Technologies for second language literacy

Annual Review of Applied Linguistics

Volumn 25, Issue , 2005, Pages 188-201

  Murray, Denise E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21644487902     PISSN: 02671905     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1017/S0267190505000103     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Belz, J. A. (2003b). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 68-117.
2. Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language, Learning and Technology, 5(3), 44-65.
3. Murray, D. E., & McPherson, P. (Eds.). (2004b). Navigating to read; reading to navigate. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
4. Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 157-167.
5. American Library Association. (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Retrieved October 7, 2004, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/informationliteracycompetency.htm
6. Beatty, K., & Nunan, D. (2004). Computer-mediated collaborative learning. System, 32, 165-183.
7. Belz, J. A. (2003a). From the special issue editor. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 2-5.
8. Biesenbach-Lucas, S., & Weasonforth, D. (2001). E-mail and word processing in the ESL classroom: How the medium affects the message. Language Learning and Technology, 5(1), 135-165.
9. Bloch, J. (2001). Plagiarism and the ESL student: From printed to electronic texts. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections (pp. 209-228). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Bloch, J. (2004). Second language cyberrhetoric: A study of Chinese L2 writers in an online Usenet group. Language Learning and Technology, 5(3), 66-82.
11. Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19, 135-145.
12. Chappelle, C. (2001). CALL in the 21st century: Looking back on research to look forward for practice. In P. Brett (Ed.), CALL in the 21st century (CD-ROM). Whitstable, Kent: IATEFL.
13. Corbel, C., & Gruba, P. (2004). Teaching computer literacy. Sydney, Australia: NCELTR.
14. Corbel, C., & Taylor, T. (2003). Online for all? Evaluating current and potential use of Internet-based activities for AMEP students. Sydney, Australia: NCELTR.
15. Davies, G. (2001). New technologies and language learning: A suitable subject for research? In A. Chambers & G. Davies (Eds.), ICT and language learning: A European perspective (pp. 13-24). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
16. Debski, R. (2000). Project-oriented CALL: Implementation and evaluation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(4/5).
17. Felix, U. (2001). Beyond Babel: Language learning online. Melbourne: Language Australia.
18. Freebody, P., & Luke, A. (1990). "Literacies" programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect, 5(7), 7-16.
19. Ganderton, R. (1999). Interactivity in L2 web-based reading. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), WorldCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 49-66). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
20. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor & Francis.
21. Gonzalez-Lloret, M. (2003). Designing task-based CALL to promote interaction: En busca de esmeraldas. Linguistics and Education, 7(1), 86-104.
22. Goodwin-Jones, B. (2000). Emerging technologies: Literacies and technology tools/trends. Language Learning and Technology, 4(2), 11-18.
23. Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. Retrieved July 9, 2002, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai
24. Healey, D. (1999). Theory and research: Autonomy and language learning. In J. Egbert & E. Hanson-Smith (Eds.), CALL environments: Research, practice, and critical issues (pp. 116-136). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
25. Jones, J. (2001). CALL and the teacher's role in promoting learner autonomy. CALL-EJ Online 3(1). Retrieved October 7, 2004, from http://www.clec.ritsumei.ac.jp/english/callejonline/6-1/jones.html
26. Koutsogiannis, D., & Mitsikopoulou, B. (2004). The Internet as glocal discourse environment. Retrieved September 30, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vo18num3/koutsogiannis/default.html
27. Kress, G. (1997). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53-79). Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
28. Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and technology literacy: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
29. Lever, T. (2004). AMEP students online: The view from morning self-access. Prospect, 19(2), 39-55.
30. Levy, M., & Debski, R. (1999). Introduction. In R. Debski & M. Levy (Eds.), WorldCALL: Global perspectives on computer-assisted language learning (pp. 7-10). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zettlinger.
31. McPherson, P., & Murray, D. E. (2003). Communicating on the Net. Sydney, Australia: NCELTR.
