Salvaging science literacy

Science Education

Volumn 95, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 168-185

  Feinstein, Noah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650062131     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20414     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Azevedo, F. S. (2005). Serious play: A comparative study of engagement and learning in hobby practice. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
3. Barton, A. C. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379-394.
4. Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899-917.
5. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68-103.
6. Basu, S. J., & Barton, A. C. (2007). Developing a sustained interest in science among urban minority youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 466-489.
7. Bell, P., Bricker, L. A., Lee, T. R., Reeve, S., & Zimmerman, H. T. (2006). Understanding the cultural foundations of children's biological knowledge: Insights from everyday cognition research. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 1029-1035). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.
9. Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91, 347-370.
10. Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2007). "Um... since I argue for fun, I don't remember what I argue about.": Using children's argumentation across social contexts to inform science instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
11. Bronowski, J. (1965). Science and human values. New York: Harper Brothers.
12. Brown, P., Zavestoski, S., McCormick, S., Mayer, B., Morello-Frosch, R., & Altman, R. G. (2004). Embodied health movements: New approaches to social movements in health. Sociology of Health and Illness, 26, 50-80.
13. Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315-344.
14. Chapman, B. (1993). The overselling of science education in the 1980s. In R. Levinson (Ed.), Teaching science (pp. 192-207). New York: Routledge.
15. Collins, H., Evans, R., & Gorman, M. (2007). Trading zones and interactional expertise. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 38, 657-666.
16. Committee for the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1920). Reorganization of science in secondary schools. Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
17. Committee of Ten. (1894). Report of the Committee of Ten on secondary school studies. Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.
18. Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Islands of expertise and the development of family scientific literacy. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333-356). Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship with science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
20. Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
21. Donnelly, J. (2006). The intellectual positioning of science in the curriculum, and its relationship to reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(6), 623-640.
22. Drori, G. S. (2000). Science education and economic development: Trends, relationships and research agenda. Studies in Science Education, 35(1), 27-57.
23. Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39-72.
24. Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25. Ford, M. J. (2008). "Grasp of practice" as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science & Education, 17(2&3), 147-177.
26. Fujimura, J. H. (1996). Crafting science: A sociohistory of the quest for the genetics of cancer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural boundaries of science: Credibility on the line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Gonzales, N., & Moll, L. (2002). Cruzando el puente: Building bridges to funds of knowledge. Educational Policy, 16, 623-641.
29. Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska, O., Lynch, M., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of science and technology studies (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J. P., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., Prain, V., & Yore, L. D. (2003). Message from the "Island Group": What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 607-615.
31. Hand, B. M., Yore, L. D., Jagger, S., & Prain, V. (2010). Connecting research in science literacy and classroom practice: A review of science teaching journals in Australia, the UK and the United States, 1998-2008. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 45-68.
32. Hazen, R. M., & Trefil, J. (1991). Science matters: Achieving scientific literacy. New York: Doubleday.
33. Hodson, D. (2009). Toward scientific literacy: A teachers' guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: SensePublishers.
34. Hornig, S. (1993). Reading risk: public response to print media accounts of technological risk. Public Understanding of Science, 2, 95-109.
35. Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(13-16), 52.
36. Irwin, A., & Michael, M. (2003). Science, social theory and public knowledge. Maidenhead, PA: Open University Press.
37. Irwin, A., & Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
38. Kleinman, D. L. (Ed.). (2000). Science, technology and democracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
39. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Lambert, H., & Rose, H. (1996). Disembodied knowledge? Making sense of medical science. In A. Irwin & B. Wynne (Eds.), Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science and technology (pp. 65-82). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
41. Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94.
42. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., & Donnelly, J. (1994). Scientific and technological literacy: Meanings and rationales; an annotated bibliography. Leeds, England: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
44. Layton, D., Jenkins, E., Macgill, S., & Davey, A. (1993). Inarticulate science? Perspectives on the public understanding of science and some implications for science education. Leeds, England: University of Leeds.
45. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831-880). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2009). Images of learning, images of progress. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 731-735.
47. Lowell, B. L., & Salzman, H. (2007). Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
48. Lowell, B. L., Salzman, H., Bernstein, H., & Henderson, E. (2009). Steady as she goes? Three generations of students through the science and engineering pipeline. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. Washington, DC.
49. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
50. Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48.
51. Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 273-294.
52. Miller, S. (2001). Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 115-120.
53. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 37, 224-240.
54. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. London: Nuffield Foundation.
55. Pedretti, E. (1997). Septic tank crisis: A case study of science, technology and society education in an elementary school. International Journal of Science Education, 19(10), 1211-1230.
56. Pitrelli, N. (2003). The crisis of "public understanding of science" in Great Britain. JCOM, 2(1).
57. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific concept: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
58. Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Koskey, K. L. K., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94, 1-28.
59. Rahm, J., Moore, J. C., & Martel-Reny, M.-P. (2005). The role of afterschool and community science programs in the lives of urban youth. School Science and Mathematics, 105(6), 283-291.
60. Roberts, D. A. (1983). Scientific literacy: Towards a balance for setting goals for school science programs. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services.
61. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 729-779). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2002). Scientific literacy as collective praxis. Public Understanding of Science, 11(1), 33-56.
63. Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-44.
64. Ryder, N. (1993). Vernacular science: Something to rely on in your actions? In P. J. Black & A. M. Lucas (Eds.), Children's informal ideas about science (pp. 148-171). New York: Routledge.
65. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1-52). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
66. Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44-52). New York: S. Karger and A. G. Basel.
67. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
68. Sutman, F. X., & Bruce, M. H. (1992). Chemistry in the community-ChemCom: A five-year evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education, 69(7), 564-567.
69. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
70. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
71. Wynne, B. (1992). Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Understanding of Science, 1(3), 281-304.
72. Wynne, B. (2007). Dazzled by the mirage of influence? Science, Technology & Human Values, 32(4), 491-503.
73. Wynne, B. (2010). Rationality and Ritual: Participation and exclusion in nuclear decision-making. London: Earthscan.
74. Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101.