On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 353-389

  Barzilai, Sarit ^a   Chinn, Clark A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85034643829     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087–2107. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2
2. Alexander, P. A. (2016). The arguments for and the reasoning about epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 100–110). New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Alexander, P. A., & The Disciplined Reading and Learning Research Laboratory. (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 259–280. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722511
4. Alston, W. P. (2005). Beyond “justification”: Dimensions of epistemic evaluation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5. Baehr, J. (2011). The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues and virtue epistemology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Baehr, J. (2013). Educating for intellectual virtues: From theory to practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 248–262. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12023
7. Baehr, J. (2016). Intellectual virtues and education: Essays in applied virtue epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge.
8. Bakhurst, D. (2013). Learning from others. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 187–203. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12020
9. Bang, M. (2015). Culture, learning, and development and the natural world: The influences of situative perspectives. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 220–233. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1075402
10. Barzilai, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003
11. Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39–85. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.636495
12. Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13–35. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.863265
13. Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2016). Epistemic (meta)cognition: Ways of thinking about knowledge and knowing. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 409–424). New York, NY: Routledge.
14. Battaly, H. (2008). Virtue epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 3(4), 639–663. doi:10.1111/phco.2008.3.issue-4
15. Battaly, H. (2016). Responsibilist virtues in reliabilist classrooms. In J. Baehr (Ed.), Intellectual virtues and education: Essays in applied virtue epistemology (pp. 163–183). New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2015). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. doi:10.1002/tea.21257
17. Bishop, M. A., & Trout, J. D. (2005). Epistemology and the psychology of human judgment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18. Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 180–195. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.003
19. Bråten, I. (2016). Epistemic cognition interventions: Issues, challenges, and directions. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 360–372). New York, NY: Routledge.
20. Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48–70. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
21. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 814–840. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.001
22. Bromme, R. (2005). Thinking and knowing about knowledge. In M. H. G. Hoffman, J. Lenhad, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign—Grounding mathematics education (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Springer.
23. Bromme, R., & Goldman, S. R. (2014). The public’s bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59–69. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.921572
24. Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) attained from others. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 163–193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 7–26. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5
26. Bromme, R., Thomm, E., & Wolf, V. (2013). From understanding to deference: Laypersons’ and medical students’ views on conflicts within medicine. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 5, 68–91. doi:10.1080/21548455.2013.849017
27. Brun, G., & Kuenzle, D. (2008). Introduction: A new role for emotions in epistemology? In G. Brun, U. Doguoglu, & D. Kuenzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 1–31). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
28. Cetina Knorr, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722
30. Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (in press). What is the value of general knowledge of scientific reasoning? In K. Engelmann, F. Fischer, J. Osborne, & C. A. Chinn (Eds.), Scientific reasoning and argumentation: The role of domain-specific and domain-general knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.
31. Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016). Epistemic cognition and philosophy: Developing a new framework for epistemic cognition. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 460–478). New York, NY: Routledge.
32. Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information (pp. 425–454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Cobb, P., Stephan, M., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2001). Participating in classroom mathematical practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1–2), 113–163. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS10-1-2_6
34. Collins, H. (2014). Are we all scientific experts now? Cambridge, UK: Polity.
35. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
36. Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85(5), 554–567. doi:10.1002/sce.1023
37. Elby, A., & Hammer, D. (2010). Epistemological resources and framing: A cognitive framework for helping teachers interpret and respond to their students’ epistemologies. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 409–434). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38. Feinstein, N. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science Education, 95(1), 168–185. doi:10.1002/sce.20414
39. Fives, H., Barnes, N., Buehl, M. M., Mascadri, J., & Ziegler, N. (2017). Teachers’ epistemic cognition in classroom assessment. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 270–283. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1323218
40. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
41. Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30, 1–32. doi:10.3102/0091732X030001001
42. Frank, J. (2013). Mitigating against epistemic injustice in educational research. Educational Researcher, 42(7), 363–370. doi:10.3102/0013189x12457812
43. Fricker, E. (2006). Testimony and epistemic autonomy. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The epistemology of testimony (pp. 225–250). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45. Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46. Goldberg, S. (2013). Epistemic dependence in testimonial belief, in the classroom and beyond. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 168–186. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12019
47. Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Goldman, A. I. (1987). Foundations of social epistemics. Synthese, 73(1), 109–144. doi:10.1007/BF00485444
49. Goldman, A. I. (1992). Epistemic folkways and scientific epistemology. Philosophical Issues, 3, 271–285. doi:10.2307/1522948
50. Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
51. Goldman, A. I. (2001). Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(1), 85–110. doi:10.2307/3071090
52. Goldman, A. I., & Beddor, B. (2015). Reliabilist epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/reliabilism/
53. Goldman, A. I., & Whitcomb, D. (2011). Social epistemology: Essential readings. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54. Goldman, S. R., Britt, M. A., Brown, W., Cribb, G., George, M., Greenleaf, C., … Project READI. (2016). Disciplinary literacies and learning to read for understanding: A conceptual framework for disciplinary literacy. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 219–246. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1168741
55. Greco, J. (2002). Virtues in epistemology. In P. K. Moser (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of epistemology (pp. 287–315). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56. Greco, J., & Turri, J. (2012). Virtue epistemology: Contemporary readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Greco, J., & Turri, J. (2015). Virtue epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/epistemology-virtue/
58. Greene, J. A., Sandoval, W. A., & Bråten, I. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of epistemic cognition. New York, NY: Routledge.
