Epistemic cognition and philosophy: Developing a new framework for epistemic cognition

Handbook of Epistemic Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 460-478

  Chinn, Clark A ^a   Rinehart, Ronald W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84967389249     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315795225     Document Type: Chapter

References (109)

1. Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95, 1-25.
2. Alston, W. P. (2005). Beyond "justification". Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3. Baehr, J. (2011). The inquiring mind: On intellectual virtues & virtue epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Batterman, R. (Ed.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of philosophy of physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Beebe, J. R. (Ed.). (2014). Advances in experimental epistemology. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
6. Bishop, M. A. & Trout, J. D. (2005). Epistemology and the psychology of human judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Bishop, M. A. & Trout, J. D. (2008). Strategic reliabilism: A naturalistic approach to epistemology. Philosophy Compass, 3/5, 1049-1065.
8. Boghossian, P. A. (2006). Fear of knowledge: Against relativism and constructivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Bourget, D. & Chalmers, D. J. (2014). What do philosophers believe? Philosophical Studies, 170, 465-500.
10. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 814-840.
11. Bromme, R., Kienhues, D., & Porsch, T. (2010). Who knows what and who can we believe? Epistemological beliefs are beliefs about knowledge (mostly) attained from others. In L. D. Bendixen, & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice (pp. 163-193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Buckland, C. A., Chinn, C. A., & Hurwitz, A. (2011, April). Expert disagreement and epistemic commitment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
13. Bunzl, M. (1997). Real history. London: Routledge.
14. Cartwright, N. (2007). Hunting causes and using them: Approaches in philosophy and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Cartwright, N. & Montuschi, E. (Eds.). (2014). Philosophy of social science: A new introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2014, April). Epistemic practices of coordinating conflicting data with competing theories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
17. Chinn, C. A., & Buckland, L. A. (2011). Differences in epistemic practices among scientists, young earth creationists, intelligent design creationists, and the scientist creationists of Darwin's era. In R. Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy (pp. 38-76). New York: Taylor & Francis.
18. Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46, 141-167.
19. Chinn, C. A., Rinehart, R. W., and Buckland, L. A. (2014). Epistemic cognition and evaluating information: Applying the AIR model of epistemic cognition. In D. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Christensen, D. & Lackey, J. (Eds.). (2013). The epistemology of disagreement: New essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony: A philosophical study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23. Collins, H. (2010). Gravity's shadow: The search for gravitational waves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Collins, H. (2014). Are we all scientific experts now? Cambridge, UK: Polity.
25. Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 186-204.
26. DeRose, K. (2009). The case for contextualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27. Dretske, F. (2000). Perception, knowledge, and belief: Selected essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
29. Duschl, R. A. & Grandy, R. E. (Eds.). (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation. Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
30. Elby, A. & Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Science Education, 85, 554-567.
31. Feldman, R. & Warfield, T. A. (Eds.). (2010). Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Ferguson, L. E. & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49-61.
33. Fricker, E. (2002). Trusting others in the sciences: a priori or empirical warrant? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 33, 373-383.
34. Fricker, M. (2003). Epistemic justice and a role for virtue in the politics of knowing. Metaphilosophy, 34, 154-173.
35. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power & the ethics of knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Galison, P. (1987). How experiments end. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Galison, P. & Stump, D. J. (Eds.). (1996). The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38. Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Giere, R. N. (2006). Scientific perspectivism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Goldman, A. I. (1986). Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Goldman, A. I. (2002). Pathways to knowledge: Private and public. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
43. Goldman, A. I. (2010). Epistemic relativism and reasonable disagreement. In R. Feldman & T. A. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement (pp. 187-215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
44. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3), 606-633.
45. Haack, S. (2001). The "ethics of belief" reconsidered. In M. Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, truth, and duty: Essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue (pp. 21-33). New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
50. Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
51. Hardwig, J. (1985). Epistemic dependence. The Journal of Philosophy, 82, 335-349.
52. Hardwig, J. (1991). The role of trust in knowledge. The Journal of Philosophy, 693-708.
53. Harris, P. L. & Koenig, M. A. (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77, 505-524.
54. Hofer, B. K. & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88-140.
55. Hookway, C. (2006). Epistemology and inquiry: The primacy of practice. In S. Hetherington (Ed.), Epistemology futures (pp. 95-110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56. Kawasaki, J., DeLiema, D., & Sandoval, W. A. (2014). The influence of non-epistemic features of settings on epistemic cognition. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 14(2), 207-221.
