Engaging in Science: A Feeling for the Discipline

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 156-202

  Jaber, Lama Z ^a   Hammer, David ^b  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945317711     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2015.1088441     Document Type: Article

References (131)

1. M.Ainley, (2007). Being and feeling interested: Transient state, mood, and disposition. In P.Schutz (Ed.), Emotion in education (pp. 141–157). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2. M.Ainley, (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S.L.Christenson, A.L.Reschly, & C.Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283–302). New York, NY: Springer Science
3. M.Ainley,, & J.Ainley, (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about sciences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
4. M.Ainley,, S.Hidi,, & D.Berndorff, (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545
5. S.Arango-Muñoz, (2014). The nature of epistemic feelings. Philosophical Psychology, 27(2), 193–211. doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.732002
6. S.Arango-Muñoz,, & K.Michaelian, (2014). Epistemic feelings, epistemic emotions: Review and introduction to the focus section. Philosophical Inquiries, 2(1), 97–122.
7. F.S.Azevedo, (2006). Personal excursions: Investigating the dynamics of student engagement. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11, 57–98. doi:10.1007/s10758-006-0007-6
8. F.S.Azevedo, (2011). Lines of practice: A practice-centered theory of interest relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 147–184. doi:10.1080/07370008.2011.556834
9. F.S.Azevedo,, A.A.diSessa,, & B.L.Sherin, (2012). An evolving framework for describing student engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 270–289. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.12.003
10. B.Barron, (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecologies perspective. Human Development, 49, 193–224. doi:10.1159/000094368
11. E.Bettencourt,, M.Gillett,, M.Gall,, & R.Hull, (1983). Effects of teacher enthusiasm training on student on-task behavior and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 435–450. doi:10.3102/00028312020003435
12. M.V.Boe,, E.K.Henriksen,, T.Lyons,, & C.Schreiner, (2011). Participation in science and technology: Young people’s achievement-related choices in late-modern societies. Studies in Science and Education, 47(1), 37–72. doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.549621
13. N.W.Brickhouse,, P.Lowery,, & K.Schultz, (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
14. J.L.Briggs, (1970). Never in anger: Portrait of an Eskimo family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. R.Bromme,, D.Kienhues,, & E.Stahl, (2008). Knowledge and epistemological beliefs: An intimate but complicate relationship. In M.S.Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge, and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 423–444). New York, NY: Springer.
16. B.Brown, (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810–834. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
17. G.Brun,, & D.Kuenzle, (2008). Introduction: A new role for emotions in epistemology? In G.Brun, U.Doğuoğlu, & D.Kuenzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 1–31). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
18. L.Burton, (1999). The practice of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to know mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 121–143. doi:10.1023/A:1003697329618
19. H.B.Carlone,, & A.Johnson, (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science, 44(8), 1187–1218.
20. P.Cobb,, & L.Hodge, (2004, June). An initial contribution to the development of a design theory of mathematical interests: The case of statistical data analysis. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Santa Monica, CA.
21. J.E.Coffey,, D.Hammer,, D.M.Levin,, & T.Grant, (2011). The missing disciplinary substance of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(10), 1109–1136. doi:10.1002/tea.20440
22. L.D.Conlin,, J.Richards,, A.Gupta,, & A.Elby, (2015). Bring it on: Explaining an 8th grader’s impassioned pursuit in science at the intersection of identity and epistemology. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. V.A.deBellis,, & G.Goldin, (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-9026-4
24. R.de Sousa, (2008). Epistemic feelings. In G.Brun, U.Doğuoğlu, & D.Kuenzle (Eds.), Epistemology and emotions (pp. 185–204). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
25. S.J.Derry,, R.D.Pea,, B.Barron,, R.A.Engle,, F.Erickson,, R.Goldman,, … B.L.Sherin, (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. doi:10.1080/10508400903452884
26. N.B.Dohn, (2013). Upper secondary students’ situational interest: A case study of the role of a zoo visit in a biology class. International Journal of Science Education, 35(16), 2732–2751. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.628712
27. J.Dokic, (2012). Seeds of self-knowledge: Noetic feelings and metacognition. In M.Beran, J.Brandl, J.Perner, & J.Proust (Eds.), Foundations of metacognition (pp. 302–321). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
28. J.A.Dole,, & G.M.Sinatra, (1998). Reconceptualizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 33(2–3), 109–128. doi:10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294
29. F.M.T.dos Santos,, & E.F.Mortimer, (2003). How emotions shape the relationship between a chemistry teacher and her high school students. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1095–1110. doi:10.1080/0950069032000052216
30. E.Duckworth, (2006). “The having of wonderful ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
31. R.A.Engle,, & F.R.Conant, (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
32. R.A.Engle,, J.M.Langer-Osuna,, & M.McKinney de Royston, (2014). Toward a model of influence in persuasive discussions: Negotiating quality, authority, privilege, and access within a student-led argument. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(2), 245–268. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.883979
33. J.Evans,, C.Morgan,, & A.Tsatsaroni, (2006). Discursive positioning and emotion in school mathematics practices. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 209–226.
