Hydrodynamic stretching of single cells for large population mechanical phenotyping

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 20, 2012, Pages 7630-7635

  Gossett, Daniel R ^a,b   Tse, Henry T K ^a,b   Lee, Serena A ^c,d   Ying, Yong ^e   Lindgren, Anne G ^c,d   Yang, Otto O ^e   Rao, Jianyu ^b,e   Clark, Amander T ^c,d   Di Carlo, Dino ^a,b  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA NANOSYSTEMS INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cytology; Flow cytometry; High throughput; Mechanophenotype

Indexed keywords

OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; STAGE SPECIFIC EMBRYO ANTIGEN 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BIOPHYSICS; CAMERA; CANCER CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL DESTRUCTION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDRODYNAMICS; IMMUNOSTIMULATION; LEUKOCYTE; MICROFLUIDICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PERIPHERAL BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL; PHENOTYPE; PLEURA EFFUSION; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRETCHING; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; BIOMECHANICS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; ELASTICITY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMMUNOPHENOTYPING; LEUKOCYTES, MONONUCLEAR; MICE; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES; NIH 3T3 CELLS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 84861216623     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200107109     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Suresh S, et al. (2005) Connections between single-cell biomechanics and human disease states: Gastrointestinal cancer and malaria. Acta Biomater 1:15-30. (Pubitemid 43348807)
2. Guck J, et al. (2005) Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 88:3689-3698. (Pubitemid 40586616)
3. Cross SE, Jin Y-S, Rao J, Gimzewski JK (2007) Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nat Nanotechnol 2:780-783. (Pubitemid 350223349)
4. Thery M, Bornens M (2008) Get round and stiff for mitosis. HFSP J 2:65-71.
5. Pajerowski JD, Dahl KN, Zhong FL, Sammak PJ, Discher DE (2007) Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15619-15624. (Pubitemid 350035348)
6. Chowdhury F, et al. (2010) Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nat Mater 9(1):82-88.
7. Khismatullin DB (2009) The cytoskeleton and deformability of white blood cells. Current Topics in Membranes, (Elsevier, Academic, Burlington, MA), Vol. 64, pp 47-111.
8. Liu Z, et al. (1998) CD8+ T-lymphocyte activation in HIV-1 disease reflects an aspect of pathogenesis distinct from viral burden and immunodeficiency. J Acquired Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 18:332-340. (Pubitemid 28359882)
9. Gregson AL, et al. (2008) Bronchoalveolar immunologic profile of acute human lung transplant allograft rejection. Transplantation 85:1056-1059. (Pubitemid 351543172)
10. Di Carlo D (2012) A Mechanical biomarker of cell state in medicine. J Lab Autom 17:32-42.
11. Kim D-H, Wong PK, Park J, Levchenko A, Sun Y (2009) Microengineered platforms for cell mechanobiology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 11:203-233.
12. Rosenbluth MJ, Lam WA, Fletcher DA (2008) Analyzing cell mechanics in hematologic diseases with microfluidic biophysical flow cytometry. Lab Chip 8:1062-1070. (Pubitemid 351904828)
13. Di Carlo D, Lee LP (2006) Dynamic single-cell analysis for quantitative biology. Anal Chem 78:7918-7925. (Pubitemid 44871754)
14. Sraj I, et al. (2010) Cell deformation cytometry using diode-bar optical stretchers. J Biomed Opt 15:047010.
15. Chen J, et al. (2011) Classification of cell types using a microfluidic device for mechanical and electrical measurement on single cells. Lab Chip 11:3174-3181.
16. Bow H, et al. (2011) A microfabricated deformability-based flow cytometer with application to malaria. Lab Chip 11:1065-1073.