59. Haack, S. (1993). Evidence and inquiry: Towards reconstruction in epistemology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
60. Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169–190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic dependence. Journal of Philosophy, 82(7), 335–349. doi:10.2307/2026523
62. Hefter, M. H., Renkl, A., Riess, W., Schmid, S., Fries, S., & Berthold, K. (2015). Effects of a training intervention to foster precursors of evaluativist epistemological understanding and intellectual values. Learning and Instruction, 39, 11–22. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.002
63. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378–405. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1026
64. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5
65. Hofer, B. K. (2016). Epistemic cognition as a psychological construct: Advancements and challenges. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 19–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
66. Hofer, B. K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2012). Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 1. Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 227–256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
67. Holma, K., & Hyytinen, H. (2015). The philosophy of personal epistemology. Theory and Research in Education, 13(3), 334–350. doi:10.1177/1477878515606608
68. Hookway, C. (2010). Some varieties of epistemic injustice: Reflections on Fricker. Episteme, 7(02), 151–163. doi:10.3366/E1742360010000882
69. Ichikawa, J. J., & Steup, M. (2016). The analysis of knowledge. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/knowledge-analysis/
70. Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Beker, K. (2016). Argumentative reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 39–53). New York, NY: Routledge.
71. Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Engaging in science: A feeling for the discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 156–202. doi:10.1080/10508406.2015.1088441
72. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
73. Jones, W. E. (2002). Dissident versus loyalist: Which scientists should we trust? Journal of Value Inquiry, 36(4), 511–520. doi:10.1023/a:1021945707032
74. Kahan, D. M., Landrum, A., Carpenter, K., Helft, L., & Hall Jamieson, K. (2017). Science curiosity and political information processing. Political Psychology, 38, 179–199. doi:10.1111/pops.12396
75. Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity, and epistemic practice. In R. A. Duschl & R. Grandy (Eds.), Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation (pp. 99–117). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
76. Keren, A. (2007). Epistemic authority, testimony and the transmission of knowledge. Episteme, 4(3), 368–381. doi:10.3366/E1742360007000147
77. Kienhues, D., Ferguson, L. E., & Stahl, E. (2016). Diverging information and epistemic change. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 318–330). New York, NY: Routledge.
78. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
79. Kirschner, P., Van Vilsteren, P., Hummel, H., & Wigman, M. (1997). The design of a study environment for acquiring academic and professional competence. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 151–171. doi:10.1080/03075079712331381014
80. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of consciousness (pp. 289–325). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
82. Kotzee, B. (2013). Education and the growth of knowledge: Perspectives from social and virtue epistemology [Special issue]. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 157–167. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12033
83. Kotzee, B. (2016). Problems of assessment in educating for intellectual virtue. In J. Baehr (Ed.), Intellectual virtues and education: Essays in applied virtue epistemology (pp. 142–160). New York, NY: Routledge.
