Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 183-210

  Kern, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847706990     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/40264516     Document Type: Article

References (128)

1. Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202-232.
2. Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it's heading. London: Routledge.
3. Bax, S. (2003). CALL-past, present, and future. System, 31, 13-28.
4. Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. The Language Learning & Technology, 6, 60-81.
5. Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 68-99.
6. Belz, J. A., & Müller-Hartmann, A. (2003). Teachers as intercultural learners: Negotiating German-American telecollaboration along the institutional fault line. Modern Language Journal, 87, 71-89.
7. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 120-136.
8. Blake, R. (2005). Bimodal CMC: The glue of language learning at a distance. CALICO Journal, 22(3), 497-511.
9. Bloch,J. (2004). Second language cyber rhetoric: A study of Chinese L2 writers in an online USENET group. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 66-82.
10. Boswood, T. (Ed.). (1997). New ways of using computers in language teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
11. Bowers, C. A. (2000). Let them eat data: How computers affect education, cultural diversity, and the prospects of ecological sustainability. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
12. Brander, B. G. (2005). Considering culture in CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 141-153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
14. Chapelle, C. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22-34.
15. Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. Chapelle, C. A. (2005). Interactionist SLA theory in CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 53-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Chun, D. M., & Payne, J. S. (2004). What makes students click: Working memory and look-up behavior. System, 32, 481-503.
18. Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24, 503-519.
19. Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 60-81.
20. Coleman, J. (1998). Evolving intercultural perceptions among university language learners in Europe. In M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Language learning in intercultural perspective: Approaches through drama and ethnography (pp. 45-76). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Collins Cobuild Bank of English. (2004). Retrieved December 12, 2005, from http://www.collins.co.uk/books.aspx?group=153
22. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Darhower, M. (2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249-277.
24. Dragona, A., & Handa, C. (2000). Xenes glosses: Literacy and cultural implications of the Web for Greece. In G. E. Hawisher & C. L. Selfe (Eds.), Global literacies and the World-Wide Web (pp. 52-73). London: Routledge.
25. Dudeney, G. (2000). The Internet and the language classroom: A practical guide for teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Dutton, W. H. (2004). Social transformation in an information society: Rethinking access to you and the world. Paris: UNESCO.
27. Egbert, J. L. (2005). Conducting research on CALL. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 3-8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Egbert, J. L., & Petrie, G. M. (Eds.). (2005). CALL research perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Ehsani, F., & Knodt, E. (1998). Speech technology in computer-aided language learning: Strengths and limitations of a new CALL paradigm. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 45-60.
30. Ess, C. (2005). Moral imperatives for life in an intercultural global village. In R. J. Cavalier (Ed.), The impact of the Internet on our moral lives (pp. 161-193). Albany: State University of New York Press.
31. Felix, U. (2005). E-learning pedagogy in the third millennium: The need for combining social and cognitive constructivist approaches. ReCALL, 17(1), 85-100.
32. Fischer, G. (1998). E-mail in foreign language teaching: Toward the creation of virtual classrooms. Tübingen, Germany: Stauffenburg Medien.
33. Frankel, M. S., & Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and legal aspects of human subjects research on the Internet. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Also available from http://www.aaas.org/spp/dspp/sfrl/projects/intres/main.htm
34. Furstenberg, G. (2003). Reading between the cultural lines. In P. Patrikis (Ed.), Reading between the lines: Perspectives on foreign language literacy (pp. 74-98). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Furstenberg, G., & Levet, S. (1999). Dans un quartier de Paris [In a quarter of Paris]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Furstenberg, G., Levet, S., English, K., & Maillet, K. (2001). Giving a virtual voice to the silent language of culture: The CULTURA project Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 55-102.
37. Furstenberg, G., Murray, J. H., Malone, S., & Farman-Farmaian, A. (Artisl). (1993). A la rencontre de Philippe [Videodisc]. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
38. Granger, S. (Ed.). (1998). Learner English on computer. London: Longman.
39. Granger, S., & Petch-Tyson, S. (Eds.). (2003). Extending the scope of corpus-based research: New applications, new challenges. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
40. Gray, R., & Slockwell, G. (1998). Using computer mediated communication for language and culture acquisition. On-CALL, 12(3). Retrieved December 12, 2005, from http://www.cllr.uq.edu.au/oncall/gray123.html
41. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
42. Hanna, B. E., & de Nooy, J. (2003). A funny thing happened on the way to the forum: Electronic discussion and foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 71-85.