34. R.P.Feynman, (1985). “Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman!”: Adventures of a curious character. New York, NY: Norton.
35. R.P.Feynman, (1999). The pleasure of finding things out. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
36. M.Gagné,, & E.L.Deci, (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
37. J.Goetz,, J.Spencer-Rodgers,, & K.Peng, (2008). Dialectical emotions: How cultural epistemologies influence the experience and regulation of emotional complexity. In R.Sorrentino & S.Yamguchi (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition across cultures (pp. 517–538). New York, NY: Elsevier.
38. P.Goldie, (2004). Emotion, feeling and knowledge of the world. In R.Solomon (Ed.), Thinking about feeling: Contemporary philosophers on emotion (pp. 91–104). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
39. C.Goodwin, (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 53–73. doi:10.1177/0957926507069457
40. M.H.Goodwin,, & C.Goodwin, (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In N.Budwig, I.C.Uzgiris, & J.V.Wertsch (Eds.), Communication: An arena of development (pp. 33–54). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
41. M.S.Gresalfi, (2009). Taking up opportunities to learn: Constructing dispositions in mathematics classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 327–369. doi:10.1080/10508400903013470
42. H.E.Gruber, (1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
43. H.E.Gruber, (2005). The creative person as a whole: The evolving systems approach to the study of creative work. In H.E.Gruber & K.Bödeker (Eds.), Creativity, psychology and the history of science (pp. 35–104). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
44. A.Gupta,, B.A.Danielak,, & A.Elby, (2010). Understanding students’ difficulties in terms of coupled epistemological and affective dynamics. In L. G. Richards (Chair), Proceedings of the 2010 Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. S3G-1–S3G-6). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
45. D.Hammer, (1996). Misconceptions or p-prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(2), 97–127. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0502_1
46. D.Hammer, (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15(4), 485–529. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1504_2
47. D.Hammer, (2004). The variability of student reasoning, lectures 1-3. In E.Redish & M.Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI (pp. 279–340). Bologna, Italy: Italian Physical Society.
48. D.Hammer,, F.Goldberg,, & S.Fargason, (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51–72.
49. D.Hammer,, & E.H.Van Zee, (2006). Seeing the science in children’s thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
50. S.Hidi, (2006). Interest: A motivational variable with a difference. Educational Research Review, 7, 323–350.
51. S.Hidi,, & K.A.Renninger, (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
52. S.Hidi,, K.A.Renninger,, & A.Krapp, (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D.Y.Dai & R.J.Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. S.Hidi,, J.Weiss,, D.Berndorff,, & J.Nolan, (1998). The role of gender, instruction and a cooperative learning technique in science education across formal and informal settings. In L.Hoffmann, A.Krapp, K.A.Renninger, & J.Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon conference on interest and gender (pp. 215–227). Kiel, Germany: The Leibniz Institute for Science Education (IPN).
54. A.Hochschild, (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 551–575.
55. C.Hookway, (2002). Emotions and epistemic evaluations. In P.Carruthers, M.Siegal, & S.Stich (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 251–262). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
56. L.Z.Jaber, (2015). Attending to students’ epistemic affect. In A.D.Robertson, R.E.Scherr, & D.Hammer (Eds.), Responsive teaching in science and mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.
57. E.W.Jenkins,, & N.W.Nelson, (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57. doi:10.1080/02635140500068435
58. B.Jordan,, & A.Henderson, (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39–103. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0401_2
59. E.F.Keller, (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York, NY: Freeman.
60. A.Krapp, (2002). An educational–psychological theory of interest and its relation to SDT. In E.L.Deci & R.M.Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self determination research (pp. 405–427). New York, NY: University of Rochester Press.