32. Murray, D. E. (1988). The context of oral and written language. Language in Society, 77, 351-373.
33. Murray, D. E. (1999). Access to information technology: Considerations for language educators. Prospect, 14(3), 4-12.
34. Murray, D. E. (2003). Materials for new technologies: learning from research and practice. In W. A. Renandya (Ed.), Methodology and materials design in language teaching: Current perspectives and practices and their implications (pp. 30-43). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
35. Murray, D. E. (2004). New frontiers in technology and teaching. In C. Davison (Ed.), Information technology and innovation in language education (pp. 25-44). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
36. Murray, D. E., & McPherson, P. (2002). Using Planet English with AMEP learners. Sydney, Australia: NCELTR.
37. Murray, D. E., & McPherson, P. (2004a). Using the Web to support language learning. Sydney, Australia: NCELTR.
38. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
39. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
40. Savignon, S. J., & Roithmeier, W. (2004). Computer-mediated communication: Texts and contexts. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 265-289.
41. Schwienhorst, K. (2003). Learner autonomy and tandem learning: Putting principles into practice in synchronous and asynchronous telecommunications environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 427-443.
42. Schwienhorst, K. (2004). Native-speaker/non-native-speaker discourse in the MOO: Topic negotiation and initiation in a synchronous text-based environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 35-50.
43. Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language, Learning and Technology, 5(1), 103-134.
44. Shield, L., Weininger, M. J., & Davies, L. B. (1999). A task-based approach to using MOO for collaborative language learning. In K. Cameron (Ed.), CALL and the learning community (pp. 391-401). Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.
45. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 38-57.
46. Snyder, I. (1999). Digital literacies: Renegotiating the visual and the verbal in communication. Prospect, 14(3), 13-23.
47. Snyder, I. (2002). Silicon literacies. London: Routledge.
48. Sorapure, M., Inglesby, P., & Yatchisin, G. (1998). Web literacy: Challenges and opportunities for research in a new medium. Computers and Composition, 15, 409-424.
49. Sotillo, S. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4(1), 82-119.
50. Stockwell, G. (2004). Communication breakdown in asynchronous computermediated communication (CMC). Australian Language and Literacy Matters, 1(3), 7-10, 31.
51. Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.
52. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Web-text: Perceptions of digital reading skills in the ESL classroom. Prospect, 17(1), 55-70.
53. Thorne, S. L. (2003a). Artifacts and cultures-in-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
54. Thorne, S. L. (2003b, April 21). The Internet as artifact: Immediacy, evolution, and educational contingencies, or "The wrong tool for the right job?" Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Chicago.
55. Thurstun, J. (2004). Teaching and learning the reading of homepages. Prospect, 19(2), 56-71.
56. Toyoda, E. (2001). Exercise of learner autonomy in project-oriented CALL. Retrieved October 8, 2004, from http://www.clec.ritsumei.ac.jp/english/callejonline/5-2/contents2-2.html
57. Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 82-99.
58. Tudini, V. (2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning and Technology, 7(3), 141-159.
59. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Shuster.
60. Walz, J. (2001). Reading hypertext: Lower level processes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 475-494.
61. Wang, Y. (2004). Supporting synchronous distance learning with desktop videoconferencing. Language Learning and Technology, 5(3) 90-121.
62. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Warschauer, M. (2000). Language, identity, and the Internet. In B. Kolko, L. Nakamura, & G. Rodman (Eds.), Race in Cyberspace (pp. 151-170). New York: Routledge.
64. Warschauer, M. (2001). The death of Cyberspace and the rebirth of CALL. In P. Brett (Ed.), CALL in the 21st century (CD-ROM). Whitstable, Kent: IATEFL.
65. Warschauer, M., El Said, G. R., & Zohry, A. (2002). Language choice online: Globalization and identity in Egypt. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vo17/issue4/warschauer.html
66. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Wood, A. F., & Smith, M. J. (2001). Online communication: Technology, identity and culture. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
68. Zarcadoolas, C., Blanco, M., Boyer, J. F., & Pleasant, A. (2002). Unweaving the Web: An exploratory study of low-literate adults' navigation skills on the World Wide Web. Journal of Health Communication, 7, 309-324.