Epistemic cognition in legal reasoning

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 215-229

  Weinstock, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967430114     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Apple, J. G., & Deyling, R. P. (1995). A primer on the civil-law system. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
2. Barzilai, S., & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39-85.
3. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Towards an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 48-70.
5. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141-167.
6. Crocker, C. B., & Kovera, M. B. (2010). The effects of rehabilitative voir dire on juror bias and decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 212-226.
7. Dhami, M. K., Lundrigan, S., & Mueller-Johnson, K. (2015). Instructions on reasonable doubt: Defining the standard of proof and the juror's task. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21(2), 169-178.
8. Fitzgerald, J., & Cunningham, J. W. (2002). Mapping basic issues for identifying epistemological outlooks. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 209-228). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Goldman, A., & Blanchard, T. (2015). Social epistemology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2015 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/epistemology-social/
11. Harris, P. L. (2007). Trust. Developmental Science, 10, 135-138.
12. Hastie, R. (Ed.). (1993). Inside the juror. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hastie, R., Penrod, S. D., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
15. Horowitz, I. A., & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (1996). A concept in search of a definition. The effects of reasonable doubt instructions on certainty of guilt standards and jury verdicts. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 655-670.
16. Illinois Courts (2014). Illinois pattern jury instructions - criminal (section 2). http://www.state.il.us/Court/ CircuitCourt/CriminalJuryInstructions/default.asp
17. Kagehiro, D. K., & Stanton, W. C. (1985). Legal vs. quantified definitions of standards of proof. Law and Human Behavior, 9, 159-178.
18. Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
19. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kuhn, D. (2001). How do people know? Psychological Science, 12, 1-8.
22. Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
23. Kuhn, D., Pennington, N., & Leadbeater, B. (1983). Adult thinking in developmental perspective. In P. Baltes, & O. Brim (Eds.), Lifespan development and behavior (pp. 157-195). New York: Academic Press.
24. Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994a). Historical reasoning as theory-evidence coordination. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 377-401). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994b). How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychological Science, 5, 289-296.
27. Leadbeater, B., & Kuhn, D. (1989). Interpreting discrepant narratives: Hermeneutics and adult cognition. In J. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving (pp. 175-190). New York: Praeger.
28. Lieberman, J. D., & Sales, B. D. (2007). Scientific jury selection. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29. Magnussen, S., Eilertsen, D. E., Teigen, K. H., & Wessel, E. (2014). The probability of guilt in criminal cases. Are people aware of being "beyond reasonable doubt"? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28, 196-203.
30. Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18(1), 3-54.
31. New York State Unified Court System (2014). Criminal jury instructions: Reasonable doubt. http://www.nycourts .gov/judges/cji/1-General/cjigc.shtml
32. Pardo, M. S. (2007). Book review: On misshapen stones and criminal law's epistemology. Texas Law Review, 86, 347-383.
33. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 242-258.
34. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189-206.
35. Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt .
36. Porsch, T., & Bromme, R. (2011). Effects of epistemological sensitization on source choices. Instructional Science, 39(6), 805-819.
37. Shapiro, B. J. (1986). To a moral certainty: Theories of knowledge and Anglo-American juries 1600-1850. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 153-195.
38. U.S. Court of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit (2012). Pattern jury instructions (criminal cases). http://www.lb5 .uscourts.gov/juryinstructions/
39. U.S. Court of Appeals in the Ninth Circuit (2010). Manual of model criminal jury instructions for the district courts of the Ninth Circuit. http://www3.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/model-criminal
40. U.S. Court of Appeals in the Sixth Circuit (2014). Pattern criminal jury instructions. http://www.ca6.uscourts .gov/internet/crim_jury_insts.htm
41. Warren, J., Kuhn, D., & Weinstock, M. (2010). How do jurors argue with one another? Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 64-71.
42. Weinstock, M. P. (2005). Cognitive bases for effective participation in democratic institutions: Argument skill and juror reasoning. Theory and Research in Social Education, 33, 73-103.
43. Weinstock, M. (2009). Like an expert: Representing the problem, epistemic requirements, and competence in an everyday reasoning task. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 423-434.
44. Weinstock, M. (2011). Narrative and relational argument orientations: Knowledge-telling and knowledge-transforming in verdict justifications. Thinking and Reasoning, 17, 282-314.
45. Weinstock, M., & Cronin, M. A. (2003). The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror reasoning skill. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 161-181.
46. Weinstock, M. P., & Flaton, R. A. (2004). Evidence coverage and argument skills: Cognitive factors in a juror's verdict choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17, 191-212.
47. Wright, D. B., & Hall, M. (2007). How a "reasonable doubt" instruction affects decisions of guilt. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(1), 91-98.