17. Abkarian M, Faivre M, Stone HA (2006) High-speed microfluidic differential manometer for cellular-scale hydrodynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:538-542. (Pubitemid 43153060)
18. Bao N, Zhan Y, Lu C (2008) Microfluidic electroporative flow cytometry for studying single-cell biomechanics. Anal Chem 80:7714-7719.
19. Rowat AC, Lammerding J, Herrmann H, Aebi U (2008) Towards an integrated understanding of the structure and mechanics of the cell nucleus. Bioessays 30:226-236. (Pubitemid 351341127)
20. Gossett DR, Di Carlo D (2009) Particle focusing mechanisms in curving confined flows. Anal Chem 81:8459-8465.
21. Di Carlo D, Irimia D, Tompkins RG, Toner M (2007) Continuous inertial focusing, ordering, and separation of particles in microchannels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:18892-18897.
22. Di Carlo D (2009) Inertial microfluidics. Lab Chip 9:3038-3046.
23. Perkins TT, Smith DE, Chu S (1997) Single polymer dynamics in an elongational flow. Science 276:2016-2021. (Pubitemid 27443601)
24. Wottawah F, et al. (2005) Optical rheology of biological cells. Phys Rev Lett 94:098103.
25. Stone HA, Leal LG (1989) A note concerning drop deformation and breakup in biaxial extensional flows at low Reynolds numbers. J Colloid Interface Sci 133:340-347.
26. Mortazavi S, Tryggvason G (2000) A numerical study of the motion of drops in Poiseuille flow Part 1. Lateral migration of one drop. J Fluid Mech 411:325-350.
27. Hoffman BD, Crocker JC (2009) Cell mechanics: Dissecting the physical responses of cells to force. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 11:259-288.
28. Massiera G, Citters KMV, Biancaniello PL, Crocker JC (2007) Mechanics of single cells: Rheology, time dependence, and fluctuations. Biophys J 93:3703-3713. (Pubitemid 350190832)
29. Remmerbach TW, et al. (2009) Oral cancer diagnosis by mechanical phenotyping. Cancer Res 69:1728-1732.
30. Sahn SA (2008) The value of pleural fluid analysis. Am J Med Sci 335:7-15.
31. Porcel JM (2011) Pearls and myths in pleural fluid analysis. Respirology 16:44-52.
32. Brown MJ, Hallam JA, Colucci-Guyon E, Shaw S (2001) Rigidity of circulating lymphocytes is primarily conferred by vimentin intermediate filaments. J Immunol 166:6640-6646. (Pubitemid 32467205)
33. Vicente-Manzanares M, Sanchez-Madrid F (2004) Role of the cytoskeleton during leukocyte responses. Nat Rev Immunol 4:110-122. (Pubitemid 38209205)
34. Worthen G, Schwab B, Elson E, Downey G (1989) Mechanics of stimulated neutrophils: Cell stiffening induces retention in capillaries. Science 245:183-186. (Pubitemid 19193935)
35. Thomson JA, et al. (1998) Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282:1145-1147. (Pubitemid 28516247)
36. Adewumi O, et al. (2007) Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative. Nat Biotechnol 25:803-816. (Pubitemid 47052190)
37. Keung AJ, de Juan-Pardo EM, Schaffer DV, Kumar S (2011) Rho GTPases mediate the mechanosensitive lineage commitment of neural stem cells. Stem Cells 29:1886-1897.
38. Fu J, et al. (2010) Mechanical regulation of cell function with geometrically modulated elastomeric substrates. Nat Methods 7:733-736.
39. Meshorer E, Misteli T (2006) Chromatin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and differentiation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:540-546. (Pubitemid 44036459)
40. Sen S, Kumar S (2009) Cell-matrix de-adhesion dynamics reflect contractile mechanics. Cell Mol Bioeng 2:218-230.
41. Thery M, et al. (2005) The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat Cell Biol 7:947-953. (Pubitemid 41486267)
42. Beil M, et al. (2003) Sphingosylphosphorylcholine regulates keratin network architecture and visco-elastic properties of human cancer cells. Nat Cell Biol 5:803-811. (Pubitemid 37087168)
43. Janmey PA, Ursula E, Traub P, Schliwa M (1991) Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. J Cell Biol 113:155-160. (Pubitemid 21909682)