Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review

CALICO Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 498-521

  Lai, Chun ^a   Li, Guofang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer mediated communication; Task based language teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044810209     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11139/cj.28.2.498-521     Document Type: Review

References (148)

1. Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. Modern Language Journal, 87, 157-167.
2. Abrams, Z. I. (2006). From theory to practice: Intra-cultural CMC in the L2 classroom. In L. Ducate & N. Arnold (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From Theory and Research to New Directions in Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 181–210). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.
3. Appel, C., & Gilabert, R. (2002). Motivation and task performance in a task-based web-based tandem project. ReCALL, 14, 16-31.
4. Appel, C., & Gilabert, R. (2006). Finding common ground in LSP: A computer-mediated communication project. In E.A. Macia, A. S. Cervera, & C. R. Ramos (Eds.), Information technology in languages for specific purposes: Issues and prospectus (pp. 75-90). New York: Springer.
5. Atkinson, D. (2002). Toward a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 86, 525-545.
6. Beauvois, M. H. (1995). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28, 177–190.
7. Beauvois, M. H. (1998). Conversations in slow motion: Computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54, 198–217.
8. Belz, J. A. (2006). At the intersection of telecollaboration, learner corpus analysis, and L2 pragmatics: Considerations for language program direction. In J. Belz & S. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated inter-cultural foreign language education (pp. 207-246). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
9. Belz, J. A., & Reinhardt, J. (2004). Aspects of advanced foreign language proficiency: Internet-mediated German language play. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14, 324-362.
10. Belz, J. A., & Vyatkina, N. (2005). Computer-mediated learner corpus research and the data-driven teaching of L2 pragmatic competence: The case of German modal particles (CALPER Working Paper Series, No. 4). The Pennsylvania State University, Center for Advanced Language Proficiency Education and Research.
11. Black, R. W. (2006). Language, culture, and identity in online fanfiction. E-learning, 3, 170-184. Retrieved from http://www.wwwords.co.uk/elea
12. Blake, R. J. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on FL Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120–136. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
13. Blake, R. J. (2005). Bimodal CMC: The glue of language learning at a distance. CALICO Journal, 22, 497-511. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=146
14. Böhlke, O. (2003). A comparison of student participation levels by group size and language stages during chatroom and face-to-face discussions in German. CALICO Journal, 21, 67-88. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=282
15. Bruton, A. (2005). Task-based language teaching: For the state secondary FL classroom? Language Learning Journal, 31, 55-68.
16. Burrows, C. (2008). An evaluation of task-based learning (TBL) in the Japanese classroom. English Today, 24, 4, 11-16.
17. Candlin, C. N. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In C. N. Candlin & D. F. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks(Lancaster Practical Papers in English). Lancaster and London: Lancaster University.
18. Carless, D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 639-332.
19. Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35, 595-608.
20. Carless, D. (2009). Revisiting the TBLT versus P-P-P debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 49-66.
21. Chapelle, C. A. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19-43. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/chapelle/default.html
22. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
24. Chun, D. M. (1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
25. Chun, D. M. (2008). Computer-mediated discourse in instructed environments. In S. S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 15-45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
26. Chun, D. M., & Wade, E. R. (2004). Collaborative cultural exchanges with CMC. In L. Lomicka & J. Cooke-Plagwitz (Eds.), Teaching with technology (pp. 220-247). Boston: Heinle.
27. Chung, Y., Graves, B., Wesche, M., & Barfurth, M. (2005). Computer-mediated communication in Ko-rean-English chat rooms: Tandem learning in an international languages program. Canadian Modern Language Review, 62, 49-86.
28. Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Communication abstracts. Communication and Information Technol-ogy, 25, 533-555.
29. Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249-277. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=426
30. Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80. Retrieved from http://llt. msu.edu/vol7num3/doughty/default.html
31. Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: From blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 9-28.
32. Duran, G., & Ramaut, G. (2006). Tasks for absolute beginners and beyond: Developing and sequencing tasks at basic proficiency levels. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 47-75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221-246.
35. Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2008). Blogging: Fostering inter-cultural competence development in foreign language and study abroad contexts. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 421-444.
