Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts

Review of Research in Education

Volumn 30, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-32

  Ford, Michael J ^a   Forman, Ellice A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34848897535     PISSN: 0091732X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0091732X030001001     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Baldwin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoyevsky'spoetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4. Barnes, B., & Bloor, D. (1982). Relativism, rationalism, and the sociology of knowledge. In M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and relativism (pp. 21-47). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
5. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
6. Bianchini, J. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: Student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 1039-1065.
7. Bloome, D., Power, C. S., Morton, C. B., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Boaler, J., & Greeno, J. G. (2000). Identity, agency, and knowing in mathematics worlds. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 171-200). Westport, CT: Ablex.
9. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
10. Brown, B. B., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89, 779-802.
11. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
12. Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3-14.
13. Cahan, E. D., & White, S. H. (1992). Proposals for a second psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 224-235.
14. Cazden, C. B. (1993). Vygotsky, Hymes, and Bakhtin: From word to utterance and voice. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 197-212). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
16. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
17. Comte, A., & Martineau, H. (1853). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte. London: Chapman.
18. Cornelius, L. L., & Herrenkohl, L. R. (2004). Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationships with each other and with concepts. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 389-392.
19. Dewey, J. (1916). Education and democracy. New York: Macmillan.
20. Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
21. Duhem, P. (1969). To save the phenomena: An essay on the idea of physical theory from Plato to Galileo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Eisenhart, M. A. (1988). The ethnographic research tradition and mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 99-114.
23. Engle, R. A. (in press). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative explanation of transfer in a community of learners classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences.
24. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-483.
25. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping in argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
26. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative metliods on research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handhook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
27. Erickson, F., & Gutierrez, K. (2002). Culture, rigor, and science in educational research. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 21-24.
28. Floriani, A. (1994). Negotiating what counts: Role and relationships, texts and contexts, content and meaning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 241-274.
29. Ford, M. J. (2005). The game, the pieces, and the players: Generative resources from alternative instructional portrayals of experimentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 449-487.
30. Ford, M. J. (in press). 'Grasp of practice' as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding. Science and Education.
31. Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Research on learning and insrruction in science: Elaborating the design approach. In C. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), Sage handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pç. 139-155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Forman, E. A., & Ansell, E. (2001). The multiple voices of a mathematics classroom community. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 115-142.
33. Forman, E. A., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, M. K., & Brown, C. A. (1998). "You're going to want to find out which and prove it": Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8, 527-548.
34. Forman, E. A., McCormick, D., & Donato, R. (1998). Learning what counts as a mathematical explanation. Linguistics and Education, 9, 313-339.
35. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-663.
36. Green, J. L. (1983). Research on teaching as a linguistic process: A state of the art. In E. W. Gordon (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 10, pp. 151-252). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
37. Green, J. L., Dixon, C. N., & Zaharlick, A. (2003). Ethnography as a logic of inquiry. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd ed., pp. 201-224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
39. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Theoretical and practical advances through research on learning. In P. B. Elmore, G. Camilli & J. Green (Eds.), Complementary methods for research in education (pp. 795-822). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
40. Gutierrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6, 286-303.
41. Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
43. Hayes, R., & Matusov, E. (2005). From 'ownership' to dialogic addressiviry: Defining successful digital storytelling projects [online]. Technology, Humanities, Education, Narrative (THEN) Journal. Retrieved October 24, 2006, from http://thenjournal.org/feature/75
44. Heras, A. I. (1994). The construction of understanding in a sixth-grade bilingual classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 275-299.
45. Hicks, D. (1995). Discourse, learning, and teaching. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 21, pp. 49-95). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
46. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. (2000). "Doing rhe lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792.
48. Kelly, G. J. (2005). Discourse, description, and science education. In R. K. Yerrick & W.-M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 79-104). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Kelly, G. J., & Brown, C. (2003). Communicative demands of learning science through technological design: Third grade students' construction of solar energy devices. Linguistics and Education, 13, 483-532.
50. Kelly, G. J., Drucker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 849-871.