61. A.Krapp, (2005). Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383–409. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
62. A.Krapp, (2007). An educational–psychological conceptualisation of interest. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 5–21. doi:10.1007/s10775-007-9113-9
63. A.Krapp,, & M.Prenzel, (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33, 27–50. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.518645
64. R.Lehrer, (2009). Designing to develop disciplinary dispositions: Modeling natural systems. American Psychologist, 64(8), 759–771. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.759
65. D.M.Levin,, D.Hammer,, A.Elby,, & J.Coffey, (2012). Becoming a responsive science teacher: Focusing on student thinking in secondary science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
66. J.E.Lineback, (2012). Mrs. Miller’s evolution in teaching science as inquiry: A case study of a teacher’s change in responsiveness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). San Diego State University, San Diego, CA.
67. J.E.Lineback, (2015). The redirection: An indicator of how teachers respond to student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24, 419–460. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.930707
68. E.A.Linnenbrink,, & P.R.Pintrich, (2004). Role of affect in cognitive processing in academic contexts. In D.Y.Dai & R.J.Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 57–87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. J.Lorimer, (2008). Counting corncrakes: The affective science of corncrake surveillance. Social Studies of Science, 38, 377–405. doi:10.1177/0306312707084396
70. A.C.Maskiewicz,, & V.A.Winters, (2012). Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429–464. doi:10.1002/tea.21007
71. R.McDermott,, K.Gospodinoff,, & J.Aron, (1978). Criteria for an ethnographically adequate description of concerted activities and their contexts. Semiotica, 24, 245–275. doi:10.1515/semi.1978.24.3-4.245
72. M.Mead, (1961). Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive you for western civilization. New York, NY: Morrow.
73. C.Milne,, & T.Otieno, (2007). Understanding engagement: Science demonstrations and emotional energy. Science Education, 91, 523–553. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
74. A.Minnaert,, M.Boekaerts,, & C.DeBrabander, (2007). Autonomy, competence, and social relatedness in task interest within project-based education. Psychological Reports, 101, 574–586.
75. M.Mitchell, (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424
76. Y.Miyamoto,, & C.Ryff, (2011). Cultural differences in the dialectical and non-dialectical emotional styles and their implications for health. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 22–39. doi:10.1080/02699931003612114
77. A.Morton, (2010). Epistemic emotion. In P.Goldie (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion (pp. 385–400). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
78. N.S.Nasir,, & V.Hand, (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179. doi:10.1080/10508400801986108
79. National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
80. Next Generation Science Standards. (2012). Next generation science standards for today’s students and tomorrow’s workforce. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards
81. S.B.Nolen, (2007). Young children’s motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 219–270. doi:10.1080/07370000701301174
82. M.C.O’Connor,, & S.Michaels, (1993). Aligning academic task and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24, 318–335.
83. S.Olitsky, (2007). Promoting student engagement in science: Interaction rituals and the pursuit of a community of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 33–56. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
84. P.Op’t Eynde,, E.De Corte,, & L.Verschaffel, (2006). Accepting emotional complexity: A socio-constructivist perspective on the role of emotions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 193–207.
85. P.Op’t Eynde,, & M.S.Hannula, (2006). The case study of Frank. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 123–129.
86. P.Op’t Eynde,, & J.E.Turner, (2006). Focusing on the complexity of emotion issues in academic learning: A dynamical component systems approach. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 361–376.
87. J.Osborne,, & S.Collins, (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467. doi:10.1080/09500690010006518
88. D.H.Palmer, (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 147–165. doi:10.1002/tea.v46:2
89. R.Pekrun,, A.J.Elliot,, & M.A.Maier, (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. doi:10.1037/a0013383
90. P.R.Pintrich, (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
91. P.R.Pintrich, (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
92. P.R.Pintrich,, & E.De Groot, (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
93. P.R.Pintrich,, R.W.Marx,, & R.A.Boyle, (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199. doi:10.3102/00346543063002167
94. P.R.Pintrich,, & D.H.Schunk, (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
95. T.Porsch,, & R.Bromme, (2011). Effects of epistemological sensitization on source choices. Instructional Science, 39(6), 805–819. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9155-0
96. G.J.Posner,, K.A.Strike,, P.W.Hewson,, & W.A.Gertzog, (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 67(4), 489–508.
97. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2010, September). Report to the President: Prepare and inspire: K-12 Education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) for America’s future. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf
98. K.J.Pugh,, L.Linnenbrink-Garcia,, K.L.K.Koskey,, V.C.Stewart,, & C.Manzey, (2010). Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education, 94, 1–28.
99. K.A.Renninger,, & S.Hidi, (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A.Wigfield & J.S.Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173–195). New York, NY: Academic Press.
