"Missed" communication in online communication: Tensions in a german-american telecollaboration

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 64-89

  Ware, Paige ^a  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244480019     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981/1934-5). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Barton, E. (1994). Interpreting the discourses of technology. In C. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning (pp. 56-75). New York: Modern Language Association.
3. Bates, A. W. (1995). Technology, open learning and distance education. London:Routledge.
4. Beauvois, M. H. (1998). E-Talk: Computer-assisted classroom discussion - attitudes and motivation. In J. Swaffar, S. Romano, P. Markely, & K. Arens (Eds.), Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom (pp. 99-120). Austin, TX: Labyrinth Publications.
5. Beers, M. (2001). A media-based approach to developing ethnographic skills for second language teaching and learning. Zeitschrift fuer Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 6(2). Retrieved May 22, 2003, from http://www.ualberta.ca/~german/ejournal/beers1.htm
6. Beiz, J. A. (2001). Institutional and individual dimensions of transatlantic group work in network-based language teaching. ReCALL 13(2), 213-231.
7. Beiz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative language study. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved January 3, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/belz/
8. Beiz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 68-117. Retrieved December 19, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol7num2/belz/
9. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2002). The cross-linguistic development of address form use in telecollaborative language learning: Two case studies. Canadian Modern Language Review/Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 59(2), 189-214.
10. Belz, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2003). Discourse options and the development of pragmatic competence by classroom learners of German: The case of address forms. Language Learning, 53(4), 591-647.
11. Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners. Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional faultline. The Modern Language Journal, 87(1), 71-89.
12. Bernhardt, E. B. (1998). Sociohistorical perspectives on language teaching in the modern United States. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Learning foreign and second languages: Perspectives in research and scholarship (pp. 39-57). New York: Modern Language Association.
13. Besnier, N. (1990). Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 419-451.
14. Biber, D., & Finnegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93-124.
15. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on Spanish L2 interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved April 2, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake
16. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Brammerts, H. (1995). Tandem learning and the Internet: Using new technology to acquire intercultural competence. In A. A. Jensen, K. Jaeger, & A. Lorentsen (Eds.), Intercultural competence: A new challenge for language teachers and trainers in Europe. Volume II: The adult learner (pp. 209-222). Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University Press.
18. Brammerts, H. (1996). Language learning in tandem using the Internet. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 121-130). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
19. Breindl, E. (1997). DaF goes Internet: Neue Entwicklungen in Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Deustche Sprache, 25(4), 289-342.
20. Byram, Michael. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural competence. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
21. Byram, M., & Zarate, G. (1994). Definitions, objectives and assessment of sociocultural competence. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
22. Cameron, D. (2000). Good to talk? Living and working in a communication culture. London: Sage.
23. Chafe, W. (2001). The analysis of discourse flow. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 673-687). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
24. Chavez, M. (2002). We say "culture" and students ask "What?": University students' definitions of foreign language culture. Die Unterrichtspraxis, 35(2), 129-140.
25. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K. & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The Culture Project. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55-102. Retrieved September 13, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/furstenberg/
27. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers. New York: Longman.
28. Gumperz, J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29. Haas, C., & Neuwirth, C. (1994). Writing the technology that writes us: Research on literacy and the shape of technology. In C. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning (pp. 319-335). New York: Modern Language Association.
30. Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
31. Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612-634). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishers.
32. Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171-183.
33. Keim, O. (1996). The application of computer networking in foreign language education: Focusing on principles of second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 19-28). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
34. Kern, R. (1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quality and quantity of language production. Modern Language Journal, 79(4), 457-476.
35. Kern, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Using e-mail exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 105-120). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
36. Kern, R. (1998). Technology, social interaction and FL literacy. In J. Muyskens (Ed.), New ways of learning and teaching: focus on technology and foreign language education (pp. 57-92). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
37. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
38. Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (Eds.) (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Kinginger, C. (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 23-46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Kinginger, C., & Farrell, K. (2004). Foreign language learning in study abroad: Case studies in alienation and desire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
41. Kinginger, C., Gourves-Hayward, A., & Simpson, V. (1999). A tele-collaborative course on French-American intercultural communication. French Review, 72(5), 853-866.
42. Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University.
