A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audio-conferencing in foreign language learning

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 50-68

  Levy, Mike ^a,b   Kennedy, Claire ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Griffith University ^*  (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042549002     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Burgess, J., & Etherington, S. (2002). Focus on grammatical form: Explicit or implicit? System, 30(4), 433-458.
2. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 1-20). Harlow, England: Longman.
3. Candlin, C. N., & Murphy, D. F. (1986). Language learning tasks. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education, Volume 7. London: Prentice-Hall International.
4. Cumming, G. (1993). A perspective on learning for intelligent education systems. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 9(4), 229-238.
5. Debski, R. (2000). Project-oriented CALL: Implementation and evaluation. Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 13, 4-5. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
6. DeKeyser, R. M. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42-63). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Doughty, C. J. (2003). Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 256-310). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
8. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus on form. System, 3(4), 419-432.
11. Fried-Booth, D. L. (1986). Project work. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
12. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Goodfellow, R., Manning, P., & Lamy, M-N. (1999). Building an online open and distance language learning environment. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), WorldCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 267-286). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
14. Hewer, S., Kötter, M., Rodine, C., & Shield, L. (1999). The right tools for the job: Criteria for the choice of tools in the design of a virtual, interactive environment for distance language learners and their tutors. Paper presented at CAL '99: Virtuality in Education. London.
15. Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the Internet. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
16. Jefferson, G. (1984). Transcription notation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social interaction. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. ix-xvi). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Levy, M. (1999). Theory and design in a multimedia CALL project in cross-cultural pragmatics. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(1), 29-58.
18. Levy, M. (2002). CALL by design: Discourse, products and processes. ReCALL, 14(1), 58-84.
19. Levy, M. (in press). Effective use of CALL technologies: Finding the right balance. In. R. Donaldson & M. Haggstrom (Eds.), Changing language education through CALL. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
20. Lightbown, P. M. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In. C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Little, D. (1997). Linguistic awareness and writing: Exploring the relationship with language awareness. Language Awareness, 6(2/3), 95-104.
22. Littlewood, W. (2003, July 12-14). Task-based interactive learning: Exploring some conditions for success. Keynote presentation at the Australian Applied Linguistics Association Conference, Brisbane.
23. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In. C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24. McLaughlin, B. T., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information processing perspective. Language Learning, 33(2), 135-158.
25. Mohan, B. (1992). Models of the role of the computer in second language development. In M. C. Pennington & V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective (pp. 110-126). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
26. Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning and Technology, 3(1), 75-87. Retrieved February 18, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/ negretti/
27. Nunan, D. (1989) Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. Ribé, R., & Vidal, N. (1993). Project work. Oxford, England: Heinemann.
29. Salaberry, M. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer-mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capabilities. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 28-37.
30. Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. M. Swain (Eds.). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 119-140). Harlow, England: Longman.
31. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11(2): 129-158.
32. Skehan, P. (1998). The cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
33. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). The influence of planning and post-task activities on accuracy and complexity in task-based learning. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 16-33.
34. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (2001). Cognition and tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 183-205). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved February 18, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/sotillo/
36. Sotillo, S. M. (2002). Constructivist and collaborative learning in a wireless environment. TESOL Journal, 11(3), 16-20.
37. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects . In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing (pp. 99-118). Harlow: Pearson Education.
38. Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Retrieved February 18, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/TOYODA/
39. von der Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M. (2001). Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs). The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 210-225.
40. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29(3), 325-340.
41. Willis, J. (1996) A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, England: Longman.