84. Kuhn, D., Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2010). Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and values of argumentive discourse. Discourse Processes, 48(1), 26–49. doi:10.1080/01638531003653344
85. Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456–496. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.830618
87. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
88. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
89. Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90. McCrudden, M. T., Stenseth, T., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2016). The effects of topic familiarity, author expertise, and content relevance on Norwegian students’ document selection: A mixed methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 147–162. doi:10.1037/edu0000057
91. Morton, A. (2010). Epistemic emotions. In P. Goldie (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion (pp. 385–399). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
92. Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6
93. Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students’ beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213–225. doi:10.1037/a0029690
94. Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 39, 168–183. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003
95. Murphy, K. P., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Interrogating the relation between conceptual change and epistemic beliefs. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 439–459). New York, NY: Routledge.
96. O’Neill, D. K., & Polman, J. L. (2004). Why educate “little scientists”? Examining the potential of practice-based scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(3), 234–266. doi:10.1002/tea.20001
97. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105
98. Perkins, D. N., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21. doi:10.2307/23087298
99. Perkins, D. N., Tishman, S., Ritchhart, R., Donis, K., & Andrade, A. (2000). Intelligence in the wild: A dispositional view of intellectual traits. Educational Psychology Review, 12(3), 269–293. doi:10.1023/a:1009031605464
100. Perry, W. G. (1999). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. (Original work published 1970)
101. Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 17–37. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9008-7
102. Pillow, B. H. (2012). Children’s discovery of the active mind: Phenomenological awareness, social experience, and knowledge about cognition. New York, NY: Springer.
103. Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 486–511. doi:10.1002/tea.20415
104. Pritchard, D. (2013). Epistemic virtue and the epistemology of education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 236–247. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12022
105. Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: Lessons learned from two teachers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 81–130. doi:10.1080/10508400709336943
106. Robertson, E. (2009). The epistemic aims of education. In H. Siegel (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of education (pp. 11–34). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
107. Robertson, E. (2013). The epistemic value of diversity. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 299–310. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12026
108. Rosenberg, S., Hammer, D., & Phelan, J. (2006). Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 261–292. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1502_4
109. Rosman, T., Mayer, A.-K., Peter, J., & Krampen, G. (2016). Need for cognitive closure may impede the effectiveness of epistemic belief instruction. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 406–413. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.017
110. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1–44. doi:10.1080/03057260108560166
111. Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children’s epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488–526. doi:10.1002/sce.21006
112. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634–656. doi:10.1002/sce.20065
113. Schommer, M. (1990). Effect of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
114. Shemilt, D. (1987). Adolescent ideas about evidence and methodology in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 39–61). East Sussex, UK: Falmer Press.
115. Siegel, H. (1988). Educating reason: Rationality, critical thinking, and education. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
116. Siegler, R. S., Adolph, K., & Lemaire, P. (1996). Strategy choices across the lifespan. In L. Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 79–121). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
117. Sosa, E. (1980). The raft and the pyramid: Coherence versus foundations in the theory of knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 5(1), 3–26. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4975.1980.tb00394.x
118. Sosa, E. (2007). A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
119. Sosa, E. (2011). Knowing full well. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
120. Sosa, E. (2015). Judgment and agency. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
121. Tabak, I. (2015). Functional scientific literacy: Seeing the science within the words and across the Web. In L. Corno & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 269–280). New York, NY: Routledge.
122. Thagard, P. (2006). Hot thought: Mechanism and applications of emotional cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
123. Thompson, V. A. (2009). Dual-process theories: A metacognitive perspective. In J. S. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 171–195). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
124. Trevors, G., Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Azevedo, R., & Bouchet, F. (2016). Self-regulated learning processes vary as a function of epistemic beliefs and contexts: Mixed method evidence from eye tracking and concurrent and retrospective reports. Learning and Instruction, 42, 31–46. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.11.003
125. Tucker, A. (Ed.). (2009). A companion to the philosophy of history and historiography. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
126. Veenman, M. V. J., van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
127. Walsh, M. M., & Gluck, K. A. (2015). Mechanisms for robust cognition. Cognitive Science, 39(6), 1131–1171. doi:10.1111/cogs.12192
128. Weinstock, M. (2016). Epistemic cognition in legal reasoning. In J. A. Greene, W. A. Sandoval, & I. Bråten (Eds.), Handbook of epistemic cognition (pp. 215–229). New York, NY: Routledge.
129. Weinstock, M., Kienhues, D., Feucht, F. C., & Ryan, M. (2017). Informed reflexivity: Enacting epistemic virtue. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 284–298. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1349662
130. Wineburg, S., Martin, D., & Monte-Sano, C. (2012). Reading like a historian: Teaching literacy in middle and high school history classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
131. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
132. Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.