36. Erben, T. (1999). Constructing learning in a virtual immersion bath: LOTE teacher education through audiographics. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), WORLDCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 229-248). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
37. Fiori, M. (2005). The development of grammatical competence through synchronous computer-mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 22, 567-602. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=151
38. Fitze, M., & McGarrell, H. M. (2008). Teacher language in ESL face-to-face and written electronic discus-sions. TESL-EJ 12, 2, 1-24. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume12/ej46/ej46a2
39. Fuchs, C. (2009). Computer-mediated task design: Language student teachers’ expectations and real-izations. Letras & Letras, Uberlandia, 25, 37-64.
40. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
41. González-Lloret, M. (2003). Designing task-based CALL to promote interaction: En busca de Esmeraldas. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 86-104. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num1/gonzalez/default.html
42. González-Lloret, M. (2008). Computer-mediated learning of L2 pragmatics. In E. Alcon Soler & A. Marti-nez-Flor (Eds.), Investigating pragmatics in foreign language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 114-132). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
43. Hauck, M., & Youngs, B. L. (2008). Telecollaboration in multimodal environments: The impact on task design and learner interaction. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 87–124.
44. Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18, 105-121.
45. Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2004). Towards an effective use of audio conferencing in distance language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 66-82. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol 8num1/hampel/default.html
46. Hampel, R., & Hauck, M. (2005). The challenges of implementing online tuition in distance language courses: Task design and tutor role. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
47. Hampel, R., Felix, U., Hauck, M., & Coleman, J. (2005). Complexities of learning and teaching languages in a real-time audiographic environment. German as a Foreign Language, 3. Retrieved from http://www.gfl-journal.de/3-2005/hampel_felix_hauck_coleman.pdf
48. Heins, B., Duensing, A., Stickler, U., & Batstone, C. (2007). Spoken interaction in online and face-to-face language tutorials. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 279-295.
49. Hubbard, P. (2004). Learner training for effective use of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 45-67). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl-baum.
50. Hwang, P. A. (2008). Linguistic characteristics in synchronous and asynchronous CMC. English Language & Literature Teaching, 14, 47-66.
51. Jeon, I. J. & Hahn, J. W. (2007). Exploring EFL teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching: A case study of Korean secondary school classroom practice. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 123-143.
52. Jeon-Ellis, G., Debski, R., & Wigglesworth, G. (2005). Oral interaction around computers in the proj-ect-oriented CALL classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 121-145. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/jeon/default.html
53. Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations—and negotiated interaction—in text and voice chat rooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79-98. Retrieved from llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/pdf/jepson.pdf
54. Kelm, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-445.
55. Kenning, M. M. (2010). Differences that make the difference: A study of functionalities in synchronous CMC. ReCALL, 22, 3-19.
56. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quality and characteristics of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
57. Kern, R. (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 183-210.
58. Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.
59. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 143-166.
60. Kitade, K. (2006). The negotiation model in asynchronous computer-mediated communication (CMC): Negotiation in task-based email exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23, 319-348. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=121
61. Kötter, M. (2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 145-172. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/kotter/default.html
62. Kramsch, C., & Steffensen, S. V. (2008). Ecological perspectives on second language acquisition and socialization. In P. A. Duff & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, volume 8, Language socialization (pp. 17-28). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
63. Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Language learning and teaching in the age of globalization (pp. 83-100). London: Routledge.
64. Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge Falmer.
65. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3),102-120. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/pdf/laizhao.pdf
66. Lai, C., Fei, F., & Roots, R. (2008). The contingency of recasts and noticing. CALICO Journal, 26, 70-90. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=723
67. Lai, C., & Lin, X. L. (2010). Learner strategy training and TBLT. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, Georgia.
68. Lai, C., Zhao, Y., & Wang, J. W. (in press). Task-based language teaching in online ab initio Chinese classrooms. Modern Language Journal.
69. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Second language literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457-482.
70. Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 44-65. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num3/lam/default.html
71. Lamy, M. N. (2004). Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL, 16, 2, 520-538.
72. Lamy, M. N. (2006). Multimodality in second language conversations online: Looking for a methodology. In Proceedings of Third International Conference on Multimodality. Pavia, Italy.