43. Kramsch, C. (1996). Toward a dialogic analysis of cross-cultural encounters. In L. Bredella & H. Christ (Eds.), Begegnungen mit dem Fremden (pp. 176-205). Giessen, Germany: Verlag der Ferber'schen Universitaetsbuchhandlung.
44. Kramsch, C. (1999). Thirdness: The intercultural stance. In T. Vestergaard (Ed.), Language, culture and identity (pp. 41-58). Aalborg, Denmark: Aaalborg University Press.
45. Kramsch, C., & Andersen, R. (1999). Teaching text and context through multimedia. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 31-42. Retrieved August 25, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol2num2/article1/
46. Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. (2002). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83-100). London: Routledge.
47. Kubota, R., Austin, T., & Saito-Abbott, Y. (2003). Diversity and inclusion of sociopolitical issues in foreign language classrooms: An exploratory survey. Foreign Language Annals, 36(1), 12-24.
48. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Introducing sociocultural theory. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 1-26). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
49. Lee, L. (2004). Learners' perspectives on networked collaborative interaction with native speakers of Spanish in the U.S. Language Learning & Technology, 8(1), 83-100. Retrieved May 23, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol8num1/lee/
50. Loos, E., Anderson, S., Day, D. H., Jr., Jordan, P. C., & Wingate, D. (Eds.). (1999). Glossary of linguistic terms. Dallas, TX: SIL International. Available at: http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/
51. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Meagher, M. E., & Castaños, F. (1996). Perceptions of American culture: The impact of an electronically-mediated cultural exchange program on Mexican high school students. In Herring, S. C. (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 187-202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
54. Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000). The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic learning networks. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 129-147. Retrieved March 30, 2005, from http://llt.msu.edu/ vol4num2/muller/
55. Ochs, E. (1990). Indexicality and socialization. In J. W. Stigler, R. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development (pp. 287-308). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
56. Ochs, E. (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(3), 287-306.
57. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B. (1989). Language has a heart. Text, 9, 7-25.
58. O'Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the "other side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118-144. Retrieved January 3, 2004, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/odowd/
59. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom. In M. Warschauer, & R. Kern, (Eds.). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice, (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60. Plass, J., & Chun, D. (1996). A hypermedia system for CALL in a networked environment. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 83-103). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
61. Polanyi, L. (1995). Language learning and living abroad: Stories from the field. In B.F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 271-292). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
62. Richter, R. (1998). Interkulterelles lernen via Internet? Zeitschrift fuer Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht, 3(2). Retrieved June 22, 2003, from http://www.ualberta.ca/~german/ejournal/richter1.htm
63. Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
64. Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural communication. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
65. Searle, J. R. (1970). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
66. Selfe, C., & Hilligoss, S. (Eds.). (1994). Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning. New York: Modern Language Association.
67. Sengupta, S. (2001). Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain? Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 103-134. Retrieved on July 14, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/sengupta/
68. Simpson, P. (1993). Language, ideology, and point of view. London: Routledge.
69. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved on March 7, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/ sotillo/
70. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
71. Tella, S., & Mononen-Aaltonen, M. (1998). Developing dialogic communication culture in media education: Integrating dialogism and technology. Helsinki: Media Education Publications. Retrieved March 22, 2004, from http://www.helsinki.fi/~tella/mep7.html
72. Toyoda, E., & Harrison, R. (2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), 82-99. Retrieved on November 29, 2003, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/TOYODA/
73. van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245-60). Oxford, England: OUP.
74. Voloshinov, V. N. (1973/1929). Marxism and the philosophy of language [Trans, by L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
75. Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
76. Ware, P. D. (2003). From involvement to engagement in online communication: Promoting intercultural competence in foreign language education. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
77. Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (in press). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. Modern Language Journal.
78. Warschauer, M. (1996a). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7-26.
79. Warschauer, M. (1996b). Motivational aspects of using computers for writing and communication. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 29-48). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
80. Warschauer, M. (1998). Interaction, negotiation, and computer-mediated learning. In M. Clay (Ed.), Practical applications of educational technology in language learning. Lyon, France: National Institute of Applied Sciences. Retrieved March 30, 2003, from http://www.insa-lyon.fr/Departments/CDRL/ interaction.html
81. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82. Wong, J. (2000). Delayed next turn repair initiation in native-nonnative speaker English conversation. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 244-267.