Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 82-99

  Toyoda, Etsuko ^a   Harrison, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042648058     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barson, J., Frommer, J., & Schwartz, M. (1993). Foreign language learning using email in a task-oriented perspective: Interuniversity experiments in communication and collaboration. Journal of Science and Technology, 2(4), 565-584.
2. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120-136. Retrieved May 6, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/blake/.
3. Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
6. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 Learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in Internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2), 143-166.
7. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Richie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition, Vol. 2: Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York: Academic Press.
9. Ortega, L. (1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 82-93. Retrieved May 6, 2001, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/ortega/.
10. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
12. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 82-119. Retrieved May 6, 2002, from http://llt.msu.edu.vol4num1/sotillo/default.html.
13. Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
14. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & G. Seidhofer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Tamaoka, K. (1991). Psycholinguistic nature of the Japanese orthography. Studies in Language and Literature, 11(1), 49-82.
16. Varonis, E. M. & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native / non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
17. Warschauer, M. (1998). Interaction, negotiation, and computer-mediated learning. In M. Clay (Ed.), Practical applications of educational technology in language learning. Lyon, France: National Institute of Applied Sciences. Retrieved May 6, 2001, from http://www.insalyon. fr/Departments/CDRL/interaction.html.
18. Werry, C. C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of Internet relay chat. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.