Conversations - And negotiated interaction - In text and voice chat ROOMS

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 79-98

  Jepson, Kevin ^a  

^a MONTEREY INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944481093     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved July 25,2005, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html
2. Beauvois, M. H. (1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-464.
3. Blake, R. (2000). Computer-mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved November 14, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/
4. Bonk, C. J., & Kim, K. A. (1998). Extending socioculturel theory to adult learning. In M. C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 67-88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chen, J., Belkada, S., & Okamoto, T. (2004). How a Web-based course facilitates acquisition of English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology, 5(2), 33-49. Retrieved November 21, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/chen/
7. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Doughty, C. J., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol7num3/doughty/
9. Egbert, J., Chao, C., & Hanson-Smith, E. (1999). Computer-enhanced language learning environments: An overview. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 1-13). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
10. Ellis, N. (1995). Consciousness in second language acquisition: A review of field studies and laboratory experiments. Language Awareness, 4, 123-146.
11. Ellis, R. (1999). Learning a second language through interaction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
12. Ellis, R., Tanaka, Y., & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
13. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Grotjahn, R. (1987). On the methodological basis of introspective methods. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 59-60). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
16. Hall, J. K., & Verplaetse, L. S. (2000). Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston: Heinle.
18. Herring, S. (1999). Coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved January 12, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/ vol4/issue4/herring.html
19. Huff C., & King, R. (1988). An experiment in electronic collaboration. In J. D. Goodchilds (Chair) Interacting by computer: Effects on small group style and structure. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA.
20. Iwashita, N. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on interactional moves and modified output in nonnative-nonnative interaction in Japanese as a foreign language. System, 29, 267-287.
21. Iwasaki, J., & Oliver, R. (2003). Chatline interaction and negative feedback. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 60-73.
22. Keim, O. R. (1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 441-545.
23. Kelm, O. R. (1996). Applications of computer networking in foreign language education: Focusing on principles of second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 19-28). Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
24. Kern, R. G. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with network computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-476.
25. Kormos, J. (1999). The timing of self-repairs in second language speech production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 145-167.
26. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
27. Lantolf, J. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28. Lin, Y., & Hedgcock, J. (1996). Negative feedback incorporation among high-proficiency and low-proficiency Chinese-speaking learners of Spanish. Language Learning, 46, 567-611.
29. Linnell, J. (1995). Can negotiation provide a context for learning syntax in a second language? Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 11, 83-103.
30. Long, M. H. (1983). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.
31. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413-469). New York: Academic Press.
32. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom SLA (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
33. Long, M. H., & Sato, C. J. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second languages (pp. 268-285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
34. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
35. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
36. Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: MacMillan.
37. McGuire, T., Kiesler, S., & Siegel, J. (1987). Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 917-930.
38. Muniandy, A.V.A. (2002). Electronic-discourse (E-discourse): Spoken, written or a new hybrid? Prospect: An Australian Journal of TESOL, 17, 45-68.
39. Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 377-404.
40. Negretti, R. (1999). Web-based activities and SLA: A conversation analysis research approach. Language Learning & Technology, 3(1), 75-87. Retrieved October 22, 2002 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num1/negretti/
41. Nobuyoshi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks. English Language Teaching Journal, 47, 203-210.
42. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking recasts: A learner-centered examination of corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 47-71). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-93. Retrieved October 22, 2002 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/
45. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.
46. Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through sychronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7-32.
47. Pellettieri, J. (1996). Network-based computer interaction and the negotiation of meaning in the virtual foreign language classroom. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Davis.
48. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kerns (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. Pica, T. (1994). Review article - Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
50. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
51. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learner interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of second language learners? TESOL Quarterly, 30, 59-84.
52. Richards, J. C. (1998). Teaching in action: Case studies from second language classrooms. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
53. Rodriguez, J. (1998). Investigating CALL use. Unpublished manuscript, Iowa State University.
54. Sauro, S. (2001). The success of task type in facilitating oral language production in online computer mediated collaborative projects. Unpublished master's thesis, Iowa State University, Ames.
55. Sauro, S. (2004). Cyberdiscursive tug-of-war: Learner repositioning in a multimodal CMC environment. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 19, 55-72.
56. Schultz, J. (1996). Computers and collaborative writing in the foreign language curriculum. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at Berkeley.
57. Schwartz, J. (1980). The negotiation for meaning: Repair in conversations between second language learners of English. In D. Larsen-Freeman, (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp.138-153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
58. Shavelson, R. J. (1981). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
59. Shehadeh, A. (1999). Non-native speakers' production of modified comprehensible output and second language learning. Language Learning, 49, 627-675.
60. Shehadeh, A. (2001). Self- and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 433-454.
61. Siegel, S. (1956). Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
62. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-54.
63. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365-398.
64. Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved November 10, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/ sotillo/
65. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 29, 1-15.
66. Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language learning: Introduction to a general theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
67. St. John, E., & Cash, D. (1995). Language learning via e-mail: Demonstrable success with German. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners (pp. 191-197). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i.
68. Sullivan, N., & Pratt, E. (1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.
69. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.
70. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H.G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
71. Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Retrieved December 12, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/TOYODA/
72. Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 141-159. Retrieved December 12, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/tudini/
73. Turbee, L. (1996). MOOing in a foreign language: How, why and who? Paper presented at the Information Technology Education Connection's International Virtual Conference/Exhibition on Schooling and the Information Superhighway. Retrieved September 22, 2002, from http://web.syr.edu/~lmturbee/itechtm.html
74. Turbee, L. (1999). Classroom practice: MOO, WOO, and more - Language learning in virtual environments. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 346-361). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
75. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
76. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
77. van Lier, L., & Matsuo, N. (2000). Varieties of conversational experience: Looking for learning opportunities. Applied Language Learning, 11, 265-287.
78. Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. (1985). Nonnative/nonnative conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
79. Warner, C. N. (2004). It's just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69-87. Retrieved December 12, 2004 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol8num2/warner/
80. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
81. Warschauer, M. (2000). On-line learning in second language classrooms: An ethnographic study. In M. Warschauer & R. Kerns (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 41-58). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
82. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
83. Warschauer, M., & Lepeintre, S. (1997). Freire's dream or Foucault's nightmare: Teacher-student relations on an international computer network. In R. Debski, J. Gassin, & M. Smith (Eds.), Language learning through social computing (pp. 67-89). Parkville, Australia: Applied Linguistics Association of Australia.
84. Werry, C. C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat. In Herring, S. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: J. Benjamins.
85. Wesche, M. (1994). Input and interaction in second language acquisition. In C. Gallaway & B. J. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 219-249). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.