73. Lamy, M. N. (2007). Interactive task design: Metachat and the whole language learner. In del P. Garcia Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 242-264). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
74. Lantolf, J., & Beckett, T. (2009). Timeline: Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Language Teaching, 42(4), 1-19.
75. Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
76. Lee, L. (2008). Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 53-72. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num3/lee.pdf
77. Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2004). A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audio-conferencing in foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 50-69. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/levy/default.html
78. Li, D. (1998). “It’s always more difficult than you plan and imagine”: Teachers’ perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 677-697.
79. Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT journal, 58, 319-326.
80. Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40, 243-249.
81. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
82. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bahtia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
83. Mackey, A., & Polio, C. (2009). Multiple perspectives on interaction. New York: Routledge.
84. Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System, 36, 437-455.
85. Murray, D. (2005). Technologies for second language literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 188-201.
86. Murray, L., & Hourigan, T. (2008). Blogs for specific purposes: Expressivist or socio-cognitivist approach? ReCALL, 20, 83-98.
87. Mustafa, Z. (2008, October 29-31). Teachers’ levels of use in the adoption of task-based language teaching in Malaysian classrooms. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Language Learning. USM, Penang.
88. Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. O’Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding ‘the other side’: Inter-cultural learning in a Spanish-English email exchange. Language Learning & Technology 7(2), 118-144. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/default.html
90. O’Dowd, R., & Eberbach, K. (2004). Guides on the side? Tasks and challenges for teachers in telecollaborative projects. ReCALL, 16, 129-144.
91. O’Dowd, R., & Ritter, M. (2006). Understanding and working with ‘failed communication’ in telecollaborative exchanges. CALICO Journal, 23, 623-642. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/member Browse.php?action=article&id=112
92. O’Malley, C., Anderson, A. H., & Bruce, V. (1996). Comparison of face-to-face and video-mediated interaction. Interacting with Computers, 8, 177-192.
93. O’Rourke, B. (2005). Form-focused interaction in online tandem learning. CALICO Journal, 22, 433-466. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=144
94. O’Rourke, B., & Schwienhorst, K. (2003). Talking text: Reflections on reflection in computer-mediated communication. In D. Little, E. Ushioda, & J. Ridley (Eds.), Learner autonomy in the foreign language dlassroom: Learner, teacher, curriculum and assessment (pp. 47-60). Dublin: Authentik.
95. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for FL computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82–93. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/default.html
96. Ortega, L. (2009a, September 13-16). Task and technology in language learning: Elective affinities and (dis)encounters. Plenary delivered at the 3rd International Task-Based Language Teaching Conference. Lancaster, UK.
97. Ortega, L. (2009b). Interaction and attention to form in L2 text-based computer-mediated communication. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction (pp. 226-253). New York: Routledge.
98. Ortega, L., & Zyzik, E. (2008). Online interactions and L2 learning: Some ethical challenges for L2 researchers. In S. Magnan (Ed.), Mediating discourse online (pp. 331-355). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
99. Oxford, R. (2006). Task-based language teaching and learning: An overview. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 94-121.
100. Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7-32. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=327
101. Pérez, L. (2003). Foreign language productivity in synchronous versus asynchronous computer mediated communication. CALICO Journal, 21, 89-104. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=283
102. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). New York: Cambridge University Press.
103. Rankin, Y. A. (2008). Design and evaluation of massively multiplayer online role-playing games that facilitate second language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
104. Reinders, H., & White, C. (2010). The theory and practice of technology in materials development and task design. In N. Harwood (Ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and practice (pp. 58-80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
105. Richards, J. C. (2005). Communicative language teaching today (RELC portfolio Series 13). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
106. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2005). Task design for audiographic conferencing: Promoting beginner oral interaction in distance language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 417-442.
107. Sadler, R. (2009). Can you build this? Virtual construction for language learning in Second Life. In L. Stone & C. Wilson-Duffy (Eds.), Task-based III: Expanding the range of tasks with online resources. International Association for Language Learning and Technology (IALLT).
108. Salaberry, M. R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 1, 5-27.
109. Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. Modern Language Journal, 85, 39-56.
110. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
111. Sauro, S. (2004). Cyberdiscursive tug-of-war: Learner repositioning in a multimodal CMC environment. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 19, 2, 55–72.
112. Sauro, S., & Smith, B. (2010). Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics, 31, 1-24.
113. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
114. Schwienhorst, K. (2000). Virtual reality and learner autonomy in second language acquisition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Trinity College, Dublin.
115. Seedhouse, P., & Almutairi, S. (2009). A holistic approach to task-based interaction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 311-338.
116. Shekary, M., & Tahririan, M. H. (2006). Negotiation of meaning and noticing in text-based online chat. Modern Language Journal, 90, 557-573.
117. Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
118. Skehan, P. (2003). Focus on form, tasks and technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 391-411.
119. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
120. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365-398.
121. Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 85-103. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/smith/default.html
122. Smith, B. (2009). Task-based learning in the computer-mediated communicative ESL/EFL classroom. CALL-EJ Online, 11(1). Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/11-1/smith.html
123. Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In F. M. Hult (Ed.), Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 79-90). Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
124. Son, J. B. (2007). Learner experiences in Web-based language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 21-36.
125. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved from http://llt.msu. edu/vol4num1/sotillo/default.html
126. Sotillo, S. M. (2010). Quality and type of corrective feedback, noticing and learner uptake in synchronous computer-mediated text-based and voice chats. In M. Putz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner’s mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
127. Stockwell, G. & Harrington, M. W. (2003). The incidental development of L2 proficiency in NS-NNS email interactions. CALICO Journal, 20, 337-359. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/mem berBrowse.php?action=article&id=326
128. Stone, L., & Wilson-Duffy, C. (2009). Task-based III: Expanding the range of tasks through the web. International Association for Language Learning and Technology (IALLT).
129. Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.
130. Svensson, P. (2003). Virtual worlds as arenas for language learning. In U. Felix (Ed.), Language learning online: Towards best practice (pp. 123-143). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
131. Sykes, J. (2005). Synchronous CMC and pragmatic development: Effects of oral and written chat. CALICO Journal, 22, 399-431. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse. php?action=article&id=142
132. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in inter-cultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/default.html
133. Thorne, S. L. (2006). Pedagogical and praxiological lessons from internet-mediated inter-cultural foreign language education research. In J. A. Belz & S. L. Thorne (Eds.), Internet-mediated intercultural foreign language education (pp. 2-30). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
134. Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/toyoda/default.html
135. Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini/default.html
136. Vetter, A., & Chanier, T. (2006). Supporting oral production for professional purpose in synchronous communication with heterogeneous learners. ReCALL, 18, 5-23.
137. Wang, Y. M. (1994). E-mail dialogue journaling in an ESL reading and writing classroom (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Oregon.
138. Wang, Y. M. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videoconferencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18, 122-146.
139. Ware, P. D. (2005). “Missed” communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64-89. Retrieved from http://llt.msu. edu/vol9num2/ware/default.html
140. Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal, 89, 190-205.
141. Ware, P. D., & O’Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43-63. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol12num1/wareodowd/de fault.html
142. Warner, C. N. (2004). It’s just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69-87. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/pdf/warner.pdf
143. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic communication in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7–26. Retrieved from https://www.calico.org/memberBrowse. php?action=article&id=604
144. Warschauer, M. (1998). Researching technology in TESOL: Determinist, instrumental, and critical approaches. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 757-764.
145. Warschauer, M. (2001). Millennialism and media: Language, literacy and technology in the 21st century. In D. Graddol (Ed.), Applied linguistics for the 21st century (pp. 49-59). International Association of Applied Linguistics (AILA) Review, 14.
146. Warschauer, M. (2006). Literacy and technology: Bridging the divide. In D. Gibbs & K. L. Krauss (Eds.), Cyberlines 2: Languages and cultures of the internet (pp. 163-174). Albert Park, Australia: James Nicholas.
147. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
148. Yamada, M. (2009). The role of social presence in learner-centered communicative language learning using synchronous computer-mediated communication: An experimental study. Computers and Education, 52, 820-833.