51. Kieran, C., Forman, E., & Sfard, A. (Eds.). (2001). Bridging the individual and the social: Discursive approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3).
52. Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229-269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-196). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55. Lampert, M., & Blunk, M. L. (Eds.). (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
57. Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19-68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Latour, B. (1999). Pandoras hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60. Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. Berkeley: University of California Press.
61. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Lehrer, R., & Schäuble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and scientific literacy. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, K. A. Renninger, & E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 4, pp. 153-196). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
64. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Carpenter, S., & Permer, D. (2000). The inter-related development of inscriptions and conceptual understanding. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms (pp. 325-360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., & Petrosino, A. J. (2001). Reconsidering the role of experiment in science education. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 251-278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
67. Lemke, J. L. (1992). Intertextuality and educational research. Linguistics and Education, 4, 257-267.
68. Longino, H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
69. Luke, A. (2004). Teaching after the market: From commodity to cosmopolitan. Teachers College Record, 106, 1422-1443.
70. Matusov, E. (in press). Application of Bakhtin scholarship on discourse and education: A critical review essay. Educational Theory.
71. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Mehan, H. (1998). The study of social interaction in educational settings: Accomplishments and unresolved issues. Human Development, 41, 245-269.
73. Michaels, S. (1981). Sharing time: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423-442.
74. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). Beyond 2000. London: King's College.
75. Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
76. Nasir, N. A. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 211-245.
77. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
78. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
79. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020.
80. Packer, M. (2001). The problem of transfer, and the sociocultural critique of schooling. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10, 493-514.
81. Pappas, C. C., Varelas, M., Barry, A., & Rife, A. (2003). Dialogic inquiry around information texts: The role of intertextualiry in constructing scientific understandings in urban primary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 13, 435-482.
82. Pera, M. (1994). The discourses of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
83. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
84. Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Dewey, Vygotsky, and the social administration of the individual: Constructivist pedagogy as systems of ideas in historical spaces. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 535-570.
85. Popper, K. R. (1968). The logic ofscientific discovery (rev. 2nd ed.). New York: Harper&Row.
86. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
87. Prawat, R. S. (2000). Dewey meets the "Mozart of psychology" in Moscow: The untold story. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 663-696.
88. Putnam, R., Lampert, M., & Peterson, P. L. (1990). Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics in elementary schools. In C. B. Cazden (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 57-150). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
89. Ritchie, S. M. (2002). Student positioning within groups during science activities. Research in Science Education, 32, 35-54.
90. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
91. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
92. Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
93. Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understand its practices philosophically. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
94. Scott, P. H., Mortimer, E. F., & Aguiar, O. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605-631.
95. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
96. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
97. Shulman, L. S., & Quinlan, K. M. (1996). The comparative psychology of school subjects. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 399-422). New York: Simon & Schuster.
98. Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 235-260.
99. Simon, S., Osborne, J., & Erduran, S. (2003). Systemic teacher development to enhance the use of argumentation in school science activities. In J. Wallace & J. Loughran (Eds.), Leadership and professional development in science education: New possibilities for enhancing teacher learning (pp. 198-217). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
100. Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75, 125-157.
101. Stodolsky, S. S. (1988). The subject matters: Classroom activity in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
102. Strom, D., Kemeny, V., Lehrer, R., & Forman, E. A. (2001). Visualizing the emergent structure of children's mathematical argument. Cognitive Science, 25, 733-773.
103. Toulmin, S. E. (1964). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1958)
104. Varelas, M. (1996). Between theory and data in a seventh-grade science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 229-263.
105. Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. C. (2006). Intertextuality in read-alouds of integrated scienceliteracy units in urban primary classrooms: Opportunities for the development of thought and language. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 211-260.
106. Volosinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1929)
107. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
108. Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (1996). "This question is just too, too easy!": Students' perspectives on accountability in science. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning new environments for education (pp. 97-125). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
109. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
110. Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
111. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press.
112. Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal 28, 495-519.