 8, 2018, 3816.
76. Long, J. et al. (2015) Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3431–3440, IEEE.
77. Ronneberger, O., et al. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, 2015, Springer, 234–241.
78. Badrinarayanan, V., et al. SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder–decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 39 (2017), 2481–2495.
79. Lin, G. et al. (2016) Efficient piecewise training of deep structured models for semantic segmentation. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 3194–3203, IEEE.
80. Zhao, H. et al. (2017) Pyramid scene parsing network. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 6230–6239, IEEE.
81. Liu, W., et al. ParseNet: looking wider to see better. arXiv, 2015 Published online June 15, 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04579.
82. Chen, L.-C., et al. DeepLab: semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional nets, atrous convolution, and fully connected CRFs. arXiv, 2016 Published online June 2, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.00915.
83. Buggenthin, F., et al. Prospective identification of hematopoietic lineage choice by deep learning. Nat. Methods 14 (2017), 403–406.
84. Yu, H., et al. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing with deep learning video microscopy. Anal. Chem. 90 (2018), 6314–6322.
85. Bhatia, S.N., Ingber, D.E., Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 760–772.
86. Ahadian, S., et al. Organ-on-a-chip platforms: a convergence of advanced materials, cells, and microscale technologies. Adv. Healthc. Mater., 7, 2018, 1700506.
87. Lu, C., et al. An oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma quantitative histomorphometric-based image classifier of nuclear morphology can risk stratify patients for disease-specific survival. Mod. Pathol. 30 (2017), 1655–1665.
88. Faust, K., et al. Visualizing histopathologic deep learning classification and anomaly detection using nonlinear feature space dimensionality reduction. BMC Bioinform., 19, 2018, 173.
89. Edington, C.D., et al. Interconnected microphysiological systems for quantitative biology and pharmacology studies. Sci. Rep., 8, 2018, 4530.
90. Zhang, B., et al. Biodegradable scaffold with built-in vasculature for organ-on-a-chip engineering and direct surgical anastomosis. Nat. Mater. 15 (2016), 669–678.
91. Check Hayden, E., Synthetic biology lures Silicon Valley investors. Nature, 527, 2015, 19.
92. Wei, J.N., et al. Neural networks for the prediction of organic chemistry reactions. ACS Cent. Sci. 2 (2016), 725–732.
93. Nguyen, B., et al. A platform for high-throughput assessments of environmental multistressors. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.), 5, 2018, 1700677.
94. Lambert, B.S., et al. A microfluidics-based in situ chemotaxis assay to study the behaviour of aquatic microbial communities. Nat. Microbiol. 2 (2017), 1344–1349.
95. Gong, M.M., Sinton, D., Turning the page: advancing paper-based microfluidics for broad diagnostic application. Chem. Rev. 117 (2017), 8447–8480.
96. Erickson, D., et al. Smartphone technology can be transformative to the deployment of lab-on-chip diagnostics. Lab Chip 14 (2014), 3159–3164.
97. Pandey, C.M., et al. Microfluidics based point-of-care diagnostics. Biotechnol. J., 13, 2017, 1700047.
98. Weng, X., Neethirajan, S., Ensuring food safety: quality monitoring using microfluidics. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 65 (2017), 10–22.
99. Pardee, K., et al. Rapid, low-cost detection of Zika virus using programmable biomolecular components. Cell 165 (2016), 1255–1266.
100. Tajbakhsh, N., et al. Convolutional neural networks for medical image analysis: full training or fine tuning?. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35 (2016), 1299–1312.
101. Kilby, J.S. Texas Instruments, Inc. Miniaturized electronic circuits, US3138743A.
102. Aspray, W., The Intel 4004 microprocessor: what constituted invention?. IEEE Ann. Hist. Comput. 19 (1997), 4–15.
103. Terry, S.C., et al. A gas chromatographic air analyzer fabricated on a silicon wafer. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 26 (1979), 1880–1886.
104. Duffy, D.C., et al. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70 (1998), 4974–4984.
105. Rosenblatt, F., The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol. Rev., 65, 1958, 386.
106. Rumelhart, D.E., et al. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323 (1986), 533–536.
107. Jordan, M.I. (1997) Serial order: a parallel distributed processing approach. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 121) (Donahoe, J.W. and Dorsel, P., eds), pp. 471–495, Elsevier.
108. Abadi, M., et al. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. arXiv, 2016 Published online March 14, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04467.
109. Rampasek, L., Goldenberg, A., TensorFlow: biology's gateway to deep learning?. Cell Syst. 2 (2016), 12–14.
110. Krogh, A., What are artificial neural networks?. Nat. Biotechnol. 26 (2008), 195–197.
111. He, K. et al. (2016) Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 770–778, IEEE.
112. Deng, J. et al. (2009) ImageNet: a large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 248–255, IEEE.