Designing task-based call to promote interaction: En busca de esmeraldas

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 86-104

  González Lloret, Marta ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^b University of Hawai'i at Manoa ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042648215     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Apple. (1998). Quicktime VR authoring studio (version 1.0) [computer software]. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc.
2. Beauvois, M. H., & Eledge, J. (1996). Personality types and megabytes: Student attitudes towards computer mediated communication (CMC) in the language Classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2,3), 27-45.
3. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved March 4, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/default.html
4. Brindley, G. (1987). Factors affecting task difficulty. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Guidelines for the development of curriculum resources (pp. 45-56). Adelaide, Australia: Adelaide National Curriculum Resource Center.
5. Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shillcock, R., & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk: Strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bruton, A., & Samuda, V. (1980). Learner and teacher roles in the treatment of oral error in group work. RELC Journal, 11(2), 49-63.
7. Candlin, C. (1984). Syllabus design as a critical process. In C. Brumfit (Ed.), General English syllabus design (pp. 29-46). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
8. Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed LA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22-34. Retrieved March 4, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num1/article1/index.html
9. Crookall, D., & Oxford, R. L. (Eds.). (1990). Simulation, gaming and language learning. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
10. Crookes, G., & Gass, S. M. (Eds.). (1993). Tasks in a pedagogical context. Integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters
11. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Doughty, C. (1987). Relating second-language acquisition theory to CALL research and application. In W. F. Smith (Ed.), Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation (pp. 133-167). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
13. Doughty, C. (2000a, September). What do computers assist in language learning? Perspectives from SLA research and LT methodology. Handout for IATEFL Conference, Madrid.
14. Doughty, C. (2000b). Negotiating the L2 linguistic environment. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 18, 47-83.
15. Doughty, C. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series (pp. 207-257). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (2002, February 3). Creating the optimal learning environment in a DL language course. Plenary: Title VI conference on distance learning of the less commonly taught languages. Washington, DC. Retrieved February 15, 2002, from http://langinnovate.msu.edu/commpapers.html#doughty
17. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.), (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Ellis, R. (1999). Theoretical perspectives on interaction and language learning. In Ellis, R. (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 3-31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
19. Ellis, R., & He, X. (1999). The roles of modified input and output in the incidental acquisition of word meaning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 285-301.
20. Ellis, R., Tanaka. Y, & Yamazaki, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension and acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
21. FMJ-Software. (2000). Awave Studio (Version 7.0) [Computer software]. Hägersten, Sweden.
22. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 299-305.
24. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1985). Task variation and nonnative/nonnative negotiation of meaning. In S. Gass & C. Maden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 149-161). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
25. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1989). Incorporated repairs in nonnative discourse. In M. Eisenstein (Ed.), The dynamic interlanguage (pp. 71-86). New York: Plenum Press.
26. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
27. Hegelheimer, V., & Chapelle, C. (2000). Methodological issues in research on learner-computer interactions in CALL. Language Learning & Technology 4(1), 41-59. Retrieved March 4, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/hegchap/
28. Higgins, J., & Morgenstern, D. (1990). Simulations on computers. In D. Crookall & R. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming and language learning (pp. 183-189). New York: Newbury House Publishers.
29. Holliday, L. (1995). NS syntactic modifications in NS-NNS negotiations as input data for second language acquisition of syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
30. Kern, R. (1995). Reconstructing classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476.
31. Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Theory and practice of network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143-166.
33. LaPierre, D. (1994). Language output in a cooperative learning setting: Determining its effects on second language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Toronto (OISE), Toronto, Canada.
34. Linnell, J. (1995). Negotiation as a context for learning syntax in a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
35. Levy, M. (1999). Computer assisted language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36. Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second languages acquisition (pp.77-99). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
37. Long, M. H. (1991a). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. P. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Long, M. H. (1991b, July). Measuring classroom language change. Unpublished manuscript, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
39. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40. Long, M. H. (1997). Authenticity and learning potential in L2 classroom discourse. In G. M. Jacobs (Ed.), Language classroom of tomorrow: Issues and responses (pp. 148-69). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
41. Long, M. H. (1998). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 16(1), 357-371.
42. Long, M. H. (1999, August). Recasts: The story so far. Paper presented at the AILA conference, Tokyo.
43. Long, M. H. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy. Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179-192). Philadelphia: John Benjamins
44. Long, M. H. (in press). Task based language teaching. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
45. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 357-371.
46. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, England: CUP.
47. Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(3), 303-323.
48. Lyster, R. (1998a). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
49. Lyster, R. (1998b). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-281.
50. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
51. Noboyushi, J., & Ellis, R. (1993). Focused communication tasks and second language acquisition. English Language Teaching Journal, 47, 203-210.
52. Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
53. Parker, K., & Chaudron, C. (1987). The effects of linguistics simplifications and elaborative modifications on L2 comprehension. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL 6(2), 107-133.
54. Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal modes, and relative clause formation in a formal and informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 38-55.
55. Pica, T. (1991). Classroom interaction, negotiation, and comprehension: redefining relationships. System, 19(4), 437-452.
56. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44(3), 493-527.
57. Pica, T., Doughty, C., & Young, R. (1986). The impact of interaction on comprehension: Do interactional modifications help? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 72, 1-25.
58. Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible input as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 63-90.
59. Pica, T., Lincoln-Porter, F., Paninos, D., & Linnell, J. (1996). Language learners' interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners?. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 59-84.
60. Polio, C., & Gass, S. (1998). The role of interaction in native speaker comprehension of nonnative speaker speech. Modern Language Journal, 82, 308-319.
61. Robinson, P. (in press). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and second language syllabus design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
62. Scarcella, R., & Crookall, D. (1990). Simulation/gaming and language acquisition. In D. Crookall & R. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming and language learning (pp. 223-230). New York: Newbury House Publishers.
63. Shank, R. C., & Cleary, C. (1994). Engines for education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64. Sharan, S. (1990). Cooperative learning: A perspective on research and practice. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 285-300). NY: Praeger.
65. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 165-179
66. Schmidt, R. W. (1983). Interaction, accumulation, and the acquisition of communicative competence. In N. Wolfson & J. Manes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 137-174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
67. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 11, 219-258.
68. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1992, 13, 206-226
69. Slavin, R. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research & practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
70. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generated. Applied Linguistics, 6(4), 371-391
71. Warschauer, M. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2 & 3), 7-26.
72. Wells, G., Ling, G., & Maher, A. (1990). Creating classroom communities and literate thinkers. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 95-121). NY: Praeger