Diverging information and epistemic change

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 318-330

  Kienhues, Dorothe ^a   Ferguson, Leila ^a   Stahl, Elmar ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967373143     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Alexander, P.A. & The Discipline Reading and Learning Research Laboratory (2012). Reading into the future: Competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 22(4), 259-280. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722511.
2. Barzilai, S. & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39-85. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.636495.
3. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection.Educational Psychologist, 22(1), 31-42. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_4.
4. Bendixen, L. D. (2002). A process model of epistemic belief change. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 191-208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bendixen, L. D. & Rule, D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model.Educational Psychologist, 22(1), 69-80. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_7.
6. Bråten, I., Britt, M.A., Strømsø, H.I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Towards an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 22(1), 48-70.doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538647.
7. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Ferguson, L.E. (in press). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of single and multiple texts. In P. Afflerbach (Ed.), Handbook of individual differences in reading: Text and context.New York: Routledge.
8. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 814-840. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.001.
9. Britt, M.A., Perfetti, C.A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.-F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S.R. Goldman, A.C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative, comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209-233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Stahl, E. (2008). Knowledge and epistemological beliefs: An intimate but complicate relationship. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 423-441). New York: Springer.
11. Buehl, M. M. & Alexander, P. A. (2006). Examining the dual nature of epistemological beliefs. International Journal of Educational Research, 22(1/2), 28-42. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2006.08.007.
12. Chandler, M. (1987). The Othello effect: Essay on the emergence and eclipse of skeptical doubt. Human Development, 30(3), 137-159. doi:10.1159/000273174.
13. Chandler, M., Boyes, M., & Ball, L. (1990). Relativism and stations of epistemic doubt. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 22(3), 370-395. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(90)90076-K.
14. Chandler, M. J., Hallett, D., & Sokol, B. W. (2002). Competing claims about competing knowledge claims. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 145-168). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 22(3), 141-167. doi: 10.1080/ 00461520.2011.587722.
16. Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(2), 186-204. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004.
17. Dole, J. A. & Sinatra, G. M. (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge.Educational Psychologist, 22(2/3), 109-128. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3302&3_5.
18. Ferguson, L.E. & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 22, 49-61. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.003.
19. Ferguson, L.E., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2012). Epistemic cognition when students read multiple documents containing conflicting scientific evidence: A think-aloud study. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 103-120.doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.002.
20. Ferguson, L.E., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013). Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in the context of reading multiple documents: Examining the role of conflict. International Journal of Educational Research, 22, 100-114. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.001.
21. Goldman, S.R., Lawless, K., & Manning, F. (2013). Research and development of multiple source comprehension assessment. In M.A. Britt, S.R. Goldman, & J.-F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading-from words to multiple texts (pp. 180-199). New York: Routledge.
22. Greene, J. A. & Yu, S. B. (2014). Modeling and measuring epistemic cognition: A qualitative re-investigation.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 12-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.10.002.
23. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 378-405. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1026.
24. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 22, 88-140. doi: 10.3102/00346543067001088.
25. Jehng, J.-C., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students' epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(1), 23-35. doi:10.1006/ceps.1993.1004.
26. Kienhues, D. & Bromme, R. (2012, April). Some like it hot: How emotions tinge laypeople's understanding of scientific controversies. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Vancouver, Canada.
27. Kienhues, D., Bromme, R., & Stahl, E. (2008). Changing epistemological beliefs: The unexpected impact of a shortterm intervention. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 22(4), 545-565. doi:10.1348/000709907X268589.
28. Kienhues, D., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2011). Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the Web: When expert information breeds laypersons' doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 193-204. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.004.
29. King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension construction-integration model.Psychological Review, 95(2), 163-182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163.
31. Kramer, T., Stahl, E., & Rieß, W. (2014, July). Epistemic judgments of German teachers and changes of epistemic beliefs in a biology & geography course on systems thinking. Paper presented at the 10th conference of the European Researchers in Didactics of Biology (ERIDOB), Haifa, Israel.
32. Kuhn, D. & Weinstock, M. (2002). What matters in epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(1), 57-68. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_6.
34. Muis, K. R., & Duffy, M. C. (2013). Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 213-225. doi:10.1037/a0029690.
35. Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99-122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Rapp, D.N. & Braasch, J.L.G. (2014). Accurate and inaccurate knowledge acquisition. In D.N. Rapp & J.L.G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 1-10). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
37. Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Rule, D. C. & Bendixen, L. D. (2010). The integrative model of personal epistemology development: theoretical underpinnings and implications for education. In L.D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom (pp. 94-123). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Situating epistemological development. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson & P. Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 347-354). Sydney: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
40. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 22(3), 498-504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498.
41. Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261-276). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Schüssele, B., Stahl, E., & Mikelskis-Seifert, S. (2014). Learning by Design: Interventionsstudie zur Veränderung des Wissenschaftsverständnisses durch Medienproduktion [Learning by design: An intervention study to change understanding of science through media production]. In S. Bernholt (Ed.), Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung zwischen Science- und Fachunterricht: Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik, Jahrestagung in München 2013 [Scientific literacy between science class and subject teaching: Society for the didactics of chemistry, and physics, annual meeting in Munich 2013]. Kiel: IPN. Manuscript submitted for publication.
43. Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The "warming trend" in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich.Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107-115. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5.
44. Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 22(2), 123-138.doi: 10.1080/00461520.2014.916216.
45. Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, R.L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.Educational Technology, 22, 24-33.
46. Stadtler, M. & Bromme, R. (2014). The content-source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379-402). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
47. Stahl, E. (2011). The generative nature of epistemological judgments: Focusing on interactions instead of elements to understand the relationship between epistemological beliefs and cognitive flexibility. In J. Elen, E. Stahl, R. Bromme, & G. Clarebout (Hrsg.), Links between beliefs and cognitive flexibility: Lessons learned.(S. 37-60). Berlin: Springer.
48. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Weinstock, M., & Zviling-Beiser, H. (2009). Separating academic and social experience as potential factors in epistemological development. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 287-298. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.004.