Erratum: Investigating L2 performance in text chat (Applied Linguistics 31:4 (554-577) DOI:10.1093/applin/amq007);Investigating L2 performance in text chat

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 554-577

  Sauro, Shannon ^a   Smith, Bryan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955904068     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: 1477450X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/amq038     Document Type: Erratum

References (47)

1. Abrams, Z. 2003. 'The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German,' The Modern Language Journal 87: 157-167
2. Beauvois, M. H. 1992. 'Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion,' Foreign Language Annals 25: 455-464
3. Belz, J. A. 2002. 'Social dimensions of telecolaborative foreign language study,' Language Learning and Technology 6/1: 60-81.
4. Blake, R. 2000. 'Computer mediated communication: a window on L2 Spanish interlanguage,' Language Learning and Technology 4/1: 120-136
5. Chapelle, C. A. 2008. 'Technology and second language acquisition,' Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 27: 98-114.
6. Cohen, L. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Crookes, G. 1989. 'Planning and interlanguage variation,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11: 367-383
8. Daller, H., R. Van Hout, and J. Treffers-Daller. 2003. 'Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals,' Applied Linguistics 24: 197-222.
9. Darhower, M. 2008. 'The role of linguistic affordances in telecollaborative chat,' CALICO Journal 26/1: 48-69.
10. DeKeyser, R. M. 2005. 'What makes learning second language grammar difficult? A review of issues,' Language Learning 55/Suppl 1: 1-25.
11. Elder, C. and N. Iwashita. 2005. 'Planning for test performance: does it make a difference?' in Ellis R. (ed.): Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 219-238
12. Ellis, R. 2005. 'Planning and task-based performance: Theory and research' in Ellis R. (ed.): Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 3-34.
13. Ellis, R. and F. Yuan. 2004. 'The effects of planning on fluency complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 59-84.
14. Ellis, R. and F. Yuan. 2005. 'The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance' in Ellis R. (ed.): Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 167-192
15. Foster, P. and P. Skehan. 1996. 'The influence of planning and task type on second language performance,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18: 299-323.
16. Gonzá les-Lloret, M. 2003. 'Designing taskbased CALL to promote interaction: En busca de Esmeraldas,' Language Learning and Technology 7/1: 86-104.
17. Kawauchi, C. 2005. 'The effects of strategic planning on the oral narratives of learners with low and high intermediate L2 proficiency' in Ellis R. (ed.): Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 143-164
18. Kern, R. G. 1995. 'Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and quality of language production,' The Modern Language Journal 79: 457-466
19. Kormos, J. and M. Dé nes. 2004. 'Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners,' System 32/2: 145-164
20. Kö tter, M. 2003. 'Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems,' Language Learning and Technology 7/2: 145-172
21. Lee, L. 2004. 'Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the US,' Language Learning and Technology 8/1: 83-100.
22. Loewen, S. and R. Erlam. 2006. 'Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study,' Computer Assisted Language Learning 19/1: 1-14.
23. Loschky, L. and R. Bley-Vroman. 1993. 'Creating structure-based communication tasks For second language development' in Crookes G. and S. Gass (eds): Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Multilingual Matters, pp. 123-167
24. Mehnert, U. 1998. 'The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 83-108.
25. Menzel, B. 2005. 'Psycholinguistic aspects of gender acquisition in instructed GFL learning' in Housen A. and M. Pierrard (eds): Investigations in Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Walter de Gruyter, pp. 51-97.
26. Ortega, L. 1999. 'Planning and focus on form in L2 performance,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 109-148
27. Oskoz, A. 2005. 'Students' dynamic assessment via online chat,' CALICO Journal 22/3: 513-536
28. Pellettieri, J. 1999. 'Why-talk? Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network-based communication among classroom learners of Spanish' Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California Davis.
29. Pellettieri, J. 2000. 'Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence' in Warschauer M. and R. Kern (eds): Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice. Cambridge University Press, pp. 59-86.
30. Pica, T. 1983. 'Methods of morpheme quantification: The effect on the interpretation of second language data,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6: 69-79.
31. Pica, T., R. Kanagy, and J. Falodun. 1993. 'Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research' in Crookes G. and S. Gass (eds): Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Multilingual Matters, pp. 9-34.
32. Sachs, R. and B. Suh. 2007. 'Textually enhanced recasts learner awareness and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction' in Mackey A. (ed.): Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition: A Collection of Empirical Studies. Oxford University Press, pp. 197-227.
33. Sangarun, J. 2005. 'The effects of focusing on meaning and form in strategic planning' in Ellis R. (ed.): Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 111-141
34. Sauro, S. 2009. 'Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar,' Language Learning and Technology 13/1: 96-120.
35. Shehadeh, A. 2001. 'Self-and other-initiated modified output during task-based interaction,' TESOL Quarterly 35/3: 433-457
36. Shekary, M. and H. M. Tahririan. 2006. 'Negotiation of meaning and noticing in textbased online chat,' The Modern Language Journal 90/4: 557-573
37. Skehan, P. 2003. 'Focus on form tasks and technology,' Computer Assisted Language Learning 16/5: 391-411.
38. Skehan, P. and P. Foster. 1999. 'The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings,' Language Learning 49/1: 93-120.
39. Skehan, P. and P. Foster. 2005. 'Strategic and on-line planning: The influence of surprise information and task time on second language performance' in Ellis R. (ed.): Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 193-216.
40. Smith, B. 2004. 'Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition,' Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26: 365-398
41. Smith, B. 2005. 'The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake and lexical acquisition in task-based computermediated communication,' TESOL Quarterly 39/1: 33-58.
42. Smith, B. 2008. 'Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing selfrepair,' Language Learning and Technology 12/1: 85-103.
43. Smith, S. and S. Sauro. 2009. 'Interruptions in chat,' Computer Assisted Language Learning 22/3: 229-247
44. Sullivan, J. and N. Caplan. 2003. 'Beyond the dictogloss: Learner-generated attention to form in a collaborative, communicative classroom activity,' Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 19/1: 65-89.
45. Tavakoli, R. and P. Skehan. 2005. 'Strategic planning, task structure, and performance testing' in Ellis R. (ed.): Planning and Task Performance in a Second Language. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 239-273
46. Towell, R., R. Hawkins, and N. Bazergut. 1996. 'The development of fluency in advanced learners of French,' Applied Linguistics 17/1: 84-115.
47. Yuan, F. and R. Ellis. 2003. 'The effects of pretask planning and on-line planning on fluency complexity and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production,' Applied Linguistics 24/1: 1-27.