43. Hanson-Smith, E. (Ed.). (2000). Technology-enhanced learning environments. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
44. Hardison, D. M. (2005). Contextualized computer-based L2 prosody training: Evaluating the effects of discourse context and video input. CALICO Journal, 22, 175-190.
45. Hawisher, G. E., & Seife, C. L. (Eds.). (2000). Global literacies and the World-Wide Web. London: Routledge.
46. Heift, T. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner uptake in CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 416-431.
47. Herring, S. C. (Ed.). (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Herring, S. C. (1999). Interactional coherence in CMC. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 4(4). Retrieved December 12, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol4/issue4/herring.html
49. Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 612-634). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
50. Hubbard, P., & Siskin, C. B. (2004). Another look at tutorial CALL. ReCALL, 16(2), 448-461.
51. Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22, 224-261.
52. Hunston, S. (Ed.). (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
53. Jones, C. (1986). It's not so much the program, more what you do with it: The importance of methodology in CALL. System, 14, 171-178.
54. Jones, L. C., & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 546-561.
55. Jones, R. H. (2004). The problem of context in computer-mediated communication. In P. LeVine & R. Scollon (Eds.), Discourse and technology: Mullimodal discourse analysis (pp. 20-33). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
56. Kern, R. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Using e-mail exchanges to explore personal histories in two cultures. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning: Proceedings of the Hawaii symposium (pp. 105-119). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
57. Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
58. Kern, R., Ware, P. D., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 243-260.
59. Kinginger, C. (2000). Learning the pragmatics of solidarity in the networked foreign language classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds.), Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction (pp. 23-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60. Kling, R. (Ed.). (1996). Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
61. Knight, P. (2005). Learner interaction using email: The effects of task modification. ReCALL, 17(1), 101-121.
62. Koutsogiannis, D., & Mitsikopoulou, B. (2004). The Internet as a global discourse environment: A commentary on Lam and Bloch. Language Learning & Technology, 8(3), 83-89.
63. Kramsch, C. (2000). Second language acquisition, applied linguistics, and the teaching of foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 311-326.
64. Kramsch, C., A'Ness, F., & Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 78-104.
65. Kramsch, C., & Thorne, S. L. (2001). Foreign language learning as global communicative practice. In D. Block & D. Cameron (Eds.), Globalization and language teaching (pp. 83-100). London: Routledge.
66. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
67. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
68. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457-482.
69. Lam, W. S. E. (2003). Second language literacy and identity formation on the Internet: The case of Chinese immigrant youth in the U.S. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
70. Lam, W. S. E. (2004). Second language socialization in a bilingual chat room: Global and local considerations. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 44-65.
71. Lamy, M.-N. (2004). Oral conversations online: Redefining oral competence in synchronous environments. ReCALL, 16(2), 520-538.
72. Levis, J., & Pickering, L. (2004). Teaching intonation in discourse using speech visualization technology. System, 32, 505-524.
73. Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
74. Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2004). A task-cycling pedagogy using stimulated reflection and audio conferencing in foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 50-68.
75. Lotherington, H. (2005). Authentic language in digital environments. InJ. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 109-127). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
76. Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C. Ogden & I. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 296-336). London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Trubner.
77. Meskill, C., & Ranglova, K. (2000). Curriculum innovation in TEFL: A study of technologies supporting socio-collaborative language learning in Bulgaria. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
78. Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The Internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford, England: Berg.
79. Mohan, B., & Luo, L. (2005). A systemic functional linguistics perspective on CALL. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 87-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80. Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000). The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic learning networks. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 129-147.
81. Murray, D. (1988). The context of oral and written language: A framework for mode and medium switching. Language in Society, 17(3), 351-373.
82. Murray, D. (1989). When the medium determines turns: Turn-taking in computer conversation. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Working with language: A multidisciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts (pp. 319-337). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
83. Murray, D. (1996). Communicating for life: The social dimensions of computer-mediated communication. Applied Linguistics Forum, 16(2), 1-2; 7-9.
84. Murray, D. (2000). Protean communication: The language of computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 397-421.
85. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
86. Nelson, M. E. (in press). Mode, meaning and synaesthesia in multimedia L2 writing. Language Learning & Technology.
87. O'Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the "other side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7 (2), 118-144.
88. O'Rourke, B. (2005). Form-focused interaction in online tandem learning. CALICO Journal, 22, 433-466.
89. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Denning the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 82-93.
