Epistemic (meta)cognition: Ways of thinking about knowledge and knowing

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 409-424

  Barzilai, Sarit ^a   Zohar, Anat ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967432160     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Barzilai, S. & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36(0), 86-103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003.
2. Barzilai, S. & Zohar, A. (2012). Epistemic thinking in action: Evaluating and integrating online sources. Cognition and Instruction, 30(1), 39-85. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.636495.
3. Barzilai, S. & Zohar, A. (2014). Reconsidering personal epistemology as metacognition: A multifaceted approach to the analysis of epistemic thinking. Educational Psychologist, 49(1), 13-35. doi:10.1080/00461520.2013 .863265.
4. Bendixen, L. D. & Rule, D. C. (2004). An integrative approach to personal epistemology: A guiding model. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 69-80. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_7.
5. Braasch, J. L. G., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students' evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 180-195, doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.03.003.
6. Bromme, R. & Goldman, S. R. (2014). The public's bounded understanding of science. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 59-69. doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.921572.
7. Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) attained from others. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 163-193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bromme, R., Pieschl, S., & Stahl, E. (2010). Epistemological beliefs are standards for adaptive learning: A functional theory about epistemological beliefs and metacognition. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 7-26. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9053-5.
9. Bromme, R., Scharrer, L., Stadtler, M., Hömberg, J., & Torspecken, R. (2014). Is it believable when it's scientific? How scientific discourse style influences laypeople's resolution of conflicts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(1), 36-57. doi:10.1002/tea.21172.
10. Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
11. Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 247-268. doi:10.1080/13562510120045221.
12. Bryce, D. & Whitebread, D. (2012). The development of metacognitive skills: Evidence from observational analysis of young children's behavior during problem-solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 197-217. doi:10.1007/s11409-012-9091-2.
13. Chinn, C. A., & Buckland, L. A. (2012). Model-based instruction: Fostering change in evolutionary conceptions and in epistemic practices. In K. S. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 211-232). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141-167. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587722.
15. Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., & Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the air model of epistemic cognition. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information (pp. 425-454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Dignath, C. & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231-264. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x.
17. Efklides, A. (2002). The systemic nature of metacognitive experiences: Feelings, judgments, and their interrelations. In M. Izaute, P. Chambres, & P.-J. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function, and use (pp. 19-34). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
18. Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1, 3-14. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001.
19. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277-287. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.277.
20. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.
21. Grau, V. & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 401-412. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.003.
22. Greene, J. A., Muis, K. R., & Pieschl, S. (2010). The role of epistemic beliefs in students' self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 245-257. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.515932.
23. Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 378-405. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1026.
25. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43-55. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5.
26. Hofer, B. K. (2005). The legacy and the challenges: Paul Pintrich's contributions to personal epistemology research. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 95-105. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_4.
27. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140. doi:10.3102/00346543067001088.
28. Hofer, B. K. & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Epistemology, metacognition, and self-regulation: Musings on an emerging field. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 113-120. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9051-7.
29. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
30. Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578. doi:10.1002/tea.10036.
31. Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26(4), 222-232. doi:10.1159/000272885.
32. Kuhn, D. (1999). Metacognitive development. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (pp. 259-286). Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press.
33. Kuhn, D. (2009). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(4), i-157.
35. Kuhn, D., Zillmer, N., Crowell, A., & Zavala, J. (2013). Developing norms of argumentation: Metacognitive, epistemological, and social dimensions of developing argumentive competence. Cognition and Instruction, 31(4), 456-496. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.830618.
36. Lalonde, C. E. & Chandler, M. J. (2002). Children's understanding of interpretation. New Ideas in Psychology, 20(2), 163-198. doi:10.1016/S0732-118X(02)00007-7.
37. Lockl, K. & Schneider, W. (2006). Precursors of metamemory in young children: The role of theory of mind and metacognitive vocabulary. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 15-31. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6585-9.
38. Mason, L., Ariasi, N., & Boldrin, A. (2011). Epistemic beliefs in action: Spontaneous reflections about knowledge and knowing during online information searching and their influence on learning. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 137-151. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.01.001.
39. Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010a). Epistemic metacognition in context: Evaluating and learning online information. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 67-90. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9048-2.
40. Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010b). Searching the web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38(6), 607-633. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9089-y.
41. Meijer, J., Veenman, M. V. J., & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2006). Metacognitive activities in text-studying and problem-solving: Development of a taxonomy. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(3), 209-237. doi:10.1080/13803610500479991.
42. Moshman, D. (2015). Epistemic cognition and development: The psychology of justification and truth. New York: Psychology Press.
43. Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173-190. doi:10.1080/00461520701416306.
44. Muis, K. R., Pekrun, R., Sinatra, G. M., Azevedo, R., Trevors, G., Meier, E., & Heddy, B. C. (2015). The curious case of climate change: Testing a theoretical model of epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and complex learning. Learning and Instruction 39, 168-183. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.06.003.
45. Nelson, T. O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51(2), 102-116. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102.
46. Nelson, T. O. & Narens, L. (1994). Why investigate metacognition? In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 1-25). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
47. Perry, W. G. (1970/1999). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass Publishers (Original work published 1968).
48. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
49. Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52(5-6), 337-355, doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025665.
50. Richter, T. & Schmid, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5(1), 47-65. doi:10.1007/s11409-009-9038-4.
51. Ryu, S. & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488-526. doi:10.1002/sce.21006.
52. Sandoval, W. A. & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2.
53. Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 114-121. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X .2008.00041.x.
54. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1-2), 113-125. doi:10.1023/A:1003044231033.
55. Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371. doi:10.1007/BF02212307.
57. Schraw, G. & Robinson, D. R. (Eds.). (2011). Assessment of higher order thinking skills. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
58. Sosa, E. (2010). Knowing full well. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2008). Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool met.a.ware on the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 716-737. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.023.
60. Swartz, R. J., Costa, A. L., Beyer, B. K., Reagan, R., & Kallick, B. (2008). Thinking-based learning: Promoting quality student achievement in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.
61. Veenman, M. V. J. (2011). Learning to self-monitor and self-regulate. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction (pp. 197-218). New York: Routledge.
62. Veenman, M. V. J., Kok, R., & Blöte, A. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33(3), 193-211. doi:10.1007/s11251-004-2274-8.
63. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3-14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.
64. Weinstock, M. & Cronin, M. A. (2003). The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror-reasoning skill. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(2), 161-181. doi:10.1002/acp.860.
65. Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S., Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63-85. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9033-1.
66. Wildenger, L. K., Hofer, B. K., & Burr, J. E. (2010). Epistemological development in very young knowers. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 220-257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. Zohar, A. & Barzilai, S. (2015). Metacognition and teaching higher order thinking (HOT) in science education: Students' thinking, teachers' knowledge, and instructional practices. In R. Wegerif, L. Li & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 229-242). Oxon, UK: Routledge.