100. K.A.Renninger,, & S.Hidi, (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168–184. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.587723
101. K.A.Renninger,, & K.R.Riley, (2013). Interest, cognition and the case of L- and science. In S.Kreitler (Ed.), Cognition and motivation: Forging an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 352–382). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
102. W.M.Roth,, S.M.Ritchie,, P.Hudson,, & V.Mergard, (2011). A study of laughter in science lessons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 437–458. doi:10.1002/tea.20412
103. C.Sansone, (2009). What’s interest got to do with it? Potential trade-offs in the self-regulation of motivation. In J.P.Forgas, R.Baumiester, & D.Tice (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 35–51). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
104. C.Sansone,, & J.M.Harackiewicz, (1996). “I don’t feel like it”: The function of interest in self-regulation. In L.Martin & A.Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions between goals and affect (pp. 203–228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
105. C.Sansone,, & J.L.Smith, (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to. In C.Sansone & J.M.Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 342–371). New York, NY: Academic Press.
106. C.Sansone,, & D.B.Thoman, (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175–186. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175
107. C.Sansone,, D.B.Thoman,, & J.L.Smith, (2010). Interest and self-regulation: Understanding individual variability in choices, efforts and persistence over time. In R.Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 191–217). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
108. M.Scardamalia, (2000). Can schools enter a knowledge society? In M.Selinger & J.Wynn (Eds.), Educational technology and the impact on teaching and learning (pp. 6–10). Abingdon, UK: RM Education.
109. M.Scardamalia, (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B.Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
110. M.Scardamalia,, & C.Bereiter, (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge-building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3
111. M.Scardamalia,, & C.Bereiter, (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K.Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
112. L.Scharrer,, R.Bromme,, M.A.Britt,, & M.Stadtler, (2012). The seduction of easiness: How science depictions influence laypeople’s reliance on their own evaluation of scientific information. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 231–243. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.004
113. E.A.Schegloff, (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J.M.Atkinson & J.Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 266–296). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
114. E.A.Schegloff,, G.Jefferson,, & H.Sacks, (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
115. U.Schiefele, (2001). The role of interest in motivation and learning. In J.M.Collis & S.Messick (Eds.), Intelligence and personality: Bridging the gap in theory and measurement (pp. 163–194). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
116. U.Schiefele, (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K.Wentzel & A.Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
117. R.A.Shweder,, J.Haidt,, R.Horton,, & C.Joseph, (2008). The cultural psychology of emotions: Ancient and renewed. In M.Lewis, J.Haviland-Jones, & L.Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed.; pp. 397–414). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
118. T.Sikorski, (2012). Developing an alternative perspective on coherence seeking in science classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
119. P.J.Silvia, (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
120. G.M.Sinatra, (2005). The warming trend in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107–115. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5
121. C.Siry,, & C.Max., (2013). The collective construction of a science unit: Framing curricula as emergent from kindergarteners’ wonderings. Science Education, 97(6), 878–902.
122. S.Sjøbeg,, & C.Schreiner, (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–16.
123. T.Stivers,, & J.Sidnell, (2005). Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 2005(156), 1–20.
124. E.Tan,, & A.Calabrese Barton, (2008). From peripheral to central, the story of Melanie’s metamorphosis in an urban middle school science class. Science Education, 92(4), 567–590. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
125. K.Tobin,, S.R.Ritchie,, P.Hudson,, J.Oakley,, & V.Mergard, (2013). Relationships between emotional climate and the fluency of classroom interactions. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 71–89. doi:10.1007/s10984-013-9125-y
126. A.Tversky,, & D.Kahneman, (1981, January 30). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
127. M.Varelas,, J.Becker,, B.Luster,, & S.Wenzel, (2002). When genres meet: Inquiry into a sixth-grade urban science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 579–605. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
128. M.Varelas,, D.Martin,, & J.Kane, (2012). Content learning and identity construction: A framework to strengthen African American students’ mathematics and science learning in urban elementary schools. Human Development, 55, 319–339. doi:10.1159/000345324
129. B.Warren,, C.Ballenger,, M.Ogonowski,, A.Rosebery,, & J.Hudicourt-Barnes, (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529–552. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
130. D.Weller,, & C.Finkelstein, (2011). From “adding inquiry” to “doing science.” Science and Children, 48(7), 49–53.
131. A.Wigfield,, J.Eccles,, U.Schiefele,, R.Roeser,, & P.Davis-Kean, (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In I.R.Lerner & W.Damon (Series Eds.) & N.Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 933–1002). New York, NY: Wiley.