90. Osuna, M. (2000). Promoting foreign culture acquisition via the Internet in a sociocultural context. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22, 323-345.
91. Parks, S., Huot, D., Hamers, J., & H.-Lemonnier, F. (2003). Crossing boundaries: Multimedia technology and pedagogical innovation in a high school class. Language Learning & Technology, 7(1), 28-45.
92. Partington, A. (Ed.). (1998). Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
93. Peirce, C. S. (1966). Selected writings. New York: Dover.
94. Pica, T. (1994). Questions from the language classroom: Research perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 49-79.
95. Rainie, L., & Horrigan, J. B. (2005, January 25). A decade of adoption: How the internet has woven itself into American life. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/148/report_display.asp
96. Reeder, K., MacFadyen, L. P., Roche, J., & Chase, M. (2004). Negotiating cultures in Cyberspace: Participation patterns and problematics. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 88-105.
97. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
98. Rutherford, W. (1987). Second language grammar: Teaching and learning. London: Longman.
99. Salaberry, M. R. (2000). Pedagogical design of computer mediated communication tasks: Learning objectives and technological capacities. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 28-37.
100. Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 39-56.
101. Scollon, R., Bhatia, V., Li, D., & Young, V. (1999). Blurred genres and fuzzy identities in Hong Kong public discourse: Foundational ethnographic issues in the study of reading. Applied Linguistics, 20, 22-43.
102. Shetzer, H., & Warschauer, M. (2000). An electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 171-185). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
103. Shetzer, H., & Warschauer, M. (2001). English through Web page creation. In J. Murphy & P. Byrd (Eds.), Understanding the courses we teach: Local perspectives on English language teaching (pp. 429-445). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
104. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
105. Smith, B. (2005). The relationship between negotiated interaction, learner uptake, and lexical acquisition in task-based computer-mediated communication. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 33-58.
106. Swaffar, J., Romano, S., Markley, P., & Arens, K. (Eds.). (1998). Language learning online: Theory and practice in the ESL and L2 computer classroom. Austin, TX: Daedalus Group.
107. Taylor, R. (1980). The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Columbia Teacher's College Press.
108. Thatcher, B. (2005). Situating L2 writing in global communication technologies. Computers and Composition, 22(3), 279-295.
109. Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38-67.
110. Thorne, S. L., & Payne, J. S. (2005). Evolutionary trajectories, Internet-mediated expression, and language education. CALICO Journal, 22, 371-397.
111. Tribble, C., & Barlow, M. (Eds.). (2001). Using corpora in language teaching and learning [Special issue]. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3).
112. von der Emde, S., Schneider, J., & Kötter, M. (2001). Technically speaking: Transforming language learning through virtual learning environments (MOOs). The Modern Language Journal, 85, 210-225.
113. W-3 Corpora Project. (1998). The Brown Corpus. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://clwww.essex.ac.uk/w3c/corpu_ling/content/corpora/list/ private/brown/brown.html
114. Ware, P. D. (2003). From involvement to engagement in online communication: Promoting intercultural competence in foreign language education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
115. Ware, P. D. (2005). "Missed" communication in online communication: Tensions in a German-American telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 64-89.
116. Ware, P. D., & Kramsch, C. (2005). Toward an intercultural stance: Teaching German and English through telecollaboration. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 190-205.
117. Warner, C. N. (2004). It's just a game, right? Types of play in foreign language CMC. Language Learning & Technology, 8(2), 69-87.
118. Warschauer, M. (Ed.). (1995). Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii. Warschauer, M. (1999a). CALL vs. electronic literacy: Reconceiving technology in the language classroom. Retrieved December 2, 2005, from http://www.cilt.org.uk/research/resfor2/ warsum1.htm
119. Warschauer, M. (1999b). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
120. Warschauer, M. (2002). A developmental perspective on technology in language education. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 453-475.
121. Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
122. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Browne (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 15-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
123. Warschauer, M. (2005). Sociocultural perspectives on CALL. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 41-51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
124. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
125. Warschauer, M., Said, G. R. E., & Zohry, A. (2002). Language choice online: Globalization and identity in Egypt. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(4). Retrieved December 12, 2005, from http://jcmc.indiana. edu/vol7/issue4/warschauer.html
126. Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H., & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
127. Zhao, Y. (1997). The effects of listeners' control of speech rate on second language comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 49-68.
128. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7-27.