57. King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing reflective judgement: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
58. Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.
59. Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
60. Kitcher, P. (2012). Preludes to pragmatism: Toward a reconstruction of philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61. Kornblith, H. (1999). In defense of a naturalized epistemology. In J. Greco & E. Sosa (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to epistemology (pp. 158-169). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
62. Kuhn, D. & Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 121-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
63. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Kusch, M. (2002). Knowledge by agreement: The programme of communitarian epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Kvanvig, J. L. (2003). The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67. Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from words: Testimony as a source of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Lackey, J. (2010). Testimonial knowledge. In S. Bernecker & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Routledge companion to epistemology (pp. 316-325). New York: Routledge.
69. Lakatos, I. (1976). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes (pp. 205-259). Netherlands: Springer.
70. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
71. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72. Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.
73. Lipton, P. (1998). The epistemology of testimony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29, 1-31.
74. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
75. Longino, H. E. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76. Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
77. Matthews, M. R. (2004). Thomas Kuhn's impact on science education: What lessons can be learned? Science Education, 88, 90-118.
78. Mayo, D. G. & Spanos, A. (Eds.). (2010). Error and inference: Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability, and the objectivity and rationality of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79. Mayr, E. (1988). Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80. Medin, D. L. & Bang, M. (2014). Who's asking? Native science, Western science, and science education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81. Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42, 173-190.
82. Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Newton-Smith, W. H. (1981). The rationality of science. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
84. Niiniluoto, I. (2002). Critical scientific realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What "ideas-about-science" should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692-720.
86. Parsons, C. (2014). Philosophy of mathematics in the twentieth century: Selected essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
87. Perry, William G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
88. Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners' epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 486-511.
89. Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing quarks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
90. Rosenberg, S., Hammer, D., & Phelan, J. (2006). Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 261-292.
91. Samarapungavan, A., Westby, E. L., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). Contextual epistemic development in science: A comparison of chemistry students and research chemists. Science Education, 90, 468-495.
92. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students' practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89, 634-656.
93. Scerri, E. R. & McIntyre, L. (1997). The case for the philosophy of chemistry. Synthese, 111, 213-232.
94. Schmitt, F. F. (Ed.). (1994). Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
95. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498-504.
96. Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261-275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
97. Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). A series of misrepresentations: A response to Allchin's whole approach to assessing nature of science understandings. Science Education, 96, 685-692.
98. Selinger, E. & Crease, R. P. (Eds.). (2006). The philosophy of expertise. New York: Columbia University Press.
99. Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D. & Hofer, B. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49, 123-138.
100. Sinatra, G. M. & Chinn, C. (2011). Thinking and reasoning in science: Promoting epistemic conceptual change. In K. Harris, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.). Critical theories and models of learning and development relevant to learning and teaching, Volume 1 (pp. 257-282). In K. Harris & S. Graham (Eds.). APA Educational Psychology Handbook Series. APA Publications.
101. Solomon, M. (2001). Social empiricism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
102. Sosa, E. (2007). A virtue epistemology: Apt belief and reflective knowledge, Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
103. Staley, K. W. (2004). The evidence for the top quark: Objectivity and bias in collaborative experimentation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
104. Swoyer, C. (2006). Relativism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved May 3, 2015, from http://plato .stanford.edu/entries/relativism/.
105. Toulmin, S. E. (1972). Human understanding: The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
106. Tsai, C.-C. (2007). Teachers' scientific epistemological views: The coherence with instruction and students' views. Science Education, 91, 222-243.
107. Weber, K., Inglis, M., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2014). How mathematicians obtain conviction: Implications for mathematics instruction and research on epistemic cognition. Educational Psychologist, 49, 36-58.
108. Wylie, A. (2002). Thinking from things: Essays in the philosophy of archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
109. Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.